Slashdot Mirror


Study Explains Evolution's Molecular Advance

pnewhook writes "The New York Times is reporting that 'by reconstructing ancient genes from long-extinct animals, scientists have for the first time demonstrated the step-by-step progression of how evolution created a new piece of molecular machinery by reusing and modifying existing parts. The researchers say the findings, published today in the journal Science, offer a counterargument to doubters of evolution who question how a progression of small changes could produce the intricate mechanisms found in living cells.'"

9 of 477 comments (clear)

  1. Re:The truth shall set you free. by CantGetAUserName · · Score: 3, Funny


    "Oh dear," says God, "I hadn't thought of that," and promptly vanishes in a puff of logic.

    (Douglas Adams)

    --
    Semper en excreta sumus solum profundum
  2. Re:God created everything... by mctk · · Score: 2, Funny
    God created science! God created discussion! God created computers! God created Slashdot! God created the "Reply to This" link! God made you type that! God made me type this!

    God rests his case.

    --
    Paul Grosfield - the quicker picker upper.
  3. Re:Waiting... for God? by From+A+Far+Away+Land · · Score: 4, Funny

    If the Great Creator Spaghetti Monster wanted you to read the article, he'd have provided you with a free registration.

  4. Re:no by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 3, Funny

    No silly.

    Don't you realise when god put all the animals onto the Earth, some obviously missed and were embedded into the rocks.

    Its like when ensign redshirt gets beamed inside a mountain.

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
  5. Re:God created everything... by smittyoneeach · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wasn't sympathy from Sir Mick Jagger enough?

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  6. Re:no by hitmark · · Score: 2, Funny

    so your saying god makes misstakes? heretic!

    --
    comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
  7. Re:Matter of time by shawb · · Score: 2, Funny

    I never said this DISPROVES a personal god, but it does show that the personal god as described in... well... most western monotheistic religions is not actually necessary for us to have gotten from a single cell floating around in a broth to the walking, thinking, complex organism that we are today. This makes the existance of that god less likely, as there is an alternative path of events that could have happened, as defined by natural laws, for us to get where we are today.

    If I go somewhere to eat and there are only hamburgers on the menu, I will order a hamburger (assuming that I order something, but us existing would be the correlary to ordering SOMETHING off the menu.) If there are hamburgers and chicken salad on the menu, it is less likely that I will order the hamburger as I could order the chicken salad instead. Wow... did I just compare god to a hamburger?????

    --
    I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
  8. Re:Waiting... by From+A+Far+Away+Land · · Score: 2, Funny

    "definately"

    I take that as no insult from someone who can't spell "definitely".

    Just because he has Dr. in front of his name doesn't mean he knows what he's talking about or isn't trying to mislead you.

  9. Re:no by fimbulvetr · · Score: 2, Funny

    s/re$/re\//