Slashdot Mirror


ATI Claims HDCP Then Covers Its Tracks

BigControversy writes "It looks like a big can of worms is being opened. The DailyTech.com is reporting that ATI sold millions of video cards knowing that HDCP support was not enabled. Despite that, the cards were sold and advertised to its customers as having HDCP capabilities. A day or two after this information was revealed, HDMI.org went completely password protected and ATI is now modifying key areas of its website, removing any mention of 'HDCP-ready'."

13 of 328 comments (clear)

  1. Ridiculous by Wulfstan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Making a mistake? Fair enough. Treating your customers like idiots and trying to hide what you've done, though, is not something that is going to fly in this day and age. ATI are going to pay through the nose on this one and doing stupid things like this to try to paint over the damage done is just plain stupid.

    Come clean, apologise publicly, recall products, do whatever you can to ensure that you have supported and looked after your customers. But to do this sort of thing smacks of burying your head in the sand.

    Dumb, dumb, dumb.

    --
    --- Nick, hard at work :->
  2. devil's advocate... by ltwally · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "and ATI is now modifying key areas of its website, removing any mention of 'HDCP-ready'."
    While I'm not saying it's cool to advertise features that do not exist in a product, isn't it the responsible thing for ATi to remove references to HDCP-ready on its websites, so as to not further mislead potential customers?

    That being said, of course ATi should roll out a driver that has hardware HDCP enabled, or offer some form of compensation to previous buyers whom were mislead.

    --



    /dev/random
  3. Let's hope the "best" for HD by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, it's time to admit something: I loathe "HD-ready" and all that surrounds it. DRM, TCPA, all that 3-4 letter acronyms that smell like "hand over your consumer rights".

    Now, I'm normally not a person to hop onto FUD and vent it 'til it stinks, but can't we hype that a little 'til no moron buys that crap anymore, and see the whole DRMism bomb like a tacnuke? It would certainly help prevent stripping us of any of the few rights left on our scale in the "balance between producer and consumer" when it comes to content.

    So far the consumer drones would buy it for the simple "booooooyehy, look at the stunnin' crystal clear display!" without realizing what comes behind it. They don't care that the content industry dictates what they may see and what not, after all, what they want to see is that latest blockbuster movie and not some small movie maker's gems.

    But hearing that their $500 piece of hardware ain't gonna do it should surely be an argument.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  4. Re:Awww by StikyPad · · Score: 5, Informative
    It's no mixup, as the "related story" (aka dupe) explains. There's no method of retroactively enabling HDCP. From TOldFA:
    "The boards themselves must be designed with an extra chip when the board is manufactured. The extra chip stores a crypto key, and you cannot retrofit an existing board after the board is produced."
    ATI knew this. Everybody knew this. Somebody in marketing decided to advertise it anyway, nobody corrected them, and now they're trying to clean up the mess.
  5. Re:Google Heaven? by tomstdenis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Really? I think the number of people who bought the cards for HDCP support and not the 3000fps they can get in Doom3 is fairly low.

    Basically do what I do. If I buy something that says "AC'97" or "PCI-Express" compatible and doesn't have linux drivers [or compatible drivers] I just return it saying it's defective. So far I've been 100% successful with only having to be marginally rude :-)

    So if you bought the card assuming HDCP support worked out of the box and it doesn't return it. If everyone did the same you'd see retailers scrambling to avoid selling them like the plague.

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  6. acronyms by revery · · Score: 5, Funny

    My ATI gives BS and my HDCP card is DOA. HDML is MIA and I am PO'd and SOL.

    CRAP

  7. they won't by TheAxeMaster · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Like the first post said, it'll end up as a class action suit most likely. Nvidia has the luxury of blaming the board manufacturers, ATi can't hide behind that. Vertical Integration isn't that bad until you screw up and get caught lying about it...
     
    Now, this doesn't make nvidia the smarter purchase choice at this point, because none of their boards support it either. Maybe when the 7900 comes along in about a month or so though. Hopefully the board makers (evga, bfg, xfx, etc.) realize that they'd better get it out there after this fiasco.

    1. Re:they won't by Florian+Weimer · · Score: 5, Funny

      Like the first post said, it'll end up as a class action suit most likely.

      Oh the irony. A class-action suit brought by customers who feel defrauded because they did not get digital rights management.

    2. Re:they won't by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Does anyone honestly _want_ HDMI support?

      I own 3 30+ LCDs. I've got a 42" plasma, and a 60" plasma. None of which support HDMI or HDCP. Guess what, I don't give a flying fuck (pardon my french).

      My cable boxes output beautiful HDTV through DVI. So do my various (Mac and/or Linux) computers. So does my xbox. And I'm expected to replace _everything_ for absolutely no extra technical capabilities?

      HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHA

      Hardware solutions like this: http://www.engadget.com/2005/07/15/spatz-techs-dvi magic-killing-on-hdcp/ already effectively crack HDCP. Do you really not expect mplayer/vlc/xine for Linux and OSX not do to the same? The technical details of how to break it are already public knowledge: http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/11/20/025 1206&mode=nested&threshold=3

      HDCP is dead on arrival, as far as I'm concerned. All it will mean is that the good, more functional equipment that supports standard DVI will be cheaper. I can get that 30" LCD for my bathroom, and maybe an outdoor one for my hot tub. No offense to the rest of slashdot, but its people (like me) that spend a substantial amount of their income on home "tech" that drive the industry, and most people I know are NOT going to replace their setups unless they see substantially improved features.

