Slashdot Mirror


Sun's Global Desktop Released

aphaenogaster writes "Suns Global Desktop version 4.2 has been released and appears to be quite effective. Applications load very quickly, and is not limited to Sparc or Solaris. Applications piped to a desktop across a slow DSL line appear to work very well. Sun has also set up a test server for users to play with."

24 of 96 comments (clear)

  1. Who copied who? by bogaboga · · Score: 2, Informative

    To put it better, who innovated first? Was is SUN or NoMachine? You can test Linux out via a slow DSL line at http://www.nomachine.com/. A faster one would be better though.

    1. Re:Who copied who? by NitsujTPU · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Neither, both look like modern realizations of a number of technologies that exist and/or have existed for a while. If nobody's suing, what difference does it make?

  2. SUN has done it again by Cyberax · · Score: 5, Funny

    Remember the last time when SUN made a public-available demo of their grid-computing thingy.

    I wonder how much time it... Oh wait, their server is already down.

    1. Re:SUN has done it again by Craptastic+Weasel · · Score: 5, Funny

      Article fixed for link...
      Sun has also set up a test server for users to play with."

    2. Re:SUN has done it again by Eil · · Score: 4, Funny

      I wonder how much time it... Oh wait, their server is already down.

      The next server is almost ready. Subscribers can slashdot it early!

  3. I'm a mere user and... by David+Hume · · Score: 3, Interesting
    FTFA:
    Secure Global Desktop Software allows you to:

            * Access applications from nearly any location on the internet over a secure connection without specialized hardware
    Sweet!
    * Reduce costs by centralizing management of users and applications
    To tell you the truth, I really don't care, but if it helps save money, leading to me getting a raise....
    * Enable auditing of application usage
    What??? Oh oh... I don't like this. How can I use the software for my *own* work... and play... after hours, of course.
    * Dramatically reduce the time to securely deliver applications
    Well, ok.
    * Ensure users can access only applications they are authorized to use
    And this is supposed to be an advantage? I guess I better update my resume on Monster.com... from the Starbucks down the street.
    * Increase resiliency by housing application sessions at the data center and not on individual PCs
    Lord knows, I'm not a techie, but it *increases* "reliliency" by having the applications located at the data center and not my PC??? And if I can't access the Data Center? Or if the application there becomes corrupt, virus infected, etc.?

    More seriously, part of my compensation package, whether my employer realizes it or not, is access to applications and a modicum of control over my PC, applications, and user experience. Take those away, and I'm less than a happy camper.
    1. Re:I'm a mere user and... by iamdrscience · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Lord knows, I'm not a techie, but it *increases* "reliliency" by having the applications located at the data center and not my PC??? And if I can't access the Data Center? Or if the application there becomes corrupt, virus infected, etc.?
      Well, it cuts both ways, if you're running all your applications on one server, and that one machine goes down, you're fucked, but you only have to maintain one machine, not the multitudes of machines running your application. In the end, which setup makes the most sense depends on what type of application you're using.
    2. Re:I'm a mere user and... by pavera · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Lord knows, I'm not a techie, but it *increases* "reliliency" by having the applications located at the data center and not my PC??? And if I can't access the Data Center? Or if the application there becomes corrupt, virus infected, etc.?

      Ok, so you trust your desktop machine with a 40GB IDE disk drive, that you admit you install applications and such onto (probably from the internet), so you've got at least 1 virus, and probably 300-400 hits on a random run of spybot... and that power supply in your system isn't redundant, and if you have a UPS it maybe lasts for 5 minutes... but you trust that more than the 2 redundant servers in the data center, with triple redundant power supplies, a RAID5 SAN, and redundant NICs, and a 6 hour UPS sitting underneath it....

      See, with this system, you can get full redundancy for the whole enterprise by simply building a 2-3 machine cluster... Everything is redundant, and I guarantee you I can build a system that will smoke your little Dell as far as reliability is concerned, and I can do it for the cost of maybe 10 standard PCs...

      Oh yeah, and now you can access your applications from any internet connected computer, not just your Dell that sits in your cube. Also, now your computer at your cube can be replaced by a completely silent, fanless, no moving parts thin client...

      If you believe part of your compensation package is being able to make system admins life hell... well I'm glad I don't work at the same place you do. Besides the license violations your machine probably presents (I know I worked at a firm that got audited by the SBA, and you wonderful users with your "Oh, I think I'll just install this app even though the IT guys told me I couldn't" cost that company more than 750k in fines). 99% of all "computer" problems are problems with some crap software the users have installed... "But I have to have this new nifty 3d Screensaver with weather reports"... Oh it logs all my keystrokes and sends them to a server in the Ukraine, and it also attempts to automatically install this software on random PCs across the internet and that's why the network has been slow for the last week? I don't care I've gotta see this cool 3d butterfly! Or my favorite was the lady who kept installing real networks player (even though we uninstalled it almost every night from her machine) to watch real time video of birds hatching... on a 128k ISDN line that fed 100+ employees... and everyone wondered why for 2 months in the spring the internet was mysteriously slow...

