Slashdot Mirror


New Patent on TV Forces You to Watch Ads

WebHostingGuy writes "A patent application filed with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office says researchers of the Netherland-based consumer electronics company have created a technology that could let broadcasters freeze a channel during a commercial, so viewers wouldn't be able to avoid it. Philips acknowledged that this technology might not sit well with consumers and suggested in its patent filing that consumers be allowed to avoid the feature if they paid broadcasters a fee."

26 of 470 comments (clear)

  1. Wow, this technology works! by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I remember seeing this a few days ago and thinking they couldn't manage it, but slashdot has broken all coding records and implemented it already ;)

    The one thing thats worrying me though is that I'm a paying member here on slashdot, so theres a bug somewhere still.

    Ahhh well, if slash can do it, so can I - heres the posting I made in the previous article:

    Forget muting commercials, this is TV - when the ad break comes on, will I be able to switch channels?

    What about the advertising on the other channels that I'm missing.

    What if I am flicking around the channels (from a sanctioned spot) and happen upon a commercial, will I not be able to continue to the next channel?

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
    1. Re:Wow, this technology works! by glesga_kiss · · Score: 5, Insightful
      What if I am flicking around the channels (from a sanctioned spot) and happen upon a commercial, will I not be able to continue to the next channel?

      Well, as always consider who gets to make this decission, and whether or not it's in their interests. Is it in the interests of Channel XYZ to get these extra eyeballs on their commercials? Damn straight. Of course, when it happens it will be "accidental". Honest.

      Rememember, with TV YOU are the product. The TV company is essentially selling your time to the advertisers. In exchange for your time, they promise to entertain you.

      Personally, I'd be for this system if (and only if) subscribing to the non-ad version completely removes all advertising. But that is never going to happen.

    2. Re:Wow, this technology works! by statusbar · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, no, they will make it so that the bathroom door doesn't open while the commercial is playing. Problem solved.

      --jeffk++

      --
      ipv6 is my vpn
    3. Re:Wow, this technology works! by mikael · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Because a law will come and require this kind of tech in all sets"

      Then they better also ensure that the power supply for the TV and set-top box are hardwired into the wall, and that the mains fusebox is protected by a combination code. Otherwise, some knucklehead customers are going to switch off the entire setup at whatever access point is available, just out of principle.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    4. Re:Wow, this technology works! by cloudkiller · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I remember the days when technology was exciting. Every new product promised so much possibility and opportunity. Hell, some of them even made me want to run out and buy the thing. These days, however, new technology just leaves me feeling sick. I find myself buying more and more tin foil, holding on to my relics of the 90's and talking about the good old days when a computer and a fast connection could get you anything but in trouble. But what can your average /. reader do? I suppose I should just settle my suit with the RIAA, buy another DVD copy of Dr. Strangelove because the first is too scratched up to play, hope Sony's rootkit will magically remove itself from my computer, and watch another 22 minutes of commercials in a half-hour re-run of Seinfeld.

      --
      [an error occurred while processing this sig]
    5. Re:Wow, this technology works! by guitaristx · · Score: 5, Funny

      Then what the hell am I paying $80/month for?

      Don't back-talk your pimp!

      *smack*

      --
      I pity the foo that isn't metasyntactic
  2. I don't mind the ads... by gowen · · Score: 5, Funny

    The thing I don't like on TV are all the repeats... (or "dupes" as they're known in the trade).

    --
    Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
  3. Improvement? by denissmith · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yes, I would much rather pay a fee to be allowed to change channels. What makes them think that we will be happy with either option?

    --
    I have nothing to hide. So, why are you spying on me?
  4. But I don't have a TV! by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Will I still have to watch the ads?

    Seriously - its a good thing that there's a patent on this. The more heavily patented (with associated royalties, etc) something is, the less likely it is that industry will actually use it...

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
  5. There are other TV manufacturers, too. by ettlz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    OK, so that's Philips and Sony off the list. Who's next?

