Slashdot Mirror


Apple's All-Seeing Screen

Based on a recent patent we may be seeing a new kind of display coming from the Apple store in the near future, one that can capture images as well as display them. From the article: "The clever idea is to insert thousands of microscopic image sensors in-between the liquid crystal display cells in the screen. Each sensor captures its own small image, but software stitches these together to create a single, larger picture."

24 of 447 comments (clear)

  1. Clandestine image capture by nizo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now I know which monitor to recommend to that cute neighbor next door. "Sure, I would be happy to help you set up your new monitor and wireless router!" Which reminds me, which wireless router would be the best for streaming video?

    1. Re:Clandestine image capture by secolactico · · Score: 4, Funny

      Unfortunately, "I've got a gun rack in my Chevy" only works in certain parts of the country. "Sports car lines" work almost everywhere, plus they make you more virile.

      "Does this rag smell like cloroform to you?"

      Not mine. If I could remember which slashdotter said that first I would attribute properly. Sorry.

      --
      No sig
  2. Ministry of Truth by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Funny

    So, what you're telling me is that Apple is NOT really the enemy of Big Brother, but Big Brother in disguise? I'm so confused. How can there be so many truths? The Ministry is supposed to protect us against such confusion by telling us ONLY the truth! If you'll excuse me, I think I need to go watch my telescreen now. Perhaps the truth is there.

    Down with Goldstein!

    (For those lacking context: Commercial | 1984)

    1. Re:Ministry of Truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Big Brother? Check.
      Two-minute Hate (e.g. evening news)? Check
      Telescreen? Check.

      We have always been at war with Terrorism.

    2. Re:Ministry of Truth by peragrin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While Apple can be bad that way.

      This tech is for video conferencing. Instead of having to look at a camera you can look at the screen to whom your talking to.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    3. Re:Ministry of Truth by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sex in the woods with beautiful young women?

      GOD, WHY CAN'T THAT BE CHECKED?

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
    4. Re:Ministry of Truth by prichardson · · Score: 4, Informative

      Because sex outdoors is more uncomfortable than sexy.

      --
      Help I'm a rock.
    5. Re:Ministry of Truth by orasio · · Score: 4, Funny

      > Because sex outdoors is more uncomfortable than sexy.

      Yes, but only when performed properly.

  3. Obligatory: Facecrime by RobertB-DC · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "It was terribly dangerous to let your thoughts wander when you were in any public place or within range of a telescreen. The smallest thing could give you away. A nervous tic, an unconscious look of anxiety, a habit of muttering to yourself -- anything that carried with it the suggestion of abnormality, of having something to hide. In any case, to wear an improper expression on your face (to look incredulous when a victory was announced, for example) was itself a punishable offence. There was even a word for it in Newspeak: facecrime, it was called."

    Found it here: http://www.newspeakdictionary.com/ns-dict.html

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
  4. D'oh! by Rollgunner · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now we won't be able to tell the classic "Blonde holding the page up to her monitor and pressing the 'PrintScreen' key" joke anymore...

  5. Apple has been a leader in addressing this problem by jwachter · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The iSight video camera was distinctive back when it was introduced for two reasons (versus most other web cams commonly used at that time). First, it connected via FireWire. Second, it came with mounting brackets (included, for free in the iSight box) to attach the camera securely to the top center of Apple's LCD monitors and laptop screens.

    The result of this second "innovation"? iSight video confernces looked significantly more natural and more natural than web conferences hosted using Logitech and other web cams that (typically) sat to the bottom right or left of the computer monitor (or awkwardly on top) and, hence, gave participants really skewed views of each others' faces.

    The innovation described in TFA is the logical next step of this eminently sensible design decision that Apple has been promoting for years.

    (Side note: the reason why the iSight demos in Apple keynote addresses look so darn good is that the participants are looking at the iSight camera, and not at the actual screen when they're doing the demo. It's a very subtle shift, but it still matters. Kind of a clever, sneaky way to make the product look even better than it actually does.)