      Part of your compensation package is not to use the computer systems however you feel... They are provided to do a job, not watch movies or play MP3s, and they are certainly not provided to allow you to run up expenses in the IT dept. If you want that go purchase your own PC, but leave the company systems to their proper function.

    3. Re:I'm a mere user and... by MagicMike · · Score: 2, Insightful


      I'm sorry - but something's amiss here.

      You proclaim you can make a more resilient setup with centralized, network-accessible services, but you were unable to find (and permanently fix) a one-PC bandwidth problem in two months?

      Now, I'm all for centralized services when it makes sense, but you haven't sold me in this case ;-)

      Nothing personal, that one just jumped out at me. Maybe it was the idea of watching baby birds hatching live...

    4. Re:I'm a mere user and... by fferreres · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are probably a developer/sysadmin...this is for a company operating in 7 countries with 25,000 notebooks/desktops for specific purposes, like POS, specific apps, etc.).

      Companies do not want every employee being a vulnerability due to malware, virus, etc. can cause chaos. This is not for you.

      --
      unfinished: (adj.)
    5. Re:I'm a mere user and... by HavokDevNull · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "is access to applications and a modicum of control over my PC, applications, and user experience."

      You my friend and people like you are the reason why the CTO and myself will do our best to demo this to upper management and executives. Along with cost savings analysis (bye bye Winblows licencing hell), security analysis (bye bye Winblows security hell) and help desk analysis (bye bye wanabe Winblows poweruser hell), etc..

      It's not the people who are completely new to computers that give me the hardest time, in fact I enjoy working with them and teaching them. It's the people who think they "Know" / "I'm computer literate" that give me the most headaches. For example; A user pluggin in laptop analog modem to a digital phone port thinking it will some how get access to the internal network, and yet it's IT's fault because they did not get a report sent out on time because of said lack of network connectivity, and they did not bother to tell us in the first place they had a problem to begin with! And yes this is the same person who said "I'm computer literate".

      So lets sum it up shall we? You know enough to really hose your OS and don't know enough or are too lazy to fix it yourself. People like you are the #1 reason why thin clients and a centralized server with only access to applications that you have permissions to work with to do your job only, will become a standardized setting in the future.

      --
      Sig
    6. Re:I'm a mere user and... by pavera · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ok, this was an engineering firm, and unfortunately, because of some of the software that was REQUIRED for a customer contract, this lady had to have admin rights on her machine. Yeah, that's windows for you. Further, it didn't take me 2 months to diagnose the problem, it took about 30 minutes, but it had been happening for 2 months every year for the last 5 (since they hired her).

      Also, she was about 3rd in command at the company, way above me, or even the IT manager... One word from her and we'd both be fired.. So yeah we pretty much had to do what she said.

      As far as the SBA audit, I was hired about 1 month before it happened, and was in the process of gathering all the licensing info, and doing an audit of all of the IT assets (they had about 30 computers whose leases had expired, and they hadn't returned, it was a complete mess). In short, it wasn't my fault, and my bosses recognized that, and I actually got a raise and a promotion after the SBA mess because of the job I did cleaning it all up.

  4. First question..... by Allnighterking · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I wonder if it works. Seeing as how it was down faster than somewhere around the second post could be written. So much for Robust. One Monday morning 9am e-mail check would bring your entire company to it's knees.

    Can this kind of application of an OS/System work. Heck Yes! It works and it's needed. However it will always fail as long as they keep trying to put all the eggs in one software basket so to speak. Stop with "one box that does it all. Get into the idea of, "this box does this, that box does that, and you can see it all from that box over there."

    We need to move from the application having access to the OS, to the OS having access to the application. Once OS/data/application are void of their death grip on each other some really amazing things can begin to happen.

    --

    I'm sorry, I'm to tired to be witty at the moment so this message will have to do.

  5. SGD isTarantella by poopie · · Score: 5, Informative

    For those of you who wondered... this isn't new, just a new name. I'll never understand why their marketing chose to change the name to something nobody knew. Perhaps trying to re-launch it?

    Sun has actually done a good job of fixing a lot of java bugs since they acquired Tarantella.

    For those of you who don't know about how SGD/Tarantella work, it's a session server/screen scraper combo that allow you to have access to Windows and Linux apps or entire desktops that can be served from arrays of application servers.

    It uses a protocol called AIP that adapts to the available bandwidth and can scale down well for low bandwidth links.

    The good things about SGD are:
    - Transportable workspaces
    - great for providing VERY LOW bandwidth links to console-based apps
    - enterprise authentication
    - ability to create and serve applications based on centrally managed user and application groupings
    - ability to manage many different OS sessions and mix of sessions from OSes in a single login session
    - pass-through printing to local printer
    - ability to connect local hard drive to remote systems
    - Client is trivial to install for users
    - a rich html application page can be created that can serve many of the requirements for previously locally installed apps
    - works very well for deployments that many many users to a few application set profiles that can load balance between arrays of application servers

    The bad things about SGD are:
    - it's a 3-tier architecture and if/when you overload the server or hit an OS bug and need to restart it, UNIX users lose x-sessions
    - not ideal for mapping of many users to unique resources where sessions are very long lived
    - some java 2d and 3d stuff takes up a lot of bandwidth

    It's worth checking out. Some users prefer vnc or NX, but SGD really is an enterprise solution - not just a machine a to machine b tool for a single user.

