Slashdot Mirror


NASA's 20-G Centrifuge Machine

Roland Piquepaille writes "Scientists from NASA and two U.S. universities are using a 20-G centrifuge machine that can simulate up to 20 times the terrestrial gravity to evaluate the effects of hypergravity on humans. This 58-foot diameter centrifuge has three cabins, one for humans -- limited to 12.5 G -- and two for objects and flying hardware. The goal of these experiments is to reduce the adverse effects that space travel can have on astronauts' physical heath. But by studying the health benefits of exercise on astronauts, the researchers also hope to help the rapidly growing senior population who, like astronauts, doesn't exercise much. Read more for additional details and pictures about this NASA's machine."

154 comments

  1. "Flying Hardware" at 20 Gs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Man, hope they keep the doors firmly bolted on that thing!

    1. Re:"Flying Hardware" at 20 Gs? by celardore · · Score: 1

      ...or at least have an inanimate carbon rod laying around somewhere.

  2. Whisky Tango Firefox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ohh. thats the giant structure floating in space that sort of looks like a ring

    I thought it was dem aliens!

  3. That thing spins fast! by jZnat · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    1. Re:That thing spins fast! by jZnat · · Score: 1

      Ah crap, the article said diameter. Real tangential velocity is about 41.64 m/s (~150 km/hr). That's still pretty damn fast, though. That would make the angular frequency 4.71 Hz, so imagine that.

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    2. Re:That thing spins fast! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although "h" is not an official SI unit, "km/h" is the recommended way to write kilometers per hour.

    3. Re:That thing spins fast! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmm, when i type in make world my cpu cooler starts to do even faster spins it seems, little g's all over the place.

    4. Re:That thing spins fast! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      45 rpm

    5. Re:That thing spins fast! by servognome · · Score: 1

      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you?

      I prefer the way women handle my "pop-ups."

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
  4. We already know that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just notch the gravity up a few more and your hair will turn gold, your punch can shatter rocks, and you can fly in the sky.

    For more information please refer to this.

  5. They need to charge admission for this ride... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The spinnerator! Whoooo!

  6. Destination: Gitmo by Quantam · · Score: 5, Funny

    Amazing 2 in 1 machine assists in space research while extracting information from uncooperative terrorists! A bargain for your tax dollars!

    --
    You have tried to support your argument with faulty reasoning! Go directly to jail; do not pass Go, do not collect $200!
    1. Re:Destination: Gitmo by Voltageaav · · Score: 1

      It dosn't leave any bruises or marks either. So those pesky human rights people don't have evidence against you... unless some dumbass takes pictures that is.

      --
      Someone save me from this sanity.
    2. Re:Destination: Gitmo by stjobe · · Score: 2, Informative
      It dosn't leave any bruises or marks either

      John Paul Stapp disagrees (emphasis mine):

      When the Sonic Wind had hit the water brake, it had produced 46.2 Gs of force. And for an astonishing 1.1 seconds, Stapp'd endured 25 Gs. It was the equivalent of a Mach 1.6 ejection at 40,000 feet, a jolt in excess of that experienced by a driver who crashes into a red brick wall at over 120 miles per hour. Only it had lasted perhaps nine times longer. And it had burst nearly every capillary in Stapp's eyeballs.
      --
      "Total destruction the only solution" - Bob Marley
    3. Re:Destination: Gitmo by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      But, whether for scientific or military purposes, if the subjects have died, the device can be named dual information extraction device, or "DIED"...

      But, in the spirit of "Rods from the Gods", "Eye in the Sky" and "Finger of God", and so on... the government can herald:

      DIETY: "Dual Information Extraction Testing Yoke"....

      (cue up all the jokes about being "yoked/yolked" around)

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    4. Re:Destination: Gitmo by davidsyes · · Score: 0

      No bruises or marks my ass... hehhee

      You get spun up about 25.5 Gs against a panel, desk edge, or chair for say 5 or 10 mintues (how else will this type of test be useful if under 5 minutes but is supposed to explore deepspace travel?...) and see if you don't come out with a new type of.... (heralding voice here) "THE BENDS". I'm sure they can pump your ass full of nitrogen or some gas, but, in the end (pun intended), your ass will STILL be all busted up inside. Probay the best to come out of it is reduced case flatulence, if that doesn't in itself turn the spinner into a gas chamber, or make it an ex-ghaspirating experience..

      One wonders whether these geniuses had the "forsight" to take a few fresh cadavers out for a spin.

      (In the name of NASA and national eminence, I suppose some contracts could be crafted for the expeditious acquisition of "near-live cadavavers"... Or, subject some bona-fide criminals to these in exchange for, ummmm, a lighter sentence. A few non-joy rides in one of these things could have the effect of compressing time and lightening the incarceration time...Could even open up a whole new set of recidivism stats for the FBI and any other agency wanting to fight over that cherry assignment.... If you "weeble and wobble" the hardened criminal elements sufficiently, major crime could "bow", or "knuckle under the pressure"...spuns (spun puns) intended...)

      But, for the criminal elements, say, (50's esque product placement voice): "You do this NOT ONLY for your COUNTRY, but for yourSELF."

      Once the subject emerges, the testers can pull Kirk's version of the IDIC/Vulcan split-fingers sign (where Kirk asked the mind-melded McCoy: "How many fingers to I have up?" It was easy for McCoy to say, "That's not very DAMN FUNNY...) and ask the emergees: "Ohhhh, say can you SEEEEEE????"

      I mean, the KNOW they have plenty of documentation about car crashes, high-altitude and low-altitude high-speed ejection, deep (attempted and failed) escape from submarines, nitrogen narcosis, and a plethora of other unnatural limits-pushing or limits-breaking events.

      I suppose this Stapp will probably be blind to some extent, if not completely. Maybe Stapp WAS the subject? If so, I envision it was QUITE an "eye-opening" to "eye-popping" experience...

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    5. Re:Destination: Gitmo by stjobe · · Score: 1
      No entry found for diety


      2 entries found for deity


      Guess you'll have to work on that acronym a bit more... ;)

      --
      "Total destruction the only solution" - Bob Marley
    6. Re:Destination: Gitmo by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      CLEARLY you're taking this DOUBLY seriously...

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    7. Re:Destination: Gitmo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah. It'd just be funnier if it was correct.

    8. Re:Destination: Gitmo by fbjon · · Score: 1

      Exactly. And the poor guy's tongue sticking out his ass is a pretty clear "bruise" to me.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    9. Re:Destination: Gitmo by Voltageaav · · Score: 1

      No one said it'd be going at 25 Gs. I'd bet most people would give before 15, and it wouldn't be all at once, they can slowly accelerate them to get the same effect. All this about a joke anyway...

      --
      Someone save me from this sanity.
    10. Re:Destination: Gitmo by stjobe · · Score: 1

      It actually states in the article (and even the ./ summary!) that the cabin for humans won't be doing over 12.5Gs, so the point is moot.

      On the other hand, why don't we let this thread go where it wants to? Just because you made a joke doesn't mean the rest of the thread has to be a joke as well.

      Relax, and enjoy das blinkenlights ;)

      --
      "Total destruction the only solution" - Bob Marley
    11. Re:Destination: Gitmo by Zaatxe · · Score: 1

      Why to you english-speaking people write Gitmo instead of Guantánamo? Really, that's not a rethorical question, I really want to know.

