Slashdot Mirror


Online Revenge

Many people have submitted this story of a broken laptop purchased on e-bay. The buyer gives a little lesson on why you should always clean your hard drive before you sell a computer.

112 of 645 comments (clear)

  1. Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Everyone is having a nice laugh right now, but it won't seem so funny if this guy commits suicide. Then we'll be reading about how the 'buyer' is on trial.

    1. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by jlarocco · · Score: 5, Funny
      Everyone is having a nice laugh right now, but it won't seem so funny if this guy commits suicide.

      I believe the word for that would be "hilarious."

    2. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by ah802 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The presumption for that, is this seller is 'honourable','respectable', and didn't sell a dead laptop with inflated specs. The images on this system clearly show otherwise and there is legal redress if he feels that he has been wronged... the truth can hurt.

    3. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by fm6 · · Score: 2, Informative

      If Amir kills himself, the guy who posted the photos might feel bad about it. But face trial? What law has he broken?

    4. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by DrSkwid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That would be as funny as Gary Glitter ending up being shot in Thailand for fucking children after fleeing the UK after his prison spell resulting from taking his PC into a computer shop and the assistant invading his privacy and finding child porn.

      The Thai's spolied a good laugh by letting him off with a fine, spoilsports!

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    5. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by jlarocco · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You, sir, are an asshole.

      And you, sir, have no sense of humor and exaggerated self-importance.

      Around 150,000 people die every single day. In the 5 minutes it will take me to post this, 500 people around the world will die. With all those people dying, I don't feel bad when one of them does it in a way I find amusing. In the grand scheme of things, a single person dying isn't that important.

    6. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by servognome · · Score: 2, Informative

      If Amir kills himself, the guy who posted the photos might feel bad about it. But face trial? What law has he broken?
       
      A wrongful death civil suit from the guy's family. There is a chance if they show what the buyer did was extraordinarily malicious, a jury could find him at fault for provoking the death.
      Not saying that it is right, just that it could happen.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    7. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, it's not like he's committed a serious offence like saying that a police horse was gay or anything.

      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    8. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by thc69 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Huh?

      Why would he commit suicide?

      Have you looked at the pictures on the blog? I saw some that I found icky -- but nothing severely embarassing. I mean, the gay pic is gross (although possibly taken out of context -- one occasionally winds up with that sort of stuff when, for example, using an automated usenet binary leeching program on a straight newsfroup, or as part of a supposedly straight series), and the foot thing is yucky, but if he doesn't find those to be a turnoff, then what's the problem? The pictures that appear to be leg shots on public transporation could possibly get him in trouble if perpetrator, location, intent, and unwillingness of participants can be proven; and all of it is sure to get him some teasing from his friends either way.

      Anyway, this is what happens when jerk A meets jerk B. From sources linked in this discussion, I gather that the following happened:

      1. Jerk A advertises item with 2gb RAM and a DVD-RW drive, but ships with 512mb and no DVD-RW. The Register's article did not say anything about him denying that. Perhaps it was working when he shipped it, but considering that he failed to erase his potentially embarassing pictures, I'd guess that it wasn't (and that he's not saavy enough to remove the hard drive and wipe it on another machine).

      2. Jerk B is angry, and does not respect existing dispute processes enough to really make an effort to follow through. Maybe he sent some "polite messages" and was told that the seller moved far away, maybe not, but this sort of revenge deserves all other avenues to be completely explored first.

      Don't forget another possibility -- maybe Jerk B fabricated most of it...but he'd have to be a Major Super Mega Jerk to do all that if Jerk A is completely innocent too.

      --
      Procrastination -- because good things come to those who wait.
    9. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by teromajusa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No chance of that. If the original owner is not Amir, he has nothing to complain about (except the theft itself) since its not his info thats posted on the internet. If Amir is the original owner and the laptop was stolen from him by some 3rd party and sold on ebay, Amir would be telling people that instead of claiming it worked when he sold it.

    10. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by AcidLacedPenguiN · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If the original owner was foolish enought to leave skivvy shots and gay porn on the hard drive, then he deserves to get owned like that.

      --
      disclaimer: I've been known to store numbers in my ass for which to dig out when quantities are required.
    11. Re:Not so funny when/if the seller commits suicide by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 3, Funny

      > So what? The guy is iranian, so he'll get his 72 virgins.

      Mmmmmm...720 creamy, succulent tootsies...

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  2. Sector encryption by flobberchops · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I always use sector encryption on my hard drives and wipe using PGP wipe when selling. Why not use the new Seagate drives with built in crypto now? Vista has sector crypto now? Why not use NTFS encrypted folders for your stuff but that doesnt cover caches and various temp files used by applications. This is something applications need to do, allow us to manage any possible cache and storage instaed of the currently splattered and hidden about files today. How about a standard on how Applications manage this kind of like a personal privacy standard?

    1. Re:Sector encryption by davidesh · · Score: 5, Funny

      I wipe with charmin ultra, it does a great job.

    2. Re:Sector encryption by davidesh · · Score: 5, Informative

      try Darik's Boot and Nuke... http://dban.sourceforge.net/

    3. Re:Sector encryption by moro_666 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      how about booting from a knoppix cd and doing

      #shell> dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda

      ?

      maybe some modifications to the line, but it should work :D ofcourse you could also take the input from /dev/random, but that could result a working windows installation ... with odds one against some zillion billion dillion.

      as for why not to use encrpytion: unless seagate has implemented it without a significant overhead, the reason for me would be performance. i didn't buy my laptop to have another sloppy lagging slow computer on my lap or desk.

      --

      I'd tell you the chances of this story being a dupe, but you wouldn't like it.
    4. Re:Sector encryption by jolshefsky · · Score: 2, Funny

      Encryption takes space and with porn, every byte counts. I thought everybody knew that.

      --
      --- Jason Olshefsky

      Karma: Poser (mostly affected by adding this line long after everyone else did)

    5. Re:Sector encryption by linvir · · Score: 3, Funny
      Hammer: $0
      THIEF!
    6. Re:Sector encryption by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wiping with all zeroes is a bad way to scrub a disk. You need to use different patterns each pass through at least, but random data would be much better. As for encryption speed.. I use the FileVault (128-bit AES) built into MacOS X on my Powerbook and I don't notice any performance difference unless that damn Spotlight search engine update is running at the time, but it's slow even if I wasn't running an encrypted filesystem.

