Slashdot Mirror


Vonage Puts VoIP 911 Caller on Hold

kamikaze-Tech writes "It is being reported on the Vonage Forums that last month when Loren Veltkamp's Chanhassen, Minnesota home caught on fire, he immediately called 9-1-1 using Vonage. Unfortunately, Vonage put him on hold, causing a delay in the response from emergency workers. By the time fire crews arrived, the fire had become a five-alarm blaze. The house was a total loss."

64 of 464 comments (clear)

  1. Dupe "Article" by TheComputerMutt.ca · · Score: 5, Informative

    This "article" is a duplicate thread on the Vonage Forum. The original thread has much more information.

    1. Re:Dupe "Article" by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If the poster had read a bit further, he would have found out This isn't a new story (same link as parent, but I had written this in notepad while wating for the story to come out of the mysterious future) AND the guy involved was a bit of an idiot who wouldn't know a five alarm fire from a small fire he could rescue a computer from. He probably caused more delay in the attempt to rescue his house by leading the police on a chase from front door, through kitchen, to basement and out a window than the delay caused by Vonage National 911 putting him on hold.

      Anybody who only has Vonage without some form of backup line (either a bare bones land line or a cell phone) is a bit of a moron anyway- what would he have done if a candle lit the drapes on fire during a power outage?

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    2. Re:Dupe "Article" by HardCase · · Score: 4, Funny

      Both look about the same to me:

      A communication error occurred: "Operation timed out"
      The Web Server may be down, too busy, or experiencing other problems preventing it from responding to requests. You may wish to try again at a later time.

    3. Re:Dupe "Article" by eln · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree. I use only cell phones for day to day calling, but I still have a basic land line hooked up, and a cheap $10 phone that doesn't require power in the closet in case of emergencies. I've had plenty of times during storms where the power went out and the phone lines still worked.

    4. Re:Dupe "Article" by geekoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, it is common for someone to be in a fire, and underestimate the danger becasue some of the chemicals in the air make it so you can not smell the smoke.

      When my mothers house caught on fire, She was sure she was fine to go back in, went in to get her keys so she could moce her car, coming back out they dragged her away. SHe kept saying it wasn't a big deal.

      They dashboard in her car was melting.

      My mother is not a moron. SHe's gt problems, but she is smart.
      My point is, don't judge this guy based on this incident, many people feel they are 'safe enough' in a fire, when they are not.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:Dupe "Article" by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My point was that a true five-alarmer would generate so much excess heat that NOBODY would have been able to enter the house. Let alone TWICE (first to get his computer, second to lead the police on a stupid chase). There's something that stinks about this story- and being put on hold by "Vonage" is the least of it.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    6. Re:Dupe "Article" by blaksaga · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > what would he have done if a candle lit the drapes on fire during a power outage?

      The same thing people did before EVERYBODY had a telephone: run to the neighbors. :)

    7. Re:Dupe "Article" by W2IRT · · Score: 4, Informative
      The term "X alarm fire" is used to describe how serious a fire is. X refers to the number of fire stations that respond to the fire. So in the story, unless 5 fire stations responded to this blaze, someone is talking out of his arse.

      Actually an alarm level isn't necessarily the number of stations involved, although that's a local definition for the most part. Urban and rural definitions can vary in terminology.

      In many areas, especially cities and towns, one alarm level would typically bring 3 engines, 2 ladders a chief and a rescue or something similar. Probably at least 2 & 2 plus a chief. If they roll up and see a building fully involved (heavy volume of fire), the senior officer would likely bang out a second alarm on arrival and bring in another set of apparatus similar to the first (another 3&2, officer, etc). In a city, a 5-5 is a seriously major fire; 15 to 20 engine companies, 8-10 ladder trucks, air supply units, mask service units, a bevy of chiefs and officers, probably a canteen and a handful of special-use units. In a rural setting, probably water supply units and relay pumpers if the building involved ins't near a hydrant network, mutual aid from nearby towns, etc.

      For a house fire, I would be surprised to see anything more than a second or third alarm unless there were kids trapped, hazmat materials in the shed and a team of strippers running the canteen. My guess is that probably there were five pieces of apparatus* on-scene and that became a Five Alarm job by some idiot reporter not familiar with the terminology.

      *The term "apparatus" is used on this side of the Atlantic to describe a fire department vehicle of some kind or another (pumper, aerial ladder, tower ladder, quint, rescue squad, etc). In the UK, they use the term appliance. The first time I heard London Fire Brigade radio traffic requesting three more appliances on a job, I swear I was prepared in my mind to hear the dispatcher reply "Sending two toasters and a blender to your location, K."