      --
      So say we all
    12. Re:Destination: Gitmo by Detritus · · Score: 1

      Fewer syllables. Informal language tends to drop excess syllables. For example, math vs. mathematics.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    13. Re:Destination: Gitmo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same reason people say USA instead of United States of America. Or UK vs United Kingdom. Gitmo is an abbreviation mainly used by the military, I suppose. That's wher I heard it first. Now that GTMO is famous, lots of people use it.

      Plus, we cant find that funny accent thingy on our keyboads.

    14. Re:Destination: Gitmo by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2, Informative
      Why to you english-speaking people write Gitmo instead of Guantánamo?

      That's what the Marines stationed there nicknamed it, long ago.

  7. Re:Amazingly by Dis*abstraction · · Score: 1

    That depends on how good you are at reading orthographic projections.

  8. Effects of hypergravity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny
    While one should be skeptical that pressures as great as 12.50G let alone 20.00G would ever be experienced during space travel (space being weightless, this would I imagine be largely of concern only to a craft piloted foolishly close to a black hole) I hope the testing of effects of hypergravity on equipment is extended to onboard computers as well.

    When we make a mistake on little things like mixing standard and metric measurements, I worry about the more complex -- designing a craft around a computer running at 1Ghz at 1G may lead to folly when electrical current is trying to move through the same circuits with twenty times the gravitational force on it.

    I'm a big believer in planning, and fortunately it looks like that's going on here. Hopefully this is a sign that we're still on track for manned intrastellar exploration.

    1. Re:Effects of hypergravity? by Clockwurk · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think the pressures they are referring to would be experienced during launch, not during spaceflight.

    2. Re:Effects of hypergravity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A G is a measure of acceleration. The reason why space flight seems weightless is not that you have completely escaped the pull of Earth's gravity (considering most space flight is much closer than the moon and the moon remains in orbit around the Earth by gravity) but rather because the astronauts and the space vehicle are both being pulled down at (usually) the same rate of acceleration.

      In fact, you would feel weightless while your space craft was pulled into a black hole because you and the space craft are still falling at the same rate.

      This changes if rockets are on. As the rockets accelerate the craft, the astronauts would feel great strain as the craft begins to move before they move with it. The same thing is true if you were trying to use your rockets to slow your fall into a black hole. Think slamming on your brakes in a car.

    3. Re:Effects of hypergravity? by m50d · · Score: 1

      While one should be skeptical that pressures as great as 12.50G let alone 20.00G would ever be experienced during space travel (space being weightless, this would I imagine be largely of concern only to a craft piloted foolishly close to a black hole)

      Erm, acceleration, dude. If we get a drive that lets us do so, the quickest way to get to alpha centurai will be to accelerate as fast as we can halfway and decellerate the other half.

      --
      I am trolling
    4. Re:Effects of hypergravity? by The+Wooden+Badger · · Score: 1

      I think the biggest benefit of this type of research is in learning about how the human body reacts to the exercise stimulus in 1 G, 2 Gs, and so on. Exercise in space is about the only way very healthy 20-30 year olds don't have serious osteoporosis symptoms after spending some time on the ISS, and to a much lesser degree the shuttle. The human body doesn't maintain bone mass, or muscle tissue if it doesn't need it. Zero gravity is the maximum example of not having any need for bone mass and muscle tissue. Throw a centrifuge onto a space station/craft and the occupants might actually be able to walk and move on their own power after a stint in space.

      Also a G is a unit of acceleration if I remember my physics right.

      --
      Heroscape, it's like legos combined with anachronistic wargames.
    5. Re:Effects of hypergravity? by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

      If we had a 20-g constant-boost drive, it could get our pulped remains to Pluto in two and a half days.

    6. Re:Effects of hypergravity? by XchristX · · Score: 1

      Erm, actually, capital case "G" is the universal gravitational constant ( 6.67300 × 10-11 m3 kg-1 s-2), and the only "unit" of acceleration is length per time squared. The acceleration due to gravity (at the poles and at a radial distance equal to the mean radius of the earth 6 378.1 kilometers) is denoted by small case "g" (~9,8 m.s^2 or 32 ft/s^2 for the Americans) and is not a good "unit" per se (because it's not really constant).

        Oh, and just FYI for everybody, there is no "acceleration", "pressure" or "force" directly experienced inside a centrifuge. What is experienced is a non-inertial pseudoforce which is the result of transforming to an accelerated frame.

      --
      l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
    7. Re:Effects of hypergravity? by Firehed · · Score: 1
      Also a G is a unit of acceleration if I remember my physics right.
      One that's remarkably close to 9.8m/s^2.
      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    8. Re:Effects of hypergravity? by WCD_Thor · · Score: 1

      Of course space is wieghtless, but when taking off into space, there is gravity, and a shit ton of G force, I think I heard its around 9gs, but I'm not sure.

    9. Re:Effects of hypergravity? by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      GOOD GOD!!!

      "0, Insightful"?

      This guy must have had INCREDIBLY NEGATIVE karma to be zero and yet insightful...

      No mercy?

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    10. Re:Effects of hypergravity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was an AC. ACs don't have negative (or positive) karma.

    11. Re:Effects of hypergravity? by stjobe · · Score: 1
      The shuttle does not subject the astronauts to more than about 3-4 Gs on take-off. On the other hand, you subject yourself to:
      • 10.4 Gs when plopping down into a chair
      • 8.1 Gs when hopping off a step
      • 3.5 Gs during a cough
      • 2.9 Gs during a sneeze

      (source)
      --
      "Total destruction the only solution" - Bob Marley
    12. Re:Effects of hypergravity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sorry to break it to ya guys but the real problem with long range space travel is not that we'll run out of food or it takes generations to get there but that even over a few years cosmic radiation would destroy a human being. our atmospere is currently shielding us and we could use water to shield space vehicles but that's kind of heavy and i think you need a wall of water around you that's about 5 meters thick. btw water is heavy and that's alot of water. you'd be dead long before getting anywhere close to alpha centauri with the current shielding.

    13. Re:Effects of hypergravity? by st1d · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, not to nitpick, but the fastest way to get to alpha centauri (not counting a few out-there theoretical means of travel) would be to accelerate the whole way, and slam into the star... :)

      --
      Microsoft has just released their much anticipated hands-free cordless mouse. Warning, it may hurt a little at first.
    14. Re:Effects of hypergravity? by st1d · · Score: 1

      Yes, I realize that A/C is a 3 star system...

      --
      Microsoft has just released their much anticipated hands-free cordless mouse. Warning, it may hurt a little at first.
    15. Re:Effects of hypergravity? by st1d · · Score: 1

      Well, aside from the fact that we're safe due more to the earth's magnetic field (and to lesser extents, the moon and sun's effect on cosmic radiation), we can't REALLY know the effects on the human body until we send somebody outside the relative safety of the earth-moon system. Not to pander to the tinfoil folks, but maybe there's something in our genetic history (panspermia) that provides a defensive reaction to cosmic radiation. I mean, theoretically, the folks that landed on the moon absorbed a lot of this stuff, and are still kicking. Maybe it's good for you, or has a chemotherapy-like effect. :)

      Besides, we can barely get to the moon, worrying about how much radiation we can absorb is like being stranded on a deserted island and worrying about the effects of high tension power lines on the human body.

