Slashdot Mirror


Flexible Body Armor

dotmax writes "One item to pop out of the Turin Winter Olympics is the use of flexible body armor. Similar to silly putty, this shear rate material is flexible under normal load and hardens under impact. Sounds expensive, but could offer some great alternatives for traditional hard shelled impact gear in active sports and military applications."

18 of 210 comments (clear)

  1. Meh... Color me unimpressed. by XorNand · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Skiwear company Spyder, based in Colorado, US, developed racing suits incorporating d3o along the shins and forearms and offered members of the US and Canadian Olympic alpine ski teams the chance to try them out several months ago. "Now they love it and won't ski without it," claims Richard Palmer, CEO of UK-based d3o Labs, which developed the material.
    I don't get it. What's the advantage of using flexible armor on body parts that don't flex? If it works as advertised, seems like this product would be more useful on the torso, back, neck, or near joints. Maybe I'm just jaded, but I'd bet that the skiers really couldn't care less about it. The CEO, on the other hand, now gets to brag about his new technology being used in the Olympics. Cycling and golf is full of this type of crap--technology and jargon used more as a marketing tool than to really enhance the product's performance.
    --
    Entrepreneur : (noun), French for "unemployed"
    1. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by Jelloman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What's the advantage of using flexible armor on body parts that don't flex?

      Try telling a downhill skiier crashing into a wall at over 100 MPH that there are body parts that don't flex. I'm sure they'll happily believe you and give up their armor.

    2. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by Kelbear · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Please don't think I'm trying to be mean here. Assume a friendly tone:P

      But I don't quite follow. The grandparent poster was skeptical about the value of flexible armor over parts that should never bend. If your shin is bending significantly, your shin's probably broken.

      Flexible armor is useful over flexing parts of your body so that you can get maximum utility. Like a flexible elbow pad, it'd let you bend your elbow easier and more powerfully. But over your non-bending shin, you'd just want the strongest protection possible here right? Shouldn't be any cases where your shin is bending.

    3. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by rahvin112 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There are advantages to having something flexible against your skin that will harden on impact. One of those is comfort. Hard plastic guards aren't comfortable and are very obvious (and more than likely hurt aerodynamics). In addition the forearms have muscles on them which if you use your muscles at all tend to flex and expand. Having a flexible soft guard on those body parts would be incredible.

    4. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by Mahou · · Score: 2, Insightful

      yeh but those areas have muscles don't they? flexible armor would be better than hard armor in allowing the muscles more freedom to move while flexing without needing to the make the hard armor loose right? the bone of my shin is just a narrow part of my leg, and my forearm isn't a column of calcium either. doesn't the rest of it need protection too?

      --
      if i'm not immortal, what's the point of living?
      ...te?
    5. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by Vellmont · · Score: 2, Insightful


      Try telling a downhill skiier crashing into a wall at over 100 MPH that there are body parts that don't flex.

      I doubt this stuff is going to have much protection against hitting a wall at 100MPH. The article says that racers are using this stuff on their arms and legs to protect against hitting the poles. I'm sure without protection hitting those poles as hard as they do is going to hurt like hell. If you hit a wall at 100mph, no amount of body armour is going to save you, as all your internal organs are going to be crushed in the impact.

      --
      AccountKiller
    6. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by pdbogen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I second this. I can't *wait* until this stuff gets into motorcycle gear. Gloves that turn to rigid gauntlets when I hit the pavement == win.

    7. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 3, Insightful
      But I don't quite follow. The grandparent poster was skeptical about the value of flexible armor over parts that should never bend. If your shin is bending significantly, your shin's probably broken.

      Consider putting it over your upper arm. Your bicep flexes, the bone underneath does not. But if you've ever hit a gate at high speed, you'd LOVE some armor over your upper arm.
      A rigid plate works, but is much harder to work with. A flexible plate, that moves as your muscles contract, would be a lot better.

      Your tibia doesn't flex (a lot), but the skin and muscle between the bone and the outside world does.

    8. Re:Meh... Color me unimpressed. by Pleb'a.nz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The point is, that they use them on "non-flexible parts" as an additional exo-skeleton to their skeleton to help strengthen limbs on impact so they dont break.

      I.e., you come hurtling at a wall.. you smack your shin on the corner.. the armour hardens to reduce impact inertia, therefore reducing impact on the bone and reducing the chances of a breakage. It's not bruises that kill the skiiers career, it's shattered bones :)

  2. Not for military really.. except maybe supplement by luvirini · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The things that happen when struck by a bullet or shrapnel are different than a skier hitting the ground. This material could perhaps help to make the impact plates, but the actual stopping of the penetration will likely need "normal means"

  3. Difficult to measure material's properties? by maynard · · Score: 3, Insightful

    But Phil Green, research director at d3o Labs, says it is difficult to precisely measure the material's properties because the hardening effect only last as long as the impact itself.