  3. karma by NetMagi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    karma, that's all there is to say

    I honestly love when ppl's stupidity overrules their lack of honesty and it bites them.

    1. Re:karma by TCM · · Score: 2, Insightful

      At first glance, you think "serves him right" of course, I'm no exception.

      But where I live, there are things you can do if someone fraudulently sells you non-working stuff as working.

      This is vigilante justice, plain and simple. I don't think the proportionalities match here.

      The seller should be forced to refund the money or provide a working laptop and the buyer should face charges for whatever crimes he committed by posting this stuff.

      --
      Of course it runs NetBSD. BTC: 1NT7QvbetmANwaMzhpVL6
    2. Re:karma by jamesh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Agreed. The worse thing about 'vigilante justice' is of course that people are going to believe him, even if he's making some or all of it up. Judge, jury, and executioner are separate people for a reason.

    3. Re:karma by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Come on, what webmaster wouldn't be happy to get 2 million hits in less than a week?

      ... and his site has google ads. I'm sure he now has enough money to buy ten laptops, new!

    4. Re:karma by LordLucless · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yep. That results in some truly wonderful miscarriages of justice. We've had a couple like that over here. You treat the home invasion and the subsequent thumping of the home invader with a baseball bat as separate crimes. Result? Home invader gets a slap on the wrist, home owner gets charged with greivous bodily harm with a deadly weapon. Or the trespasser who tripped on the garden host and sued the owner of the yard they were trespassing in.

      If someone commits a crime, the law should not protect them from the repercussions of that crime. If we take the article at face value, the guy in this story intentionally sold a non-functional laptop. Because the laptop was non-functional, he erroneously assumed that his porn collection was inaccessible. If he had been selling a fully-functional laptop, he wouldn't have made that assumption, and he wouldn't have had a trouble. The direct cause of his current predicament is his own attempt to defraud another person.

      If you've ever tried to reclaim money through a small claims court, you know how farcical it is. You can get all the judgements made in your favour, but you still have to pay out for anything you want done. Send out the sherif to repossess goods? Pay up. Need a locksmith to get into the place where the goods are kept? You need to foot the bill. And there are no guarantees that when you do all that you'll find anything able to be sold, especially if your complaint is against a company. You'll have shelled out $300 and all you'll have to show for it is an unenforcable judgement.

      On the issue of vigilante justice: yes, it's bad. But people generally only take the law into their own hands when the authorities aren't holding on to it tightly enough. A recent story on the news over here was that of the manager of a hotel, whose rooms had been broken into over 60 times in the last year. On a number of occasions, he filmed the thieves as they robbed him, and handed in the tape to police. There have been no arrests in connection to any of the robberies. When it comes to a choice between vigilante justice and no justice, you don't have to be a genius to guess what people will decide to go for.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
  4. The Register's new market: tabloids by iamlucky13 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Fantastic. I thought the register considered itself a somewhat legitimate news entity, but now they've posted a link to a defamatory website of unverified accuracy in an article. Many, many points down the toilet in my book.

    1. Re:The Register's new market: tabloids by Splab · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Uhm.. what?

      They just reported it as it is, someone claims to have been cheated out of a working laptop, now he has posted stuff from it on the net and gets himself looked into by the police... Oh and theres a website for you to look at.

      Why is that not proper reporting? They don't even take sides - which is highly unusual for The Reg.

    2. Re:The Register's new market: tabloids by iamlucky13 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not verified (making it questionable as news at best, but since it's of a personal rather than public nature, I wouldn't even grant it that much ground to stand on), it is very highly damaging to the guy's reputation (not just as an online seller, but more importantly as a person), and it's potentially dangerous (950,000+ hits and he's getting threats...some sicko among all those visitors just might be crazy enough to do something based on the rumor). The one site linked to obviously has taken a side. If there were any hard facts presented, writing the article at least would make sense, but not providing an avenue into the alleged perpetrator's personal life by linking to a vigilante website.

      I hate digging into the big bag of cliche counter-arguments, but here's a case where this one definitely fits: How would you like it if someone displayed your entire personal life (simple or shocking as it may be) in a deliberately disparaging fashion? Or perhaps (we don't actually know in this case), they make a bunch of crap up about you. I knew a guy who's personal and professional reputation was destroyed by a false allegation that was spread freely before any proper investigation was made. The case against him was tossed out in court, but his personal business (bike shop) never recovered and he had to close down and leave town. Assuming that he was innocent, as we have every bit as much reason to believe as the judge did, is this in any way just? Did those who spread the rumor contribute in any way to the betterment of society or did they harm it?

    3. Re:The Register's new market: tabloids by ScouseMouse · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Two things about this post:

      The Register contains lots of biased articles. While it does contain decent articles, its usually better to get them from the source, such as securityfocus. This, to me, doesnt make it a news source, it makes it a blog with news in it. (However i have to say i am an avid fan of the BOFH)

      secondally, The police are now investigating. I suspect this is due to the content of the comments, some of which seem to bring out some very nasty sentiments - a lot of which were unrelated to the issue, rather than the content of the blog, itself, however.

      While i think the owner should have kept more control over it, perhaps restricting posting, i dont think they have done anything wrong. They decided that a public humilliation was a good way of going about this.

      If you believe the blog, and i have reason not to, the owner of the blog tried to sort this out amicably. Anyone who has been through EBAY's dispute procedure will tell you its a pile of cr*p, certainly in the uk. Other than cancelling accounts, there is very little they can do other than to refer the seller to the police. I dont know if this happened in this case.

      However, its true to say some of the UK tabloid press, have a lot to answer for, and the BBC should make an apology for misreporting and post it publically on their website.

    4. Re:The Register's new market: tabloids by ScouseMouse · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I should probably tell you now that its more likely that the blogger is probably just helping with the investigation for the contents of the comments on his blog, some of which were Racist, Homophobic, included death threats and just plain nasty.

      I suspect that the phrase "Co-operating with the police" probably in this case means exactly that rather than the usual "Were keeping him locked up because we think he did it, we just havent got enough to prosecute him yet."

      Unless he really is lying through his teeth, and the laptop was up to spec and working when he got it, i dont think he is any danger of being called up for Libel.
      That implies at least some degree of lying on his part.

      IMHO, a fraudster got caught out. and got the heavy end of a hammer dropped on him
      Shame.

  5. CFNM by JohnGrahamCumming · · Score: 5, Funny

    Whatever the rights and wrongs of posting this guy's personal information, I did learn from one of his photos about a fetish I'd never come across: CFNM (Clothed Female, Naked Male).

    Thanks Amir!

    John.

    1. Re:CFNM by JohnGrahamCumming · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually you forget that I'm old enough to have used Usenet when it was in its prime. Most of what you can find on the web was already seen on Usenet long, long ago.

      And someone would have had the decency to write a FAQ about it.

      John.

    2. Re:CFNM by baadger · · Score: 2, Informative

      And someone would have had the decency to write a FAQ about it. ..and these days people write a Wikipedia article about it.

  6. and the seller... by macadamia_harold · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The buyer gives a little lesson on why you should always clean your hard drive before you sell a computer.

    And if you read the full story, you'll see that the seller gives a little lesson on how the law views vigilantism on the internets. Hint: Police are involved.

    1. Re:and the seller... by moe.ron · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What law was broken here? Is the buyer personally threatening the seller or something? Because if not, I can't see how the buyer did anything wrong. The seller sold the laptop, hardware and all (read: software/data). I don't see why the buyer does not have the right to do what he pleases with all of the seller's personal information. The seller put his personal life on the laptop up for bid. The buyer bought it all, so why doesn't the buyer have the right the information and the right to post all of it online if he/she pleases?

    2. Re:and the seller... by Neoprofin · · Score: 4, Informative

      The police are involved because the seller called them, not because the police are doing anything.

      It's still purely a civil matter as reported by the register and the defamatory site is still up. Score one for vigilantism on the internet.

      Unless of course this is one of those things that falls under libel in Britain because it damages his reputation even if it does end up being 100% true.

    3. Re:and the seller... by igb · · Score: 4, Informative

      Truth is an absolute defence to libel in England and Wales and I presume Northern Ireland (I don't know about Scotland). The problem is the reversed burden of proof: the defendent has to prove truth, albeit only to civil standards.

    4. Re:and the seller... by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 4, Informative

      Defamation is spreading falsehoods to harm another person's reputation. "Libel" is the term used when the defamation takes the form of print; "slander" is the term used when the defamation is oral.

    5. Re:and the seller... by jcr · · Score: 2, Informative

      the defamatory site is still up.

      It's not clear that the site is defamatory. I'm not sure about English law, but in the USA, truth is a complete defense.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  7. Yawn. by robogun · · Score: 2, Interesting

    However, the link about the car seller at the bottom was much more entertaining.

    1. Re:Yawn. by robogun · · Score: 4, Funny
  8. Wow. by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I agree about the cleaning of the harddrive, but this really seems like useless drama to me. Is this really news, or internet angst taken a bit too far?

  9. Boot and Nuke by mahesh_gharat · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you are selling/sending for repair, either your laptop or storage media, do not forget to take the backup and wipe out the entire content. Simply formatting/deleting the content may not help. The data will be still there, only the index (Allocation table) will be changed.
    You can use something like Darik's Boot and Nuke http://dban.sourceforge.net/ for deleting the content permanently.

    1. Re:Boot and Nuke by Jeremi · · Score: 2, Interesting
      You can use something like Darik's Boot and Nuke http://dban.sourceforge.net/ for deleting the content permanently.


      I noticed that the Disk Utility in recent releases of MacOS/X also has a paranoia-erase setting: you can tell it to overwrite a disk with zeroes once, seven times, or (for the tinfoil hat crowd) 35 times(!). It's a pretty slow process, though -- doing the 7x option took my G5 about 4 hours. I can almost see now why the military prefers to physically destroy the drives.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    2. Re:Boot and Nuke by fm6 · · Score: 2, Funny
      ...do not forget to take the backup and wipe out the entire content.
      With this kind of content, I think it makes sense to skip the backup step.
    3. Re:Boot and Nuke by lon3st4r · · Score: 2, Interesting
      maybe he didn't have the sense enough to wipe the data clean; or maybe - because the system wasn't working - he didn't have the motivation enough to yank the hdd out, put it on another system - and wipe it there.

      the auction says that the laptop comes with all paperwork, but it might be a stolen laptop - so the police might be investigating that also. the price for that laptop configuration is quite a sweet deal!

      * lon3st4r *

    4. Re:Boot and Nuke by Minwee · · Score: 2, Funny
      "I can almost see now why the military prefers to physically destroy the drives."

      Well, that and the way that those guys destroy things is just plain fun.

  10. Why is this on the front page... by ystar · · Score: 3, Informative

    This isn't news. Anyone who reads Slashdot would hopefully know to delete the contents of their HDD before shipping it out to a stranger...then again, anyone who reads slashdot isn't likely to be selling a "broken" laptop - not when there's spare parts around and Linux to be installed.

  11. Extortion by Crasoum · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Extortion is basically what it boils down to; "Amir, if you want to refund my money you know where to contact me, and this page will disappear forever."

    The rest of the crap in the story is unverifiable from the information provided. It is just here-say.

    1. Re:Extortion by Crasoum · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The photos are very difficult to deny, but all it proves is he does not know how to eliminate data.

      It is also doubtful the laptop is stolen, it probably is indeed Amir's.

      He also used a free service (Which supports AdSense if he took the time to set it up.), why would he need to worry about bandwidth?

    2. Re:Extortion by Crasoum · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Which goes back to where's the proof he committed fraud, the item was shipped, the person was able to access the hard drive (I know there are plenty of ways of doing so with and without a working laptop.), but there was no documentation as to what was borked on the computer.

      He simply stated that it was broke.

      No pictures of the broken item, no description of what was broke. Just a statement that the ram and DVD-Rom was wrong, again, -hear-say.

      For all I can tell, it was missing a charger which can lead to all sorts of assumptions.

      The extortion part comes in to play with the statement that boils down to you pay, it goes away.

    3. Re:Extortion by ShellFish · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Funny how you simply assume the seller is telling the truth. If you read the reported story (especially quotes from him) and look at the original posting of the eBay auction, you'll see that there are many inconsistencies (i.e., the seller is lying in one of these two places). The seller has a -3 feedback rating, and this isn't the only buyer who has claimed to have been scammed by him. The pictures and other data are internally consistent with the blog posting -- i.e., not a bunch of random cell phone pictures scoured from the 'Net.