      --
      Microsoft has just released their much anticipated hands-free cordless mouse. Warning, it may hurt a little at first.
    16. Re:Effects of hypergravity? by A+non-mouse+Cow+Herd · · Score: 1
      While one should be skeptical that pressures as great as 12.50G let alone 20.00G would ever be experienced during space travel
      They already have been. While normal trajectories don't expose the astronauts to loads that high, aborts and other off-nominal situations do. For example, the first attempts to fly Soyuz T-10 and Soyuz 18
    17. Re:Effects of hypergravity? by Tomfrh · · Score: 1

      "Oh, and just FYI for everybody, there is no "acceleration", "pressure" or "force" directly experienced inside a centrifuge."

      Yeah there is...

    18. Re:Effects of hypergravity? by kfg · · Score: 1

      While one should be skeptical that pressures as great as 12.50G let alone 20.00G would ever be experienced during space travel (space being weightless. . .

      How do you suppose one gets to space?

      And of course space is weightless. Space is just geometry. It is truely massless. D'oh!

      KFG

    19. Re:Effects of hypergravity? by zblack_eagle · · Score: 1

      How about sudden changes in direction?

    20. Re:Effects of hypergravity? by WCD_Thor · · Score: 1

      After going to Wikipedia, I have to say that sitting down does not give 10gs, because right above the data you listed it says fighter pilots sometimes gray out at around 6gs, if this was the case plopping into a chair would be much more interesting than it already is.

    21. Re:Effects of hypergravity? by stjobe · · Score: 1

      Time is of the essence.

      On that note, the words "instantaneous" and "sustained" might be of interest to you. You'll find them in any online or offline dictionary.

      Isn't it ironic that you call your blog anti-idiots? ;)

      --
      "Total destruction the only solution" - Bob Marley
    22. Re:Effects of hypergravity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaha! Classic. Props to you sir.

      There are still those among us who appreciate a good troll.

    23. Re:Effects of hypergravity? by Dis*abstraction · · Score: 1

      FYI, I think your sig is missing a crucial comma, without which its meaning is completely reversed. Just thought you'd like to know...

    24. Re:Effects of hypergravity? by XchristX · · Score: 1
      --
      l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
    25. Re:Effects of hypergravity? by edflyerssn007 · · Score: 1

      You experience centriptal force, which is actually a Normal force of the wall of the human chamber experienced on ur body pointed from the wall to the center of the of the machine, assuming u sit facing inward. So there is a force. Welcome to physics 101.

      --
      So you see what had happened was....
    26. Re:Effects of hypergravity? by m50d · · Score: 1

      It'd help with that, too, but other than space combat (hopefully not coming anytime soon) we shouldn't need them.

      --
      I am trolling
    27. Re:Effects of hypergravity? by WCD_Thor · · Score: 1

      Wow, now you go so low as to get personal. I knwo what instantaneous and sustained mean asshole, but untill that wikipedia page has sources listed that I can check, I will not agree with its info, because wikipedia has been historicly incorrect many times.

    28. Re:Effects of hypergravity? by Tomfrh · · Score: 1

      I quote from the centrifugal force article:

      "As it is an actual force, it is always present, independent of the choice of reference frame."

    29. Re:Effects of hypergravity? by XchristX · · Score: 1

      The article is wrong. Look up Goldstein's Classical Mechanics (the definitive textbook in Class Mech). The wikipedia article presents an ambiguous definition of centrifugal force (as a reaction to centripetal force). Physicists today do not use this definition (I am one). The reaction to centripetal force is just that. A reaction. centrifugal "force" only exists in the noninertial frame (together with Coriolis and Euler pseudoforces).

      --
      l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
    30. Re:Effects of hypergravity? by XchristX · · Score: 1

      Oh, and another thing. The force experienced by the fellow in the rotating chamber is generated by some other source (a motor, or gravity or whatever). The fact that this equals

      $$
      \dot{theta}X\dot{theta}X r + 2 (\dot{theta} X \dot{r}) + \ddot{\theta} X r
      $$

      is a consequence of the dynamics, not the force. Thus, the centrifugal acceleration is a consequence of the dynamics, not the force, so it's not a force (it's not generated by any of the strong, weak, electromagnetic or gravitational interactions). The normal force experienced by the fellow is generated by the electromagnetic interactions between the atoms of the surface and the atoms of the fellow, but that's not the centrifugal force, 'cause that would exist even if the system was not accelerating (it would be a different value). The centrifugal force (as I understand it) produces a qualitative difference between a rotating frame and an inertial frame (it's not there in the latter), so it's a characteristic of the dynamics.

      --
      l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
    31. Re:Effects of hypergravity? by XchristX · · Score: 1

      Oh, and I almost forgot, there is no such thing as a force anyway. It's an artificial device introduced by Newton to make the laws of classical mechanics less obfuscated. Ultimately, the most elegant formalisms of classical mechanics (Lagrangian, hamiltonian, and Canonical transformations/Hamilton Jacobi Theory) does away with this "force" nonsense altogether. There are only geometrical and topologocal constraints thatdetermine the dynamics. This is easily exported to relativity, so this formalism's better.

      --
      l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
    32. Re:Effects of hypergravity? by The+Wooden+Badger · · Score: 1

      Again if I remember my physics correctly, acceleration is a change in speed and/or direction. A centrifuge is a change in direction for sure.

      --
      Heroscape, it's like legos combined with anachronistic wargames.
    33. Re:Effects of hypergravity? by XchristX · · Score: 1


      >Again if I remember my physics correctly, acceleration is a change in speed >
      >and/or direction. A centrifuge is a change in direction for sure.

      Yes, that is true. But, that acceleration is the centripetal acceleration which iscaused by the motor of the centrifuge, not by any nonexistent "centrifugal force" (even if we accept the concept of force, which itself is nonexistent as I have stated in posts above).

      In what follows I adhere to the standard definition of "centrifugal" force as the non-inertial force, not as the normal reaction to centripetal force.

      The force of the motor gets propagated by Newton's 3rd law through the atomic interaction of the walls of the centrifuge and transferred to the fellow in contact with it. So the force experienced by the fellow in the chamber is the force due to the motor.

      The other way to look at it is that there is no motor, but there is an accelerated frame (where the motor is conceptually unimportant as it is outside your universe of the accelerated frame), and you follow an artificial recipe that says that you should just "plug in" (by rote) a force term (in this case "centrifugal force") equal to -mass*acceleration_of_the_frame. This recipe is convenient sometimes, but unnecessary as we can get the same result from ab-initio reasoning as in the previous paragraph.

      So what you are doing is assuming that the centrifuge is a different universe, where all physical phenomena are appended by this universal divine "centrifugal force". I dunno abt you, but that's too wierd for my taste.

      There is no such thing as centrifugal force. The very idea is completely bogus and unnecessary and so can be removed from all formalisms of accelerated frames without losing any of the physics, so it does not exist.

      It's ambiguities like this that proves that the whole concept of force is a pile of rubbish and can easily be done away with (okay, maybe not easily, but the formalisms in classical mechanics that get rid of forces are far more elegant and insightful than all this clunky Newtonian stuff, and).

      In case you think I'm being pedantic, I should point out that Hamiltonian, Lagrangian and canonical formalisms are significantly easier to implement computationally in systems where analytical solutins cannot be done (likechaotic systems or quantum systems with multiple nonlinear resonances) because of their logically algorithmic structure, so in the modern world of research, nobody implements all this "force" stuff into their computations.

      --
      l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
    34. Re:Effects of hypergravity? by The+Wooden+Badger · · Score: 1

      I think that ultimately this is splitting hairs to some degree. I have only a basic understanding of physics, but I think there is a tremendous opportunity for advancement in regards to our understanding of the human body in alien environments (both real and simulated). If we can keep spacefarers healthier by including a centrifuge to simulate gravity it is worth looking at, whether or not there is such a thing as "centrifugal force" (as an aside I believe I heard that the concept was erroneous in Jr High).