      --
      Cheers, Peter, W2IRT
  2. Nothing to see here by michaelhood · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is no different than the 911 service on PSTN (regular phone service).

    I've been put on hold at least 50-60% of the time I've called.

    They're understaffed.

    1. Re:Nothing to see here by mtenhagen · · Score: 4, Funny

      And how many times did you call? 2 times and you where put on hold 50%-60%?

      Or did you make enough calls to 911 to make it statiscly relevant? If so you where put on hold while they send out the police to arrest you!

      --
      200GB/2TB $7.95 Coupon: SAVE90DOLLAR
    2. Re:Nothing to see here by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Were you first asked "is this an emergency?" That used to be the standard when I was involved in fielding emergency calls. If you said "yes," then you weren't put on hold.

      I had to call a couple of weeks ago about a suspected (and thankfully non-existant) chimney fire (turned out to be a piece of newspaper went up the flue and got caught in the spark trap at the top of the chimney- made for a nice bit of harmless fireworks spotted by a passing car, who notified me). I was put on hold without anybody asking anything- by the time I was off hold, they sent out the fire department anyway though I said the flames were out...

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    3. Re:Nothing to see here by Pharmboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Do you know how they defined emergency?

      The imminent loss of life, limb or property. Or at least that is the standard in most locales. Breaking your wrist isn't an "emergency". Cutting it with a razorblade is.

      The problem is they should ENFORCE fines for "obvious" misuse, such as calls for barking dogs, etc. No fines for borderline cases (ie: when there is an injury, extremely loud sound that could have been explosion, smell of gas, etc.) but for the very obvious.

      At least $200 for a first time offense and going up another $200 for each subsequent non-emergency calls in a 3 year period. There are already enough laws on the books to cover this. The problem is that it is not enforced.

      Same for people who don't pull over when an ambulance/firetruck is trying to get by, except considerably higher fines ($500 for the first offense that is without an affirmative defense). Not so ironic, people are usually quick to pull over to make room for the police...

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    4. Re:Nothing to see here by woolio · · Score: 4, Funny

      I've been put on hold at least 50-60% of the time I've called.

      I'm not sure which is more disturbing -- that you were put on hold or that you have called enough times to be able to establish these percentages...

    5. Re:Nothing to see here by technothrasher · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Or did you make enough calls to 911 to make it statiscly relevant? If so you where put on hold while they send out the police to arrest you!


      Well, I don't know the original posters situation but I used to live by a dangerous intersection and called 911 at least once every couple weeks or so to report yet another accident in front of my house. So you can actually have a situation where you make a lot of 911 calls and still not be abusing the system.

      BTW, I was never put on hold.

    6. Re:Nothing to see here by rob1980 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not really disturbing - I worked at ADT for a couple months awhile back and I could have established these kinds of percentages easily within a week if I was taking notes. And it wouldn't be for one city, it would have been across the entire nation. I think the longest I was ever on hold was 15 minutes for the LAPD.

    7. Re:Nothing to see here by hawk · · Score: 4, Funny

      I've called 911 more times than I'd like to admit, but I will anwayy

      1988 or so, San Diego: "A car just flipped, spun 720 degrees, bouncing off the concrete barrier 3 times."
      "Was anyone hurt?"

      1990, Las Vegas: The dumpster behind my office is on fire!
      "Where are you?"
      "It doesn't show on your systems?"
      "No,not here."

      2002 or so, Pennsylvania: child drank "yucky water." handled reasonably.

      Last year, Pennsylvania: barely & pre-teens camping in the yard, some moron terrorizing them. Well handled.

      Last week: one of my students, in a contest to see who could jump the fartherest from the swing . . .

      And there are a couyple more that don't come right to mind.

      I've never been put on hold, though . . .

      hawk

    8. Re:Nothing to see here by xx_toran_xx · · Score: 2, Informative

      73% of all statistics are made up on the spot.

      --
      Arrrrrrr
  3. Why VoIP? by networkBoy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Was this his only phone?
    Any reason he didn't have access to another phone?
    Traditionally you exit your burning house ASAP and call from a house next door...
    -nB

    --
    whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    1. Re:Why VoIP? by Phurd+Phlegm · · Score: 2, Informative
      Was this his only phone?

      Any reason he didn't have access to another phone?

      Traditionally you exit your burning house ASAP and call from a house next door...

