Slashdot Mirror


America's War on the Web

An anonymous reader writes "The Sunday Herald is reporting that while the US is continuing to pursue traditional means of protecting national security, they are also planning to launch a new wave of 'information warfare' to help combat a perceived growing threat of IT security. From the article: 'The Pentagon has already signed off $383 million to force through the document's recommendations by 2009. Military and intelligence sources in the US talk of "a revolution in the concept of warfare". The report orders three new developments in America's approach to warfare [...] the Pentagon says it will wage war against the internet in order to dominate the realm of communications, prevent digital attacks on the US and its allies, and to have the upper hand when launching cyber-attacks against enemies.'"

12 of 428 comments (clear)

  1. Better Article.... by toleraen · · Score: 5, Informative

    A summary with a bit more information (and without horrible formatting errors), including a link to the actual document, can be found here. Apparently it's been declassified for a couple months now...but better to get this info out a little late then never I suppose.

    1. Re:Better Article.... by lbrandy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A summary with a bit more information (and without horrible formatting errors), including a link to the actual document, can be found here. Apparently it's been declassified for a couple months now...but better to get this info out a little late then never I suppose.

      This article and summary seems like a huge troll to me. It's carefully worded to be inflamatory, and appears to be, in large part, wrong. The US isn't preparing for war "on" the internet... as much as it's preparing for a war via the internet. The article goes on to use a bunch of careful prepositional games where I have to guess whether the US is actually thinking about attacking the internet... or considering how warfare will be conducted via the internet. It then goes on to quote a bunch of unnamed military guys saying things that I've never heard them say before...

      Every plan I know of details a plan for electronic warfare using the internet.... yet here you have some terrible editorial trying to stir the spot, feeding into the slashdot groupthink and... stirring the pot. You already have people talking about the US "attacking" the internet. This is just shoddy journalism and bad editorializing to preach to a bunch of sheep. And the sheep cometh...

    2. Re:Better Article.... by mspohr · · Score: 5, Insightful
      "Strange...the Bush crew is often portrayed as bumblers who can't do anything right, then they are accused of being devious co-conspirators to rule the world. Which is it guys?"

      I think it's both... They want to be devious co-conspirators who want to rule the world but they really are clueless bumblers.

      Unfortunately, their clueless bumbling is a threat to world stability without any real control ... worst of both worlds.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
  2. Cyber-terror Unlikely by wiz31337 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The last time I checked Al-Qaeda uses a rather primitive approach to terrorism. They use incendiary devices in shoes, which often fail, second hand weapons, and other non-technical approaches.

    The website for Al-Qaeda should be near the bottom of the list for the defense department.

    Everyone has the idea that terrorists will one day hack into the power grid and cripple the stock market. They should focus on protecting the power grids from physical attacks before they start focusing on "cyber terrorism" where they could take the grid by "hacking into the system."

    --
    /whisper/ Thanks for the candy!
    1. Re:Cyber-terror Unlikely by hal2814 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, I even heard the Taliban has a version of the Amish Virus:

      "You have just received the Taliban virus.

      Since we have no electricity or computers, you are on the honor system.

      Please delete all of your files on your hard drive. Then forward this message to everyone in your address book.

      Praise Allah."

  3. Cyber Attacks by umrgregg · · Score: 5, Funny

    Submit the targeted server to Agent CmdrTaco. His legion of followers will take care of the rest.

    --
    NMG
  4. Re:Is this new? by wiz31337 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "We brought the Internet into this world, and by God we can take it back out!"

    --
    /whisper/ Thanks for the candy!
  5. smac is ever appropriate by Dolly_Llama · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Once again, Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri proves to be the best game ever made:

    As the Americans learned so painfully in Earth's final century, free flow of information is the only safeguard against tyranny. The once-chained people whose leaders at last lose their grip on information flow will soon burst with freedom and vitality, but the free nation gradually constricting its grip on public discourse has begun its rapid slide into despotism. Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master.

    --Pravin Lal

    --

    Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -- Carl Sagan

  6. If it's illegal for Americans... by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 5, Insightful

    to fund terrorist organizations, does that mean no income taxes on April 15?

    --
    "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
  7. What a fantastic idea! by dark_requiem · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From TFA:

    Secondly, psychological military operations, known as psyops, will be at the heart of future military action. Psyops involve using any media - from newspapers, books and posters to the internet, music, Blackberrys and personal digital assistants (PDAs) - to put out black propaganda to assist government and military strategy. Psyops involve the dissemination of lies and fake stories and releasing information to wrong-foot the enemy.

    Wow, now that's a good idea. I sure don't see anything immoral here, and certainly no potential for abuse. After all, the only way to have a stable democratic state which protects its citizens' freedoms is if that state controls the media and uses it to knowingly distribute lies and propoganda. The founding fathers knew this, which was why when they wrote the first amendment, they... Oh wait, that's right. The media is supposed to be independent from the state. A state that uses the media to distribute lies is a mortal danger to freedom, and needs to be deposed, quickly.

    Thirdly, the US wants to take control of the Earth's electromagnetic spectrum, allowing US war planners to dominate mobile phones, PDAs, the web, radio, TV and other forms of modern communication. That could see entire countries denied access to telecommunications at the flick of a switch by America.

    Do I really even need to comment on this one? Combined with their planned propoganda campaign, they're looking to completely exclude targeted populations from recieving accurate and timely information. Again, if the true objective here was to combat terrorists by spreading democracy, this would obviously be massively counterproductive. But of course we all know that this is not about spreading democracy, or combating terrorism, any more than Iraq or Afghanistan were about freedom and democracy. It is about control.

  8. It's Happening Now People by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From the Article:

    "IMAGINE a world where wars are fought over the internet; where TV broadcasts and newspaper reports are designed by the military to confuse the population; and where a foreign armed power can shut down your computer, phone, radio or TV at will."

    Imagine? We don't have to imagine, we are already living it!

    The irony is, it's not the military that's waging a ware of dis-information, it's our own government waging a war of dis-information on us! Examples: Terror Alerts, WMDs, Climate Change, Evolution...Contradictory statements are being released by government officials. The government rebrands military operations: The War on Terror, The Global War on Terror, The Long War, or The Global War on Extremism...

    This is indeed an interesting time in which we live.

  9. Re:The lines blur once more. by isotope23 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is why conservatives don't trust American liberals (leftists).

    And its sad that both words have been hijacked. Today's liberal is in reality a socialist,
    while today's conservative would be either authoritarian or national socialist.

    Classical Liberalism
    Classical Conservatism

    It is truly a shame that the country has wandered so far from its roots....

    --
    Service guarantees Citizenship! Questions Guarantee GITMO.... Amerika Uber Alles!