      I think the original post muddied things up a bit by thinking too much about the extremes of the experimental observations, and it misses the practical applications. The original post I responded to propogated ideas that I don't think fall under the umbrella of physics unless he has heard some very advanced concepts without the basic understanding. I doubt very much that circuits would be impacted by a "force" of 20G for example.

      My field is exercise science, so I focus on the human organism. Perhaps there is an application to the instruments and devices that would be used at hypergravity (thus the 20 G stuff in the article), but I find the human element far more interesting, and compelling. I for one would love to see experimental data for a person living at say 1.5G for a two week period, and the impact that the experiment would have on bone density, muscle mass, and the ability of the subject to recover from training bouts. I think a very interesting experiment would be examining training at various multiples of gravity and then recover in zero gravity. If we can find the ideal multiple G training environment with a zero G rest environment we could keep astronauts healthy for the duration of a trip to (and from) Mars.

      --
      Heroscape, it's like legos combined with anachronistic wargames.
    35. Re:Effects of hypergravity? by XchristX · · Score: 1

      >I think that ultimately this is splitting hairs to some degree

      Well, within the context of traditional Newtonian mechanics, you're right. It's essentially about semantics and interpretations. It gets more complex in more advanced treatments of classical mechanics.

      >but I think there is a tremendous opportunity for advancement in regards to our >understanding of the human body in alien environments

      I guess that's true. Irrespective of whether centrifugal force is real or not, it is a fact that the adverse effects of acceleration are real.

      Science fiction writers like Arthur C. Clarke have proposed a "field-based engine" where, instead of using thrust to propel ships, causingforces to be distributed inhomogenously through atomic interactions (thereby causing all the pressure, G-forces etc that cause people ot die at high accelerations), the engine (or an externalsource) would generate a force field, much like gravity, only more powerful. This would cause all particles to move with the same acceleration, and there would be no "G-forces".

      But that is all fiction, in reality, you will have to go through G-forces if you want to accelerate (unless you do so by gravity, but that's rather weak) and so we need to see how it affects us in detail.

      I'd mod you up, but I blew all my points yesterday.

      --
      l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
    36. Re:Effects of hypergravity? by stjobe · · Score: 1
      Oh, this is rich :)

      On that very page -- right after the table of everyday G forces -- is a link to a Popular Mechanics article which in turn references "a classic medical study published nearly a decade ago in the medical journal Spine", which most likely is available on PubMed should anyone want to check it out.

      Now let me quote from the PM article (emphasis mine):

      Time Matters
      When discussing the effects of g-forces on the body, time emerges as one of the most critical factors. When it comes to the higher-g sections of amusement rides (see the illustration above right), exposure to high g-forces lasts only a fraction of a second. Blackouts and other health problems associated with g's require exposure to g-forces that are either greater in magnitude or of much longer duration than those achieved by today's amusement rides.

      The issue of g-forces on the body was explored in detail in a classic medical study published nearly a decade ago in the medical journal Spine. In their investigation, doctors and engineers found that the normal movements we go through every day subjects us to far greater gravitational pull than that felt on any amusement park ride. According to the study, you experience 10.4 g's when you plop down into a chair. Hopping off a step generates 8.1 g's. A cough is a 3.5 g experience, a sneeze generates 2.9 g's. By comparison, 4-g amusement rides are wimpy.

      So, you see, it doesn't matter if you agree or not, those are the facts.

      I would suggest a more humble approach in the future; there are still people around that can teach you a thing or two, young padawan.

      --
      "Total destruction the only solution" - Bob Marley
  9. Very interestng proposal... by kitsunewarlock · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've personally wanted to play around with a "high gravity" machine for a long time. Training in one would be the ultimate experience for any athlete I'm sure. I just wonder if the intense G's would actually strengthen your organs and bones by stress-testing them, so to speak, or just weaken them. Probably the latter.

    --
    Ginga no Rekshiya Mata Each page.
    1. Re:Very interestng proposal... by electrosoccertux · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Certain techniques can strengthen bones. What you speak of, stress-testing them, is a common way of building bone mass among martial artists. Actually they don't have to work at it, it just happens. Bones are an interconnected calcium (among other things) mesh. In between these connections, there are lots of miniature bubbles and air pockets. When the fighter repeatedly hits an object with enough force, the pressure in the bones breaks the weakest parts of the mesh. Later these get built back. But this time they are much stronger, and can withstand more force.

      Since the centrifugal machine is sustained force and not an impulse, I doubt would inherently make your bones stonger. As far as making organs tougher, there are other ways to do that. Having a friend drop a medicine ball on your stomach while you tense it is a great way to toughen your abdomen.

    2. Re:Very interestng proposal... by transiit · · Score: 1

      My first thought was "When will the U.S. Olympic training center get one?"

      Not that I give a rat's ass about the olympics, but if you could convince athletes to spend prolonged periods in such a device and train them at that, there's at least a few events that would surely see an improvement that didn't involve performance-enhancing drugs or blood-doping.

      The real engineering feat would be to make a centrifuge pod large enough to not only simulate a high-jump track, but also large enough to provide living quarters and whatnot. Just imagine the size of the counterweight, and then imagine the insane energy requirements to keep that thing spinning continuously for years.

      I say we try it, even if the portion of the population that actually thinks about olympic events (short of the every-four-years television retrospective) is exceedingly small. It'd make for a great physical and psychological case study.

      -transiit

    3. Re:Very interestng proposal... by The+Wooden+Badger · · Score: 1

      I was going to spend some mod points on this discussion, but I have to respond to this. I have a degree in exercise science and work with a men's and a women's college volleyball team. There would be almost no benefit to athletes that would live in this type of condition. The results from training are highly specific. There are two obvious ways ( to me at least) this is a problem.

      If an athlete were to train at 2 Gs, let's use olympic weightlifting for this example, they would certainly develop more maximal force production, but that depends a whole lot on how much training can be done. If the athlete is living at 2 Gs, they don't get a whole lot of opportunity to rest and recover from training bouts. This means they don't get to train as often or as intense.

      There are motor learning problems as well in that the motor units would learn the movement AT 2 Gs and performing that movement at standard gravity would be entirely different. The lifter, assuming the force production is greater than normal training, would lift too quickly to control, and injury becomes likely (think picking up something that is much lighter than expected).

      The same would hold true for almost all sports. Few events would benefit from hypergravity training. 100 meter dash is the only one that comes to mind at the moment. Periodic jump training might benefit sports like volleyball, but the other ones involve skill performance that would be seriously hindered. Most olympic caliber athletes are already in peak condition and this would help very little; certainly not enough to justify the cost. One I'm familiar with is a 6' 8" volleyball player that can jump high enough to touch 12'+ (top of a regulation basketball backboard) while wearing jeans. In most matches he doesn't come close to his maximum vertical leap. If there was constant training in 2 Gs for a volleyball team they would be horrible on game day because of jacking the ball too high and far, and their timing to jump and spike the ball would be painful to watch (i.e. my 10 year old daughter would look better)

      --
      Heroscape, it's like legos combined with anachronistic wargames.
    4. Re:Very interestng proposal... by NitsujTPU · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dude. They could learn to become Super-Saiyans!!

