Slashdot Mirror


Researchers Create Artificial Insect Eye

maxzilla writes "An artificial insect eye that could be used in ultra-thin cameras has been developed by scientists in the US.The dimpled eye, contains over 8,500 hexagonal lenses packed into an area the size of a pinhead. The dome-shaped structure, described in the journal Science, is similar to a bee's eye. The researchers, from the University of California, Berkeley, say the work may also shed light on how insects developed such complex, visual systems. Darpa is also funding this project with applications expected for digital cameras and high speed motion detectors."

28 of 140 comments (clear)

  1. Hooray! by Sathias · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now we won't have to provide blind insects with guide dogs!

    --
    Blessed are the 1337, for they shall pwn the earth.
  2. And for their next trick... by unitron · · Score: 2, Interesting
    "Researchers Create Artificial Insect Eye"

    When will they be getting around to the rest of the artificial insect?

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    1. Re:And for their next trick... by Dr.+GeneMachine · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why build artificial insects when you can remote control cockroaches?

      --
      This comment does not exist.
    2. Re:And for their next trick... by Compuser · · Score: 5, Funny

      They mention swallowing a diagnostic tool
      to see the insides of your stomach. The tool
      would have this lens, some imaging chip and
      a wireless link.
      Now imagine swallowing a cockroach...

    3. Re:And for their next trick... by CRCulver · · Score: 5, Interesting

      When will they be getting around to the rest of the artificial insect?

      In his book The Age of Spiritual Machines , futurist Ray Kurzweil ventures that the transformation of humans from flesh-and-blood to total machine bodies will start with small augmentations like this, proceeding step by step until everything original is replaced.

    4. Re:And for their next trick... by suv4x4 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In his book The Age of Spiritual Machines , futurist Ray Kurzweil ventures that the transformation of humans from flesh-and-blood to total machine bodies will start with small augmentations like this, proceeding step by step until everything original is replaced.

      That's pretty good, and natural. After all only then we'll be in power to control out own destiny. Of course I don't see the brain being replaced in the near 100-200 years, not just for technical, but also religious, political and moral reasons.

  3. Tables Turn by d'alz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So we are competing with nature now. Very soon the blind will have a better option at vision and the rest of us will be scrambling in the dark. That would be a funny sight.

    --
    There is nothing permanent except 'Change'- HERACLITUS,6TH CENTURY B.C
    1. Re:Tables Turn by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Funny
      Very soon the blind will have a better option at vision and the rest of us will be scrambling in the dark.
      It's all fun and games until someone loses an eye...

      Then they get fitted with a broad-spectrum robo-eye & hunt you down in the middle of the night.
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
  4. I'll be impressed by Physician · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'll be impressed when they can transplant this eye into a poor blind insect.

    --
    Does God treat us as servants or friends? Check my homepage.
    1. Re:I'll be impressed by Fred_A · · Score: 4, Funny

      Typical of those egoistical scientists. Always out to make a quick buck when they could do something useful helping out crippled insects. Bastards.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    2. Re:I'll be impressed by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 5, Funny
      Actually they tried that but the testing was rather difficult.

      Doc: Can you read the top line on the chart?
      Insect: Zzzzzzz.

      Doc: Now the third line.
      Insect: Zzzzzzz.

      Doc: [Sigh] And the bottonm one, please.
      Insect: Zzzzzzz.

      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
  5. Is it end of blindness? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Relevant stories has been on slashdot before here and here where scientists have successfully developed artificial eyes and implanted.

    The question, I want to ask is, is it still in research phase or professional services will start becoming available, when and how much it might cost?

    There is pool of blind people in developing countries like India, China and so on. The inofrmation might be useful for them too.

    [Posting anonymously to avoid karma whoring]

    1. Re:Is it end of blindness? by suv4x4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The question, I want to ask is, is it still in research phase or professional services will start becoming available, when and how much it might cost?

      The problem is all these are misleading. Articles about wiring cameras to the eye nerves, artificial eyes and so on are coming down the pipe for years now. I remember not less than 4 years ago articles about artificial eyes that can help blind people.

      In most cases, the misleading sytarts right at the source, where for PR reasons the achievement is blown out of proportion for PR reasons, to justify the spent resources and time, and back them when they request more funds for continuing their research.

      Frequently also the media tag on catchy "breaking news" titles to make their articles more interesting.

      A recent example is for example the computerised machine guns that disarms rockets that get close to a tank.. That was "marketed" as a magical energy shield around tanks.. Comment withheld..

