Heh, CS:S server admins will just script around it for their servers using something like EventScripts.
Whenever people aren't fond of Valve decisions they write a script for their use-- hundreds of these for CS:S here.
We are investigating alternatives to the Citrix system we currently operate.
You said this, but didn't state why you're searching for alternatives. Is it because it's too expensive, because you need more features, or because you think there's a better alternative out there?
I think about the only argument you can really have is that it's expensive. There really are no other alternatives out there with more features (other than perhaps value-add things on top of Citrix Presentation Server, the new name for MetaFrame) or more stability/usefulness.
Some shops are able to make-do with the lower costing alternatives, but they have to live with far fewer features (e.g. only allow full desktops, don't do printing very well, have no way to load balance, have no way to isolate bad apps from one another, etc). If your needs for it are lighter then you can try piloting a Terminal Services-only solution which is (necessarily) less expensive than a Citrix one.
It's hard, though, for people to offer something better than Citrix. They've spent their entire lifetime focusing on the whole remoting applications gig. TS and RDP was built on top of code licensed from Citrix, so even MS takes a backseat.
But to save you some trouble, here's the excerpts about Mozilla:
Mozilla browsers have the most vulnerabilities
During the first half of 2005, 25 vendor confirmed vulnerabilities were disclosed for the Mozilla browsers, the most of any browser. 18 of these were classified as high severity. During the same period, 13 vendor confirmed vulnerabilities were disclosed for Microsoft Internet Explorer, eight of which were high severity.
Mozilla browsers have the most vulnerabilities
The Web browser is a critical and ubiquitous application that has become a frequent target for vulnerability researchers. In the past, the focus of security has been on the perimeter: servers, firewalls, and other systems with external exposure. However, a notable shift has occurred, with client-side systems--primarily end-user systems--becoming increasingly prominent targets of malicious activity. More and more, Web browser vulnerabilities are becoming a preferred entry point into systems. During the first half of 2005, the Mozilla browsers, including Firefox, had the most vulnerabilities of all browsers. During this period, 25 vendor confirmed Mozilla vulnerabilities were disclosed, compared to 32 in the previous reporting period and two in the first half of 2004. 18 of the 25 Mozilla vulnerabilities in this period, or 72%, were classified as high severity. This is up from the 14 high-severity Mozilla vulnerabilities in the second half of 2004 and one in the first half of 2004.
During the first six months of 2005, 13 vendor confirmed Microsoft Internet Explorer vulnerabilities were disclosed. This is a decrease from the 31 documented in the second half of 2004.26 During the first half of 2004, seven Internet Explorer vulnerabilities were confirmed by Microsoft. The average severity rating of the vulnerabilities associated with Internet Explorer during the first six months of 2005 was high. Eight of the 13 Internet Explorer vulnerabilities disclosed during the current period, or 62%, were considered high severity. 18 Internet Explorer vulnerabilities were considered high-severity in the last six months of 2004, amounting to 58%. In the first half of 2004, four of the seven, or 57%, were rated high severity.
[...]
The fact that Mozilla browsers had the most vendor confirmed vulnerabilities over the past two six-month periods may suggest that Mozilla is currently acknowledging and fixing vulnerabilities more quickly than other vendors. This could be because the Mozilla browsers are open source and may be more responsive to reports of new vulnerabilities and subsequently developing and delivering associated patches. For instance, except in certain instances,60 Microsoft releases fixes on a relatively fixed schedule rather than as needed, potentially increasing their acknowledgement time.
I used it once and it did a pretty decent job at preserving the tables. Yet if they're using anything odd like graphics or it's been incredibly tweaked, it probably won't be 100% perfect.
After enough Counterstrike, I come out of it looking at hallways and thinking how I might bounce a grenade off the wall to get around corners.
Since I never actually have grenades, this isn't so bad.
Half-life 2 was worse. It makes you lazy. I'd come out of the game feeling like I didn't have to walk over towards anything I wanted to pick up. I could simply pull it towards me with my, ummm, non-existent gravity gun.
It's amazing how persistent that feeling is-- it makes one yearn for telekinesis.
Slashdot Mirror
Well, they haven't needed to update CS:S. The community is rabid. There's nearly 1000 different modifications for it:
http://addons.eventscripts.com/
CS:S will also be moving to Orange Box source engine, so it should see a little love then.
Element 137 should be the max element: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Untriseptium
Heh, CS:S server admins will just script around it for their servers using something like EventScripts. Whenever people aren't fond of Valve decisions they write a script for their use-- hundreds of these for CS:S here.
Heh, server admins will just script around it for their servers using something like EventScripts.
For those not fond of other Valve decisions, there are hundreds of server-side scripts/mods to change the gameplay of CS:S. (Here)
Someone needs to add this to the eel catfish article on Wikipedia. It's a little lacking.
Did you know Hu Jintao got his degree in hydraulic engineering? Why can't we have an engineer presient?
We are investigating alternatives to the Citrix system we currently operate.
You said this, but didn't state why you're searching for alternatives. Is it because it's too expensive, because you need more features, or because you think there's a better alternative out there?
I think about the only argument you can really have is that it's expensive. There really are no other alternatives out there with more features (other than perhaps value-add things on top of Citrix Presentation Server, the new name for MetaFrame) or more stability/usefulness.
Some shops are able to make-do with the lower costing alternatives, but they have to live with far fewer features (e.g. only allow full desktops, don't do printing very well, have no way to load balance, have no way to isolate bad apps from one another, etc). If your needs for it are lighter then you can try piloting a Terminal Services-only solution which is (necessarily) less expensive than a Citrix one.
It's hard, though, for people to offer something better than Citrix. They've spent their entire lifetime focusing on the whole remoting applications gig. TS and RDP was built on top of code licensed from Citrix, so even MS takes a backseat.
We'd love to hear about your online engagement stories, too.
_ story
Post them here at the AppleBride wedding encyclopedia (like wikipedia):
http://www.applebride.com/pages/Online_engagement
... Ender.
It looks nice.
Still, by far the nicest looking web-mail interface I've seen is:
http://www.goowy.com/
The actual URL to Microsoft's MSN AdCenter:
adcenter.msn.com
I think it's been a few weeks now on my DirecTV.
They make a big point in the article about hiring. Here's the link to their open positions:
http://www.epicgames.com/epic_jobs.html
PEP is less than 400 lines of PHP. Here's the source code for the curious:
http://prodigem.com/code/pep/pep.txt
(from the PEP home page)
This virus has been in the wild since at least early 2002.
c /data/linux.rst.b.html
Here's Symantec's take on the virus:
http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/ven
https://ses.symantec.com/Content/displaypdf.cfm?S
But to save you some trouble, here's the excerpts about Mozilla:
His first Mini-Microsoft article:r -mini-microsoft.html
http://minimsft.blogspot.com/2004/07/blast-off-fo
I wonder if he was at PDC?
Here's a tool I saw linked off of O'Reilly Radar once:
http://textism.com/wordcleaner/
I used it once and it did a pretty decent job at preserving the tables. Yet if they're using anything odd like graphics or it's been incredibly tweaked, it probably won't be 100% perfect.
What about P2P based on IRC?
I'm not sure why the #1 is at first place, the best one is:
This is the best one:
http://ipjusticeleague.com/
Why not just use a CD? I use ERD Commander.
the risk of the thing getting lost and delayed for the wrong reasons
As opposed to getting lost for the right reasons?
Or Gemini
After enough Counterstrike, I come out of it looking at hallways and thinking how I might bounce a grenade off the wall to get around corners.
Since I never actually have grenades, this isn't so bad.
Half-life 2 was worse. It makes you lazy. I'd come out of the game feeling like I didn't have to walk over towards anything I wanted to pick up. I could simply pull it towards me with my, ummm, non-existent gravity gun.
It's amazing how persistent that feeling is-- it makes one yearn for telekinesis.