  6. Re:Interesting, but... by lowoddnumber · · Score: 5, Informative
    ...what can it do that ssh and an X11 session can't?

    Well, maybe if you did a little reading...


    Supported Protocols
    Microsoft RDP
    X11
    HTTP, HTTPS
    SSH
    Citrix Independent Computing Architecture (ICA)
    Telnet VT, American National Standards Institute (ANSI)
    TN3270E
    TN5250

    Supported Application Types
    Microsoft Windows
    Solaris, Linux, HP-UX, and AIX (character and graphical)
    IBM mainframe or AS/400
    HTML, Java

    Client Requirements
    Leading Java technology-enabled clients, including Microsoft Windows, Java Desktop System, Linux, and Mac OS X
    Sun Secure Global Desktop Native Client-enabled devices including thin clients, wireless PDAs, and pocket PCs
    Server Requirements

    Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) v3
    Microsoft Active Directory
    RSA SecurID
    Network Information Service (NIS)
    Microsoft Windows Domains
    HTTP, HTTPS including Public Key Infrastructure (PKI)-based client certificates


    And if you're being forced to use a browser to access your server, who says that you're not on a machine with keyloggers and screen capturing?


    Well, if I were a Sun salesman, I'd say you don't use a crappy Internet Explorer/Outlook Express spyware machine, you use a nice little Sunray which is supposed to use less power than a nightlight - 4 watts - http://www.sun.com/smi/Press/sunflash/2006-04/sunf lash.20060412.4.xml


    I admit I work for Sun.
  7. Windows applications too? by DuncanE · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Seems to only be available for download for Linux and Solaris, but the features list indicates that it can run Windows applications. Any ideas how they do this?

    1. Re:Windows applications too? by poopie · · Score: 2, Informative

      SGD proxies RDP sessions from Windows servers, or it can use Citrix.

    2. Re:Windows applications too? by beevan_jedi · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, SGD translates native display protocols like RDP, X11, ICA etc. into AIP, so it's not just dumb proxying.

  8. Re:They just won't give up by sol_geek77 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How is this any different then what Google is doing (aside from being the "benevolent and all holy" Goggle versus the "almost as evil as Microsoft" Sun)? The client should never matter when running the application and if you look here http://www.sun.com/download/products.xml?id=433240 e1 you can get the client application for just about anything including dumb terminals and handheld devices.

    And stating that Sun is trying to put all applications on Sun systems is a bunch of crap. The design of the product is to have a gateway to all vendors applications. So you continue to run your existing applications and connect to them from the gateway, and no it doesn't have to be Solaris http://www.sun.com/download/products.xml?id=43321d b9

  9. Re:Wow Its X11 - remoted X11 has limitations by poopie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Try remoting some chatty X11 apps across a 100 millisecond link.

    Then introduce periodic link failures that make remoted X apps go "pop!"

    Then constrain an entire office down to a few mbps of shared WAN bandwidth

    Then introduce IP phones that suck up all the "extra" bandwidth.

  10. Collection of blog posts... by bout · · Score: 2, Informative
  11. Fixed submission text... by stinkbomb · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Sun has also set up a test server for slashdot to melt." Fixed that last sentence for you.

  12. great error msg by revxul · · Score: 3, Funny

    They get my vote for best Slashdot Effect message.

    --
    Truth, Just Us, And Hatred For All Mankind!
  13. Re:They just won't give up by Octorian · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, over the past several yeas, Sun has gotten REALLY GOOD at the whole thin client thing. A modern Sun Ray setup bears no resemblance to the terminals of old, or even X terminals. They're essentially stateless devices you just "plug in", and everything runs off the server. When I say "everything", I even mean your whole session and screen contents (something X terminals and serial terminals don't do as nicely). You can even detach and re-attach (i.e. hot-desking) your session between thin clients. (I equate it to "VNC in a box, that doesn't suck")

    Heck, the UI performance is even good enough that you *can* use it comfortably as a primary desktop, for 2D stuff.

    But guess what? There's more!

    These things also support audio (with hot-desking, so you're mp3s are still playing in the background and hit the speakers of the next thin client when you re-attach your session). These things also support USB peripherals as well! (a couple of days ago, I plugged my SD card reader into one to get some photos from my digital camera... normally I have one hooked to a USBRS-232 box for some embedded stuff I do)

    Yes, I actually have a home installation of the Sun Ray 150 model, and I've been REALLY happy with it. I get a persistant session not tied to a portable device (something not do-able with laptops, unless thinking of the Tadpole COMET15 SunRay laptop), and essentially computer access in every room. It rocks!