Slashdot Mirror


Giant Cloud of Methanol Found in Space

kakos writes "Astronomers have recently discovered a giant cloud of methanol in our region of the Milky Way Galaxy. The cloud measures 463 billion kilometres across. Study of this cloud could lead scientists to a greater understanding of how star formation occurs. Furthermore, the abundance of organic molecules in interstellar space could also shed light on the chemical origins of life."

27 of 104 comments (clear)

  1. Post Petroleum economy solved! by jvalenzu · · Score: 5, Funny

    Finally, a solution for our post-peak oil problems! Now, all we need to do is make a solar powered spaceship and pack a really long siphoning hose...

    1. Re:Post Petroleum economy solved! by Edward+Teach · · Score: 3, Funny

      Back in Texas, we called that an Oklahoma Credit Card...

      --

      Setting his threshold to 5, Sparky eliminated most of the trolls on /.

    2. Re:Post Petroleum economy solved! by walt-sjc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Also note that you could smoke a bushel of industrial hemp and not get high. You don't need BC superweed to make methonol or use the fiber in other products. The US and other countries could just allow certain seed stock that has a very low THC content to be grown. May even be able to be genetically engineered out.

    3. Re:Post Petroleum economy solved! by drsmithy · · Score: 2, Informative
      Despite the fact that legal drugs were less dangerous" should read "despite the fact that legal drugs are arguably more dangerous.

      There's no "arguably" about it. Both alcohol and tobacco are demonstrably more dangerous than marijuana.

    4. Re:Post Petroleum economy solved! by foandd · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Yeah, that's a cool conspiracy theory and all...

      Of course, those who are paying attention will know that there was a big push in the early 20th century to outlaw many drugs which were legal but which were causing major social problems (complicated by the fact that technically speaking, Congress doesn't have the authority to regulate such things. Which is why Timothy Leary actually succeeded in making marijuana legal in the late 60s; but I digress).

      The guy who was in charge of such things, the nation's first drug czar, didn't want to bother with marijuana because he was after drugs which actually caused serious problems, and the ganja just didn't happen to be one of them. However, we were in a depression, and California and Arizona (Texas and New Mexico also threw in) were looking for a way to get rid of their plentiful and cheap Mexican labor. It turns out that marijuana was heavily used in the Mexican laborer population, and the only other identifiable group which used it was black musicians in New Orleans, and really, who the hell cared what they thought? So marijuana became a regulated substance basically in order to get rid of cheap foreign labor so unemployed Americans could be exploited within an inch of their lives instead.

      Which really seems to me to be at least as good as your conspiracy theory, with the added benefit of actually being true.

  2. Scientists described the cloud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    as "great tasting", with "less tar".

    1. Re:Scientists described the cloud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hmm... close, but no cigar.

  3. Fire Up the Engines! by Quaoar · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh wait, you said Methanol...well, we can still get totally wasted off of that, broseph!

    /Frat Aliens

    --
    I'll form my OWN solar system! With blackjack! And hookers!
  4. The state of general knowledge. by Yeshua · · Score: 5, Funny

    You know things are starting to slip when it has to be explicitly pointed out in an article about an astronomic discovery that you can't drink the thing.

    Other than jokingly, I wonder how many people thought "Cool, space booze!"?

  5. Methanol, eh? by CRCulver · · Score: 4, Funny

    Remember kids, looking at it in a telescope is fine, but drink it and you'll go blind. Instead of imbibing galactic moonshine, buy your alcohol only from a legitimate manufacturer.

  6. Old news... by deadgoon42 · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is old news.

    --

    Smeghead every day of the week.
  7. Dreams by mqduck · · Score: 3, Funny

    This reminds me of the pool of ethanol I swim in in my dreams.

    --
    Property is theft.
  8. Alert the neocons ! by javaDragon · · Score: 4, Funny

    Time for a regime change in space, let's liberate aliens and bring them democracy.

    --
    -- javaDragon is an instance of JavaDragon.
  9. Oh. Methanol, not methane. by ccmay · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Interesting. Methanol is a precursor for some amino acid syntheses.

    -ccm

    --
    Too much Law; not enough Order.
    1. Re:Oh. Methanol, not methane. by AWeishaupt · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This is definately the most interesting part of this discovery. We know that simple organic molecules like MeOH were most likely critical steps in the biochemical origins of life on Earth, and it has been generally accepted in the past that these kinds of molecules couldn't remain stable in space, primarily due to radiolysis, whilst now it seems they can.

  10. Reminds me of Captain Janeway by saramakos · · Score: 3, Funny

    "There's Coffee in that Nebula"

  11. Martinis anyone? by ncrypted · · Score: 5, Funny

    you know, If we could muster enough methane, the right catalyst, and a gallon of vermouth we could have a martini almost half a light-year across.......

    And who says there's no God...

    --
    == That terrible green-green grass, and violent blooms of flower dresses, and afternoons that make me sleepy.==
    1. Re:Martinis anyone? by clickety6 · · Score: 3, Funny

      But where do you find the 2 petatonne olive? And the mega-mini-umbrella ?

      --
      ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
  12. Help me? by 4D6963 · · Score: 2, Funny
    Ummm let's see... let's say that a liter of methonal costs about 30 USD cents, that's $3 * 10^11 a cubic kilometer. Provided that the cloud is about round, it must have a volume of about 4 * 10^35 cubic kilometers. Ummm.. I only need to know the density of this cloud in order to calculate how much it's worth in order to attract investors in order to send a tube there and suck all of it off.