  6. Obligatory: In Soviet Apple.... by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 5, Funny

    the monitor watches you!

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  7. Could they call it... by iolaus · · Score: 5, Funny

    The the iSaruman?

    Muahahahahaha!

    --
    I find laziness to be an excellent motivator.
    1. Re:Could they call it... by mrchaotica · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, Sauron was the one with the all-seeing eye, you fool of a Took!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  8. So if I throw a hammer at it... by richdun · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...is that covered under the warranty?

  9. Re:details? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Informative
    an image "stitched together" from thousands of tiny (but physically spread out) sensors, has got to look like it is on drugs.

    The highest resolution radio telescopes work by reconstructing an image from multiple spread-out receivers. I saw a demo at Cambridge about a decade ago where they used the same concept on optical wavelengths to produce a clearer image than Hubble was capable of from a small set of ground-based telescopes.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  10. Touch screen, not camera! by isaac · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Think touch-screen here, not camera. Regular touch screens typically register only a single point at a time. There are alternatives that use frustrated total internal reflection, but currently these require rear projection - not feasible for a tablet. See http://mrl.nyu.edu/~jhan/ftirtouch/ if you haven't already.

    Incorporating sensing elements within the display will permit sensing multiple simultaneous points of contact of arbitrary size/shape in a tablet form-factor. Neat!

    Apple's been patenting lots of touch-interface concepts recently, too. Vide.

    This patent is probably more about touch-screens than screen as scanner (that'd be a neat trick too, but probably would require too much resolution) or camera (would require a different but perfectly calibrated refractive element at each sensor - probably impractical).

    -Isaac

    --
    I am not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice. For Entertainment Purposes Only.
  11. No. Autofocus, decent appearance, large CCD. by SuperBanana · · Score: 4, Informative
    The iSight video camera was distinctive back when it was introduced for two reasons (versus most other web cams commonly used at that time). First, it connected via FireWire. Second, it came with mounting brackets (included, for free in the iSight box) to attach the camera securely to the top center of Apple's LCD monitors and laptop screens. The result of this second "innovation"? iSight video confernces looked significantly more natural and more natural than web conferences hosted using Logitech and other web cams that (typically) sat to the bottom right or left of the computer monitor (or awkwardly on top) and, hence, gave participants really skewed views of each others' faces.

    Number one, iSight cameras aren't even remotely as popular as all the PC USB-based webcams; they're EVERYWHERE, and ISPs for years have been giving them away as freebies. Number two, the iSight wasn't distinctive because of its interface; webcams have been available for years with USB2. I strongly suspect it was firewire because most people NEED their USB ports for keyboards and mice, but don't really use their firewire port except for occasional camcorder use, if at all.

    The iSight was distinctive because:

    • Physical appearance A bit of cheap cast aluminum looked a hell of a lot better than a few cents of plastic.
    • Autofocus
    • A relatively large CCD size for lower noise (a larger CCD also makes optics easier/less critical)
    • built-in microphone specifically designed for the purpose
    • A somewhat decent lens
    • Privacy shutter

    The mounting devices just make it slightly more convenient to attach the camera, particularly if you had an Apple LCD. It's a problem solved with a little bit of tape, by the way.

    Another "by the way"- the iSight cameras in the Macbook and iMac absolutely SUCK. They're basically cellphone cameras; microscopic lens and CCD, no autofocus. No privacy shutter. The picture is very noisy and low resolution, the colors are funky...

  12. When does a camscreen become mandatory? by Catbeller · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When does a camscreen become mandatory?

    I'm not kidding here. After all, if I'd told you ten years ago that by 2005, all cell phones would have a mandatory GPS tracker broadcasting your location to the phone company as you move about, with a nominal abilty to be switched off (ha), would you have believed me?

    I see no outrage over Homeland Security, your phone company, Scientology, and any random corporation with a legal staff being capable of tracking your movements for the rest of your lives. Where is the outrage?