      Here's the local TV station's report. They don't say so, but I assume that his only phone service was VOIP. As for running next door, I assume he figured it would be quicker to report if he played the percentages and didn't hang up to try again. According to the report, he was arrested for repeatedly reentering the house to save his computers.
    2. Re:Why VoIP? by Bacon+Bits · · Score: 5, Informative

      Irrelevant. FCC regulations require service providers to connect any 911 emergency calls. That's why you can [supposedly] connect a phone to a jack with no service and dial 911, or use a cell phone that has no account and dial 911. It is Vonage's responsibility to see that this happens each time every time. There is no burden on the consumer for this one. If Vonage doesn't like it, they can choose not to be in the telcom business in the US.

      Now, some of the reports I've read do say that Vonage connected him, but that the operators put him on hold. In that case, Vonage is not to blame as they met the requirments of law.

      --
      The road to tyranny has always been paved with claims of necessity.
    3. Re:Why VoIP? by westlake · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Traditionally you exit your burning house ASAP and call from a house next door...

      "Next door" to my father's place is the farmhouse a mile down the road. "Next door" assumes you are in a condition to walk or drive. That your judgement is not impaired.

      I have vivid memories still of my one and only experience with carbon monoxide poisoning.

    4. Re:Why VoIP? by frinkster · · Score: 5, Informative

      Irrelevant. FCC regulations require service providers to connect any 911 emergency calls. That's why you can [supposedly] connect a phone to a jack with no service and dial 911, or use a cell phone that has no account and dial 911. It is Vonage's responsibility to see that this happens each time every time. There is no burden on the consumer for this one. If Vonage doesn't like it, they can choose not to be in the telcom business in the US.

      I work in the cell phone infrastructure business. It's not really FCC regulations that make it so, it's a requirement of the various cell phone technologies.

      A cell phone recognizes 911 (and the other emergency numbers used around the world) as an emergency call, picks the closest tower and requests an emergency call. It's a different process than making a normal call and bypasses nearly all of the steps involved with making a call (including such things as authentication, determining if you are allowed access, if you are roaming or local, if you should be billed, and a host of other steps). If there is no capacity, the base station will disconnect a paying call to make room. Whether you have a SIM card in the phone or even an active account is irrelevant to the whole process.

      When we test new systems and major software upgrades, we attempt emergency calls first. Not really because we want to make sure they work, it's because it's a lot easier to set one up!

  4. Amazing by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny

    They claim to be associating establishing a physical location with each E911, at so many counties per week. Yet someone on the blog points out in Ohio they're moving at a snail's pace and only in 4 rural counties. Sounds like my office, let's process ~1,500 applications, which average about 30 minutes each, by one person, who is being phased out due to lack of work. It done be amazing.

    "please click on 1 if you have just seen bigfoot, click on 2 if a wolf has lept through your living room window, click 3 if you believe CowboyNeal is lurking under your bed, click 4 if you laughed so hard at the last South Park that you are choking on a cheezy poof, click 5 if you are so offended by the last South Park you are choking on a cheezy poof, click 6 if you think The Lakers is a stupid name for a team that moved from Minnesota to Los Angeles where there are no lakes, click 7 if your house is on fire and your children have flown, click 8 if you are suffering a medical emergency, click 9 if you are "dying zerelda, dying zerelda, die, die, die, die, die, die!!!" or stay on the line and listen to some light jazz until your connection is mysteriously dropped."

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Amazing by evil+agent · · Score: 2, Funny
      *click*

      "You have selected regicide. If you know the king or queen being murdered, press 1."

      --
      End transmission.
  5. happens on POTS as well by Splork · · Score: 4, Interesting

    try calling 911 on a POTS line or cell phone in any major city and see for yourself.

    1. Re:happens on POTS as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The correct procedure is to call the 911 supervisor and inform the supervisor you will be performing a 911 test. You may need to call your phone provider first to find the number or call 311 if it is available in your area. The number is typically something like nxx-x911. Make sure the supervisor can see your information and give the supervisor enough time to notify the operators. If you change POTS or PRI providers, you need to add 911 testing to your checklist. I forgot to do this once and learned my lesson. Fortunately, no harm came from it. The PRI provider did not setup the PRI to route to correct 911 call center. They had routed to the county call center instead of the city. For some reason, when a call goes to Travis County Emergency Center instead of the City of Austin, all information about who placed the call is stripped.

  6. on hold by gnuguru · · Score: 5, Funny

    Tried to follow the link in the story, but the server put me on hold....

