IBM's High Performance File System
HoosierPeschke writes "BetaNews is running a story about IBM's new file system, General Parallel File System (GPFS). The short and skinny is that the new file system attained a 102 Gigabyte per second transfer rate. The size of the file system is also astonishing at 1.6 petabytes (petabyte == 1,024 terabytes). IBM has up a page with more information and specs on the system.."
Atleast someone can make a new filesystem... *cough* Microsoft *cough*
But what kind of performance does this give on relatively small ( 10Tbytes) file systems? Petabyte arrays are still kind of out of reach for most.
A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
Wow that"s fast stuff, plus with the ability to slow light to save energy IBM should have some great new systems coming out!
Britney Simpson
I thought this article was going to be about IBM's HPFS from OS/2.
That aside, how do I get one for my TiVo?
"It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
root@ibm$rm - r *
humm that was quick
'...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
So, the important question: How many Libraries of Congress is that per second?
Typical porn movies per hour (TPMH)??
AT&ROFLMAO
... 1.6 PB ought to be enough for anybody.
Shouldn't that be:
root@ibm# rm -rf *
And as always on storage/bandwidth topics: the pr0n/ogg/divx potential of that thing... *sorry*
640 terabytes should be enough for anybody.
We don't see the world as it is, we see it as we are.
-- Anais Nin
Chuck Norris penis is so big that 1.6 petabyte can only store 4 seconds of Chuck Norris porn.
I tried to install GPFS on Windows 98 and I keep getting GPFs... Is this supposed to happen?
LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP