Slashdot Mirror


Guess Who's Coming to Dinner?

theodp writes to mention a C|Net article about Chinese President Hu Jintao's historic first visit to the U.S.. The catch is that his first dinner won't be at the White House. It will be at Bill Gates' manse. From the article: "The approximately 100-person guest list is a who's who of the U.S. Pacific Northwest power elite, including Starbucks Chairman Howard Schultz and Washington state Gov. Christine Gregoire, said event organizers. The guests will undergo strict security checks before entering Gates' lodge-style, 66,000-square-foot home overlooking Lake Washington with a reported seven bedrooms, six kitchens, 24 bathrooms, a domed library, a reception hall and an artificial estuary stocked with salmon and trout. Gates and Gregoire are expected to introduce and welcome Hu, who will then offer a toast in front of the gathering."

30 of 370 comments (clear)

  1. Oh boy, here we go.... by BWJones · · Score: 4, Funny

    Rather than reference the classic movie starring Sydney Poitier, Spencer Tracy and Katharine Hepburn, I imagine this would be a more appropriate dialogue.

    Rove: "Sir, Hu is going to be attending a dinner at one of your biggest campaign contributors houses, Mr. Bill Gates."

    Bush: "Who?"

    Rove: "Yessir, Hu."

    Bush: "No, I'm asking you..... Who's coming to the US to have dinner with Geeky Gates?"

    Rove: "That's right sir, Hu."

    Bush: "...............Daggummit Turd Blossom! I'm asking you who is coming to the US to have dinner with Geeky Gates?"

    Ad nauseum

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Oh boy, here we go.... by sunwolf · · Score: 5, Funny

      Uh...properly spaced, that would be:

      Bush: What about when?
      Rove: Wen?
      Bush: Yes, when.
      Rove: I don't know if the Premier is coming.
      Bush: Who asked about the Premier, damnit!
      Rove: Oh, did he? I assume he would know.
      Bush: Who?
      Rove: Yes, Hu would know Wen.
      Bush: Rove...
      Rove: Yes?
      Bush: Don't make me feed you a pretzel.

  2. Who does number 2 work for by fxer · · Score: 5, Funny

    with a reported seven bedrooms, six kitchens, 24 bathrooms, a domed library, a reception hall and an artificial estuary stocked with salmon and trout.

    I bet the 1:3.4 ratio of sleeping to dumping at Gates' place has to be the highest in the nation.

    1. Re:Who does number 2 work for by appleLaserWriter · · Score: 3, Funny

      I bet the 1:3.4 ratio of sleeping to dumping at Gates' place has to be the highest in the nation.

      Didn't you know Bill likes to host bathroom-orgies?

    2. Re:Who does number 2 work for by sumdumass · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe he just expects everyone to be full of shit when they come a'courtn him.

  3. Pirated Windows easy to spot... by Faust7 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Chinese government issued a decree two weeks ago that all PCs will need to have a licensed operating system software installed before leaving the factory gates in an effort to crack down on piracy.

    Spotting the pirated copies of Windows will be easy.

    Instead of "Start," the button will say "Very Much Go."

  4. Takes One to Know One by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 5, Funny

    What happens when that security check reveals that one of the people walking through the door is a tyrant with billions subjects, harboring the biggest piracy, spammer and phishing rings it the world, with nuclear weapons?

    And that another is the slightly less powerful guest of that tyrant, the president of China?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  5. Now that your country has purchased XP by tlynch001 · · Score: 5, Funny
    Gates: Now that you've purchased a zillion licenses for XP, I want to talk about Vista.

    Hu: Yes, the view of Lake Washington is magnificent.

    Gates: Hee hee, that's not what I'm talking about...

  6. Animal Farm by twitter · · Score: 5, Insightful
    It's hard to tell who should be more ashamed of this meeting, but a brief quote from Animal Farm is appropriate:

    "Gentlemen," concluded Napoleon, "I will give you the same toast as before, but in a different form. Fill your glasses to the brim. Gentlemen, here is my toast: To the prosperity of The Manor Farm! "

    There was the same hearty cheering as before, and the mugs were emptied to the dregs. But as the animals outside gazed at the scene, it seemed to them that some strange thing was happening. What was it that had altered in the faces of the pigs? Clover's old dim eyes flitted from one face to another. Some of them had five chins, some had four, some had three. But what was it that seemed to be melting and changing? Then, the applause having come to an end, the company took up their cards and continued the game that had been interrupted, and the animals crept silently away.

    But they had not gone twenty yards when they stopped short. An uproar of voices was coming from the farmhouse. They rushed back and looked through the window again. Yes, a violent quarrel was in progress. There were shoutings, bangings on the table, sharp suspicious glances, furious denials. The source of the trouble appeared to be that Napoleon and Mr. Pilkington had each played an ace of spades simultaneously.

    Twelve voices were shouting in anger, and they were all alike. No question, now, what had happened to the faces of the pigs. The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which.

    Forty years ago, Nixon invented the policy of engagement to balance the dangerous Soviet Union against an equal dangerous but hungry Communist China.

    Ten years ago, with the Soviet menace defeated, Bill Clinton invented the complete sell out. Slave made goods have flowed into out country, jobs and money have flowed out. Parallel to this was born the myth of the "information economy" where the US would own ideas and the rest of the world would do our bidding because of it. Of course, for this ownership to be complete, it must apply to our own citizens. To enslave others, we must first prove our dedication to ruling by enslaving ourselves.

    You can draw a straight line to today, with the DMCA, Patriot act and rampant domestic spying from a tremendously expanded federal government. As the rich and powerful gateher in Redmond, ask yourself where the rhetoric of freedom has gone and why your boss is dining with a Communist. What in the hell are we doing?

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  7. Re:Wait a minute. by MBraynard · · Score: 3, Informative
    I was preparing to make a similar concept. I'm surprised no one here listed what really happened with China - the Chicom government has REQUIRED that every machine that goes out of a factory door in China have a LISCENSED OPERATING SYSTEM installed. Three of the major makers, including Lenova - new owners of the thinkpad line - are taking the lead in compliance.

    The pigs are walking upright.

  8. Re:Only 7 bedrooms? by RoadWarriorX · · Score: 5, Funny
    And 24 bathrooms? Why? Possibly it could be useful for situations such as this, but it seems a bit odd.


    You obviously never lived with 5 sisters. They need all the bathrooms they can put there hands on.
  9. What the hell is this? by rob_squared · · Score: 3, Funny

    A James Bond movie?

    Just...strikes me as odd is all.

    --
    I don't get it.
  10. China isn't reall communist by 7of7 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you'll look, after the mess in Tiananmen in 1989 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiananmen_Square_prot ests_of_1989 the Chinese government basically said something to the effect of "ok, you know we'll kill you if you embarass us again like that" and that they were going to turn the country capitalist in the sense that foreign companies could do whatever they want and they decided to invest heavily in technology and modernization. Their bread and circuses decision has lead China to be one of the fastest growing economies in the world if not the fastest. There were sweeping reforms economically that took place while the political landscape remained as barren as before. True communists they are not in any sense.

    --
    *The most erroneous stories are those we think we know best - and therefore never scrutinize or question.*
  11. geek pres by NoInfo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Did you know Hu Jintao got his degree in hydraulic engineering? Why can't we have an engineer presient?

    1. Re:geek pres by Kuukai · · Score: 4, Funny

      Did you know Hu Jintao got his degree in hydraulic engineering? Why can't we have an engineer presient?

      Because we elect ours. Sad but true.

      --
      Sendou Wave Kick!!
    2. Re:geek pres by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Informative

      And yet, it was with Nixon where the lines first started, as well as the outrageous inflation. It was JC who solved it by deregulating oil as well as bringing volker to manage the bank (nixon's idea was WIN and Reagan basically kept JC's system in place).

      JC tried to get America back on course of doing our own energy, rather than being dependant on outside energy. Sadly, we had 17% importing back then. Now we are up to 66% imports. Now, we have ex-NSA/CIA directors who are concerned with the amount of oil imports that we do.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    3. Re:geek pres by metlin · · Score: 4, Interesting



      >Did you know Hu Jintao got his degree in hydraulic engineering? Why can't we
      >have an engineer presient?

      Because we elect ours. Sad but true.



      Umm, India is the world's largest democracy and has a rocket scientist and engineer for a President and an economist/professor of economics for a Prime Minister.

      Your point?

  12. Mutated Trout from The Evil Empire. by twitter · · Score: 3, Funny
    artificial estuary stocked with salmon and trout.

    I'll bet those trout are ill tempered and have lasers on their heads. Hey, the work for Microsoft so they have to be in a bad mood. Everyday is a bad day, then they serve you for dinner when they "fucking kill" you as they've done before and will do again.

    It's nice to see the head of Evil Industry's Starbuck's division getting some publicity and credit. Number two's idea there was quite profitable.

    Gates, stroking a bald cat: "Do you like my quasi futuristic clothing, Chairman Hu? I designed them myself."

    Chairman Hu: "Ah yes, they are much like Chairman Mao's favorites, but he liked drab blue."

    Master Gates: "A toast then, to $400,000,000 and the drab."

    -clink-clink-

    Chairman Hu: "I have a thing for Red."

    Flunky S. Baller: "Tell me you are not talking about Red Flag Linux!" Perspiration half moons show under his arms.

    Chairman Hu: "I am."

    Baller, raising chair "I'm going to fucking kill Linus. I've done it before and -"

    Master Gates slaps Baller on the back of the head: "Down boy!" Turns and smiles. "He's a little fired up tonight."

    Baller: "I love this company! I work in the swamp. Though I do not fall in the trenches of coding, I am yet a soldier! Developers, Developers, Developers!"

    Master Gates laughs and pats Baller on the head. Yes, this is my favorite number two.

    Everyone laughs.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  13. A friendlier "Communism" by Dis*abstraction · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Nowadays the government calls it "socialism with Chinese characteristics," not because they think they're fooling anyone, but as a pretense to legitimacy. Socialism is being redefined as something roughly along the lines of Nordic-style welfare capitalism. It's not even clear that the burgeoning urban bourgeoisie would care if the Party apparatus were to repudiate socialism once and for all.

    Certainly we should petition for greater freedoms in mainland China and in particular for the rights of imprisoned journalists, political opponents, and religious leaders. Still, considering how terribly China's citizens suffered under previous incarnations (Mao) of the present post-Tiananmen regime, I'm optimistic for the future. I believe the Party will continue on its path of liberalization as a younger, more cosmopolitan generation of Oxford- and Columbia-educated Chinese accedes to power. Who needs revolution, after all, when you can build democracy from within?

  14. Hu Cares? by AnalystX · · Score: 4, Funny

    Really.

  15. Microsoft Security, Plays for Sure. by twitter · · Score: 4, Funny
    What happens when that security check [identifies Bill Gates]

    If it works like most Windoze "security" a little report is generated, a few files are wiped out, stability suffers and they all contract bird flu anyway.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  16. Ladies and Gentlemen... by Puff+of+Logic · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...I give you the future. It used to be that heads of state met openly, whilst businessmen made deals behind the scenes. Today, we see a head of state openly meeting with arguably the most powerful businessman in the United States. In a few years, the business men will simple meet, having done away with the facade of "heads of state." We live in interesting times.

    --
    P.P.S. I'm doing Science and I'm still alive.
  17. Big business is evil by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It is time for a good political rant. Big business is too powerful and interfering in international relations to a frightening extent.

    Most innovation and growth comes from small and medium companies. Large companies exaggerate the power of economies of scale because being nimble is more important in a fast changing world. Big biz survives by bullying smaller companies, not by doing the job better or being more efficient. Anybody who has worked for a big company knows that they are inharently disfunctional.

    American car companies didn't grow bloated and slow because of lack of foreign competition, but because of a lack of domestic competition, ei. smaller but more car companies. Japan's auto makers grew competitive because Japan had about 12 car companies before going overseas.

    Big businesses should be split, or at least mergers above a certain size should curtailed. Most mergers result in a net loss of profits. The only reason they still happen is because of a select few who make big bucks off such deals and the ego power of being big.

  18. Clever by Nemus · · Score: 4, Interesting
    This is probably intended more as a snub towards Bush, as opposed to a show of favor towards Gates. While it is typical for business leaders to meet with heads of state (Gates has done it several times, I believe) they typically do it on the head of state's home soil, as a sign of showing favor towards the nation. On the other hand, by making his first official visit to the U.S. one to the home of a person who is still technically a private citizen, Hu is essentially slapping Bush across the face. Otherwise, theres no real reason for Hu to come to the US, as opposed to Bush visiting China.

    Honestly, I'm really not sure how many times since Western style diplomacy became the Gold standard internationally that something like this has happened. For a foreign head of state to visit a country and not visit at least someone in the government first is highly, highly irregular. This isn't so much a tech story, I think, as a political one.

    --
    Mod Points: Helping you keep your opinion to yourself.
    1. Re:Clever by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It almost seems as if the world doesn't have time to keep up the charade. You can meet with US politicians and talk till your face turns blue, but the reality is action and policy is directed by business leaders, and with rare exception our politicans, from the President on down, are going to accomidate those who fund their campaigns.

      Perhaps China realizes this. Why meet with Bush when you know trade policy is going to be in the hands of the American tycoons? Heck, we probably wouldn't go to war unless it somehow served the interests of America's business power elite.

      I'm not saying this is exactly how it is with America's politics, but it sure as heck seems that way. And if it's true, China is snubbing Bush because they simply want to talk to who's really in charge.

      --
      The Internet is generally stupid
    2. Re:Clever by tgd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well look at the two choices. Gates is an intellectual, one of the biggest philanthropists in history, and is spending billions of dollars helping to improve education around the world (especially in the US with his new project) and helping to cure real killer diseases like Malaria.

      Bush is the crowning achievement of the anti-intellectualism movement in America, couldn't imagine doing something good for another human being, but rather would lie and thieve his way to his own and his frieds' personal benefit at the expense of everyone else.

      Fault Gates as you will for his business practices (although they're tame compared to Balmer and nearly every other CEO or ex CEO in business), but I know which of the two I'd rather spend time with.

  19. The Indian prez and prime minister by alphakappa · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Indian prez (Dr. Abdul Kalam) is a rocket scientist while the prime minister (Dr Manmohan Singh) is a PhD in economics from Oxford.

    --
    "When the only tool you own is a hammer, every problem begins to resemble a nail." - Abraham Maslow (1908-1970)
  20. Re:More pressure to move to Red Flag Linux? by fred911 · · Score: 4, Funny

    "The two companies also agreed to work together to promote the use of genuine versions of Windows"

    All three copies!

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  21. Google Search by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 3, Funny

    Google Search for: Hu visit to US

    result:

    Your search - Hu visit to US - did not match any documents.
    IP Logged.

    --
    Huh?
  22. Re:Who is better? President Bush or Gates? by be-fan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Gates, Harvard undergraduate dropout. GDub, Yale BA, Harvard MBA. Who is the intellectual?

    MBA's aren't intellectuals. The intelligence required to get an MBA, even somewhere like Harvard, is a fraction of the intelligence required to get into Harvard as a technical major. Given that Gates has shown both far more intellectual capacity than Bush, technically, as well as having been orders of magnitude more successful as a businessman, I find your point to be positively silly.

    If you call opposing the creation of a race of subhumans bread only for their stem cells to be anti-intellectual then I hope we have more of it. You are intellectually dishonest.

    Who exactly is proposing creating a race of subhumans breed for their stem cells? Do you have a good grasp on how the technology works? The stem cells come from disposed fetuses (which are about as human as a piece of steak), and it is the cells that are cultured, not the fetuses.

    --
    A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...