Slashdot Mirror


An Underground Radio to Save Lives

Roland Piquepaille writes "The Duluth News Tribune wrote last week about a communication device which could be a lifesaver for miners. This invention is the brainchild of David Reagor, a physicist at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). His prototype radio works at depths of 500 feet and is based on very low frequency electromagnetic radiation and digital signal processors. A commercial version is in the works and could be used not only by workers trapped in a mine, but also by firefighters and other emergency workers to communicate with people in collapsed buildings or subways."

18 of 82 comments (clear)

  1. Sound familiar by CCFreak2K · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sounds like something I saw in Dante's Peak. No pun intended.

    --
    "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master."
  2. VLF has been used for submarines for decades by ishmalius · · Score: 5, Informative

    Very low frequency (VLF) has an extremely low data rate, yet it has a great ability to penetrate earth and water. The Navy has been using it for a long time to communicate with submarines.

    1. Re:VLF has been used for submarines for decades by skogs · · Score: 4, Informative

      It seems you do not understand VLF/ELF ideas. The entire point is that it is a super low frequency. Low frequency doesn't cycle very often, and makes it hard to press data...so it would be rather difficult to compress audio and then send it.

      The navy's ELF is just that...ELF...it sends text only. This is no email system, this is exactly what needs to be sent, and thats it...and some messages take several minutes to send. Sending voice data would take an extremely long time...and transmitting for that long wears down batteries. Your LMR(land mobile radio) be it motorola, etc, MIGHT last an entire day or 8/12 hr workday...but it only gets keyed for about 20 minutes of that timeperiod, if that.

      I think, even if it was VLF instead of ELF, they would be far better served to make a keypad, and force people to type short messages to transmit. That way it might actually last for 3 or 4 days if there were an emergency. Otherwise it simply wouldn't have the power to maintain sporadic communications for that kind of timeframe.

      --
      Who is this that even the wind and the waves obey Him? Surely this computer must submit also!
  3. Troglographs are not new by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 4, Informative

    Troglographs are not new.

    --
    Evil people are out to get you.
  4. wait a second. by mattpointblank · · Score: 3, Funny

    "A communication device which could be a lifesaver for miners"? We already have Myspace.

    Wait, miners? Oops.

  5. Fact of the matter is... by nitrocloud · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In recent mine collapses, two things were needed in the mining tunnels, oxygen, and communication. Without oxygen, humans die. Without communication, humans are lost in a large mine shaft with relatively no way to signal those above of where ventilation shafts can drilled to vent toxic gases and supply oxygen. The truth is, communication is vital, and the lack thereof has been proven deadly, with this radio, perhaps mining accidents don't become mining tragedies in the future.

    --
    Karma: Good, or bust!
  6. Not deep enough. by blair1q · · Score: 4, Insightful

    South Dakota's Homestake gold mine is 8,000 feet deep. 16 times deeper than this thing can reach. What's needed are acoustical communicators that can ping through the rock with a coded signal telling the miner's location. But given the safety record of mine operators, they won't update the codes as new side-tunnels are dug, won't keep the batteries charged, won't keep the receivers in working order, and won't train the safety personnel.

    1. Re:Not deep enough. by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 2

      On other other hand all it has to do is to reach a level with a repeater and power. A disaster that wipes out everything in a 2000 fout radius in all directions would not be a resonable design case.

      As regards your allegations about mine safety practices, you are (pardon the phrase) dead right.(*)

      (*)Useta live in West Virgina. Study the history of coal companies before you call anyone in high-tech "evil".

  7. Nothing new here by n1ywb · · Score: 4, Informative
    As usual, there is nothing new under the sun. Cave radios have been under active development for some time. Check out these resources

    Cave Radio & Electronics Group
    Google "Cave Radios"

    Granted this guy's sounds a little more advanced with DSP and stuff, but still not a new concept.