  7. Next at 6... by SuperBanana · · Score: 4, Funny

    It is being reported on the Vonage Forums that last month when Loren Veltkamp's Chanhassen, Minnesota home caught on fire, he immediately called 9-1-1 using Vonage. Unfortunately, Vonage put him on hold,

    Next at 6: Slashdot links to Vonage-forum, forum webserver puts thousands on hold and THEN catches fire.

    PS:Houses usually don't "catch" fire, like they're standing around and fire lands on them out of the blue. How'd the guy's house actually catch fire? Why didn't he have an extinguisher? Why didn't he hang up the phone and DIAL AGAIN?

    PPS:The above is half serious and half spoofing the typical "apologist" line.

  8. not suprising. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I live about 6 minutes away from chanhassen, and the last time I called 911 I was put on hold. I called from a cell phone not voip so I'm geussing its just the local emergency services fault.

  9. You know their stupid commercials... by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 5, Funny
    ...with that annoying music they play, showing people doing stupid things. And then they say, "People do stupid things..."

    I think their new commercial should show a guy getting Vonage and then his house burns down, and then they say, "People do stupid things. Going with Vonage is one of them."

  10. Regular 911 service is just as bad, or worse! by qwave54 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I had to call 911 a few times in the past few years, and every single time I've had nothing but trouble from them. One time when I witnessed a car accident and stayed to help, I called 911 because a woman at the scene had trouble getting out of her car (the door wouldn't open and her legs were pinned). The 911 operator *wouldn't believe* that she needed help and refused to send more than one police car. Luckily he came quickly and called for the proper help. Another time I had to call, I was transfered to the wrong emergency service. I needed the police, but was sent to the fire dept. While the fire operator was talking, the 911 operator interrupted the call and transfered me to the EMS! Again, interrupted and finally I got the police. Other times I've had operators who were rude and unhelpful.
    So Vonage's 911 seems to be at par with the poor level of service given by the other 911 services.

    1. Re:Regular 911 service is just as bad, or worse! by soft_guy · · Score: 3, Funny

      I have had a similar experience. Once I called 911 because I had lost my TV Guide and I needed to know when Seinfeld was on. They were totally rude and unhelpful.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    2. Re:Regular 911 service is just as bad, or worse! by jmnormand · · Score: 3, Funny

      in related news, national 911 services are now being routed to an call center in india...

    3. Re:Regular 911 service is just as bad, or worse! by MyLongNickName · · Score: 2, Funny

      Easy solution. Just say "dang... I was hoping to not have to shoot another one of those damn thiefs. But ya gotta do what you gotta do". Then hang up. You will have eight squad cars in ten minutes.

      And hopefully one of the cops will be trigger happy enough to fill the dude with lead.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    4. Re:Regular 911 service is just as bad, or worse! by noldrin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Once I called 911 to report an emergency, Livestock were wondering a highway durring rushhour. I was told by 911 that this wasn't an emergency and I should hangup and call animal control. So this required me making a call to 411 over my cell phone, which cost me $2.50. I was then connected to the local police department. Thank you so much 911. Next time I'll tell them I'll call back after the accident has happened.

    5. Re:Regular 911 service is just as bad, or worse! by fredklein · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think you're looking for this joke:

      An elderly man living alone was awoken by a stange noise in the middle of the night. He looked out of his back bedroom window and saw two men breaking into his garden shed. So he called 911 to report what was happening.
      "I'm very sorry," said the sergeant, "but there's no-one available at present. When someone become free I'll send them along to your address."
      Two minutes later he called 911 again.
      "I'm sorry to bother you again about this," he explains, "but I called about a couple of minutes ago about a burgary. Don't bother to send anyone out, though, because I've just shot them."
      Five minutes later the avenue is swarming with policemen and a SWAT team.,There are police vehicles in all the surrounding streets and a helicopter hovering overhead with search lights beaming. They catch the two burglars red handed.
      "I thought you said you'd shot them," said the police sergeant.
      "And I thought you said you had nobody available," replied the old man.

    6. Re:Regular 911 service is just as bad, or worse! by Anonymous+Meoward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Once I called 911 to report an emergency, Livestock were wondering

      'Tis a sad day in our fair republic when the imagination of livestock is a threat.

      (Let's focus on the real problems, shall we? Like the imagination of those humans who wonder about livestock..)

      --
      --- The American Way of Life is not a birthright. Hell, it's not even sustainable.
  11. Re:Who needs 911? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 4, Informative

    You can usually do both- just call your local phoneco and ask for a emergency-only line that only dials 911 and 0. Also known as Basic Dial Tone Service, it will cost you someplace between $0-$12/month, depending on whether or not they force you to get local dialing with it or not, and what taxes apply. Don't forget to plug in an old fashioned WIRED phone to the line, so that you have service in case of a power outage as well.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  12. No lawsuit required! by babbling · · Score: 4, Funny

    They're giving him $20 credit and 7% off all his future 911 calls.

