Slashdot Mirror


The World Oceans Now 70% Shark Free

wheresjim writes "According to a study published in The Proceedings of The Royal Society, the world's oceans are now about 70% shark free. This is a bad sign for the sharks, the oceans and of course, journalists during slow news cycles."

26 of 178 comments (clear)

  1. /. response. by Janek+Kozicki · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nothing for you to see here, please move along

    70% appropriate.

    --
    #
    #\ @ ? Colonize Mars
    #
  2. Free jaws' willy by SirWraith · · Score: 1, Funny

    I think this means it is time for a half-jaws, half-free willy environmentalists movie. in the spirit of free willy, michael jackson will obviously be chosen for the theme. i see the theme as being, itself, a cross between "beat it" and "don't stop til you get enough." it's probably not a coincidence that this also seems to be his take on children.

  3. Either you're with us you're with the sharks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I am shocked to hear this kind of pro-shark fascism being spewed on Slashdot. As we all know, sharks are vile, evil creatures who are a danger and threat to all life and liberty.

    Why do you hate America?

  4. The other 30% by yobjob · · Score: 5, Funny

    Are circling around Australian beaches.

    1. Re:The other 30% by Fire+Dragon · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nope, they went to law-school.

    2. Re:The other 30% by jaymz168 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or are delivering candygrams.

  5. Bad news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    This is a bad sign for the [...] journalists during slow news cycles.
    Unless, of course, this is slashdot, and they can report on bad signs for real journalists...
  6. By volume? by Toba82 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does this mean that the ocean is 30% sharks by volume? I AM NEVER SWIMMING AGAIN!

    --
    I pretend to know more than I really do by mooching off google and wikipedia.
    1. Re:By volume? by jamesh · · Score: 2, Funny

      Worse than that, the polar ice melting is exactly balancing out the extinction of sharks. If we didn't have global warming, you'd have to travel much further to go to the beach!!!

      Or maybe we could just wring out all the sponges that are sitting at the bottom of the ocean.

  7. To all alien tourists... by Secret+Rabbit · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... our waters are now 70% shark free! We are now the safest planetary water park in the galaxy for your children! Come now and get 20% off your water slide pass!

    Offer only valid in the next 10 minutes.

  8. Is that like 70% Fat Free? by GrpA · · Score: 3, Funny

    Because if it is, that means that the Oceans are now 30% shark, 70% water... Not a good mix. GrpA

    --
    Enjoy science fiction? "Turing Evolved" - AI, Mecha, Androids and rail-gun battles. What more could you want?
  9. Batman! by broothal · · Score: 5, Funny

    I blame Batman for dumping his anti-shark-spray into the ocean.

    (if you get that joke you're really old)

  10. Bad news for journalists during slow news? by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Funny

    Apparently not, as they can just write another story about how there are fewer sharks than before.

    1. Re:Bad news for journalists during slow news? by (negative+video) · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, but if they do it too often the story will ... wait for it ... jump the shark.

  11. Lazers by SecureTheNet · · Score: 1, Funny

    Looks like the sharks with lasers on their heads are slowly taking over.

    --
    SecureThe.Net - Practical Resources for Securing Systems
  12. Re:Bad for all of us by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sure, but what about the poor Austrian fishermen? Why aren't you taking them into consideration with your "facts"?

    --
    We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
  13. Of course, they left the oceans ! by javaDragon · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now they live in Lawyer offices.

    --
    -- javaDragon is an instance of JavaDragon.
  14. I starve last by Ugly+American · · Score: 3, Funny

    And make some plans for what you will do for food in 2012.

    I've made my plans; they involve some fava beans and a nice chianti.

    --
    For sale: one sig space, gently used. Inquire for details.
  15. Re:Bad for all of us by tomrud · · Score: 5, Funny
    > Sure, but what about the poor Austrian fishermen? Why aren't you taking them into consideration with your "facts"?

    We should encurage them to get new jobs. In the Austrian Navy for example.

    --
    For a nice date: Call strftime(3C)!
  16. Quoth the sharks... by Kredal · · Score: 3, Funny

    "So long, and thanks for all the surfers"

    Keep an eye out for Vogons, people.

    --
    Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
  17. midget sharks by Mahou · · Score: 2, Funny

    they prefer to be called little people eaters

    --
    if i'm not immortal, what's the point of living?
    ...te?
  18. Surprised no one else has asked... by unitron · · Score: 3, Funny

    So does this decline mean that sharks have jumped the shark?

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  19. So I guess this means by rpjs · · Score: 2, Funny

    That we aren't going to need a bigger boat after all.

  20. Re:Bloody disgrace! by pilybaby · · Score: 2, Funny

    What gives them the right?

    That they're higher in the food chain.

  21. Candygram... by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 2, Funny

    In related news, 40% of the Earth's land area is infested with sharks. Scientists blame evolution while religious leaders said it was some god's punishment for something they hate and lots of people enjoy or something.

  22. oblig. fortune by arabagast · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... So the documentary-makers stick with sharks. Generally, their
    procedure is to scatter bleeding fish pieces around their boat, so as
    to infest the waters. I would estimate that the primary food source of
    sharks today is bleeding fish pieces scattered by people making
    documentaries. Once the sharks arrive, they are generally fairly
    listless. The general shark attitude seems to be: "Oh God, another
    documentary." So the divers have to somehow goad them into attacking,
    under the guise of Scientific Research. "We know very little about the
    effect of electricity on sharks," the narrator will say, in a deeply
    scientific voice. "That is why Todd is going to jab this Great White
    in the testicles with a cattle prod." The divers keep this kind of
    thing up until the shark finally gets irritated and snaps at them, and
    then they act as though this was a totally unexpected and very
    dangerous development, although clearly it is what they wanted all
    along.
                                    -- Dave Barry, "The Wonders of Sharks on TV"

    Seems like the documentary people has stopped feeding the sharks

    --
    Doolittle : ...What is your one purpose in life?
    Bomb no.20 : To explode of course.