    --
    -73, de n1ywb
    www.n1ywb.com
  8. partially a matter of economics by fermion · · Score: 4, Informative
    The talk lately has been that plenty of technology exists to help in rescue efforts and insure the trapper persons survive until rescue happens. The probelm seems to be funding for production, the market for these devices is very small, following existing safety regulation, and training. THE VLF frequency radio is nothing new, and this just seems like a way promote the technology and encourage the federal authorities to mandate the device, and probably use tax monies to partially fund the deployment. I don't know why we would want to do this insted of enforcing the current regulation, perhaps raise fines on violation, and, if we want to be realy radical, actually expect the fines to be paid. In fact USA Today, which I am lothe to quote, seems to think that the current rash of accidents are a result of lack of enforcement over the past several years, and not the direct result of the lack of any safety equipment. I know that I would much rather be at the dinner table with my family than trapped in a mine, even if I did have the ability to say goodbye with my last dying breath, and with the full knowledge that the mine company will get the digging equipment in as soon as humanly possible, and would pay the $5000 fine for the accident, if it survived the appeal.

    Which is not to say that accidents never happen, but when a mine has been cited at nearly every safety inspection, and has not paid fines, one wonders whether more safety gizmos are really going to do any good.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  9. Not deep enough by ajdlinux · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here in Australia there are two miners trapped around 935 metres (3116 ft) below the ground. They managed to contact them using existing radios. Fact is, most mines are deeper than 500ft.

  10. Developped in caving activities up to 1Km deep by zijus · · Score: 4, Informative

    Hi there.

    You better check that out : systeme Nicola. I don't put a hand on publishing date, but some folks in Europe are developing such a system for a while. They are aiming at caving rescue activities. In specific conditions they got the communication through 1000 m of rock. Interesting. Funny as well to get a feeling on how polluted can be our environment in the low frequencies realm.

    Bye. Z.

  11. Can be made to work by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 2, Insightful
    and mines in South Africa go much deeper than that.

    Most rockfalls leave the main shaft ok. You could run a cable down the shaft and have "access points" at vaious depths etc. The VLF only has to cover the last bit to the actual miner.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  12. Lifesaver for commuters, too by ozbird · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As loss of radio contact was one of the factors the resulted in Jean Charles de Menezes being shot dead by police, radios that work in the Underground ("tube") as well as underground would be a good thing.

    1. Re:Lifesaver for commuters, too by AB3A · · Score: 2, Informative

      Uhh, radios DO work in the "underground." The Metro in Washington DC does this, as do many other subway systems. The technology has been around since at least the late 1970s. It's really quite simple: A leaky coaxial cable (Andrew Corporation makes one called Radiax) can be used for both receiving and transmission. If what you say is accurate, the folks managing the London Underground could really use an education.

      Now as for mines, such systems are useful for tunnels which don't change much, such as underground railway tunnels. Engineering these systems on an ad-hoc basis isn't simple, nor cheap. Mines need to use something better. A robust digital modulation scheme which can survive multiple repeating nodes with less than ideal signal to noise ratios is something which needs development. Ideally this system would use something robust like turbo-codes, where a damaged packet could be recovered with some delay.

      This could result in some messages taking many seconds to get to and from the surface, but at least they'd get there...

      --
      Nearly fifty percent of all graduates come from the bottom half of the class!
  13. Three cave radios by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm aware of these three underground radios:

    - The MolePhone
    - The HeyPhone
    - System Nicola

    I believe they all operate at around 87 kHz. The Mole Phone has been around for 30 years or so; the others are newer and more high-tech, with greater range.

  14. Grintek Mine radios by HermanAB · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Mine radios used to be manufactured by SAAB Grintek, but was sold to a company called Guduza, which promptly disappeared without trace.

    These radios used a 100kHz carrier and was basically inductive radios, using the shoulder strap as an antenna. It could penetrate 100m of solid rock. During that journey, it would typically find some piece of metal - pipes, railway tracks, whatever - couple to that and provide communications throughout an underground mine.

    So it seems that this guy is re-inventing 1970s technology. It is a proven concept and should work well.

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
  15. Re:Make that armored copper by ColaMan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That's exactly what we use undergound - leaky feeders with repeater/amp modules every thousand feet or so. Coupled with standard VHF radios it works ok. It also carries a "PED" - a one-way text pager that's embedded in the battery pack for my caplamp.

    But yet, it's still a pain in the ass. If you cant see a leaky feeder hanging from the roof, there's no comms. It's strictly line-of-sight. Even though it's armoured cable, a ton of rock will easily crush it.

    So forget using leaky feeder cable for rescue.

    If I could just get a text pager that worked outside the range of a leaky feeder, I'd be happy. This looks like it might be a solution.

    --

    You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
    There is a lot of hype here.