    Certainly a researcher could take a sample of this material and strike it with increasing force using a material with known hardness. That might get them an answer beyond: "we don't know." I'm skeptical of this material's utility in a military application. Particularly as body armor against high velocity bullets and shrapnel. Woven carbon and Kevlar seem still unmatched in its capacity to take a high impact round. But, like I said, an assault riffle and a material sample could answer that question in minutes...

    1. Re:Difficult to measure material's properties? by ronanbear · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The strain rate hardening effect is velocity dependent but also requires time. As body armour is wouldn't be fast enough to stop a bullet. Hence it hasn't been used yet in military armour. It could be developed to have been ballistic properties. For example using it in conjunction with kevlar/ceramic armour might allow for lighter more flexible armour. There's probably a whole lot of development needed before that happens. It might be useful for other applications such as light armour to stop knives, clubs etc. For the moment sporting applications such as the ribcap allows this to occupy a place between tradional hard armour and soft padding. Sports like baseball, soccer and rugby could really benefit.

      --
      the more they over-think the plumbing the easier it is to stop up the pipe
  4. Could be great for inline skating, etc by JRock911 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I do a lot of inline skating and I can see where this stuff could be revolutionary for outdoor inlining, skateboarding, etc.

    Personally, I don't wear pads because they're uncomfortable. I do wear a helmet and palm sliders, which are supposed to help keep your palms from getting skinned up in an actual fall by serving as a buffer between your palms and the asphalt. In theory, they work pretty good. When you fall going upwards of 30MPH, they aren't a lot of help. Once you hit the ground, even if you initially brace with your palms, momentum is pretty much going to send you wherever it wants.

    Being able to wear a long sleeved shirt or pants made of this stuff to help protect the knees and elbows would be huge. I have a road rash spot on my elbow now from a fall last weekend. Granted I don't fall much.. that was the first time in over a year I've had a crash and it was a very minor crash but even still, I'd probably wear this stuff for safety if it was available and not terribly bulky. Most inliners who are serious wear skin suits or jerseys so substituting this stuff would pretty much have no downsides as long as, like I said, it wasn't too bulky.

    On the flip side, most skateboarders want to look "extreme" so this stuff might not be a huge hit with them. I personally like my skin intact, however.

  5. $14,000 Hammers by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Why would the Pentagon buy American troops more expensive body armor, just because it works better, when they don't even buy the cheaper stuff that's better than nothing? Maybe a few $BILLION for the defense contractors to "test" it, but none to actually support our troops in the line of fire.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  6. Getting the wrong impression by wrook · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think people are getting the wrong impression here. This is put into suits for slalom and super G athletes. It's not to protect you from a fall, but to protect you from the flags that whip you when you go around them. It's not going to save you when you crash into a tree. It's going to stop you from getting bruises on your arms and legs when you hit the flags.

    Cool idea. But probably not particularly practical in other applications (maybe useful for kendo??? -- but the armour's way cool, so why change :-) )

  7. Neat but... why? by dbucowboy · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Another potential application may be sound-proofing. The propagation of sound waves should generate a similar strain to an impact, so it may be feasible to create a material that becomes more sound proof in response to increasing noise. "It could have some very interesting, unexplored properties," Green says.


    Kinda cool, but what is the point of scaleable soundproofing? If you want something to be soundproof, why would it need to ever increase or decrease sound proofability? Why not just make it as soundproof as possible from the start?
    --
    This just in! 3 out of 4 people make up 75% of the population.
  8. Why shots penetrating the vest is a Bad Thing. by Fluffy+the+attack+ki · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Let us assume that you are about to be shot in the chest with a 12 gauge 3.5" super-magnum slug, which is overkill for anything short of a bear, or maybe a truck. Let's also assume that you have the option of either wearing the thinnest vest that will stop that slug or nothing at all.

    If you wear the vest then when the slug hits it'll dump all it's energy into your chest. You'll sustain massive blunt trauma on the level of getting smacked with a sledgehammer. Lots of broken ribs, lots of bruising, possibly some organ damage and internal bleeding, if you're hit near the heart maybe death.

    If you DON'T wear the vest then the slug enters the front of your chest, dumps part of it's energy into your tasty meats, exits your back, and continues on it's way into whatever was behind you. It breaks any ribs it hits near, creates a big ol' permanent cavity through whatever organs are in the way, and paints the wall behind you a lovely shade of red.

    I don't know about you, but I think I'll take my chances with the vest TYVM. If I could get the vest lined with some of this stuff to help soak up some of the blow then even better.

  9. The slow blade penetrates the shield by aeon00100 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seriously, this stuff would be awesome for paintball armor.