      You throw that word "unverifiable" around as if it's the end of the argument. There are many ways to gain confidence in the soure of information. Here, the internal clues and external clues combine to give me pretty high confidence that the buyer is telling the truth. And you know, "hear-say" doesn't mean it's automatically not true or unverifiable, it just means that you have to use your critical thinking skills to figure out what is more likely true.

      You call this extortion. In reality the seller sold a computer that was not accurately described, did not even work, shipped it two months late, and refused t a refund despite repeated requests and even lied about where he was to get out of it. The buyer is now posting the truth out there and asking, again, to have just his money back. It isn't extortion if all you do is tell the truth and ask for your money back so that a fraud can be undone..

  12. Eraser w/Nuke Disk Option by CodeBuster · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Eraser program is an excellent and free way to securely wipe your hardrives prior to sale of your computer in addition to providing everyday secure wiping services including secure file deletion, free space, and swap file wiping w/multiple overwrite pattern options. I have no financial interest in this company whatsoever, but I have found this program to be a useful addition to my toolbox so you may want to check it out.

  13. The "Chicken Shop" by TX297 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Heh, I think I know where that place is... looks like it's on that road heading into the toppling phone booths in Kingston... I've eaten at that place a couple of times but the shops in the background don't look right, but I haven't been there for a couple of years so who knows? It's possibly a chain, but the interior furnishings are exactly the same. Mod me down, this comment is useless.

  14. Obligatory link by mincognito · · Score: 3, Funny

    When it comes to repaying unscrupulous ebayers, nothing beats...the P-P-P-Powerbook!

    http://www.p-p-p-powerbook.com/

  15. Re:Sick by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I doubt it's about the money. Scamming/cheating/robbing people REALLY pisses them off, even when the amount of goods involved is trivial.

    I won't blame anyone for exposing a scumball after the scumball tried to screw him.

    And why are the police getting involved, anyway?

  16. just in case anyone is interested... by AxemRed · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here's a link to the finished auction.

  17. How to make sure your data is not readable by iceco2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Israeli Army uses the only fool proof method I know for erasing data off magentic hardrives and is made up of 2 steps:
    A. run the Harddrive through a Powerfull Degauser (a rapidly changing electro-Magnet)
    B. Shred the Hard drive into pieces less then one square milimeter in size.

    However this system may be hard to come by for most of us, and tends to harm the hard drive.

    Writing a set of zeros on a sensative file is much better than deleting it but not necessarly
    enough, because:
    a. your OS may decide to move your file to another location on the disk.
    b. Even after writing once or twice over the data, It still may be recoverable, especially
          if you use constant zeros(or ones).

    Writing random data several times is a better method, but is most be done over the entire
    hard drive and in sevral passes over the entire hard drive,
    since modern harddrives have a cache mecahnism(as well as one in the OS), so If
    some one writes over the first sector of a hard drive 20 times, chances are the hard drive
    actually got something physiclly written to it only once.

    several tools for securly deleting data available on the net, I would not trust
    my good reputation on any tool which securly deletes specific files but only on
    those which wipe your disk clean,
    these too may not protect you 100% becasue modern hard drive have a feature to correct(re-Map) bad-sectors automaticly, With this feature if the hard drive fails
    to access a certain sector sevral times it will stop using it and send and use
    a diffrent secotr instead(reserved in advance for this purpose and not normally accessable).
    The damaged secotr may still contain private data after hard drive is wiped clean.

    In short if you want to be truely safe use the Degause and shred Method.

          Don't be paranoid
                  Me.

    1. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by techno-vampire · · Score: 4, Informative
      There's another 100% secure way to wipe all the data from a hard disk, and it only has one step:

      Drop it in an electric furnace and let it melt.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    2. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by Eivind+Eklund · · Score: 2, Informative
      Unforunately, the writethrough flag often don't work correctly. At least hard disk manufacturers used to ignore it routinely in order to get better benchmarks, and those that made real high-availability systems (think telephone companies and big databases) had to order drives with special firmware.

      Eivind.

      --
      Doubting the existence of evolution is like doubting the existence of China: It just shows that you're uninformed.
    3. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by TractorBarry · · Score: 2, Informative

      Where I work our machines are leased and when it's time to have them replaced then, before returning them, I always wipe the drive by using a Knoppix CD.

      To do this simply boot from the Knoppix CD, open a terminal and issue the following command:

      shred -vz -n 30 /dev/hda

      Then it's just a metter of leaving the machine to it (this can take quite a while depending on the machines power)

      Repeat as necessary for the number of drives in the box.

      Of course the data may still be recoverable but this method's "good enough" for my purposes. It's also 100% more effort than most of the other people I work with use !

      --
      Sky subscribers are morons. They pay to be advertised at !
    4. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by Keebler71 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Admit it... You watched LOTR last night didn't you!

      --
      "It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance." - Thomas Sowell
    5. Re:How to make sure your data is not readable by Keebler71 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Cool! When did the book come out?! ;)

      --
      "It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance." - Thomas Sowell
  18. Re:Sick by TorAvalon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because, like you, they don't know the whole story unless they get involved.

  19. Splash damage by phorm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Except for the fact that some of the pictures are of people other than the owner. While the owner might be in for some karma, how about other people who are having their pictures posted on the 'revenge' site?

    1. Re:Splash damage by arivanov · · Score: 2, Informative

      And this is exactly the reason why the guy who posted all this crap is being investigated by the police. Check the register for details: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/05/31/ebay_lapto p_site/

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    2. Re:Splash damage by igb · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Although it would be an interesting question to ask the police what crime they think they're investigating. You take photographs. You pass those photographs to me in a commercial transaction. I publish them. The only thing I can think of is a copyright dispute, and surely to God the Met have better things to do in 2006 than investigate trivial non-commercial copyright infringement? The third parties might like to bring a case for privacy infringement, but in that scenario the person who put their pictures onto a hard disk and then sold it on EBay might find his position someone exposed (even if they could get a court to accept the basic action, which I doubt).

      ian

    3. Re:Splash damage by linvir · · Score: 2, Insightful
      surely to God the Met have better things to do in 2006 than investigate trivial [whatever this happens to be]
      They pounce on pretty much every high profile incident of any kind. The police are attention whores. Until they press charges, the only guy who needs to worry about them is the dickhead who posted the stuff, who by the way has a lot of potential charges facing him, one of which nobody has mentioned so far: blackmail

      He should have gone through the proper channels, but then hindsight is 20/20, especially when it's not about you.