  6. X-Files warned us of this by mitymidget · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...They didn't create it, dosn't anyone watch X-Files, its a discover lead by the Aliens, who will use the new eye to further the artificial development of insects to carry Alien genetic material to form the super Alien race (we all know humans are the most suppiorer already, just not intelectual). Comming soon, nanite insects that "Repair" damaged organs or tissue...Yeah Repair

  7. Wow, imagine the possibilites... by bepe86 · · Score: 2, Funny

    New viewing angle tecnique for movies - fly on the wall...

  8. A Victory for Creation Science!!! by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 2, Funny

    SEEE! This PROVES the eye is so complex that it requires an Intelligent Designer! :P

    --
    This space available.
    1. Re:A Victory for Creation Science!!! by avasol · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ok so there's the Evolutionists, and the ID:ers, but other than Douglas Adams and myself, who else believes in the lesser known _Un-Intelligent (But Ambitious!) Designer_?

      And that would explain the disappearance of the dinosaurs too. Ooops, fucked it up. Sowwy. We'll have to try again. Let's try Humans this time. Yes... Yes.. Excellent physical design, but brains too unevolved. Let Humans consume the Earth's resources disparately and divide their wealth unevenly until they realize the error of their ways. That should teach 'em! Next up, Vulcans.

      See? Makes everything fit together neatly!

  9. Compounding the problem by mrogers · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's comforting to know that our future robot masters will have terrifying, alien faces with which to express their terrifying, alien throught processes.

  10. Surveilance! by putko · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you thought those fiber-optic based surveillance cams were bad, you'll hate these even more.

    Yeah, this will find tons of apps in all sorts of useful places, but at a certain point, they'll be so cheap that you'll have to be afraid that people have hidden them somewhere, and that you are being watched.

    This will be like camera phones, but squared and then cubed.

    --
    http://www.thebricktestament.com/the_law/when_to_s tone_your_children/dt21_18a.html
  11. Animal Inspired Optics by stuckinarut · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's not only insects we're mimicing, crustaceans too. Astronomers have investigated the eyes of lobsters and used the way they focus light to create a Lobster Telescope For X-Rays

  12. A bit premature by Fred_A · · Score: 5, Insightful

    According to TFA, "At the moment, the artificial eye is not connected to any kind of imaging device.".

    I understand that whoever made this thing is eager to show it around but shouldn't they actually wait until they have something to show ?
    It's becoming the norm nowadays to announce stuff that's only half done... I don't know if it's to satisfy investors or what but it sounds quite silly.

    "look, we have this great insectile artificial eye !"

    "impressive, what does it see ?"

    "we don't know"

    Well, duh.

    --

    May contain traces of nut.
    Made from the freshest electrons.
  13. Artificial insects: army of the future. by master_p · · Score: 3, Informative

    Future wars will not be faught by giant robots or ultra-enhanced bionic soldiers or UAVs. They will be faught by fleets of artificial insects with collaborative AI.

    Artificial insects are capable of a wide range of operations:

    1) psyops: killing the important people of the opposing force (leaders, generals, scientists, etc) would be as easy as sending an insectoid armed with deadly poison. Undetectable, it can sting its victim while the victim is sleeping, or goes to the bathroom, or is in a public place surrounded by thousands of people.

    2) blocking enemy forces: a swarm of insectoids can easily render whole armies inoperable in a blink of an eye: tanks, rocket launchers, comm centers can be rendered inoperable with few insectoids injecting the proper substances at the proper places.

    3) invading a land by only killing humans, living infrastructure intact.

    A swarm of insectoids can go undetected by radar, since insectoids can fly in small formations, and only joined at the destination.

    Nanomachines can be used to create billions of one-time insectoids at very low cost.

    1. Re:Artificial insects: army of the future. by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 3, Funny

      The entire war will take place in the very same shoe box currently being used for a third-grade dinosaur diorama. A spokesman from Fox news says that they'll looking forward to providing embedbug coverage.

  14. Been there. Done that. by elFisico · · Score: 2, Informative

    Seems german scientists beat those US scientists to it. The team from the Fraunhofer Institute received a german research award for creating an artificial insect eye over a year ago.

    Find more technical infos here (sorry, german only).

  15. Dump the sci-fi by suv4x4 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why is it that 99% of those articles try to be done with the boring facts as fast as possible and dive into the exciting world of "this may/can/will be used for [INSERT SOMETHING FROM A MOVIE OR SOMETHING THAT SOUNDS REALLY IMPORTANT]" speculation.

    So if a new sort of "no unpopped kernels" popcorns was disovered, we'll have to read how this will lead to us flying to distant galaxies and finding the purpose of existence.

    1. Re:Dump the sci-fi by suv4x4 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But in case of inventions (or rather tools, as is the case here), if the scientists are doing it at all, they will be doing it with some future goals in mind.