    1. Re:There are other TV manufacturers, too. by Charcharodon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Why even bother with TV's anymore. My 24" monitor works great as a TV. I watch everything off of DVD's or downloads now. No commercials, no DVR rental fee, no cable fee.

  6. Good job. by CosmeticLobotamy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Someone finally found a way to make to make people go back to reading books. Good work, guys.

    I'm off to patent magazines that refuse to let you turn the page for 30 seconds if there's an ad on it.

  7. 30 seconds into the future... by Turbofish · · Score: 5, Funny


    1) Forbid viewers from switching channels during commercials.
    2) Forbid viewers from turning off their TV's.
    3) Get promoted to CEO of Network 23.
    4) Rule the World!


    Bwahhhahahahahaha!

  8. Yes but... by techstar25 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yes but can it keep me from turning the TV off and reading a book instead?

  9. Dear broadcasters: by Eggplant62 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Fuck you. The commercials are the stupidest part of my television-watching experience. Everytime a commercial break happens, I feel my intelligence is insulted. The idiots ensure that the commercials are as annoying, as loud, as irritating as possible in the chance that I might pay attention and buy whatever it is they are pushing, kinda similar to when you visit some neighborhoods in Detroit, and the pimps and pushers start trying to hawk their wares to whoever will listen.

    Best example: Matthew Lesko, the screaming asshole who hawks the book full of gubbermint programs to help you go to college, get a job, get money to pay your bills, etc. This idiot runs around in a coat covered in $-signs, looks like Waldo of "Where's Waldo" fame, and SCREAMS ABOUT HOW MUCH HE'S GOING TO HELP ME FIND MONEY FROM THE GOVERNMENT TO GET A CIRCUMCISION OR BOFF MY WIFE NEXT WEEK OR USE CAT FECES AS AN ALTERNATIVE FUEL SOURCE.

    Second best example: Recently, Burger King started a commercial campaign to promote a new chicken sandwich. To do so, the commercial starts this slow music with lyrics that go like this:

    Big.... buckin' chicken...
    You are big... and you are chicken...
    Big... Buckin' chicken...

    The commercial features some clown in a chicken suit with a saddle on its back and another idiot riding in the saddle, probably a midget. I work from home, usually leaving the television on, tuned to Spike TV, since there's like a 5 hour marathon of ST:DS9 and ST:TNG reruns, which seem like heaven when compared with the rest of the afternoon fare. Spike ran this commercial at every break during that 5 hour marathon every weekday for the entire months of January through March. On my wife's days off, it was a race to see who could grab the remote the fastest to at least mute the idiocy that was that commercial. Since then, I've vowed never to eat at a Burger King again.

    So, now they want to extort money from me to have control over an appliance I've paid upwards of $400 to $1000 US for? Fuck you, you assholes. I'll toss the bleedin' thing in the garbage and start pirating even *more* movies than I do from USENET. It's getting so that I really don't need the TV any more.

    1. Re:Dear broadcasters: by Pedrito · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I work from home, usually leaving the television on, tuned to Spike TV, since there's like a 5 hour marathon of ST:DS9 and ST:TNG reruns, which seem like heaven when compared with the rest of the afternoon fare. Spike ran this commercial at every break during that 5 hour marathon every weekday for the entire months of January through March.

      Being in a similar situation, I certainly understand. I too work from home and I need some video noise to help me through the day sometimes. But I do it in a different way. I have a second monitor which is routinely playing TV shows. I've been re-running entire series (Did all the Star Treks last year, on the 3rd season of Northern exposure right now).

      I like the noise, but commercials would actually distract me from work. No way I'd put up with that. I recommend you try getting commercial free versions of your favorite shows. I won't comment on where to get them...

    2. Re:Dear broadcasters: by AviLazar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So, now they want to extort money from me to have control over an appliance I've paid upwards of $400 to $1000 US for?