  13. Same Problem in LA by osmodion · · Score: 2, Informative

    A few weeks ago I was rear ended. The damage to my car was pretty extensive, so one of my passengers called 911 while I talked to the other driver. He was on hold for well over five minutes. When someone finally answered, he handed the phone to me. I talked for about 4 seconds before being cut off by the operator. The nice version is that if no one was bleeding or dead, she was hanging up to deal with more important calls.

    The call centers are vastly understaffed, which isn't Vonage's fault, so people get put on hold. End of story.

  14. Re:Who needs 911? by HappyDrgn · · Score: 3, Informative

    Plug a phone into your wall outlet, or if you have a spare disconnected cell phone, keep it charged and make sure your family knows where it is. 911 service works on any phone line in the U.S. even if the service is not activated. We have Vonage, but we also have a backup phone plugged into the wall. The Internet is something I would want to rely on in an emergency.

  15. This should surprise no one (911 horror stories) by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This should surprise no one. 911 is not anywhere near as reliable as you think it could or should be. A friend of mine nearly cut off this thumb with a chop saw. He ran into the house, called 911, and .... it was busy. Rather than dick around bleeding (drip, drip), he called the one person he knew he could rely on: his office secretary (three cheers for secretaries!) She called the local ambulance service, they picked up, took him to the hospital, and after a little tendon reattachment surgery and months of rehab, he was good as new. No thanks to 911.

    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  16. Obligatory Simpsons' quote by MagicDude · · Score: 4, Funny

    Flanders drives into his driveway and Bart panics, pleading with Lisa to leave. Instead she climbs the stairs, but Bart warns her she'll be trapped. He sees Ned looking angry, walking with an ax.

    Bart: [watching Flanders] An ax. He's got an ax! I'll save you, Lisa! [tries to walk on his broken leg, falls back] Uh, I'll save you by calling the police. [dials 911]

    Voice: Hello, and welcome to the Springfield Police Department Resc-u- Fone[tm]. If you know the name of the felony being committed, press one. To choose from a list of felonies, press two. If you are being murdered or calling from a rotary phone, please stay on the line.

    Bart: [growls, punches some numbers]

    Voice: You have selected regicide. If you know the name of the king or queen being murdered, press one.

  17. Something doesn't seem to fit by Ah+huh+and+then · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Looks like this person needed someone to blame. First off, this was not a five alarm fire. Thoes are just slightly bigger, usually apartment building or commerical wherehouses. More then one firetruck will arive at a five alarm fire, hense the name. One other kinda fishy thing is
    "by the time fire crews arrived, the fire had become a five-alarm blaze. The house was a total loss."
    which conficts with Veltkamps own statment in the local media:
    "When I was ordered out of the building, I didn't want to comply with that," Veltkamp said. Fire crews convinced him to leave, but he later re-entered the home - followed by police. "They chased me in, saying they were going to taze me if I didn't come out," Veltkamp said. He then ran from police through the house, and escaped out of the basement.
    It probably didn't help that the firecrews had to shoot water over trees at this house either video http://kstp.dayport.com/viewer/viewerpage.php?Art_ ID=165697&NoAds=true local report http://www.kstp.com/article/stories/S14441.html?ca t=1
    1. Re:Something doesn't seem to fit by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I think I read some details on that fire - the fire was through the roof when first-due rolled on-scene. Generally, if the fire has self-vented in all but a few specific types of construction - such a structure is considered a loser unless there are intact firewalls running all the way up to the peak, which is unlikely in a residence. Combine that with truss construction and engineered wood products (and this structure definately had trussing), the structure is automatically a write-off. With truss or engineered wood construction, crews are typically forbidden from entering the structure after 10 minutes of fire unless (1) there is a victim inside, AND (2) there's a prayer of saving them... and even then, we'll honestly consider if it's worth the risk, based on the time that has elapsed. Truss + Fire = 12 minute "roof falls onto you" deathtrap, and EWood + Fire = 4 minute "floor falls under you" deathtrap, period, no exceptions.