    5. Re:Very interestng proposal... by st1d · · Score: 1

      Pretty much agree with your comment, but not sure the 100 meter dash would benefit. Heavy Gs would stress the cardiovascular system, and might be of benefit to long distance runners, but dashes are largely about harnessing the power of gravity, as running is pretty much controlled falling. Heavy Gs might benefit a weight lifter, as they could get used to the forces, and when they returned to normal Gs, they would retain that power for a small amount of time. Just living in that environment might increase their ability to lift, as they would be strengthening their bodies without thinking about it.

      As for runners, not only would it make them clumsy, but if anything, it would probably slow them down, simply because they would spend more time learning how not to fall on their faces. Running at higher Gs would force them to lean less, or end up on the floor. However, perhaps running in slightly less gravity on occasion might make it easier for them to lean forward and move their legs quicker, because they wouldn't have to expend as much effort maintaining their balance. This would have to be done carefully though, so they didn't become too adapted to smaller g forces, and end up feeling like somebody was riding on their shoulders. As an occasional experience though, it should allow them to experiment with moving their center of gravity forward, moving their legs faster, all without having to risk serious injuries in the process.

      --
      Microsoft has just released their much anticipated hands-free cordless mouse. Warning, it may hurt a little at first.
    6. Re:Very interestng proposal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Just remember to tense it. Having a "friend" drop a medicine ball on your stomach while you don't tense it is just painful and damaging.

    7. Re:Very interestng proposal... by Julian+Morrison · · Score: 1

      "Since the centrifugal machine is sustained force and not an impulse, I doubt would inherently make your bones stonger."

      Only if they lie flat and don't move. A footfall at 12 gees has to hurt. Even shuffling would be "haul up, smash down".

    8. Re:Very interestng proposal... by iNetRunner · · Score: 1

      If you happen to be in space, then you would benefit from having an centrifuge, that you could use for a couple hours a day to maintain bone mass. This I think has been proven to work. So, why wouldn't it also work on Earth when you exceed 1 G in it? Sure impulses might be more effective (time per day wise), but it could be difficult (or painful) to administer them to all bones etc..

      --
      Store with salt
    9. Re:Very interestng proposal... by eonlabs · · Score: 1

      I'm sure, more than anything, it would just start to sort them by density. The heavier ones away from the center of the centrifuge. This would probably be similar to what happens to cells in a centrifuge when people are trying to extract DNA from them. I'm sure the effect isn't nearly as strong, since it's easier to spin something smaller much faster.

      --
      I wouldn't consider the mad hatter mad. Just reality impaired. He sure can make a mean cup of tea.
  10. exercise by omeomi · · Score: 3, Funny

    help the rapidly growing senior population who, like astronauts, doesn't exercise much

    This seems like a really expensive way to prove that both groups just need to exercise more...

    1. Re:exercise by Heraclius · · Score: 1

      I don't get it, they're going to help senior citizens exercise by putting them inside a machine with 20G gravity?

    2. Re:exercise by Basehart · · Score: 3, Funny

      "I don't get it, they're going to help senior citizens exercise by putting them inside a machine with 20G gravity?"

      Not all of them at once. Sheesh!

    3. Re:exercise by st1d · · Score: 2, Funny

      >>Not all of them at once. Sheesh!

      Of course not. You put them in a few at a time, then spin them at 20g for a bit.

      Then you can fit more in. :)

      --
      Microsoft has just released their much anticipated hands-free cordless mouse. Warning, it may hurt a little at first.
    4. Re:exercise by kfg · · Score: 1

      This seems like a really expensive way to prove that both groups just need to exercise more...

      Really. Dr. Kenneth Cooper (Dr. Cooper Bio) of the Air Force nailed this one more than 40 years ago.

      For people interested in the simple version of how exercise works physiologically I recommend the Covert Baily (M.S. in Biochemistry from MIT) materials. The book Fit or Fat is good, but the video series is not to be missed. Maybe your library has copies. Mine does. Covert is a natural performer and you'll have more fun looking at diagrams of molecules than you thought possible.

      It's pretty easy to study the effects of exercise on people, seniors or not, in one G. Just build a simulation of Earth. All we need is budget approval.

      KFG

  11. Professional Journalism 101: Grammar by Yonsen · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    "...about this NASA's machine."

    Need I really say more?

    1. Re:Professional Journalism 101: Grammar by Ninjaesque+One · · Score: 1

      this National Aeronautics and Space Administration's machine. Sounds speculative about the existence of NASA, but no problems besides that.

      --
      Ninjas and pirates. How piquant.
    2. Re:Professional Journalism 101: Grammar by mjeppsen · · Score: 1

      Good point. We could all use a heathy dose of Grammar Naziism from time to time.

      -MJ

    3. Re:Professional Journalism 101: Grammar by stjobe · · Score: 1

      Here you go: l
      You seem to be missing one :)

      --
      "Total destruction the only solution" - Bob Marley
  12. Margaritas by achesloc · · Score: 4, Funny

    I just want to know if it can mix a good margarita. My machine broke.

    1. Re:Margaritas by Basehart · · Score: 1

      "I just want to know if it can mix a good margarita. My machine broke."

      Did you try plugging it into an electrical outlet that you know for sure is operational?

      Did you turn the power switch to the ON position?

      Call NASA!

    2. Re:Margaritas by 1iar_parad0x · · Score: 1

      Actually a centrifuge (a traditional one) is the opposite of a mixer. It would remove the mix from the liquid alcohol. I don't know much about margaritas, so pardon my dilettante bartending knowledge.

      --
      What do you mean my sig is repetitive? What do you mean my sig is repetitive? What do you mean....
  13. Vehicular health improves physical health by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to reduce the adverse effects that space travel can have on astronauts' physical heath

    By spinning the crap out them!

    We've already demonstrated astronauts can survive the g-forces of entry and re-entry. Really the best way now to improve the adverse health effects of space travel is to glue their foam on tighter.

    1. Re:Vehicular health improves physical health by st1d · · Score: 1

      >>Really the best way now to improve the adverse health effects of space travel is to glue their foam on tighter.

      We tried that, but they kept suffocating. :(

      --
      Microsoft has just released their much anticipated hands-free cordless mouse. Warning, it may hurt a little at first.
  14. Physical heath? by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 0
    The goal of these experiments is to reduce the adverse effects that space travel can have on astronauts' physical heath.

    My department worked on early prototypes of this astounding mahcine, and I got a ride on one. It physically crushed the heath bar I had in my pocket, and made my lunch relocate to the floor behind my feet. If space travel is indeed like this, it is certainly not good for your physical health, or your heath, physically (only physically bad, since it is still a yummy treat, even if it is all smashed and broken).

    --
    This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
  15. Re:Gravity of which planet? by CRCulver · · Score: 2, Informative

    The word "terrestrial" comes from the Latin word terra "Earth" (in turn from PIE *ters- "dry [ground]", see Sihler's New Comparative Grammar ). While arguing from etymology is not always valid, I daresay that in this case if one simply says "terrestrial gravity", it's logical to assume to refers to the Earth's gravity, and not that of the moon or other planets, which have their own appropriate adjectives.

  16. Re:Gravity of which planet? by mlyle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    terrestrial P Pronunciation Key (t-rstr-l)
    adj.
    Of or relating to the earth or its inhabitants.

  17. Re:Gravity of which planet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Terra" - Latin for "Earth". Terrestrial.

    "Terrestrial gravity of earth" would be redundant.

    Also, it would be redundant.

    See redundancy.

  18. lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    experiment complete.