      HDMI + 4 times HDTV resolution + Real 3D versus Standard HDTV on DVI? Yeah, maybe we'll upgrade.
      HDMI + Standard HDTV versus DVI + Standard HDTV? Bwahahaha. Tell me another.

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    3. Re:they won't by dgatwood · · Score: 5, Insightful
      How? The DRM'd "Trusted" drivers won't let you do that, and the drive won't work without "Trusted" drivers.

      Uh... that's not the way it works, generally. The drive might not decrypt content without trusted drivers, but at a low enough level, it's still an ATAPI block device, and an ATAPI block read still reads a block. The only way they could even make this difficult would be to make the drive reject read requests to a particular "special" region of the disc containing decryption key data, much like DVD-R drives reject writes to those regions. However, since the hardware must, by definition, be able to read those blocks, even if they put limits on what blocks can be read, it would still be a mere firmware limitation, and we've seen just how well firmware limitations have worked with region codes....

      At some point, it comes down to this: an ATA bus isn't encrypted. The bus is easily snoopable. Ditto for USB, ditto for FireWIre, SCSI, etc. Any key data that leaves the drive can be snooped, so if the drive hands the key and the data to your video card to do the decoding, you can snoop it on the ATA bus. If the reverse happens---if key data is sent from the video card to the drive---it can be snooped on the ATA bus. Either way, there must be a key exchange. That means that it is vulnerable to a man-in-the-middle attack. Any technology not vulnerable to a man-in-the-middle attack, by definition, is a shared secret algorithm, which is inherently vulnerable to the revelation of the shared secret by unscrupulous people (social engineering), which is how CSS was broken, I believe.

      Fundamentally speaking, HDCP will be a joke, just like CSS, because all content protection is, my its very nature, a joke. It relies on an inherently flawed premise, specifically the assumption that you can give someone a piece of data and a decryption key and then somehow dictate how and when they can use that key to decrypt the data. It doesn't work that way. The only way to prevent decryption is by withholding the key, which would prevent it from ever being decrypted in any way. The best HDCP can do is add more initial shared secrets to steal.

      Besides, unless they have improved it in recent years, HDCP has already been broken.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  8. Re:Whoa... How did they get away with this? by ScottLindner · · Score: 5, Informative

    HDMI does not inherently include HDCP. The specific is a bit loose in the way people interpret it. HDMI is the physical standard, HDCP is essentially a data layer standard. It's the same as wondering why you only get two channel audio if you use an SPDIF interface (AC-3/Dolby Digital). Sure, SPDIF can carry full 5.1 audio, but that doesn't mean it has to. This is the same with HDMI and HDCP. What I think most people are confused or frustrated with is some displays say HDMI support, and don't tell you that they require HDPC as well. You gotta figure that one out by visiting forums.

    --
    Slashdot.. where people join together in deliberate ignorance.
  9. This WAS going to happen by ratboy666 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Of course all those video cards are "HDCPI Ready". They *can* generate the encrypted content. No sweat.

    But (and here's the rub), the content providers (strike that, the "copyright industry", or CI) have decided to not trust any "home-brew" system. Which means that the keys won't go to the cards (because the *system* isn't trusted) and the feature is now useless.

    Of course, a new system can have exactly the same chip, and it will then work.

    Its the CI backlash against the DVD crack (which, of course, a vendor of playback equipment was responsible for -- which is NOT being forgotten). Coupled with some bad crypto choices, and DVDs are now wide open. The CIs would want to prevent this, and are now qualifying everything (my opinion).

    External boxes can only produce SD (DVD) quality output on analog, which is what Vista will generate as well.

    ATI make chips, boards and drivers. They (in my opinion) couldn't care less -- they just implement the spec. They put it the feature, and now can't use it because of key control concerns; they have been caught with their pants down.

    Is is possible for ATI to sue the CIs? Because if I were in ATI, I would be as mad as a wet hen right now.

    Ratboy.

    --
    Just another "Cubible(sic) Joe" 2 17 3061
  10. ATI Code of Ethics by aitio · · Score: 5, Funny
    ATI Code of Ethics

    At ATI, we are committed to conducting our business with the highest level of integrity, honesty and professionalism. Maintaining high standards are also critical for maintaining investor confidence and shareholder value as a publicly traded and world-leading high-tech company.

    The Code of Ethics outlines the key principles and policies that define our business practices and formalizes these standards. The rules set out in the Code serve as a complement to the corporate by-laws, policies and other corporate requirements and directives governing the conduct of ATI and its employees. In its application, the Code applies to all ATI directors, officers, and employees, whether full-time or part-time, and to all other service providers including, contractors and consultants.

    ATI's Code of Ethics extends to wherever business is carried out on ATI's behalf including ATI offices, business travel and any other work-related functions such as meetings with third parties, seminars, conferences and training programs. As everyone lives up to the expectations in all places of business, in this regard ATI's reputation as an excellent company with high ethical standards will be upheld.

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.