    I see no problem with camscreens becoming mandatory in the next 15 years. Even the techiest of the techies have no problem with the tracking devices in their phones, cameras on the streets, and eventually mandatory trackers in our cars, so letting Mr. X watch you as you all watch your computer screens is not a biggie. I can see an infinite number of excuses to make it required by law. Hell, even the emergency health care bit that they used for the cell phones could be re-rigged for this one.

    And the generation of kids coming up through school have been seen drug tests, dog searches, RFID trackers, and lie detectors. They've been told they have no rights as minors, and I doubt they'll be any more rebellious as adults. They're also convinced they are surrounded by enemies wanting the kill them in their schoolbuses and office buildings, so the fear excuse is a big Go.

    Such a neat device, a camscreen. Here's what I'd like: separate power circuits for the screen and the camera element array. So I *know* that the thing cannot operate without my permission. But I wanted that for my cell phone's tracking device, and so far the phone salesmen look at me like I'm bin Laden or a specially-abled adult who left his house without his nurse. (big thought: look overseas for a phone capable of giving me the option of being untracked, import the damned thing. Maybe I am a little slow).

    1. Re:When does a camscreen become mandatory? by mrchaotica · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I'm not kidding here. After all, if I'd told you ten years ago that by 2005, all cell phones would have a mandatory GPS tracker broadcasting your location to the phone company as you move about, with a nominal abilty to be switched off (ha), would you have believed me?
      Don't you realize that every cellphone since the beginning of time has had a tracking ability? It has to, by design -- otherwise, the system won't know which tower to route the call to. The only difference with the new ones is that triangulation via GPS is more accurate than triangulation via cellphone towers.
      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  13. Enough w/ the creepy stalker stuff, and "on" LEDs by maggard · · Score: 5, Interesting
    First for all of those posting "Heeeey, way to spy on chicks!": You're why many women dislike /. You're not funny; you're sad, creepy, and need to get a life.

    I'll also point out a relative of mine had this happen to her. She's a pretty, vivacious, young woman, married, was then working in a public relations firm. The IT fellow was always a little too attentive for her comfort, to the degree she actively avoided calling him for issues.

    Eventually she needed her speakers for a project, but rather then call in creepy IT guy she asked office clever guy to take a look, it was probably just a loose wire or something. That was indeed the issue, however he also discovered an additional cable, running to a camera, mounted under her desk staring into her crotch, feeding into a nearby cabinet with a VCR.

    Much hullaballoo ensued, everyone in the building heard of it within a few minutes, much to the ire of the police. There were fingerprints, and all of the fellas in the office but for creepy IT guy offered theirs for comparison. none of the supplied prints matched, IT guy quit, relative had her desk replaced with a table.

    That's who you sound like when you post stuff like that.

    The good news is Steve Jobs has been here before. I remember NeXT bringing around one of their boxes to demo at my local http://www.acm.org/">ACM chapter. It came with a nifty built-in microphone, to which someone immediately noted "great for spying!" The NeXT rep gave a smile and pointed to the red LED next to the microphone, hardwired to light up whenever the microphone was active.

    This practice continues to this day at Apple, putting in hardwired signal LEDs to indicate when a camera is active. My expectation is that this will continue. Indeed I wouldn't be surprised if Apple were to even include a camera-active screen mode to brighten it for a better picture when the camera is active, possibly swapping in a white background.

    --
    I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
  14. Oh great by proverbialcow · · Score: 4, Funny

    First I get in trouble for looking at pr0n at work. Now I'm going to get in trouble for masturbating, too?

    --
    The only surefire protection against Microsoft infections is abstinence. - The Onion
  15. Re:Enough w/ the creepy stalker stuff, and "on" LE by soft_guy · · Score: 4, Funny

    I don't know any women who dislike Slashdot.

    OTOH, I don't know any women.

    --
    Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  16. Re:Apple has been a leader in addressing this prob by geekoid · · Score: 4, Funny

    That was a long way to go just to show off the fact that you have a 24" monitor. ;)

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect