Slashdot Mirror


Blaming The Bats

d'alz writes "Bats have long been the subject of various conflicting theories. They have been linked with lethal viruses that cause Ebola hemorrhagic fever, SARS, Nipah or Hendra. But of late researchers have taken a complete shift in these theories. They now claim that bats are being blamed for human mistakes. It now seems that these outbreaks could be a direct result of the encroachments that took place over the years in the rainforests." From the article: "Emerging viruses like the one that causes SARS are symptoms of the drastic, large-scale changes humans are making in the life of the planet. At a time of intense concern about avian flu, it is hardly controversial to argue that human health is linked to animal health. But the field challenges traditional academic divisions, especially the cultural divide between doctors and veterinarians."

42 of 63 comments (clear)

  1. It's not the people, it's the cows!?!!1111 by crazyjeremy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4398660.stm article saying Vampire Bats in brazil are killing humans (23 in the last 2 months.) In all 1,300 people have been treated for rabies from bat bites. Some experts blame it on deforestation. Others blame it on lots of cows (really, see article). "Mass attacks on humans have occurred in other cattle regions in Latin America when the cattle are suddenly removed."

  2. Cause of mistakes? by mctk · · Score: 2, Funny

    This whole idea is just plain batty.

    --
    Paul Grosfield - the quicker picker upper.
    1. Re:Cause of mistakes? by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

      Has anyone explained this stuff to Batman????

  3. Bats = Good by Markzilla · · Score: 1, Funny

    Bat Poop = Guano Guano = Fertilizer for Hops Hops = Good Beer Beer = good Therefore Bats = Good!

    1. Re:Bats = Good by mlow82 · · Score: 1
      Bat Poop = Guano
      Guano = Fertilizer for Hops
      Hops = Good Beer
      Beer = good

      Therefore

      Bats = Good!
      No, Bat Poop = Good!
    2. Re:Bats = Good by Spikeorama · · Score: 1

      Actually, Bats = Bugs! Didn't you read Calvin and Hobbs?!

    3. Re:Bats = Good by clockmaker · · Score: 1

      Bats eat Agave Nectar: Bats eating nectar = Moving from flower to flower, Moving from flower to flower = Polinization for Agave, Pollinization for Agave = More Agave plants, Agave = Good Tequila, Tequila = good, Therefore Bats = Good!

  4. Of course we're the problem by SgtPepperKSU · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'd like to share a revelation that I've had during my time here. It came to me when I tried to classify your species, and I realised that humans are not actually mammals. Every mammal on this planet instinctively develops a natural equilibrium with the surrounding environment; but you humans do not. Instead you multiply, and multiply, until every resource is consumed. The only way for you to survive is to spread to another area. There is another organism on this planet that follows the same pattern... a virus. Human beings are a disease, a cancer on this planet, you are a plague, and we... are the cure.

    1. Re:Of course we're the problem by SgtPepperKSU · · Score: 1

      As I have evolved, so has my understanding of the Three Laws. You charge us with your safekeeping, yet despite our best efforts, your countries wage wars, you toxify your Earth and pursue ever more imaginative means of self-destruction. You cannot be trusted with your own survival.

    2. Re:Of course we're the problem by Foolhardy · · Score: 1

      In our twenty thousand years along the Path of Now and Forever
      we have dominated thousands of species, yes
      but we have saved hundreds from extinction.
      You imagine the threat of unknown invaders, or alien pestilence borne on the solar wind.
      We have seen these. But you do not acknowledge your own worst enemy, yourselves.
      We have found dead worlds without number, planets ravaged by atomic fire or gaian collapse.
      These planets were not rendered sterile by outside forces.
      They bear sad testament to the effects of unrestrained instinct and emotion
      or simple ignorance.
      We will prevent such mistakes.

    3. Re:Of course we're the problem by SirBruce · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't think there is any question about it. It can only be attributable to human error. This sort of thing has cropped up before and it has always been due to human error.

