Slashdot Mirror


Extortion Virus Code Cracked

Billosaur writes "BBC News is reporting that the password to the dreaded Archiveus virus has been discovered and is now available to anyone who needs it. Archiveus is a 'ransomware' virus, which combines files from the My Documents folder on Windows machines and exchanges them for a single, password-protected file, which it will not unlock unless a password is given. The user would normally be required to pay the extortionist money in order to receive the password, but apparently the virus writer made one small, critical error in coding: placing the password in the code. BTW, the 30-digit password locking the files is mf2lro8sw03ufvnsq034jfowr18f3cszc20vmw."

86 of 371 comments (clear)

  1. What relief! by AltGrendel · · Score: 4, Funny
    BTW, the 30-digit password locking the files is mf2lro8sw03ufvnsq034jfowr18f3cszc20vmw."

    I was just looking for that. Thanks!

    --
    The simple truth is that interstellar distances will not fit into the human imagination

    - Douglas Adams

    1. Re:What relief! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah me too. I was just trying aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaagh8 and then the story appeared.

    2. Re:What relief! by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Funny
      > > BTW, the 30-digit password locking the files is mf2lro8sw03ufvnsq034jfowr18f3cszc20vmw."
      >
      > I was just looking for that. Thanks!

      What?! That's exactly the kind of combination a Slashdotter would use on his luggage!

    3. Re:What relief! by wasimmer · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's amazing! I've got the same combination on my luggage!

    4. Re:What relief! by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 4, Funny
      Geez, what a couple of noobs you guys are!

      Note to self: change luggage comnbination.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    5. Re:What relief! by Kortec · · Score: 2, Funny

      Scale of 1-10 . . how incriminating is it if that sequence just happens to actually be my luggage lock combination?

      --
      "My heart is in the work." - Andrew Carnegie
    6. Re:What relief! by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 3, Funny
      I was just trying aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaagh8

      I take it you were dictating?

    7. Re:What relief! by caseydk · · Score: 4, Funny

      I just trademarked the Web mf2lro8sw03ufvnsq034jfowr18f3cszc20vmw.0 conference.

    8. Re:What relief! by dakara · · Score: 2, Funny

      What!? Who leaked my root password?!

    9. Re:What relief! by ultranova · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I was just looking for that. Thanks!

      Unfortunately, you cannot use it. To do so would be to circumvent an effective access control method. That, in turn, would put you in violation of the DMCA.

      I'm not joking. I'm serious. You are breaking the law if you use this code without having gotten it from the virus writer. Draw your own conclusion about the DMCA from that.

      I'm not a lawyer. This is not legal advice.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    10. Re:What relief! by IDontAgreeWithYou · · Score: 2, Funny

      You have locks on your luggage?!! TERRORIST!!!!

      --
      Finding other idiots on /. that agree with your opinion doesn't make it any less stupid.
  2. ummm by geoffspear · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Odd how that "30 digit password" has 38 characters, 13 of which are digits.

    --
    Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    1. Re:ummm by honestmonkey · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe they meant 30 as in "any number that is greater than 29 and less than 40". You know, thirty. Thirty-ish. Mostly thirty. About thirty. Close to forty, but not quite. Good enough for government work. In Soviet Russia, YOU are 30. 30) Profit! 38 is the new 30.

      Actually I didn't see any fingers or toes in the password at all.

      --
      Everything you know is wrong, Just forget the words and sing along.
    2. Re:ummm by sharkey · · Score: 2, Funny

      Perhaps the period is not part of the password, but rather denotes the end of the sentence.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    3. Re:ummm by darkmeridian · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, no. You have to pay the virus researchers to find out which eight characters to ignore. Thank god for the virus researchers, otherwise the virus ransomers would really have us, huh?

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    4. Re:ummm by Negadecimal · · Score: 3, Funny

      You mean tredecimal Duodecimal?

      You called?

    5. Re:ummm by nybble_me · · Score: 2, Funny

      I for one welcome our new 30 overlords!
      NetCraft confirms, 30 is dead!
      Imagine a beowolf cluster of 30s!
      Yum, 30 with hot grits
      IANAL 30!

      --

      reenigne
  3. Wait... by ImaLamer · · Score: 5, Funny

    We are all now victims of a DMCA lawsuit!