  19. Re:Gravity of which planet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am not ridiculing you when asking this, I truly want to know for the sake of curiosity: What did you think "terrestrial" meant in that sentence?

  20. Re:Gravity of which planet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    That article should read "20 times the terrestrial gravity OF EARTH". The terrestrial gravity of the moon is much different than the terrestrial gravity of Mars or that of Earth.


    Yeah! I'm so sick of these Earth-centric news.

  21. Ummmm Astronaughts are in Fantastic shape. by feyhunde · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've got a chance to meet a few when I was working on a college project a few years back that had Nasa ties.
    Don Pettit, former ISS Science Officer, was up for around 6 months. You'd think he'd be like that Russian who was too weak to walk and had a critical loss of bone density.

    Nope. He got up, and with in a week was running 10 miles or more a day. He lost essentially no bone density. Freaking fantastic shape he's in. All the astronaut core is like that. It's all about constant exercise and having impact exercise.

    --
    I'd say more, but my guild is raiding.
    1. Re:Ummmm Astronaughts are in Fantastic shape. by Barnoid · · Score: 1

      He was up there for "only" 6 months.

      On the other hand, Soviet cosmonaut Yuri Romanenko who had to be carried to a hospital was there for about a year. Russian cosmonaut Valery Polyakov even stayed for 439 days. I can't recall the name of the Russian guy returning to earth quite recently, but afair also he has been up there much longer than 6 months.

      Could it be that the effect is getting worse with time?

    2. Re:Ummmm Astronaughts are in Fantastic shape. by stjobe · · Score: 1

      There's a reason we have different spelling for words that sound alike, and that's because they mean different things.

      Dreadnought ~ "Fearless"
      Astronaught ~ "Starless"?

      I was trying to think of a joke about astronaughts (Star zeroes? Those not astronauts?) but I guess sunday morning coffee hasn't taken effect yet...

      Sorry for being a nitp(r)ick. Your meeting with Don Pettit is very interesting, and confirms my belief that astronauts are indeed very fit.

      --
      "Total destruction the only solution" - Bob Marley
    3. Re:Ummmm Astronaughts are in Fantastic shape. by david.given · · Score: 1
      Nope. He got up, and with in a week was running 10 miles or more a day. He lost essentially no bone density. Freaking fantastic shape he's in. All the astronaut core is like that. It's all about constant exercise and having impact exercise.

      I remember there being some talk, not that long ago, that it would be better if astronauts weren't be so fit. The idea was that because you inevitably get out of shape in space --- partly due to the free fall, partly due to being in a very small metal box with little opportunity to exercise --- it's very bad for the astronauts morale. The idea is that if you send up people who are in decent shape but not ultra-fit and obsessed about staying in shape, you'll end up with a much happier crew without there being much overall change in performance. Also, the kind of people who are willing to exercise for hours every day tend to be strong-willed extroverts who probably aren't the best choice for being cooped up for months in said small metal box.

      I don't know if anything came of it; it was a while ago, and I don't have any references...

  22. Re:Gravity of which planet? by Unbeliever · · Score: 1

    I'm trying to remember where, but I read some author positing that given our experience with Earth languages, that if ever we meet any extra-terrestrials, no matter how many, that in their native language, the name of their home planet will most likely to translate to "dirt" just like it does for us.

    --
    --Carlos V.
  23. Awesome! by starwed · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now I can finally become a Super-Saiyan!

    1. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummmmm i think you need 300G to become one ........prince vegeta

  24. Effects by Aggrav8d · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    From the description, it would also seem that the mere *subject* of high gravity reduced the cognitive functions, impairs the ability to write clearly, and generally gives one the appearance of brain damage. I suppose it was written while sitting in the machine in such a way that blood was forced to the back of the brain, away from the frontal lobes.

    Now to see how many people comment on my own writing abilities as a sign of my equally deteriorated mental state. ;)

  25. Slashdot has really gone downhill by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2, Insightful

    a 20-G centrifuge machine that can simulate up to 20 times the terrestrial gravity

    Geez, no shit sherlock. I wonder how much G earth gravity is?

    I can understand if this bit of info has to be included in say a BBC report but this is supposed to be a place filled with geeks and nerds who could work out for themselves that 20G is 20 times the G force of earths gravity. Even the americans should be able to handle the math involved. The canadians might need help. The dutch? It is sunday morning. To stoned to care. Not that it being sunday morning has anything to do with that.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Slashdot has really gone downhill by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1
      "Geez, no shit sherlock. I wonder how much G earth gravity is?

      I can understand if this bit of info has to be included in say a BBC report but this is supposed to be a place filled with geeks and nerds who could work out for themselves that 20G is 20 times the G force of earths gravity. Even the americans should be able to handle the math involved. The canadians might need help. The dutch? It is sunday morning. To stoned to care. Not that it being sunday morning has anything to do with that."


      Within minutes I was on the internet, registerring my disgust throughout the world!
      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    2. Re:Slashdot has really gone downhill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't that read, "...Too stoned..."? :P

    3. Re:Slashdot has really gone downhill by MadUndergrad · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you really want to complain, point out that 'G' is the universal gravitational constant, while 'g' (note: lowercase) is the acceleration of gravity at Earth's surface. Gotta remember to keep those units straight.

    4. Re:Slashdot has really gone downhill by barefootgenius · · Score: 1

      If you really want to complain. Ask, "Where on the Earths surface?".

      --
      /. bug #926803 - Why I can post.
    5. Re:Slashdot has really gone downhill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The dutch? It is sunday morning. To stoned to care.

      Hey, I resent that! Yesterday was a national holiday, we're too _hungover_ to care. Besides, cannabis is for tourists. Sheesh.

  26. Weightless? No! In freefall! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > space being weightless

    As long as you're in orbit, you're in freefall, not weightless. It just so happens that you go far enough sideways that there's never any ground to run into. So you have weight, and you are falling, it's just that everything else is falling with you, so you don't feel the force of gravity pusing you against the shuttle or whatever you're in.

    Sorry, just the obligitory physics lesson :)

  27. Re:Gravity of which planet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow. Just wow.

    I'm bookmarking this comment so I can check the replies later.

  28. Obligatory Futurama by zblack_eagle · · Score: 4, Funny

    Zoidberg: Relax, Fry. I'll simply spin you in a high-speed centrifuge, separating out the denser fluid of His Highness.

    Fry: But won't that crush my bones?

    Zoidberg: Oh, right, right, with the bones! I always forget about the bones.

    1. Re:Obligatory Futurama by Kagura · · Score: 1

      Did anybody else just HEAR Zoidberg's voice perfectly when they read that? Wooaaah~...

  29. Re:Gravity of which planet? by Voltageaav · · Score: 1

    Is it not generally assumed that when talking about units of garvity and it's not specified otherwise, it's the Earth's gravity that they're using? I'm sorry, but I'm betting that anyone who read that and thought they were talking about the gravity on Mars is on Crack.

    --
    Someone save me from this sanity.
  30. Re:Gravity of which planet? by Antony+T+Curtis · · Score: 1

    Um...Sorry to break it to you but...

    "Terrestrial gravity" is, by definition, the gravity experienced on Earth, 3rd planet of our solar system.

    If they meant the Moon (as in, the large body orbiting the Earth) they would have written "Luna gravity".

    For Mars, it would be "Martian gravity".

    For Jupiter, it would be "Jovian gravity"

    --
    No sig. Move along - nothing to see here.
  31. Re:Destination: Gitmo "Honestly... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    This is NOT your father's merry-go-round or Ferris wheel...