      Dear User,
      We understand your concerns and will forward it to our customer complaint department at the local sanitation department. As a temporary solution we suggest that you buy one of our improved TV models. These models, which are the same as yours, range in the price of $1600-$4000 but have the added benefit of allowing you to change channels during commercials

      We do want you to enjoy your TV experience, but the added cost of TV production has given the need for this new technology.

      Sincerely,

      TV Customer Service

      P.S. You will be getting a knock on your door from the FBI for attempting to circumvent our commercial broadcasting experience.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
  10. I Already PAY a Fee by Grimster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Every month when my cable bill comes in, I pay a fee, I should be able to time shift and skip any commercials I want, I pay nearly $80 per month for all the bells, whistles, and channels I get and by god I feel like that gives me all the right I need to skip the stupid commercials.

    Product placement is gonna get more and more common and intrusive as the old way of just showing commercials becomes less and less profitable. Wait till people stop mid show, hold up a bottle of dawn and smile and say how much they love how it makes their hands feel. What's old is new again.

    --
    --- www.f-theocean.com
    1. Re:I Already PAY a Fee by mrchaotica · · Score: 4, Informative

      Originally, cable TV promised that you wouldn't even have commercials to begin with. The fact that you're still subscribing even though they are showing you commercials only proves that they can do whatever the fuck they want, and you'll bend over and take it!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  11. "PAY TV" by Egonis · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I remember in the early 80's here in Canada, Rogers Cable offered "Pay Television" whereby you pay them for a cable hookup, and enjoy television without commercials... that's why it costed money. The rabbit ears hookup only showed commercials for the sake of covering broadcasting costs.

    What happened? How incredibly greedy can people become? Television shows make millions, and cable providers make millions, etc. etc.

    I remember they once talked about showing ads while shows aired, an almost Truman Show-esque "Joey drinks Coca-Cola" while watching Friends.

    And now they wonder why people pirate television programs, movies, games, music, etc.? Because it has become not only inconvenient to watch, use, or play due to the number of advertisements in everything nowadays, but we are PAYING for them.

    Just like buying clothes at the Gap, and billboarding their logo to everyone, what's next? Car Insurance companies will require you to paste their logo on your car? Or how about when you see the dentist? Will they make you wear a hat pointing downward saying "This smile brought to you by Dr. Dentafark".

    Now possibly moving outward to an off-topic, but people question why youth today are so different, have a look at how many advertisements they see, and wear every day!

  12. That's nothing by Kj0n · · Score: 4, Funny

    New Patent on Slashdot Forces You to Read Articles Twice (if you're lucky).

  13. Bad enough already by BenjyD · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was visiting the US recently (from the UK) and tried to watch TV. I just couldn't bear it - the adverts were just so frequent and intrusive that I had wandered off and started browsing the web by the time the show came back on. And these guys want to make that *worse* by removing the option of just flicking channels? Stupid in the extreme.

  14. Re:Seriously? by jasen666 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Who's talking content? We own the hardware. That includes the remote and the controls on the TV.
    Who owns my remote? Me, or the content provider? If I want to change the channel and watch something else, that's my right.

    Until my TV comes with a EULA stating that I am not buying the hardware, and that I'm just licensed to use the hardware however Fox network sees fit. And that is the day I stop buying TV's.

  15. Now the question is... by Billosaur · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...when these TV shows show up on DVD, will they have commercials embedded in them that can't be skipped over? It seems like the next natural step. Is this then going to migrate to web content? Sounds like a kind of DRM-in-disguise, only instead of keeping you from altering the content, they're keeping you from watching the content the way you want.

    --
    GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
  16. Dear Advertisers, Broadcasters, and TV Makers by Maximilio · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If I am flipping through channels and find myself unable to switch away from a commercial, or turn up or down the volume, I will use the big red OFF button to solve the problem. And if that is also disabled I'm likely to put my foot through the display and never use the thing again. Just an FYI.

  17. Slashdot patent by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 4, Funny

    I hear that Slashdot has a patent on a technology that forces you to read the same articles over and over again.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning