AMD-ATI Merger on the Way?
miketronics writes "Forbes.com is reporting the possibility of a merger between industry heavyweights AMD and ATI. This is largely based on a 'prediction on recent checks in the PC food chain' by industry analyst Apjit Walia. A move like this might give AMD some leverage over Intel, who has been slashing prices lately to compete with a major surge in AMD popularity in both the home and server markets. Despite AMD's recent gains Intel still has a dominant market share and consumers have high hopes for their upcoming Conroe processors."
There goes the amd64 stable keyword...
It goes from God, to Jerry, to me.
At what percentage of market share am I supposed to stop liking AMD?
I'm pretty sure the analyst just liked typing ATI and AMD together. I mean I imagine he thinks they do almost the exact same thing... they both begin with A right?
Don't forget all of those Solaris/Matrox boxes filling the shelves at Best Buy.
...
Made you look! :P
Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
He's forward thinking.
Ignore this signature. By order.
Pretty sure I wouldn't be able to either. I mean, the Katami, being a much earlier chip probably has about half the number of pins that the Conroe has and might be lighter, but the Conroe uses BGA, so it'd probably hurt less, being less spiky. In the end, though, Conroe, Katami or 6502, I'd mainly just be pissed that you hit me in the head with one.
-twb
Being an analyst is awesome! Think about it: you make up wild speculation all day and people pay you for it. Next up: Amazon to buy RedHat and sell it on eBay!
___
If you think big enough, you'll never have to do it.
I happen to like ATI quite a bit. I think a merger between AMD and ATI is a bit far fetched, though certianly some kind of close-knit partnership is definitely within the realm of possibility. I replaced a Geforce2 With a Radeon 7500 and have NEVER looked back. I had a very bad experience with nVidia, and went to ATI and have been very impressed with the performance, versatility, and overall capabilities of the cards that I've had. I run Windows primarily. I also run Linux. Both my laptop and Desktop have ATI cards in them. Under Linux the performance isn't the best, but I don't game in Linux either. Here's the key though: It's getting better. Compare the driver updates, fixes, patches, corrections, tweaks, etc. released by ATI in even just the last 6 months compared with nVidia. ATI may not be the best for a Linux system, but they're at least working on it (which is more than can be said for a LOT of companies that have hardware and/or software products which give lackluster performance, if any at all, under Linux). I prefer ATI because they're cheaper, and in my experience, perform better than nVidia cards. Also, ATI makes the card, AND the chipset. I like that in a video card. My thoughts