    But, NOR is it a torture device, or a gas chamber... It's a reincarnation *acceleration* chamber...(think Reagan era comments on the gas chamber...)

    Officially, it's an Information Secretion Device, though it can cause EXcretion and catonia and rapid weight loss, circulatory problems and acute inverse osteoporosis... But, primarily it has variable speed success at inducing persons of interest to secrete secret informations under otherwise unpossible nomral-g sitiations......

    Indeed, in the spirit of extracting every valuable penny's worth of information, we will TAX the shit out of all subjects subject to the newly-improved "Salad Spinner", aka "Vegetable Maker". The resulting past is tronger than vegemite...

    Talk about extracting information (from terrorists OR from science subjects) at "dizzying speeds"

    Now, just put James Bond in THAT intense G-force. I imagine almost ANYone would be "impregnable" under those harsh circumstances...

    Say, has anyone got a torch? It's quite dark in heeeeeeeee!!!!!!!!!!!

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  32. Re:Gravity of which planet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    which reminds me, I need to get cash out of the ATM machine

  33. centrifuge by tabatj · · Score: 0

    I once created a 20-G centrifuge machine that simulated up to 21 times terrestrial gravity.

  34. Re:Destination: Gitmo... USPTO? by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    Nevermind Gitmo... some of these could end up in Guam, Diego Garcia, some hinterland island of the Philippines... some afloat Prison/Afloat Mobyle Einformation Extraction Fasility... anyplace where US anti-torture laws would "normally" appall, umm, apply...

    Would the human inside count as a power source? If the device is properly balanced, the human inside this habit-trail might make this thing qualify as some sort of perpetual motion machine. Maybe NASA will get the first patent!

    We, NASA, on behalf of DHLS, claim an apparatus enabling the constant motion of a machine, which comprises a dense food and water supply, hope-inspiring-but-useless escape tools, and a plurality of combative but resilient human subjects contained therewithin, intent on fortuitously arriving upon or fervently concocting escape plans, inducing perpetual motion of embodied device.

    Further uses of this device are classified under various secrecy acts and are exempt from disclosure

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  35. Re:Gravity of which planet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ooooooh, I bet you regret that post. It made you look like Thick Dick McThicky of the clan Thick, talking on Thick Thursday.

  36. Just like the Moonraker Centrifuge by acid_andy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Bond: How fast does it go?
    Goodhead: It can go up to 20Gs, but that would be fatal. 3Gs is equivalent to take-off pressure. Most people pass out at 7.
    Bond: You make a great saleswoman.
    Goodhead: You don't have to worry. This is what we call a chicken switch. You just keep your finger on that button and the moment the pressure gets too much for you, release the button and the power's cut off.
    Bond: Just like that?!
    Goodhead: Oh come on Mr Bond, a 70 year old can take 3Gs!
    Bond: Well the trouble is there's never a 70 year old around when you need one...

    --
    Your ad here.
    1. Re:Just like the Moonraker Centrifuge by payndz · · Score: 1

      "Look after Mr. Bond. See that some harm comes to him."

      --
      You must think in Russian.
    2. Re:Just like the Moonraker Centrifuge by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Bond: Well the trouble is there's never a 70 year old around when you need one...

      Roger Moore was born in 1927....

  37. Re:Gravity of which planet? by stjobe · · Score: 1
    the name of their home planet will most likely to translate to "dirt" just like it does for us.

    2004 National Novel Writing Month winning "The Journal of Alan Ledford" by Roger Ostrander has a similar thought:

    The point is, nearly nobody names things originally. If the translator gives me a name for a station that ends up being "Small night-blooming flower native to the planet this station orbits found only in the high reaches of the southern hemisphere during the correct season", it's not a name I'm going to keep using but it at least shows that they gave naming it some thought. Those stations that aren't named "Outward Station" "Border Station" "Station for the Inspection of Others" and such are nearly always named after the planet they orbit, and if the species is native to that planet, that name is always "Dirt". So there are even more Dirt Stations than there are Outward Stations.
    --
    "Total destruction the only solution" - Bob Marley
  38. Black Hole???? by gijoel · · Score: 0
    While one should be skeptical that pressures as great as 12.50G let alone 20.00G would ever be experienced during space travel (space being weightless, this would I imagine be largely of concern only to a craft piloted foolishly close to a black hole)


    Given that the nearest black hole is 1600 light years away I'd be more interested in said craft's drive system than it's centrifuge.
  39. I did 17 Gs once - a car accident by spineboy · · Score: 1
    I was in a car accident and went from 35 MPH to 0 in about 2 feet (thats the crumple distance the bumper was pushed in). Luckily I was wearing my seatbelt, because the force thru the seatbelt broke 3 ribs, and I broke my right wrist in 3 places on the steering wheel. My left, free hand, left AN IMPRINT of my fist in the winshield glass!! I really sprained my neck - couldn't turn to the right more than 30 degrees for about a month, and sprained my shoulder on the opposite side of my broken wrist.

    Getting out of bed with 3 broken ribs (all low in front, by where the stomach muscles attach), a sprained neck and 2 bum arms took about 10 minutes each time, for the first month. I healed up just fine, it just involved putting an external fixator on my wrist for 8 weeks.

    Check out the life of Dr. (Col) John Stapp, who did all the early NASA high G experiments - he got up to 35 Gs in his rocket sled experiments. Similar injuries to mine, except he had a nice cushy 6 point restraint system, as compared to my 3 point typical car seat-belt
    http://nationalaviation.blade6.donet.com/component s/content_manager_v02/view_nahf/htdocs/menu_ps.asp ?NodeID=-654157167&group_ID=1134656385&Parent_ID=- 1

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  40. Re:Gravity of which planet? by Meumeu · · Score: 2, Funny

    That article should read "20 times the terrestrial gravity OF EARTH".

    Right. We don't want to confuse it with the venusian gravity of Mars...

  41. 17 Gs? Quit yer whining ;) by stjobe · · Score: 1

    Formula One race car driver David Purley survived an estimated 179.8 g in 1977 when he decelerated from 107 mph (172 km/h) to 0 in a distance of 26 inches (66 cm) after his throttle got stuck wide open and he hit a wall. He suffered 29 fractures, 3 dislocations and 6 heart-stoppages.

    --
    "Total destruction the only solution" - Bob Marley
    1. Re:17 Gs? Quit yer whining ;) by Detritus · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised that he survived. At those levels of deceleration, people are often killed by things like a torn aorta, which can kill you very quickly due to massive internal bleeding.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  42. CT Scanners by vectra14 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We were recently discussing CT scanners in a class... those things spin pretty damn fast, with all of the electronics experiencing something like 20G's... for hours and hours and hours. And the gantry is these days pretty damn heavy and insanely complex (i wonder how they get the data from the spinning sensors? surely not a million sliprings?) I suppose still maybe MRI is more impressive with its multi-tesla QUICKLY changing magnetic fields.

  43. Yeah but...it's a start! by FatSean · · Score: 1

    Seriously, I don't hate old people. Just the ones who drive like assholes and never get pulled over for it, but I get a ticket for 5MPH over.

    --
    Blar.
  44. Piquepaille tags by linvir · · Score: 1

    Come on guys, are we really that scared of his submissions that we need three tags composed of his name? Why not "centrifuge" or "gravity"?