      That's why, like you, I'm almost baffled that the police chased this idiot inside - but from the size of the structure in the video, half of the building could be flashing over while at the other end of it, you'd never know it. With a smaller structure, he'd not have gotten two steps into the door and still be able to see, let alone breathe all of the phosgene & methal-ethyl-kills-you shit in the air. Since neither he nor the cops needed rescue, it pretty much demands that "when fire crews arrived" the fire was at one end of the house (the end farthest away from the platform truck, judging by the extent of the burn there), and he was running into the near-end, which wasn't involved (or smoke filled) yet. That the fire vented itself so quickly is probably a major factor as to why the rest of the structure wasn't a lethal atmosphere, as well.

      For your own fun - shooting the water over the trees wasn't really relevent; by the time you use a master stream (such as from the platform in the video) - those things flow anywhere from 1500 to 2500 gallons per minute - it's over.

      Why, you ask?

      One gallon of water weighs 8 pounds. Our truck is rated at 2500 GPM; from a draft, it can (real life) sustain around 2200 GPM; that's 17 thousand, 600 pounds of weight per minute that we're dumping onto the floor of that structure. A typical stream like that will be flowed for up to 5 or 10 minutes, since you're trying to suppress fire on the ceiling and walls - and most of the water is on the floor, in a structure that's already (heavily) compromised... and actively being further compromised, to boot. Five minutes... 88 thousand pounds, 44 tons of weight... that's like having, what, about 30 cars parked on that floor? Even if we do succeed in knocking down the fire, the odds of the structure surviving US is small, at best... and that's one master stream. If placement allows, we'll use two, plus (if warranted) a portable from the ground, shooting into a window.

      So, apparatus placement didn't help much, as you said - but using THAT specific piece is typically a "fat lady singing" move when a residence is involved; the trusses (what few are left) in the video are a dead giveaway. A fire in that type of construction... first alarm should bring two engines and a truck; second alarm should bring an additional engine and truck (and water supply, if needed); third alarm brings coffee; fourth alarm brings donuts; fifth alarm brings pizza and fresh cell phone batteries - because if the first alarm crew couldn't nail it, it's moot. Steel Trussing sucks; Wood Trussing really, really sucks; the only thing worse is Engineered Wood.

      For what it's worth, we have several similarly *stupid* houses in our district, that have little or no access for truck or engine placement - some, you cannot even fit a freakin E-One up the driveway, let alone a stick or platform truck. For those, we've added a trailer to our Mini brush-truck; 1500 feet of supply line, a bunch of gated water-theives, and four attack lines. If WE get stuck with a fire in such a place, our initial alarm will

      --

      help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

  18. Something i learned about smoke and fire. by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you are ever woken up by the smell of smoke/fire in your house, you have just about three minutes to get out before you die. Basicly, the amount of smoke and gasses in the air that are enough to wake you up are jsut slightly les then it takes to kill you.

    Also, a tiny fire can turn life threatening in jsut a couple of minutes. Fire is not somehitn to be fucked with.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
    1. Re:Something i learned about smoke and fire. by NumberGod · · Score: 3, Informative

      I really hate to disappoint you, but the smoke and gasses WILL NOT WAKE YOU.

      They put you into a deeper sleep, while removing all the oxygen from the air.

      Then you die. Not from the flames. From not having oxygen.

      At least that's what they taught me at paramedic school.

      Get yourself a smoke alarm for every bedroom. It might save your life one day.

    2. Re:Something i learned about smoke and fire. by Eivind · · Score: 2, Insightful
      IF you are waken up.

      A large portion of the people who die in fires die sleeping in their beds, never waking at all.

      Get a smoke-alarm. It's not perfect, but it's a hell of a lot of an improvement.

  19. Loren Veltkamp ... by Fooby · · Score: 3, Informative

    was convicted for assaulting a former tenant of his while performing a "citizen's arrest" for failure to pay rent. He appealed the case pro se, and unsurprisingly lost on his irrelevent legal arguments. The man seems to be a bit nutty, if not dangerous.

  20. Re:This should surprise no one (911 horror stories by LearningHard · · Score: 2, Funny

    I had a similar experience. Except instead of relying on others I applied pressure to my finger and drove to the hospital. In fact I've never taken an ambulance to the hospital for anything even when I broke my shin. I hopped to my truck, jumped in and drove to the hospital and hopped into the emergency room.

  21. Re:This should surprise no one (911 horror stories by bani · · Score: 2, Insightful

    most of the publically available numbers are not staffed 24/7 and are usually not the appropriate numbers for dispatch. call your local police department and you'll generally get a nice voice menu where you have to navigate 15 levels deep to reach someone.

    only 911 is guaranteed to be staffed 24/7.

  22. Light on details, heavy on hype, I should know by BcNexus · · Score: 2, Informative

    I see no conclusive evidence to blame Vonage.

    TFA doesn't explain what "put on hold" is. This vague problem could be with any number of systems, which could belong to Qwest (very big here in Minnesota), or some other company. Or , to echo other comments, the 911 center in Chanhassen ould have been understaffed and may have put the caller on hold.

    Moreover, KSTP Channel 5 has shitty sensationalist news. I live in Saint Paul MN. In my opinion, Channel five news is a joke. The news team offers interesting headlines without necesary details in the actual stories.

    In conclucsion, readers, please don't give this ancedotal /. story any consideration; there simply aren't enough details, and I think the station that first reported the story isn't trustworthy for detailed, accurate stories.

  23. Fire: respect it or die by garylian · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually, speaking as a former firefighter, it isn't common for folks to misunderstand how dangerous a fire can be. Most folks freak completely out. They panic, and make mistakes they should know better than to do.

    Small grease fires take out a whole kitched because the panicked homeowner throws water on it, instead of something like flour.

    It's simple Fight or Flight syndrome. Most folks run for it (flight), but without applying a thought process to what they are doing. Those that try to deal (fight) with it aren't usually trained to deal with it properly. Sometimes even those that ARE trained get caught by something they didn't expect.

    Fires are nothing to mess around with. Those that have a healthy respect for them can deal with it once they are properly trained. Those that don't, tend to die, even with training. Just check out the number of firefighters that die each year due to really dumb things like buildings falling on them.

    Most firefighter deaths (that aren't due to traffic accidents or heart attacks) were completely preventable. There's usually a cover-up, for the officers in charge, all the way down to even the victim's themselves. Nobody wants to tarnish a hero's legacy, even if said "hero" had their head up their ass and was in a place they should have known better than to be, or was doing something they shouldn't have done. The public doesn't end up knowing, but most of it ends up getting caught on tape by some bystander, and then the government ends up buying the tape rights so that it doesn't get on the 11 o'clock news. Then, they show it as training video, and tell us "See, these guys are dumbfucks, and so is their commanding officer". And yet, more than half the class would still make the same mistake.

    1. Re:Fire: respect it or die by Pinachi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah, throwing flour on a grease fire. That is the most stupid thing I think a real fire fighter could say. Powdered flour is extremely explosive. If it's really grainy it would work, if there is any fine flour in there though you'll get a nice flash fire that would spread it around the room. The stupidity almost is up there with throwing coffee creamer on a fire. Use baking soda or a fire extinguisher.

    2. Re:Fire: respect it or die by nahdude812 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Trying to move a burning pot outside (especially in the case of a grease / oil fire) could be insanely dangerous! Most people don't realize how hot a grease fire can actually be (significantly hotter than boiling water or the fire in your fireplace). Of course the actual temperature depends on the type of grease.

      They might grab the pot, start moving it toward a door, and be overcome by the heat, slopping some burning grease onto themselves or onto the floor, if they don't drop the pot completely.

    3. Re:Fire: respect it or die by CharlieG · · Score: 2, Informative

      so does having a tight fitting metal cover for the pot/pan, and always keeping it out when cooking - I've had grease catch in the bottom of a pan - reach over, pick up cover, put on pan, turn off burner. Amazing what happens when you cut off the source of air and heat - take 2 of the 3 legs of the triangle out, fire goes out fast

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
  24. WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    disclaimer: I work in the telecom field.

    Vonage put the call on hold?? Or was it the 911 operator?
    I wasn't aware Vonage operated 911 call centers. Do they have SLAs with emergency responders?
    If Vonage [equipment] didn't answer the call, they were just providing the transport.

    Next time the wife hangs up on me am I supposed to call Cingular and open a trouble ticket
    for dropped calls on my cell phone?

    Please.

    1. Re:WTF? by fishbowl · · Score: 2, Insightful



      >Vonage put the call on hold?? Or was it the 911 operator?

      The premise of the story is that Vonage did, presumably in the process of routing the call to the localized 911. They have to do some processing, in order to provide localized 911 at all, and they had to be dragged kicking and screaming into compliance.

      The discussion board is light on details, and in particular, the questions I'd ask as a juror aren't even approached. Was this a delay between the CO and the 911 call center? How did the route trace at the time of the call, in terms of the customer's broadband connection, and in terms of the voip packets? When was the 911 call initiated? When was it received by Vonage? What are the specific details of the handling of that call, timestamped logs please. If Vonage can't provide that information, as a juror I'd be willing to impose bankrupting fines against the company and recommend criminal prosecutions for the people who knew or should have known that this system could fail.

      On the other hand, if the company can demonstrate due diligence, and especially if they can show that the same hold time would have resulted from a landline 911 call terminated at the same CO, then I'd find for the company. Either way, the homeowner has no fault. Any insurance company that tried to dismiss a claim because the homeowner used Vonage for 911, should lose.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  25. PARENT IS A TROLL by Lehk228 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    a real firefighter would never suggest throwing flour onto a fire, flour explodes when thrown into flame

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    1. Re:PARENT IS A TROLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      It doesn't exactly explode, especially if poured instead of thrown. For a grease fire, the flour will congeal on the top of the grease and help cutoff the air supply (go look up saponification - that's how the dry chem extinguishers work on grease fires). Problem is that you need a lot of flour to cover the whole burning surface and you risk getting burned trying it. It's better to simply put the lid on the pot. Here's some real advice from a fire department. http://www.casperfire.com/fire_prevention/fp_greas efiresafety/grease_fire_safety.htm

    2. Re:PARENT IS A TROLL by ivan256 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Flour, like most things that explode due to combustion, is only explosive if mixed with of oxygen in a narrow range of concentration. A big handful of flour won't explode. You should be glad that it won't or kitchens with gas stoves would be blowing up every time somebody made a cream sauce.

  26. 999 to get non-emergency back-up by Netscryer · · Score: 2, Informative

    And in the UK... http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/03/08/govt_numbe r/ "Around seven in ten calls to the 999 service are not deemed to be emergencies, thus clogging up the system and making it harder for staff to handle urgent calls. Which is why the government wants a new Single Non-Emergency Number (SNEN). The new SNEN service - 101 - will be used for people to report matters such as vandalism, graffiti, and noisy neighbours." (I think 999, 911 and 112 are equivalent in the UK, but 999 is most familiar to most people, I've only ever dialed 999 though.)

  27. 911 use to hang up on my daughter too by cdn-programmer · · Score: 2, Informative

    This happened frquently and I had to teach her to just be persistant and keep phoning until they listened. Her mom was very ill. Crap like this does happen and often they don't get it right.

  28. Flour *IS* better than water by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Flour? you sure you want to be throwing fine powdered carbohydrates on a fire?

    I wouldn't be at all surprised if a knowledgeable instructor said (sarcastically) "You'd be better off throwing flour", knowing that flour could ultimately become a fuel. Then trainee misunderstands the sarcasm as "Flour is a really good idea".

    Now, one thing I'd say is that throwing flour from 5 feet away would creat a nice fine mist of fuel that military types call FAE (Fuel/Air Explosive). Bad, bad news.

    On the other hand, pouring a couple of kilos of flower from a foot or two away would attack the two primary methods of stopping a fire:

    1. cool the fuel. If you have more flour than grease, the flour will cool the grease -- probably below the burning point. At this point, you have the ability to move the pan from the burner... (further cooling the fire).
      When flour hits hot grease, there's a chemical reaction that takes place (first step for making cream sauces). This reaction is probably endothermic, which would further cool the fuel.

      Strangely this is actually how placing a lid on the pot helps to put out a fire... It removes the exothermic ("hot") fuel-air interface point from the surface of the grease, thus slowing down the feedback loop of heating the grease from both top and bottom -- now you just need to get the bottom of the grease away from the hot burner....

    2. deprive it of oxygen (or -- to put it another way, deprive the oxygen of flame-temperature fuel. The flour will congeal and cut down on the spattering of the grease which gives a nice fuel-air interface. It can also cover the surface of the grease (before it sinks) -- once again depriving the fuel of it's oxygen (or vice versa).
    Water, on the other hand, will just instantly expand into steam, and toss grease into the air -- in a fine mist of flame-temperature fuel. When that hits the air, instead of cooling, it will light on fire which will further heat nearby droplets ..... Another FAE situation -- not to mention the large globs of (near) burning grease that will probably cover your body.

    So, he's not completely out to lunch -- but I'd say that if you have an ABC or K fire extinguisher on hand, or just a lid (or another, larger pan), that's probably a better solution ... Just remember... Never put water on an oil/grease/gasoline fire.

    Last point: Firefighters walk into these kinds of fires with equipment that goes well beyond choosing between flour and baking soda. If it gets to the point where a (fully suited) firefighter is choosing between flour and baking soda to put out a fire, (s)he's probably also wondering about whether his/her last will and testament is up to date. I seriously doubt that they get in-depth training about the nuances of using common kitchen ingredients as firefighting tools.

    --
    Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.