Opposition to AOL's 'Email Tax' Growing
An anonymous reader writes "The Register is reporting that opposition to AOL's proposed 'Email Tax' that would create a two tier email filtering system is growing.
DearAOL.com, representing such organisations as the EFF and Craigslist, has written an open letter to AOL asking them to reconsider. "
"... representing such organisations as the EFF and Craigslist... "
...and Moveon.org and the Gun Owners of America, and Civic Action, and the Cancer Online Resources etc...
In total this coalition has more than 15 million people in it according to USA Today.
BTW, AOL just announced that it is going to be raising its general monthly fee as well. Either they will drop this e-mail tax crap or they will lose those idiots who are still subscribed to their "internet" service
We seldom regret saying too little but often regret saying too much.
I think I'd be happy if my ISP implemented this so-called "email tax", provided that it was applied directly to lowering my bill. I pay $50 a month - which is about average for cable broadband in the US (in my experience). Anything that lowers my cost is welcome. Plus, I have *never* used my ISP provided email address, so I'd never see a single piece of certified spam from this endeavor. I don't see a downside.
Now if my ISP were to use this money for purposes other than lowering my bill - or perhaps increasing my speeds - I'd be entirely against this idea.
-ds
Yahoo is already trying to make this tax explicit:
The bold print giveth, and the fine print taketh away