    1. Re:Piquepaille tags by Aranth+Brainfire · · Score: 1

      Seriously, if these tags are going to be useful at all (which is really kind of doubtful now that I think about it) the taggers need to grow up.

      --
      "Quoting yourself is stupid." -Me
  45. Re:"Flat People" at 12.5 Gs by MindKata · · Score: 0

    I hope they have a way of scraping the poor sods off the back wall! :)

    --
    There are 10 kinds of people in the world... those who understand binary and those who don't.
  46. Liquid by WebfishUK · · Score: 1

    The ultimate plan is to liquify the astronaughts using high G, freeze dry them and send them up in packs of 100 for storage on the ISS. Then they can be work rotated simply by boiling the kettle. Great idea so long as no one mixes them up with the food supply.

    --
    -- "Can't sleep, clowns will eat me!"
  47. Re:BitCSh by cheese-cube · · Score: 0

    I agree completely. Especially the part about Lemonade.

  48. Re:Gravity of which planet? by dsanfte · · Score: 1

    Heh, let me guess, that book is used as a textbook in university. Otherwise I don't see why it would sell for more than $40. I'm greatly interested in such topics but to feed the money-grabbing textbook publishing machine seems almost tragic.

    --
    occultae nullus est respectus musicae - originally a Greek proverb
  49. Puny little centrifuge... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Puny little centrifuge. At NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, the centrifuge can do 30 Gs with a 5000 lb payload. Here it is swinging an SUV around for no apparent reason:

    http://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/news/topstory/ 2003/0212suv.html

  50. This is amusing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A whole journal entry devoted to flaming me*. Sweet. But let me point out a couple of things.

    1. You picked the fight. You started with me. You are the one who started the name calling and accusations of stupidity. In your post I was a "stupid, wise-ass arrogant asshole" who should stuff my fat face with another burger.

    2. I never said I know everything. Only that there are some people in Africa who could use financial help with access to computers.

    Is that wrong? If it is why don't you say why it's wrong? You never tried to explain why it's a bad idea to help get computer access to poor people (who are not starving and have clean water and education). You never even said what part of my post was wrong or why. You just brought up true, but irrelevant points like how starving, disease ridden people don't need computers. Which I never disputed.

    Seriously, can you explain what parts of my posts are factually wrong?. Or explain why you even started with me in the first place. My first post on the subject never implied that computers are more important than food, clean water and infrastructure. Yet you responded as if I had made that assertion.

    One thing in the entry is true though: judging by your other posts and journal entries, I am a much happier person.

    *Posting AC because this is so off-topic. Since I don't have negative karma, this would actually be visible to most readers.

  51. Hard drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just be sure to park the heads of those hard drives. It's not that I don't care about the mush you'll be turned on. It's about getting the aliens to be able to read our hard drives content.

  52. Back to the Future quote by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    "Whoa ... heavy."

    "What is this 'heavy'. Is there something wrong with the force of gravity in your time?"

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  53. Re:Gravity of which planet? by CRCulver · · Score: 1

    It's a reference grammar, not a textbook. And that is a fairly typical price for a hardbound book from Oxford University Press.

  54. Hey! by Arimatheus · · Score: 1

    Didn't they steal this idea from Dragonball Z?

    --
    OEÉæÁÄZÝÈA OEÉæé_CX
  55. Those Wacky Russians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Crap - 20 G's? That's gonna hurt.

    As I recall - back in the day - the Apollo Saturn V main stage produced around 4 G's or so and the command module escape system cranked at about 6, to make sure it could seperate from the presumably still accelerating booster stack. IIRC, the maximum safe sustained acceleration for a human is still considered to be around 12 G's. I could be wrong about that one - i'm sure someone will correct me if so.

    But this isn't really new. During the 50's and I think continuing up into the 1990's the Navy operated a manned centrifuge at the Naval Air Development Center in Warminster, PA (now closed). Among it's luxury features it:

    1) was capable of delivering 40 G's to a test subject in any orientation
    2) was eventually fitted with a gondola capable of holding a three man crew
    3) was powered by one of the largest DC motors ever built
    4) still holds the record for whole-body human acceleration at 32 G's

    Flannagan Grey (my dad's boss) did that one in a water jacket affectionately called the Iron Maiden. It was the only way to apply those kinds of forces to someone and not puree his insides. I saw it - you'd never get me up in one.

    After they got done slinging chimps around in the thing at ridiculous accelerations and before NASA built their own it was used to train Astronauts for the Mercury and part of the Gemini programs. They moved on to flight physiology studies of military and civiian aircraft pilots, which was it's original purpose.

    A concise history of that facility can be found at(PDF Warning):

    http://www.crompton.com/wa3dsp/k3nal/Documents/DFS -history.pdf

    Check out chapter 3 for the Iron Maiden story.

    Being associated with the facility was a great source of pride for my father and it never took much to get him to talk about it. I got to see it a few times at the NADC's open house. Very impressive.

    -DL

    1. Re:Those Wacky Russians by A+non-mouse+Cow+Herd · · Score: 1
      I'm pretty sure some of NASAs crew escape systems produced similar G-loads, given that the Russians pretty much lifted that design from Max Faget. I don't have a reference handy, but I'm pretty sure Apollo and Mercury were in the same ballpark. Gemini was a whole different ballgame...

      I thought one of the records set for sustained human Gs was on a rocket sled... Ah yes, Dr. John Paul Stapp.

      Ejection seats are another area where people are exposed to high Gs. The Gemini seats were particularly infamous. Both rocket escape systems and ejection seats balance the chance of injury to the crew against the risks of not getting them away fast enough.

      Good stuff, as long as I only have to read about it :D

  56. This is fairly old news. by queazocotal · · Score: 1

    Interesting table below - showing maximum time at given G levels.
    Interestingly, from the second line and below, you're at about orbital speed
    at the end of the accelleration, if it's linear.

          Summary of Results: (Data primarily from: Bioastronautics Data Book,
          second edition, 1973, NASA)

            I - Sustained Acceleration

          CAPTION: Time vs. Tolerance : G-force limits for reclining subjects

                                Time (min) Accel Coach (Gs) Water Immersed (Gs)
    0.5 23 28
    1.0 17 22
    2.0 12 17
    3.0 8 14
    4.0 7 12
    5.0 6 9
    6.0 5 8
    7.0 4 7
    8.0 4 6
    9.0 3 6
    10.0 3 6

    1. Re:This is fairly old news. by Migraineman · · Score: 1

      Let's do the math - using the trusty old v = at equation.
      using data from line 2: (1 minute)*(60 sec/min) * (17g)*(9.8m/s^2/g) = 9996 m/s

      Yep. Orbital velocity at LEO is typically about 7.5 km/s, so if you can tolerate 17g for 45 seconds, you're there. Earth escape velocity is about 11km/s, so if you can tolerate 17g for (11000/9.8/17) = 66 seconds, you may leave the planet and go elsewhere.

      Note: this analysis is "napkin math," and is intended to check to see if the numbers are in the right ballpark. It intentionally ignores things like atmospheric drag. If you want the full-blown analysis, you may contract my services for $165/hr.

  57. Live in northern Canada/Russia by peter303 · · Score: 1

    You weight a couple ounces more at the poles due to the equatorial bulge. The arctic is at sea level and little more than the antarctic whihc is at mountainous elevation.

  58. Re:Gravity of which planet? by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 1

    Alf (Alien Life Form) came from a planet named Melmac, which is also what it was made of. Too bad everyone turned on their hair dryers at the same time, and the planet blew up.

    --
    All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)