      Correct, but the articles lead many people (see grand-grandparent) to believe the invention is working and the practical implementation is about to happen, which is totally misleading.

      What we get is very small and (in the big picture) insignificant steps to solve the puzzle of bringing an invention in working state to the market, but we get breaking news that we're about to get flying cars every other week.

      People get tired, and start becoming suspicious. Is this what we want.

  16. And here the troll goes again... by DrYak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sorry for feeding the troll, but :

    The biggest difference between having faith in some deity or having faith in selection/randomness/ifinite time/etc... is that in case of the second, you can also try to disect the subtle mechanics of it and try to understand it, and then try to apply the knowledge you acquired. It makes you able to develop better medecine, or to be able to predict what will happen next according to the models you developped studying science (or in case of archeoly : try to guess what happened 'between' before the archeological evidence shows up). Which is hard to do with a deity, because you'll have to catch it first before being able to disect it, because as you're not a deity yourself you're not supposed to be able to understand it, and you aren't supposed to be able to predict what's is someone else head.
    Evolution is a way to say "Let's try to understand how it works", ID is a way to say "Fuck, I give up. It's too hard to understand. It must have been done by [insert your favorite deity's name here]".

    On the other hand, religious faith has generated some nice and interesting pieces of art and litterature, although it also managed to generate a lot of holy wars.

    Second, EVOLUTION IS NOT PURELY RANDOM. Most moderne life form have (thru evlotion) acquired means to 're-use' what has been done before (example: by recombining and reshuffling functionnal parts) and evolve and adapt faster than just waiting until it happens by randomness.

    (NOTE: I *do* work in a genetic lab. A *do* know what I'm speaking about)

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:And here the troll goes again... by Wwolmack · · Score: 3, Informative
      Troll or no, talkorigins addresses this. Read it sometime if you disagree with evolution, and reference it if you disagree with ID.

      Reshuffling requires random acts... when's the last time you conciously reshuffled your genes? Reshuffling is not evolution. Evolution ultimately teaches creation of new information, something never demonstrated by evolutionists. Besides, most reshuffling results in loss of information. For each step in the process, and whenever an evolutionist finds more detail about how something works in nature, that person should be required to calculate the probability of that particular detail evolving, and combining that with the probablility of everything else evolving, to put everything in perspective. ...Not that that would help. Your beginning premise is flawed anyhow.

      From: http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CB/CB102.html

      Claim CB102: Mutations are random noise; they do not add information. Evolution cannot cause an increase in information.

      Source:
      AIG, n.d. Creation Education Center. http://www.answersingenesis.org/cec/docs/CvE_repor t.asp

      Response:

      1. It is hard to understand how anyone could make this claim, since anything mutations can do, mutations can undo. Some mutations add information to a genome; some subtract it. Creationists get by with this claim only by leaving the term "information" undefined, impossibly vague, or constantly shifting. By any reasonable definition, increases in information have been observed to evolve. We have observed the evolution of
        • increased genetic variety in a population (Lenski 1995; Lenski et al. 1991)
        • increased genetic material (Alves et al. 2001; Brown et al. 1998; Hughes and Friedman 2003; Lynch and Conery 2000; Ohta 2003)
        • novel genetic material (Knox et al. 1996; Park et al. 1996)
        • novel genetically-regulated abilities (Prijambada et al. 1995)

        If these do not qualify as information, then nothing about information is relevant to evolution in the first place.

      2. A mechanism that is likely to be particularly common for adding information is gene duplication, in which a long stretch of DNA is copied, followed by point mutations that change one or both of the copies. Genetic sequencing has revealed several instances in which this is likely the origin of some proteins. For example:
        • Two enzymes in the histidine biosynthesis pathway that are barrel-shaped, structural and sequence evidence suggests, were formed via gene duplication and fusion of two half-barrel ancestors (Lang et al. 2000).
        • RNASE1, a gene for a pancreatic enzyme, was duplicated, and in langur monkeys one of the copies mutated into RNASE1B, which works better in the more acidic small intestine of the langur. (Zhang et al. 2002)
        • Yeast was put in a medium with very little sugar. After 450 generations, hexose transport genes had duplicated several times, and some of the duplicated versions had mutated further. (Brown et al. 1998)

        The biological literature is full of additional examples. A PubMed search (at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi) on "gene duplication" gives more than 3000 references.

      3. According to Shannon-Weaver information theory, random noise maximizes information. This is not just playing word games. The random variation that mutations add to populations is the variation on which selection acts. Mutation alone will not cause adaptive evolution, but by eliminating nonadaptive variation, natural selection communicates info