  4. My Lord what are we coming to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    These days even the virus authors don't know anything about writing secure software :(

    1. Re:My Lord what are we coming to by Ougarou · · Score: 2, Interesting
      They/He/She should have used a public key to encrypt it, and keep the other one private. He should also have used a special random code which is rehashed by the author to create a sort of license key. They should make a .NET library to help these guys with propper DRM.

      Well, that's how I would have done it (or tried to do it). For that matter: why isn't GPG as mainstream as milk?

  5. Wow! by daivzhavue · · Score: 3, Funny

    That's the combination to my luggage!

    --
    "A REAL computer has ONE speed and the only powersaving it permits is when you pull the power leads out of the back!"
    1. Re:Wow! by monkaduck · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hey, you too?

      --
      Napalm is nature's toothpaste
    2. Re:Wow! by minusthink · · Score: 5, Funny

      You know you really should change the default on those types of things.

      --
      "when life gets complicated, I like to take a nap in a tree and wait for dinner" - Hobbes.
    3. Re:Wow! by nacturation · · Score: 2, Funny

      Luggage? Heck, that's what's flashing on my VCR right now!

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  6. Just wait... by hanssprudel · · Score: 5, Insightful


    Next time it will be a virus writer who knows about public key cryptography, and then you'll just have to pony up the dough... (or you could stop getting your computer infected with malware in the first place.)

    1. Re:Just wait... by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >(or you could stop getting your computer infected with malware in the first place.)

      Backing up your data would also work.

      Notice how much this virus is like a proprietary file format? You can't get at your own data without paying for a license to the proprietary reader.

    2. Re:Just wait... by mrchaotica · · Score: 3, Interesting
      When the files are being encrypted by software running on your computer, such a virus is inevitably vulnerable.
      Unless it uses the Trusted Platform Module on new computers to do the encryption for it!
      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    3. Re:Just wait... by swillden · · Score: 5, Informative

      Public key cryptography does not work against a man in the middle attack.

      True, in general, though precautions can be taken. I fail to see how a MITM attack is even relevant here, though.

      When the files are being encrypted by software running on your computer, such a virus is inevitably vulnerable.

      Why? Virus contains public key, generates random session key (ideally in memory-locked pages that cannot be swapped out), encrypts all your data with session key, encrypts session key with public key, writes encrypted session key to a file, wipes session key from memory, then shuts down.

      Assuming you don't notice the virus before all of this happens, you're toast unless you can get a copy of the private key.

      To overcome this flaw, the virus writer would have to send the files to a pre-known IP address for off-site encryption (which among other problems would probably be a pretty noticeable activity). Doing so would presumably also expose the author to risk that the computer in question (and presumably he himself) could be siezed.

      Did you mean decryption? If so, yes, the writer would have to have you ship your session key file to him so he could decrypt it and give you your unique decryption key. I don't think that activity is nearly as risky to the writer as trying to figure out how to collect the money, though. Following money trails is something the world's law enforcement agencies are very good at.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    4. Re:Just wait... by BeBoxer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Following money trails is something the world's law enforcement agencies are very good at.

      Yeah, I used to think that. But the fact that I get hundreds of emails every day from people hawking either pirated software and counterfeit/illegal pills has convinced me otherwise.

    5. Re:Just wait... by TikiTDO · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You are absolutely wrong. PKI was designed with the purpose of preventing man-in-the-middle attacks. The virus writer would include the public key in the virus with an associated encryption algorithm. The problem arised with decryption. In order to decrypt a file you would need an associated private key. Now if this key is available inside the virus it would be just as easy to find as the password within the article.

      In fact the whole idea of cryptography revolves around the encryption algorithm telling you nothing about a method to decrypt the data it encrypts (At least without a certain key). These are called trapdoor one-way functions.

      The most realistic way I can think of writing such a virus would be to provide and encryption algo in the virus and then provide a decryption program when the intended victim has paid you the money. Now aren't you glad I'm not writing viruses?

    6. Re:Just wait... by AK+Marc · · Score: 2, Informative

      Following money trails is something the world's law enforcement agencies are very good at.

      Have them send the money via Western Union under the name Boris Yeltson or some such. Western Union does not ask for ID and does not verify the identity of the person picking up the money (at least they didn't a year ago when I last paid attention to such scams). All you need is the confirmation code. They assume that if you show up at the right branch with the right string of numbers, you must be authorized. And once it is picked up, it is gone forever.