    Maybe the desnity is indicated somewhere in the article... should I read the article? This is Slashdot, no way!

    --
    You just got troll'd!
  13. Re:Origins of life my foot by AhNewBis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Considering Helium is the byproduct of a nuclear Hydrogen reaction in stars, I'd say its VERY important regarding possible origins or histories of life long past.

  14. Anyone ever notice... by Fry-kun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...that on every article about space exploration, there's always a sentence attached, which reads something like "[this discovery] could lead scientists to a greater understanding of X" (where X is usually Life, Universe, or Everything)
    It's kind of starting to get on my nerves.. oh well..

    --
    Did you know that "FTW" ("for the win") is a direct translation of "Sieg Heil"?
    1. Re:Anyone ever notice... by gstoddart · · Score: 2, Insightful
      ...that on every article about space exploration, there's always a sentence attached, which reads something like "[this discovery] could lead scientists to a greater understanding of X" (where X is usually Life, Universe, or Everything)
      It's kind of starting to get on my nerves.. oh well..

      Has it occured to you that Astronomy is trying to answer the Really Big Questions (tm)? These are fundamental questions about the nature of the Universe, not just nose-picking. Also, the discovery of vast amounts of such material can change our assumptions about how prevalant the building blocks of life in the Universe just may be. We've always assumed you'd only get such things in such incredibly rare situations as to be virtually impossible.

      If, instead of being astonishingly rare, the basic gooey bits of life are remarkably prevalant in the Universe, the presumptions about life need to change.

      If the Universe is absolutely swimming in organic compounds, then the likelihood of life existing/having existed/likely to exist elsewhere goes way up. If you can get a couple of billion kilometres of alcohol just floating around in space, I'm sure you can get all sorts of other wacky stuff happening.

      Why the hell has Slashdot gotten so friggin anti-science of late? ... THAT is starting to get on my nerves.
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  15. Re:Origins of life my foot by FirienFirien · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Considering how tough it is to find organic molecules at all - whether organic by courtesy or not - finding a vast cloud of methanol is extraordinary. While finding methanol on earth would at best be vaguely interesting, since in the lifetime of the earth we've managed to significantly bypass the stage of small molecules, remember that if you've got 463 billion km of methanol there's a fair chance that something did it. Whether it's vapour trails from a cosmic express or some strange unforeseen product from the explosion of a star with just the right mass balance to get this kind of ratio of atoms to form the products, it's hugely interesting to find it up there.

    The chances of two random atoms interacting is middling to fair. Biatoms will readily form molecules, especially since the simplest atom is hydrogen which will happily pair up with another of itself. The chances of two different molecules interacting closely enough to react is very low. On earth we need dense solutions with a heat source to get a reaction to happen. The chances of interaction to produce a cloud of particles is very low, though with the amount of stuff out there you can understand how it happens. The chance of getting reaction of enough molecules in one way to produce enough of one kind of product to show up on a spectrometer is fantastically small. Note that the article doesn't say "methane and methanol", which would be more expected from reaction with carbon in a hydrogen-rich environment; and if you mix oxygen and methane together in an attempt to get methanol, you'll get the lower-energy products of carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide and water.

    --
    Browsing with +2 to insightful posts and a higher threshold makes the average post seen seem a lot more ingenious
  16. What they don't say.... by phlegmofdiscontent · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...is that the cloud isn't made of just methanol. It just has enough methanol to be detectable from its radio emissions. Most of this cloud (which has been known for a long time) is made up of hydrogen and helium, just like most of the universe.

  17. Methanol? by miscz · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wake me up when they find some ethanol. :\

  18. somebody really dropped a big one ... by SimonInOz · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wow, that's the hugest fart in the entire .. sorry, I thought you said methANE.

    Sorry. Forget I said that. Sorry

    --
    "Cats like plain crisps"
  19. Re:Origins of life my foot by Quadraginta · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Can't say that I agree. In the first place, about forty of the 130 or so known interstellar molecules are as big or bigger than methanol. In the second place, methanol is readily formed in a reducing environment, such as you'd find in hydrogen-rich interstellar space. Third, while it is true that the formation reaction rate would be low, because as you point out the interstellar gas density is low, it is equally true that it's got billions of years to react. Remember how easily Stanley Miller got amino acids to form in a primordial soup with a little electrical discharge? Frankly, I'd be shocked if simple organics didn't form in a reducing, cryogenic environment with plenty of high-energy photons swimming about.

    On earth we need dense solutions with a heat source to get a reaction to happen.

    Not always, no. Plenty of reactions will go without heat, and in dilute solution.

    if you mix oxygen and methane together in an attempt to get methanol, you'll get the lower-energy products of carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide and water.

    To be sure. But that is a highly oxidizing environment, and hydrogen-rich interstellar space is a highly reducing environment. Surely most oxygen in a hydrogen-rich molecular cloud is going to be present as H2O, not O2, and then

    CH3 + H2O -> CH3OH + 1/2 H2

    would happens readily enough in a highly energetic environment. Interstellar space is an unusual chemical environment from the point of view of Earthlings, used as we are to living at the bottom of a pool of potent oxidizer. It's highly nonthermal and highly reducing. Our Earth-based chemistry instincts may not necessarily be a good guide.