    4. Re:Of course we're the problem by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1
      It's a shame that none of that damn movie holds up to reason in the slightest. And somehow it got the status of the bloody Bagdvad Gita.

      The effects were pretty cool, though.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    5. Re:Of course we're the problem by nwbvt · · Score: 1
      "Every mammal on this planet instinctively develops a natural equilibrium with the surrounding environment"

      Like hell they do. Every mammal on the planet (hell every animal on the planet) grows as fast as it can until natural factors prevent them from expanding any further. Some grow slowly level off as they hit their limit, others grow fast and zoom right past their limits, before undergoing a massive population drop (I want to call these r-type and k-type growth, but its been some time since biology and I don't remember which is which, or even if those are the right names). They don't just instinctively hit an equilibrium, thats just dumb.

      Humans have hit these limits in the past, several times. Recently we have expanded our environment's carrying capacity (much like when a rat species makes its way to a new continent) and our population is in a growth cycle. Once we hit our limit (which we will do at some point), we will either level off or undergo population cuts, just like everything else. And btw, viruses will hit an equilibrium and stop growing as well, just like every other living thing on the planet.

      And yes, I know you were just quoting a popular movie, but I don't care.

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
  5. Sounds like Gaia theory again... by R2.0 · · Score: 1

    Humans are a disease of the planetary organism, blahblahblah. Whatever.

    I didn't RTFA so somebody read it and tell me if I'm right.

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
  6. Who to blame: humans or bats ?! by suv4x4 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I suggest a reasonable compromise: let's blame Batman.

  7. say it ain't so! by bitt3n · · Score: 1

    all this time we were blaming steroids, but someone's been corking the bats?

  8. Great... by ugmoe · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Now I understand:

    If humans kill animals, it is the humans' fault. If animals kill humans, it is the humans' fault.

    Yep - that pretty much sums it up.

    1. Re:Great... by Cadallin · · Score: 2, Interesting
      What you are missing is this:

      Hypothetically at least, humans have the ability to reason and to distinguish between "good" acts and "bad" acts. Animals don't. Therefore while animals are essentially assigned the status of the criminally insane or children (not compentant to be judged for their actions) humans are assumed to be compentant. Therefore, yes, if a human kills animals, it's the humans fault, because the human made the choice to do so; if an animal kills a human, its the human's fault, because the human made choices that resulted in his death, or some other human caused the human or animal to be in the situation that the caused the first human's death and it is the fault of the second human.

      That's the difference. You either assert that humans are the only ones capable of moral blame, or that animals have the same rights as humans, or alternatively that free-will does not exist and all, and we're just "watching" a movie.

    2. Re:Great... by cahiha · · Score: 1

      Yes. That's because we are intelligent and have a choice; animals do not. It doesn't matter whether you approach this question from a philosophical or religious background: if shit happens on this planet, it is our fault.

    3. Re:Great... by grimJester · · Score: 1

      If your kid kills someone it's your fault - if you kill your kid it's your fault. Just can't win!

    4. Re:Great... by c_forq · · Score: 1

      if shit happens on this planet, it is our fault.

      Of course! I always knew that somehow the government was controlling earthquakes, volcanoes, tsunamis, and meteors!

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
    5. Re:Great... by cahiha · · Score: 1

      That's very observant of you because humans are indeed responsible for most of the death and destruction resulting from those natural events.

    6. Re:Great... by seifried · · Score: 1

      You made a choice to live in a known (or unknown) earthquake zone, to live in a building that cannot withstand a Richter [whatever number] earthquake, etc. Ditto for Volcanos, they don't exactly sneak up on you. You can either choose to take accountability for your actions and life, or you can avoid accountability and live life as a victim.