    7. Re:Just wait... by Ken_g6 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Or worse, a virus writer could just use a randomized one-time pad which makes the files unrecoverable, claim he has the password, and just make off with the dough!

      (Mod me down to hide my post if you think I'm giving virus writers too many ideas.)

      --
      (T>t && O(n)--) == sqrt(666)
    8. Re:Just wait... by BeBoxer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The fact the LE is good at following money doesn't mean they're actually interested in doing it in the cases you care about.

      As a loyal slashdot member, I had not bothered to read the article before posting. I actually did go back and read it, and you'll never guess how the ransom is paid. The victims are asked to go buy drugs at one of three online "pharmacies". Curious, eh?

    9. Re:Just wait... by swillden · · Score: 3, Funny

      As a loyal slashdot member, I had not bothered to read the article before posting.

      That goes without saying, good sir.

      I actually did go back and read it

      You what??? As an even more loyal slashdot member, I *still* have not read the article :-)

      you'll never guess how the ransom is paid. The victims are asked to go buy drugs at one of three online "pharmacies". Curious, eh?

      Very. So this virus is... advertising? Wow.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  7. Wow... by beheaderaswp · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hmm...

    It also works for new Windows XP Professional installs.

    Strange.

    --
    Another consultant who stuck it out.

    "We are the Priests, of the Temples of Syrinx..."
  8. umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    seriously my next guess

  9. News That's Old, Stuff that's Stale by lbmouse · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hasn't this been around for a while? According to this page, the password has been know for at least a month.

    1. Re:News That's Old, Stuff that's Stale by ajs · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Results 1 - 10 of about 69 for mf2lro8sw03ufvnsq034jfowr18f3cszc20vmw. (0.17 seconds)"

      Nuff said.

  10. hold on... by joe+155 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    you mean that when they pay up the people actually let them get their files back? you would think any criminal would just delete them, say that they would give them back and then just take off with the money; they are already breaking the law, whats another one added to that? I wonder if this will now work like it should in the perfect open source community though, a bug is found, someone patches it, the new stuff is available within the day, maybe even better than before?

    --
    *''I can't believe it's not a hyperlink.''
    1. Re:hold on... by venicebeach · · Score: 4, Insightful

      you mean that when they pay up the people actually let them get their files back? you would think any criminal would just delete them, say that they would give them back and then just take off with the money; they are already breaking the law, whats another one added to that

      If you don't give the files back you remove the incentive for other infected users to pay up.

    2. Re:hold on... by ThePyro · · Score: 3, Insightful
      If you don't give the files back you remove the incentive for other infected users to pay up.
      But that assumes that other infected users are collaborating (how else would you hear about the deletions?). And if they were collaborating then they could just share the password (like what has just occurred in this article), and the money dries up anyway.
  11. strings? by blinder · · Score: 3, Funny

    heh, is this strings to the rescue?

    one of the best programs evar :)

  12. Consider this a warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you are still betting on antivirus companies to keep you safe, you should consider this a warning. There is no technical reason why the password should be recoverable. Had the author used strong public key cryptography instead of a symmetric cypher, there would be no way to get the key without the help of the virus author. The only way to be safe is to not get infected and that means you have to use your brain.

    1. Re:Consider this a warning by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Which is why I just laugh when new viruses come out, it's only the idiots that will be infected (generally speaking). So long as you use your brain, your fine. If you somehow fail to use your brain then you deserve to lose your files. I in no way condone the actions of virus writers, but I don't lose sleep about it, and veiw the people who manage to contract the things as just as bad (though in a different sence).

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
  13. If it's the same password... by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If it's the same password for every infection, wouldn't it be likely that the first victim who actually paid for it would then release it to the wild to screw-over the extortionist ASAP?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  14. From the TFA by BaltikaTroika · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The most interesting part of TFA: "Victims are only told the password if they buy drugs from one of three online pharmacies."

    Are online pharmacies so unregulated that criminals can extort people as a means for advertising?

    Wow.

    1. Re:From the TFA by geoffspear · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If they can get away with illegally selling prescription drugs without a prescription and sending out billions of emails advertising the fact (as well as hacking PCs to use as zombies to send out said emails), they can probably get away with a little extortion on top of it.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    2. Re:From the TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      to buy Cialis [...] for my girlfriend (because she didn't want to go to the doctor to get an actual prescription... partially, I think, out of fear her parents would find out even though she was in college at the time...)

      Er, you'd really have thought their parents would have found out their gender by the time they reached college age. They seem to have confused you, too, though, unless you mean "girlfriend" in some kind of metaphorical sense.

      (Wikipedia to the rescue: Cialis is a drug used to treat male erectile dysfunction.)
    3. Re:From the TFA by WillyMF1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can see the future of TV advertising on its way now. "Watch Survivor:XXI next Monday night and pay attention to the scroll bar during the commercials in order to get your documents back!"

  15. weird by mr_tommy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Strike anyone else as odd that the BBC (et al.) ran this story big time - made the world service - on the same day that Microsoft announced their all in one security suite, that, by coincidence, protects against such virus'?

  16. Profit! by insanechemist · · Score: 3, Funny

    1) Write ransom virus
    2) Release
    3) ....
    4) Profit!

    Wait - that actually works I think

    1. Re:Profit! by 50m31sl4sh. · · Score: 2, Funny

      You forgot the third step - mf2lro8sw03ufvnsq034jfowr18f3cszc20vmw.

      --
      Rediculous is ridiculous!
  17. Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    You're wrong. You can cypher it with the public key and it can't be recovered without the private key, which is safe at his computer.

    1. Re:Wrong by Xugumad · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You're both wrong :)

      First up, a man in the middle attack requires that someone spotting the virus on its way to your computer, and re-writing the public key parts. So, not really an issue here. Mostly, the poster appears to be confused with using public keys for verifying identity.

      Problem is, however, that the same private key would unlock all ransomed files. The virus actually needs to be able to get a new public key for each computer in infects, which means having a remote site accessible for it to register with, and request a new key from.

      I'm assuming fairly standard RSA here. There is the possibility that someone could make a more complex cipher; so you start with a private/public key, and the virus carries the public key. On arrival at a system, it generates another public/private key pair, from the public key, which it would encrypt the files with, then destroys the private key. The public key it just generated would then be sent back with payment, the virus author creates a unique decryption key from that public key, and their private key, and sends it in turn back. Hell, it may be possible to do this with RSA, I'm not that much into crypto.

      Luckily, anyone bright enough to figure that all out can probably earn plenty of money legally :)

      Going back to stuff I should be doing, now.

    2. Re:Wrong by EvanED · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The virus actually needs to be able to get a new public key for each computer in infects, which means having a remote site accessible for it to register with, and request a new key from.

      No it doesn't. You've got the idea right, but your version is a bit more complicated than it needs to be.

      Look at real-world implementations of public-key encryption systems. [I know PGPDisk does this. I don't know if PGP does it for other, smaller things. Almost all the encrypted network protocols I've studied do this too.] You usually don't encrypt data with a public key; it's too performance consuming. What you do is generate a random key for a symmetric cypher, encrypt the data with that, then encrypt the generated key with the public key. In network protocols, this generated key is what you'll see called the session key. When your recipient gets the data, they'll decrypt the session key using their private key, then decrypt the data with their session key.

      A virus like the one under discussion could implement this very easily. No need to mess with RSA on two levels, or generate another keypair, just a symmetric key. The virus generates a symmetric key [no need to log onto an external server to request one, just pull from the system clock, /dev/random, whatever], encrypts $HOME using it, encrypts the symmetric key with the extortionist's public key. It then destroys the information in $HOME and discards the unencrypted symmetric key. When you go to get your password, you have to give the extortionist the encrypted symmetric key. He decrypts it with his private key, and gives you the unencrypted key.

    3. Re:Wrong by fizzup · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ah, yes, the zero knowledge transfer of knowledge.

      Black hat: "Give me $500 for the password to decrypt your data."
      White hat posing as victim: "Okay." (gives $500)
      Black hat: "mf2lro8sw03ufvnsq034jfowr18f3cszc20vmw" (gives private key)
      White hat: "Thanks, now I'm going to go tell the New York Times."
      Black hat: "Nuts."

    4. Re:Wrong by ultranova · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ah, yes, the zero knowledge transfer of knowledge.

      Black hat: "Give me $500 for the password to decrypt your data."
      White hat posing as victim: "Okay." (gives $500)
      Black hat: "mf2lro8sw03ufvnsq034jfowr18f3cszc20vmw" (gives private key)
      White hat: "Thanks, now I'm going to go tell the New York Times."
      Black hat: "Nuts."

      Easily avoided:

      1. The BH makes a keypair for asymmetric crypto.
      2. The BH puts the public key into the virus and keeps the private key.
      3. The virus generates a random key for symmetric crypto and uses it to crypt the victims files.
      4. The virus crypts the symmetric key with the public key and destroys the original (never stores it anywhere).
      5. The virus gives the crypted symmetric key to the victim. Since it is crypted, the victim cannot use it to decrypt his files.
      6. The victim sends the money and the crypted symmetric key to the BH.
      7. The BH uses his private key to decrypt the symmetric key.
      8. The BH sends the decrypted symmetric key back to the victim.
      9. The victim uses the decrypted symmetric key to uncrypt his files.
      10. Even if the victim tells the decrypted key to the world, it is useless, since the key is randomly generated at the victims computer when the virus activates and thus extremely likely to be different for every victim.

      The only weakness here is that the victim must be able to contact the Black Hat, since otherwise he couldn't pay. But that's the weakness of every extortion scheme.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  18. Thank the GPL by mypalmike · · Score: 4, Funny

    The virus writers could have used a GPL-based crypt library, but realized that there would be legal issues involved, requiring them to open-source the whole virus.

    --
    There are 0x40000000 types of people: those who understand 32-bit IEEE 754 floating point, and those who don't.
  19. Due to high oil prices... by avatar4d · · Score: 4, Funny

    today's Sesame Street program has been brought to you by:

    mf2lro8sw03ufvnsq034jfowr18f3cszc20vm and w

    --
    Confucius say: "Man who associates with smarter men than himself is smarter than the men he associates with."
  20. Extortionware ? by ch-chuck · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wow, I can see it now. New user clicks on "check email", sees "I Love You!" and clicks on the attachment. A popup window with a gun pointing out the screen appears and the message: "Alright buddy, this is a stickup - Type your bank account password in the field below and click 'submit' or everything in My Documents gets deleted!! I'm not kidding!!! Do it NOW!!!!"

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  21. Arrest? by crossmr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Has this guy been arrested? It shouldn't have taken a genius law enforcement officer to make a payment for this and track it and then pick the guy up?

    1. Re:Arrest? by crossmr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Following a payment is a lot easier than following a spam e-mail.

      When spammers send out e-mails they're not looking for respones, and don't particularly care if people can get back to them. They're pointing them to websites.

      This guy was probably taking payment online via some online system. Depending where its based, its possible they could get the records and track this guy down.

  22. Re:Erm call me stupid but . . . by bill_kress · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Personally, worst case I'd write a little algorithm to generate it (if I wanted a constant password that is).

    More likely I'd write one that created a hashcode from the completed compression, encoded the hashcode in base64, told the user to enter it when he bought his drugs then used a second algorithm online to encode that result into a specific "key" that would only work for that one, umm, "Customer". If possible I'd write the algorithm in a custom bytecode language so that it wasn't just a straightforward decompile.

    Of course, if I was going to go through all that effort I'd just write an online casino or something and steal my money the old fashion way.

  23. Obvious problem by Sylver+Dragon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There seems to be one glaring problem with the idea of ransomware:
    Eventually you're gonna piss off the wrong person.
    Imagine the DoD or the CIA getting hit with this. They lookup the registar of the sites you are supposed to buy the drugs from. They then go visit that registar's main office (borders, what borders? we're the CIA, we've never paid attention to soviernty in the past.). They politely ask the registar to hand over all information on the person paying for the domain name (for the definition of polite which involves pointing guns at and kicking people in the head). Once they know who is paying for the web sites (credit info/check info), they visit that person and politely ask for the password to unlock the virus (same definition of polite).
    If it's the DoD which gets hit, replace CIA with a Navy SEAL team.

    --
    Necessity is the mother of invention.
    Laziness is the father.
  24. Our Documents by Skiron · · Score: 2

    I am pretty sure that 'mf2lro8sw03ufvnsq034jfowr18f3cszc20vmw' is a registry key for 'My Documents'. It had to be encrypted for 2 reasons:

    1) Only you and MS can open 'My Documents'
    2) They haven't yet worked out how to really have spaces in file names lusers use. [cue: spinning hour glass]

  25. DAMMIT! I'm screwed! by martinultima · · Score: 4, Funny

    How'd that guy find out my root password!?

    --
    Creative misinterpretation is your friend.
  26. Drats. Time to change passwd on the server farm! by rjamestaylor · · Score: 5, Funny

    Um diddle diddle diddle um diddle ay
    Um diddle diddle diddle um diddle ay
    mf2lro8sw03ufvnsq034jfowr18f3cszc20vmw!
    Even though the sound of it Is something quite atrocious
    If you say it loud enough
    You'll always sound precocious
    mf2lro8sw03ufvnsq034jfowr18f3cszc20vmw !
    Um diddle diddle diddle um diddle ay
    Um diddle diddle diddle um diddle ay
    Because I was afraid to speak
    When I was just a lad My father gave me nose a tweak And told me I was bad
    But then one day I learned a word That saved me aching nose
    The biggest word I ever heard And this is how it goes:
    Oh, mf2lro8sw03ufvnsq034jfowr18f3cszc20vmw!
    Even though the sound of it
    Is something quite atrocious
    If you say it loud enough
    You'll always sound precocious
    mf2lro8sw03ufvnsq034jfowr18f3cszc20vmw !

    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  27. Base 13 Jokes by sconeu · · Score: 4, Funny

    Douglas Adams made one....

    "What do you get when you multiply six by nine?" "Forty-two".

    Work it out in base 13.

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    1. Re:Base 13 Jokes by KlomDark · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wow, I am REALLY slow on the draw. It's been near 25 years since I first read that and today is the first time I ever even 'did the math in my head' and realized that 6x9 != 42. (It's 54 for other slow thinkers... :) )

      More info:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base_13

    2. Re:Base 13 Jokes by It'sYerMam · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The quote above, "no-one writes jokes in base 13" is a quote from DNA himself, upon hearing this theory about the question on a newsgroup, I believe.

      --
      im in ur .sig, writin ur memes.
    3. Re:Base 13 Jokes by 0racle · · Score: 2, Funny

      VMS

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    4. Re:Base 13 Jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      > It doesn't stop morons from repeating the HAL -> IBM
      > every goddamned time you read anything about the book/movie, though.

      Erm, but you just...oh never mind :)

  28. Re:Erm call me stupid but . . . by grassy_knoll · · Score: 4, Funny
    How else are you supposed to do it? Or did TFA mean that it was stored in plaintext in the code?


    I was confused by that as well. I presume plaintext, since storing a hash and comparing a hash generated from user input seems standard practice... at least in the non-virus writting community.

    Ya think the writter had a PHB leaning on him to meet deadline?
  29. Re:BTW by causality · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's odd. In my experience, the moderators tend to use "Offtopic" when they wish to say "Hey you, shut the fuck up and don't point out the truth unless it's what we want to hear." Other than the use of "Troll" instead of "Offtopic," believe me when I tell you that this is nothing new. This is simply one of the easier ways to abuse this particular system.

    I see this going on often enough that I am heading towards the conclusion that meta-moderation is not a strong enough solution for this problem. Meta-moderation is great against mods who deliberately abuse their mod points, but it doesn't work so well against the no-regard-for-facts crowd, which is much larger by comparison. However, because a partial solution is superior to no solution at all in this case, I usually meta-moderate any chance I get and when doing so, I am swift to mark idiot moderations like this as "Unfair."

    As to why the moderation is a shitty judgment call, I will give a hopefully adequate analogy: I do not blame Microsoft for producing half-ass products and profiting handsomely from it; I blame anyone who decides to reward their lack of quality with cold hard cash. By random chance, we ended up with an example of this named Microsft, but there is an entire world full of people with situational ethics waiting to exploit any situation where shit gets rewarded. If Microsoft had not so effectively capitalized on this situation, rest assured that another player would have done so. It's a giant whack-a-mole game until you address the actual problem, which is the decline of the discriminating customer. Therefore, it makes no sense to blame the guy who points out the fact that the Slashdot editors have a mediocre command of the English language. If you must place blame, this would belong to the editors for having a mediocre command of the English language combined with the audacity to still refer to themselves as "editors" because once this is established, it becomes a predictable eventuality that a user who actually cares about quality will point out their shortcomings.

    Incidentally, "Overrated" is a pansy-ass way to express your disapproval with a post, because it allows you to make a claim (that the post deserves a negative sanction) without even giving so much as a hint of reasoning explaining why.

    --
    It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
  30. Big Bird chimes in by Dachannien · · Score: 2, Funny

    mf2lro8sw03ufvnsq034jfowr18f3cszc20vmw
    It's the most remarkable word I've ever seen!
    mf2lro8sw03ufvnsq034jfowr18f3cszc20vmw
    I wish I knew exactly what I mean!
    It starts out like an M word as anyone can see,
    But somewhere in the middle it gets awful 4J to me!
    mf2lro8sw03ufvnsq034jfowr18f3cszc20vmw
    If I ever find out just what this word can mean,
    I'll be the smartest bird the world has ever seen!

  31. All your documents are belong to us! by blueZ3 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Had to be said, karma be damned

    --
    Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
  32. count again; it's 30 by commodoresloat · · Score: 4, Funny

    (for exceptionally high values of 30.)

  33. Re:Closed Systems & Encryption? by Kijori · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, that meta-theorem is kind of included in the idea that, with sufficient time and money, almost any cipher can be broken. And isn't the system necessarily open, since the extotionist must collect the money? This would, I suspect, me much easier to trace than the private key being delivered, which could just be a disc in an envelope sent via the postal service.

  34. Major flaw by Vexorian · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There is a major flaw with the whole ransomware idea and it is that they are actually the most benign kind of virus. They just encrypt your files instead of deleting it? If someone's information is important enough to be worth paying for recovering it should already have a backup copy.

    Then the real problem problem for the hacker is getting the money without losing his secret identity

    --

    Copyright infringement is "piracy" in the same way DRM is "consumer rape"
  35. OMG! Is it a violation of DMCA? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2, Funny

    May be I am wrong, but I thought the Digital Millennium Copyright Act prohibited breaking any encryption and made it a crime to "attempt to circumvent protection". The anti-virus people reverse engineered the virus code, decompiled it, probably ran it under SoftICE and published the password for the whole world to see. Can the author of the virus sue these anti-virus people under DMCA for causing "irreparable financial harm"? And hold slashdot as an accomplice for aiding and abetting the dissemination of the cracking key?

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  36. CIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    The CIA won't have a problem taking down an online pharmacy or two, they really hate it when people interfere with their drug trade anyway.

  37. No he didn't by juletre · · Score: 2, Informative

    When confronted with this at a press conference, mr Adams said "no one makes jokes in base 13". It is a coincidence.

    (or so i've heard)

    --
    "he, who has quotes in his signature, is a douche" - unknown.
  38. Re:Erm call me stupid but . . . by suv4x4 · · Score: 2, Funny

    How do you write a jump instruction for my handmade bytecode-interpretted vm? And doesn't the CRC, which I run inlined tests of throughout my code, of the file change when you modify that instruction?

    You have a full-blown hand-made bytecode interpreter now? Let me guess how this is gonna continue:

    ME: I whip out my advanced lexical analyzer and break your bytecode into well laid out PDF specification

    YOU: I point a laser gun at you, and it's loaded.

    ME: Batman comes through the window to help me.

    YOU: Superman comes makes a hole through the ceiling and comes to help me.

    ME: Superman? What, we'll f*cking use Superman to break into encrypted files? At least Batman is ok with technology.

    YOU: Batman is just a geek: strip the technology off and what remains is a middle-aged guy with obsession over flying mice.

    ME: Bats are NOT MICE, DUH!!

  39. Actually, the author is even more stupid by TheSpoom · · Score: 2, Insightful
    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
  40. Funny base joke by totallygeek · · Score: 4, Funny

    You know why computer programmers get Thanksgiving and Christmas confused? Cuz OCT 31 == DEC 25.

    1. Re:Funny base joke by the+real+darkskye · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thanksgiving is on the same day as Halloween?

      Now I understands what all the Americans are _really_ giving thanks for

      --
      Music is everybody's possession.
      It's only publishers who think that people own it.
      Fuck Beta
      ~John Lenno