  20. Re:Two possibilites.. by AxemRed · · Score: 4, Informative

    Based on Amir's Ebay record, I'm going to guess that he's a slimy crook.

  21. Has this guy got much legal defence? by Freaky+Spook · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This guy sold the computer and recieved payment? Wouldn't that mean the hard drive & its contents are now owned by the guy who bought it, and its up to him what he wants to do to it?

    Its like someone selling a house then going back 6 months later trying to reclaim property they left behind.

    1. Re:Has this guy got much legal defence? by WWWWolf · · Score: 2, Informative
      Wouldn't that mean the hard drive & its contents are now owned by the guy who bought it, and its up to him what he wants to do to it?

      He sold him a physical copy of the data, and didn't actually make a contract that would specifically transfer any rights to it, or allow it to be reused.

      The seller's copyright on the data definitely remains, at least.

      If you bought a desktop machine from a famous musician and noted "oh wow, the guy's Protools directory is still here, let's make a remix - oh, what the hell, let's just sell the song as it was famously performed and let the world know I'm the new owner of this song", guess what would happen?

  22. Re:Two possibilites.. by pimpimpim · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Both the possibilities you mention are valid in this case.

    1:) All the people here talking about deleting contents of your harddrive get the point wrong. This guy sold his laptop because it broke and he was too stupid to consider mounting the HD in an other PC and moving the contents before selling it. The HD was still fully functioning, and it took the buyer no effort to get the contents of it, which he was eager to do as he was screwed by buying a broken laptop which status was mentioned as "refurbished".

    2:) The buyer is an unreasonable dick, because he could have known that this was not a serious seller. The buyer posts screenshots of the e-bay auction, that make this clear here and here. Just read the text the seller wrote, and you know that this is a no-go. Still, the buyer goes on ranting that the seller described himself as a businessman, yeah, idiot, did he really believe that?

    Nasty people will try to screw you when selling material over the internet (and not only there), and stupid people will get screwed at obvious scams. Any interference by law representatives or even the media is just a waste of time in this case.

    --
    molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
  23. Note the feedback by CdBee · · Score: 4, Informative

    Link to Amir's profile Amir has done this before.. and how typical that the only positive feedback comes from someone called Nick Tofang.....

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    1. Re:Note the feedback by Raenex · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No excusing the seller, but the buyer is an idiot for making a purchase of this size from a non-reputable user.

  24. Unverifiable? Let's give it a go... by mattmacf · · Score: 5, Informative
    After an intensive bit of sleuthing (ok, I found thesetwo screenshots off the original blog) we can dig up just a bit more info than the Register story provided.

    For your viewing pleasure:

    The original ebay auction (someone might wanna grab a mirror in case ebay decides to pull that down). Up for auction is a refurbished HP laptop with a 2.8 GHz P4 with two gigs of ram, a 15" screen and a DVD+/-RW. Ironically enough, the HD capacity is not listed.

    The seller, amir6626, who is no longer a registered ebay member with a feedback score of -2 (0 at the time of the auction with only one or two total feedback tops).

    The buyer, spikytom, an ebay member since '02 with a score of 79 (70 at the time of the auction) with a total of 1 negative feedback.

    The bid history. Of note here is the fact that the auction was sniped 20 seconds before ending for GBP$350 (roughly US$660), quite a deal on the laptop that was listed.

    Personally, I think it's quite a leap to claim extortion. I'll let you guys make your own judgements, but if you ask me, it seems like nothing more than a legitimate ebayer pissed after getting tooled over by a run-of-the-mill ebay scammer. And hey, who wouldn't be? Call me crazy, but I think the blog is great. Not only does spikytom get his own creative revenge, we all get a laugh out of it.
    --
    I only mod funny =D
  25. Revenge Blog Has Enabled Google Ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Here's the actual site:

    http://amirtofangsazan.blogspot.com/

    Note the allegedly scammed buyer has enabled Google ads on the web page he supposedly set up solely to extract revenge. Decide for yourself whether this impugns his credibility as a purported victim.

    1. Re:Revenge Blog Has Enabled Google Ads by iezhy · · Score: 2, Informative

      follow-up: here's the actual eBay page: http://cgi.ebay.ie/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item= 6825578528 note that the actual photos were removed

    2. Re:Revenge Blog Has Enabled Google Ads by Korvar · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's optional; it's also incredibly easy to set up. He could have simply set Google Ads up to see what happened when he clicked on that button. Certainly I did. I'm still trying to decide where to spend the 24p I've made so far :)

      --
      Korvar the Fox!! www.korvar.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk
  26. Re:More trouble for the buyer by s7uar7 · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...he's made himself vulnerable to a libel suit. Being in Britain, even if everything he says is true, that's not a defense. He held the seller up to public ridicule, and that's all that matters there.

    No, truth is an absolute defence in defamation or libel cases in the UK. However, the defendant has to prove it's the truth, it's not up to the claimant to prove it's not.

  27. Re:Horrible by thegrassyknowl · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Assuming the story is true, the seller deserved a slap on the wrist. The buyer deserves jail time.

    It's people like you who are the reason the world is so fucked up. The seller deserved a slap on the wrist... what's with that?

    Assuming the story is true, he knowingly ripped someone off and refused to make good with it. That is not slap on the wrist-worthy. Public shame is too good for him. Also, his rampant stupidity should make him a prime candidate for a darwin award but it is unlikely he will ever win one.

    Stupid, shonky people are rewarded for screwing the hard working public and when hard working public tries to get a little of their own back then they get in trouble. Fuck that. I spent all of yesterday fighting a court battle because stupid shonky corporation was sending me bills for service that I never requested or used. When the bills went unpaid they sued me! Of course, I lost a day's income and the court only made them pay court costs - no compensation for my time! Screw that.

    I say publicly shame the shammers!

    --
    I drink to make other people interesting!
  28. Re:Unverifiable? Let's give it a go... by balthan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Also, amir6626's only positive feedback is from 'nicktofang'.
     
    Amir's last name is Tofangsazan.

  29. I don't think we should be applauding this... by apflwr3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The buyer seems to be in the right in this case and it seems the seller is getting what he deserves. But I would be hesitant to applaud the buyer too much and encourage copycats... For example, quite a few stolen laptops show up on eBay. I'd hate to see someone doubly victimized, both by getting their laptop stolen and by a pissed off buyer plastering their personal information and photos all over the internet.

  30. Use the security erase feature of the ATA spec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...which is made for this purpose.
     
    You could use MHDD to do this. Just password protect your drive using an ATA-command, then hack into it 3 times (MHDD does this automatically) to activate the security erase of the harddrive.
    Wait a little while (2-6 hours, depending on the harddrive), and you're done.

    I can also recommend this article, which details info on the very subject of erase protocols for harddrive, including DOD-protocols.

  31. Linky by anethema · · Score: 2, Informative

    For those who dont read the articles, link to the page containing pics and excerpts from the hdd is here:

    http://www.amirtofangsazan.blogspot.com/

    --


    It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
  32. sigh by illuminatedwax · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While Amir might be deserving of some kind of punishment, the buyer who posted the pictures is a complete asshole.

    --
    Did you ever notice that *nix doesn't even cover Linux?
  33. Melodrama != Angst by Draconix · · Score: 5, Funny
    --
    By reading this you acknowledge that you have read it.
    1. Re:Melodrama != Angst by machine+of+god · · Score: 2

      angstyangst angst angst

  34. Not True! by Greyfox · · Score: 4, Funny
    The best way in the world to handle scammers is by impaling. Impaling would be a cornerstone of my regime. I don't think we've had enough of it in the past 500 years or so, and I aim to bring it back. I'd be Bruce the Impaler. Don't knock it -- during Vlad's reign, you could leave a bag of gold on the street in Romania and no one would touch it. Why? They didn't want to get impaled.

    I doubt I'd go for Vlad's solution to the homeless problem though. He invited them all to a feast, locked them in and burned the building down. Me, I got nothing against homeless people. If you want to be homeless that's your business. So, "yes" impaling, "no" burning homeless people to death. Any successful regime must have compasison after all. Maybe "yes" burning spammers alive too. On the days we're not impaling them. I'm all about choices.

    My regime would also replace all organized relgion with a state sponsored one involving smurfs. Non-smurfy activities would be punishable by impaling. Non-smurfy activities like scamming or spamming.

    I figure I'm a shoo-in on the next Republican ticket...

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  35. Re:Unverifiable? Let's give it a go... by mister_tim · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Also, the one piece of positive feedback showing on Amir6626's eBay profile is from nicktofang, who seems to share a name quite similar to Amir Tofangsazan. nicktofang also has mediocre feedback, is no longer a member, and started with one piece of good feedback from amir6626.

    Certainly looks fishy to me.

  36. Wisdom foolows, pay attention! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    > Yes, it would suck if the buyer had to go on trial.

    He will. The personal data protection laws in the European union (of which Britain is a member state) are extremely serious. The guy used the data without authorization and by making it public, he has become a criminal. He is very lucky if he aviods spending actual time in prison. I am sure the civil penalties will make him bankrupt anyhow.

    Just yesterday, the EU supreme court crushed the EU-USA airline passanger data exchange agreement because it does not adequately protect EU citizens' privacy rights. If Sheik Osama is not enough excuse for rights treampling, that 375UKP certainly cannot be enough as well.

    Also, the british mentality values privacy of the individual over anything else. The guy who posted someone else's details in public made himself anathema from the community of gentlemen and may have difficulty finding a job or gaining university admission by showing such moral definiencies in handling details of others' personal lifes. Also, the guy who posted the photos on the web is obviously homophobic based on his comments, which is a big no-no in liberal Europe and gayness is well established in britain since Oscar Wilde.

    Not to mention the gross violation against the other people seen in those images. That is not "collateral damage", that is pure wickedness. I hope some of those people will also sue the avenger guy and make him feel the pain of having to pay half of his wage for penalties for a hundred months to come.

    Finaly the guy who posted the photos online violated the most basic rule of civilization as we know it: presumption of innocence. Where is the proof the laptop was indeed sent in already faulty condition? What proof is there the damage did not happen while being rudely transported by the postal service, etc.?

    1. Re:Wisdom foolows, pay attention! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      > Unlikely considering he sold the data to the buyer.

      Except that pimpy neoliberal nerds of America do not make law in Europe (yet). Certain unalienable things cannot be sold, just like you cannot sell yourself to slavery.

      Even when the law allows you to voluntarily provide your data for handling to certain private economic entities (like marketing agencies), the data recepient must have an established corporate legal framework and EU-compliant privacy protection charta approved by the authorities. The laptop buyer certainly meets none of that.

      Europe, especially continental Europe is very paranoid about personal data handling. We have gazillion paragraphs to protect people over that. Personal info databases of separete functionality must not be connected just for ease of operation, but for a compelling need, approved by 2/3rd parlamentary vote or supreme court decision, and many other restictions like that.

      The avenger guy will be held responsibly almost as seriously as if he had found state secrets on that laptop and uploaded that confidental info on the open web.

      Look at from this viewpoint: the photos the laptop buyer uploaded allege that the seller is homosexual or at least bisexual. In the Holocaust, same-sex people were the third largest minority group persecuted by the nazi (after jews and gipsy). That was a mere 60 years ago. Hope you understand why we think such data better not be handled, collected, traded, disclosed by anyone in Europe or anywhere in the world. The data privacy situation in the USA is frightening for any european.

      BTW, if this reported event happened in Switzerland, the laptop buyer would have been murdered two dozen times already. That country values absolute privacy over justice, truth or honesty due to its entire reliance on banking, much of which is very dirty (dictators, drug barons, arms smugglers, world politicans, speculants, spies all keep their fiscals there).

    2. Re:Wisdom foolows, pay attention! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The guy who posted someone else's details in public made himself anathema from the community of gentlemen

      Oh, that fine old British community of gentlemen. Give up; I'm British and I have no idea what community you're talking about.

      The guy who posted the site is already doing a university degree (in cognitive science, apparently) whilst the seller is apparently doing two A-Levels in the hope of becoming a barrister, which suggests to me that they have lowered the threshold of that qualification, two A-levels being hardly enough to get you into Kingston Poly^WUni.

      Not sure I see much sign of specific homophobia, unless the site is also to be seen as foot-sucking-fetish-phobic.

      As it happens, I think what the British mentality does value (if anything, and it is worth bearing in mind here that there are a lot of flavours of British) is not privacy of the individual but operating within reasonable limits. You could call it playing fair if you were of a 1920s hockey-playing sort of persuasion, but what it means is that those who kick the ass out of the system don't get much respect. You can go on about presumption of innocence all you like, but then you're not stuck with a faulty laptop and a buyer who claims to have moved to Dubai...

    3. Re:Wisdom foolows, pay attention! by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 4, Funny
      Also, the british mentality values privacy of the individual over anything else.

      ha
      ha
      ha
      *cough*
      CCTV
      *cough*

      ha ha ha ha ha

      Can I have something of what you've been smoking? Apparently it's some very good stuff!

    4. Re:Wisdom foolows, pay attention! by Macthorpe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Where is the proof the laptop was indeed sent in already faulty condition?

      The fact that the laptop was delivered below the specs listed suggests a general dishonesty that would also lead the seller to sell a broken laptop. Also, I suspect that if he expected the laptop to be actually usable, he would as a potential barrister have the presence of mind and foresight to wipe the contents first.

      I am British, and being British I appreciate not only irony but also 'just desserts'. A man who deliberately set out to defraud someone has reaped his reward!

      --
      "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
    5. Re:Wisdom foolows, pay attention! by squiggleslash · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Without wishing to comment on the GP, which makes some presumptions that aren't really true at the moment (though he's bang-on about the privacy laws), the seller may have sold a copy (the only copy) of the data to the buyer, but the buyer still doesn't have the right to redistribute the information.

      The GP is right that data protection laws are extremely strict throughout Europe, including Britain. Laws on libel and slander also do not rely upon the information being false (truth is not a strict defense against defamation charges in Britain) and, actually, the way the information has been presented, if the guy who sold the laptop isn't well-out-of-the-closet with the various alleged fetishes, he almost certainly has a strong libel case, under British law, against the buyer (actually, he probably does anyway, if the buyer can't prove the laptop wasn't broken before it was shipped.)

      Quite honestly, this is the wrong way to conduct business whatever country you're in. "Alas" for the buyer, he's chosen the most extreme way to conduct business in a country where there are severe legal penalties for pulling these kinds of stunts. Even assuming the seller wasn't willing to take back the laptop, and the product wasn't shipped with insurance, there's a small claims court he could have used. Instead he's resorted to harassment, taking the law into his own hands.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    6. Re:Wisdom foolows, pay attention! by duerra · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Also, the british mentality values privacy of the individual over anything else.

      Uhh... is this the same British mentality that allows their government to track their every destination on the roads, and store that data for years?

      Is this the same British mentality that is allowing the EU to dictate that ISP's retain all traffic info on all of their users for a minimum of 5 years?

      Is this the same British mentality that recently got an innocent man shot because they thought he might be a terrorist, because he was wearing a trench coat?

      Is this the same British mentality that is allowing their government to develop ID cards that have all your fingerprint and facial recognition data on it for analysis by all of these closed circuit cameras you guys are putting up on every street corner?

      Huh... I must have missed something.
    7. Re:Wisdom foolows, pay attention! by m0thr4 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      > Also, the british mentality values privacy of the individual over anything else.
      The same British mentality that feeds our famously invasive tabloid press?
    8. Re:Wisdom foolows, pay attention! by pthisis · · Score: 2, Informative

      the photos the laptop buyer uploaded allege that the seller is homosexual or at least bisexual. In the Holocaust, same-sex people were the third largest minority group persecuted by the nazi (after jews and gipsy)

      Not to denigrate any group, simply to ensure that others are not forgotten:

      Jews were the largest group persecuted, followed in order by Catholics, Poles, Serbs, the disabled, Roma/Sinti ("gypsy), Freemasons, Communists, homosexuals, and Jehovah's Witnesses. That's assuming you don't include millions of Slavic and Soviet citizens and POWs killed as persecutions per se.

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
  37. just wondering? by atarione · · Score: 3, Interesting

    for everyone that says it is "wrong" ..illegal ..etc for the buyer to have posted the pics?

    the Seller sold the buyer the equipment... the harddrive thusly becoming the property of the "buyer"....Didn't the contents of the harddrive also became the property of the buyer????

    Assuming that is correct... would it really be "wrong" for the buyer to utilize the contents of the drive to his choosing????

    i certainly hope no action is taken agaist the "buyer" (assuming of course the lappy was as described broken and otherwise not as advertised).

    --
    actually I am happy to see you, however that is in fact a banana in my pocket.
    1. Re:just wondering? by HappyEngineer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We don't even know that the pictures really came from the laptop. It seems reasonably likely that the laptop was broken if the feedback on ebay is any guide. But, the buyer is obviously pretty dim. He bought a laptop from someone with 1 feedback. It seems reasonable to me that someone that stupid (being more an animal than a human) would be capable of lying about finding those pics on the laptop.

      Or maybe it's all true. There's no way to tell from this tabloid crap.

    2. Re:just wondering? by Bogtha · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Didn't the contents of the harddrive also became the property of the buyer????

      Yes they did. However property is not copyright. The person who took the photos still retains the copyright and could probably sue him for copyright infringement.

      Think about it - the laptop probably came with Windows on the hard drive too - would it be legal for the buyer to put Windows on a website for people to download too?

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    3. Re:just wondering? by Keebler71 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Assuming that is correct... would it really be "wrong" for the buyer to utilize the contents of the drive to his choosing????

      I think you are confusing legality with morality. Legal ... of course. Moral ... Maybe/maybe-not

      --
      "It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance." - Thomas Sowell
    4. Re:just wondering? by phiwum · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No. Copyright doesn't work like that.

      Suppose I write a book and sell a copy to you. Even if I express no copyright or licensing restrictions, you do not have the right to distribute that text. (You have first sale rights to loan, sell or give the book, but not to distribute copies of the entire text.) The same applies to photos. If you acquire photos for which I hold the copyright, you have no legal right to distribute those photos absent some explicit agreement with me.

      The copyright holder retains distribution rights unless there is an explicit agreement otherwise. (The fact that software comes with the inevitable shrinkwrap terms and DVDs come with reminders that all rights have been reserved probably explains why folks think copyrights have to be expressly claimed. But it isn't so in any Berne convention signatory, like the US and UK.)

      --
      Phiwum's law: anyone that names an obvious law after himself and then puts it in his own sig is just pathetic.
  38. 'nother ebay story by thephydes · · Score: 2, Informative

    My daughter "bought" an ipod on Ebay, and it never arrived. A couple of weeks later she was contacted by another "buyer" who had noticed that the "seller" had a business email address. So, he looked up the business on the internet and contacted the owner. Lo and behold, the business was a security firm, and the"seller" had been using company time, and the company system to market the ipods that she didnt have. So, Mim contacted the owner, and he told her that she would have her money in her bank account by the end of the week, which it was. I wonder if the seller is still a trusted employee at the security firm. ....... I certainly hope not. We subsequently heard that she had ripped off at least another 4 people with the same scam.

  39. say hello to the 1950s for me by RMH101 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    "Also, the british mentality values privacy of the individual over anything else. The guy who posted someone else's details in public made himself anathema from the community of gentlemen and may have difficulty finding a job or gaining university admission by showing such moral definiencies in handling details of others' personal lifes.

    Are you posting that from the Victorian era?
    We now have Big Brother as one of our most popular TV shows (attention seeking nobodies stuck in a house and monitored live 24/7), the most CCTV in Europe etc...

  40. Now in the hands of the police by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 4, Informative

    According to The Register, the Metropolitan Police have received a complaint about "improper use of communications networks" and are investigating. Whether the complaint was made by the eBay seller, we don't know. There's also an amusing-in-a-schadenfreude-way article in the (right wing scandal rag) Daily Mail today, where someone else claims to have been shafted by the seller on eBay.

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
  41. yes but by RMH101 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...you're not the sort of muppet who, when his laptop "breaks", thinks "I know, I'll sell it to someone on Ebay and pretend it was still working".
    Not everyone is clued up enough to take the HDD out and wipe it in another PC, either and I think we've had demonstrated that the person in question isn't the brightest tool in the box...

  42. LIBEL is FALSE allegations by MosesJones · · Score: 2, Informative

    If its true then its NEVER LIBEL. Calling Jeffery Archer a liar and a criminal may damage his reputation but that is okay because its true and has been proven in a court of law.

    So if this bloke did sell a broken laptop and did have all this content on there, then the only question would be invasion of privacy, which is a civil not a criminal matter.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
  43. I have mixed feelings about this by Zaatxe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's hard to know where the truth is... they usually say the truth lies between the two versions of the story.

    I really have mixed feelings about this. I agree that when you are cheated on, the punishment has to be harsher than the cheating itself to discourage future cheatings. We can't know if the laptop wasn't really working and if the memory and CD/DVD driver specifications where incorrect, but most of us agree this laptopguy is ruining the boy's life.

    Anyway, just to tell you an anedoct of my own life, I once honked to a guy who cut my way on the street. I just honked. It wasn't a long honk, I didn't yell or anything. I just thought "he didn't see me, I will honk and make my presence known". But the guy started to slow down in front of me and then waved a gun. I turned in the corner between us and sped away from there. The lesson I learnt that day:

    Don't mess with who you don't know, you have no idea what the reaction will be!

    And about leaving sensible information in a computer you are selling, sorry, but it's all your fault. Like an old chinese saying goes (I swear it's a real old chinese saying, I'm not making it up), "he who sleeps with his ass dirty wakes up with the fingers stinking".

    --
    So say we all
  44. Re:Truth not always a defense by igb · · Score: 2, Informative

    When Liberace sued the Daily Mail over Cassandra's column, which implied that Liberace was gay, homosexuality was still illegal in the UK. The Daily Mail didn't run a justification defence: they argued that the words complained of did not accuse Liberace of a crime. They lost, but not for the reasons you suggest. If I could be bothered I'd fish a book I have about the case out and correct the Wikipedia article.

  45. Re:Unverifiable? Let's give it a go... by warrigal · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I've really no trust in feedback in any case. A while back I bought a couple of low-priced items on ebay. The seller informed me that the goods would ship once I posted "good feedback". The rest of the seller's items on ebay were similarly low-value. Feedback-farming, anyone?

    A threat of bad feedback got my purcases shipped.

  46. It MIGHT not have been a scam by the seller by ylikone · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There is the possibility (remote, yes, I know) that the seller did ship a working laptop which just broke on transit... OR the buyer has a grudge against the seller and the laptop works fine, he's just getting revenge for something else (but it's highly unlikely). See, this is why we have laws in place to deal with things instead of vigilante justice, because when people take matters into their own hands, they can never truly know the whole story or if they are acting properly instead of just out of emotion.

    --
    Meh.
  47. I'm with the minority with this one. by DeanFox · · Score: 5, Insightful


    Maybe I need to do some soul searching but I think what the buyer did was outstanding. Yet, at least at my moderation setting, comments are running 5 to 1 against the buyer.

    Maybe it's because my home has been broken into 5 times by neighborhood kids. Or, that a box of checks was stolen and someone wrote $2000+ against my checking account. Or, that I've had my CC number stolen and everything from kitchen appliances and plane tickets were charged to my account. Maybe it's just because I'm sick and tired of the scum inhabiting this planet. But I think what the buyer did is great and we need more of it.

    The light has been shown on this Amir guy for what he is. Public humiliation is a sensible, non-violent form of deterrent and socially acceptable. The police publish the names of "Johns" arrested for solicitation for all to see. Even the Bible supports public humiliation as a deterrent. The Bible says on judgment day all will be known and nothing hidden and exposed for all to see. Our (USA) and (English) early judicial systems used public square stocks and humiliation as a formal sentence.

    The buyer has done his due diligence. All the documentation is there. The seller took 2 months to ship and only after repeated requests. The seller also agreed to refund the money once called on the fact the laptop was junk but then reneged. The seller was given multiple opportunities to correct the problem. He just wasn't interested because he knew he was scamming the guy.

    I saw one post "If the guy kills himself, what a loss". A loss of what? The world would loose a scamming criminal who doesn't think twice about stealing other people's money? That's a loss I can bear.

    Maybe, just maybe, this Amir guy will learn a valuable lesson from his fellow brothers that so far his religion has failed to teach him. Maybe Amir will pull his life together, get some morals and become a valuable member of our society. Maybe, just maybe he's been given a second chance to come clean and make it right.

    JMHO

    -[d]-