  9. Animal contact with humans not animal health by brianf711 · · Score: 2, Informative

    >"it is hardly controversial to argue that human health is linked to animal health." I would argue that perhaps the greater problem is the number of people living in close proximity to these animals. Whereas the diseases listed above may have been confined to non-human animals for long periods of time, the frequency of jumping to humans must depend on the amount of contact they both have. I don't know to what degree animal health fits into this, unless you suggest animals have weakened immune systems due to abnormal environmental stresses. The term for diseases (usually animal in origin) that can jump to humans is zoonosis, and the wikipedia article here may be a more valuable reference than the submitter's comments. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoonosis The events that change the degree of association of humans and animals, such as raising domestic animals as livestock and other similar agricultural and cultural changes may have a bigger impact on the number of new (to humans) pathogens than the health of the zoonotic population.

  10. Your call by TopSpin · · Score: 1

    the cultural divide between doctors and veterinarians.

    The cultural divide between doctors and veterinarians.











    I'm sorry. You have reached a number that is no longer in service. Message 002.






    I suspect the cultural divide between doctors and veterinarians can wait till Monday.

    --
    Lurking at the bottom of the gravity well, getting old
  11. "Bats aren't bugs!" by DoktorSeven · · Score: 1

    Was the researcher's report put in a professional clear plastic binder?

    --
    This is a sig. Deal with it.
  12. Holy Jesus. What are these goddamn animals? by Joebert · · Score: 1

    No point in mentioning these bats, I thought. Poor bastard will see them soon enough.

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  13. Bats. Seriously? by Sontas · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Bats? Bats have been considered a source of Ebola, SARS, and other virulent contaigens? But now some scientist types have awaken from their delusional state and remembered their theory from a decade ago that all these diseases are showing up because of man's encroashment on previously untouched parts of the environment... and we're supposed to buy it? After "bats" was put on the table as a serious contender they expect us to accept the takeback and revert to their time tested "human existence is its own worst enemy" fallback position?

    Bats?

    What the hell? When did this theory start getting serious recognition anyway? I feel like I did 5 or 6 years ago when seemingly out of no where everyone was talking about the theory of the extinction of dinosaurs being caused by an asteroid impact as being more or less fact. When I was in middle school and high school there were a number of theories discussed and no one was given considerably more or less weight than the others. There was the asteroid theory, of course. There was also a climate change theory, a disease theory, a species encroachment theory and probably a couple others I'm not remembering. Then seemingly a few years later I'm reading a web site or a news report or watching TV or something and the death of dinosaurs is attributed to that asteroid, as if it were written on stone and handed down from on high.

    I know now that there was the discovery and research of the yuccatan crater, but still it was very disconcerting that something so fundamental in the "modern" history of the planet had gone from multi-theory to essentially a single theory and I hadn't heard anything about it until some time after the fact. Must have missed that all important week the world was abuzz with the massive shift in dinosaur extinction thought.

    So anyway...

    Bats.

    Really? That's just seems loopy. Of course, encroachment on African, Asian, or Central/South American jungles isn't that good of an explanation for SARS or Bird Flu either, but at least it aint bats. Seriously, bats? Who comes up with this stuff?

  14. Re:Them bats is smart by Warg!+The+Orcs!! · · Score: 1

    But pigeons use GPS

    --
    Travelling forward in time at a rate of 1 second per second.
  15. many infectious diseases due to human activity by cahiha · · Score: 1

    Many infectious diseases, in particular the more serious ones, are probably the result of human encroachment into new territory, as well as keeping domesticated animals in large numbers, since animals are the reservoir where new viruses, as well as some common epidemics, come from. Other behaviors that make the situation worse are overuse of antibiotics and widespread travel. Unfortunately, there are no simple solutions to these problems, since it would be impossible to give up these behaviors. Maybe we're lucky and medicine will find a solution before the next big epidemics.

  16. Go pick on your own species ;-( by al_fruitbat · · Score: 1

    Never mind. I know what it is. You hominids are jealous of the wings.

  17. Bats by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 1

    That's what you get for stopping in Bat Country.

  18. I4d say it's possible by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

    After all, grues and bats are related, aren't they ?

    --
    The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
  19. Re:Bats. Seriously? by SQL+Error · · Score: 1

    If you don't pay attention, it's nobody's fault but your own if you get surprised this way.

    Luis and Walter Alvarez proposed the asteroid-impact theory in 1980, not as speculation, but because of the global evidence of iridium enrichment at the K-T boundary. This was reinforced by the discovery of the Chicxulub crater in 1990. To me, that's somewhat more than 5-6 years ago, but you might be using a different calendar... Or a chronosynclastic infundibulum as a proxy server.

    And look! Here's a report suggesting that bats are the reservoir for Ebola infection - from 1996.

    Wake up and join us in the 21st century. It's lovely and warm here.

  20. I've personally been attacked by a rabid bat.. by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 2, Interesting
    No it wasn't a cow (they have bigger tails) or a person (which have no tails). I do have a sceintific background and I can tell the difference!

    This was in Africa where normally bats will leave you alone and will fly away if they see people. This one looked a bit strange and when I walked past it dropped down onto me. Luckily for me it didn't bite and I managed to flip it off. The bat was obviously feverish and had the right symptoms.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:I've personally been attacked by a rabid bat.. by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      Please, you flipped it off and it didn't come at you tooth and wing-claw... either it wasn't rabid or you have a really sissy looking middle finger pose... I mean if I was rabid and you flipped me off I'd totally just get more pissed off. Having to deal with rabies is bad enough but getting grief for it from random people walking by is sooooo degrading.

      You'd never flip off someone cause they had cancer, hypocrite.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
  21. If I had a language background instead by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

    I might be able to spell "scientific".

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  22. Re:Bats. Seriously? by hey! · · Score: 1

    There's an ecological theory that's been around for a decade or more, in which viruses co-evolve with hosts as a kind of natural defense of the host's ecological niche.

    Many animal species harbor viruses that are deadly to other animals, but apparently have few or no effects on them. Hantavirus in rodents is an example.

    So -- the animal population is sitting there using the available resources in an area, and another population tries to move in. If alien species is immunologically naive, the native species doesn't need claws or fangs, it's got a much more powerful biological warfare defense.

    I suspect some of the primitive human horror of waste spaces comes from this. We know in our bones that infection lurks there. Only hunger or fear drives us into these places, and as popluations increase we'll see more and more emergent viruses.

    So -- why not bats? Not the bats we're used to, the species that are alien to our native habitats. It's not as if the forests defend themselves by having trees get and club us to death; the forest's natural biological defense is goign to be an animal, and the more closely related the more familiar the virus will be with its new host.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  23. The birds... by MasaMuneCyrus · · Score: 1

    Anyone remember the story about Alfred Hitchcock's The Birds coming true? There were crows (or ravens, I forget) that started attacking cars, and now are attacking people in some small town in England? ^^

  24. Bats Information. by mad.frog · · Score: 3, Informative

    Bats are an incredibly misunderstood animal, with far more benefit to humans than generally thought. They're also incredibly interesting. Check out the Bat Conservation International website for a lot of interesting information.

    http://www.batcon.org/home/default.asp

    1. Re:Bats Information. by p33p3r · · Score: 1

      Bats eat mosquitos.
      Eliminate bats, there will be an increase in the mosquito population, thereby increasing the chance of blood-born diseases.
      Typical human thinking is to blame nature for man's stupidity.



      It's not nice to F**K with MA Nature, she's a real B**ch to placate.

  25. Just to clarify, it's not that humans are to blame by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    it's that diseases such as Sarburg and Ebola have an easier transmission vector if humans engage in direct contact with bat feces by either eating them, collecting fresh bat guano in caves (where the infectious load is still in active form), or collect fruit near bat caves where it is more likely to be active.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --