Slashdot Mirror


SanDisk Baits Apple And Woos Rockbox

An anonymous reader writes "CNET reports that SanDisk is courting open source developers to port Rockbox to its popular MP3 players. SanDisk is currently the world's second most popular MP3 player manufacturer after Apple. Rockbox is an open source OS for most major MP3 players. The article also talks about SanDisk's subversive new anti-iPod advertising campaign which calls iPod owners 'iChimps' and uses a 'street graffiti style' to create the illusion of a 'counter-culture uprising against the iPod'. The writer says, 'SanDisk is the first company to market its player as an ideological rather than technological alternative to the iPod. To do so is to fight Apple on their own terms.'"

22 of 374 comments (clear)

  1. Al Gore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hear Al Gore puts all his music in a Rockbox

  2. Might as well cut out the middle man by Jeremi · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Oh goody, a corporate-manufactured "cultural backslash" to a corporate-manufactured "cultural movement".


    I vaguely remember the days when culture had something to do with people, not just competing marketing departments...

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    1. Re:Might as well cut out the middle man by McNally · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Oh goody, a corporate-manufactured "cultural backslash" to a corporate-manufactured "cultural movement".
      I vaguely remember the days when culture had something to do with people, not just competing marketing departments...
      Or maybe you just think you do..
    2. Re:Might as well cut out the middle man by GlassHeart · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I vaguely remember the days when culture had something to do with people, not just competing marketing departments...

      Would this be the days when a diamond was forever, or the days when an apple a day kept the doctor away? Corporate manipulation of popular culture, despite your low user ID, probably predates you.

  3. Who to support?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I... don't know who to support! It's Apple vs open source software! My world is crumbling - fanboy fighting fanboy, zealot fighting zealot. Cats and dogs living together!

  4. NEWS FLASH: iPod "Killer" Product/Campaign Launch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dear Rockbox,

    Oh no, not that! Nobody has ever accused iPod owners of being slaves to fashion before! I'm sure everybody in the world will now rush out to buy your heroic piece of shit music player now. What ever will we do???

    Love,
    Steve Jobs

    P.S. Why not just make unlicensed stickers of Calvin pissing on the Apple logo while you're at it? The rest of your ads are almost, but not quite, that cool.

  5. Re:Clever Campaign. by Distinguished+Hero · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Differentiating by making iPod users seem like sheep [idont.com] is a pretty effective idea.... perhaps!
    The funny thing is that anyone who changes their mind based on this stupid marketing campaign really is a sheep.

    --
    Uttering logically derived and empirically supported truths to the disciples of the orthodox establishment.
  6. Re:Clever Campaign. by ePhil_One · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Apple got it's dominant position largely through a clever (and cool, and the early) advertising campaign.

    Apple got its dominate position by creating a effective and user freindly UI to a useful and stylish bit of hardware. If the underlying UI & Hardware weren't up to the task, the ipod would have fallen flat when the first generation of users didn't like them. I owned a pre-ipod player, it had a painful UI, so despite its slick hardware, I hardly ever used it and bad mouthed it to freinds.

    --
    You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
  7. iZZZZZZZ by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 5, Funny
    The article also talks about SanDisk's subversive new anti-iPod advertising campaign which calls iPod owners 'iChimps'

    What was the executive meeting for that one? "Hey, boss! Let's insult the hell out of our target market!"

    and uses a 'street graffiti style' to create the illusion of a 'counter-culture uprising against the iPod'.

    And nothing says "street cred" like a modern Western corporation. Hey, I be down wit dat, um, dogg... or word, or whatever. Shizzle-something.

    The writer says, 'SanDisk is the first company to market its player as an ideological rather than technological alternative to the iPod.

    Thanks SanDisk! I was just thinking this morning that, gosh, there simply is not enough mental illness^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H ideology in this world.

  8. More Info: by shrapnull · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I "accidentally" stumbled onto the iDon't website the other day when I was researching Ogg alternatives to iPod.

    It's not so much that the iPod is without it's flaws, but for them to masquerade as a "revolution" counter-culture and have me find out that it's a sponsored astroturf really pissed me off. Not only that but the link to the SanDisk player on the site, also went to a SanDisk-sponsored page Anything But iPod.

    I can judge for myself based on the qualities and features of a player for myself, but blogs are getting more and more worthless every day since big media will simply continue to masquerade with a false list of "satisfied customers" for everyone to see. A previous employer of mine has actually added astroturfers to their PR team that do nothing but spam forums with their excellent experience with the product they secretly happen to sell.

    sigh...

    --
    If you're half as beautiful naked, you'd be 4 times as beautiful with twice as many clothes on.
    1. Re:More Info: by Keebler71 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      It is a shame that the vast majority of the mp3 player market treats the consumers as if we all have precisely the same requirement... I was in the market for one a several months ago and I settled on a 2gb nano. I hated it as it was completely ill suited for my needs. Before I get castigated as a troll, let me explain. I use my mp3 player to listen to music while exercising, listen to language lessons, and listen to podcasts. The latter two drive a requirement to be able to frequently pause and resume, have a large capacity, and have a display (I can think of nothing more painful than to try to find a specific podcast on a shuffle). The exercise requirement dictated that it had to be rugged (I will drop it) or so cheap that I don't care about scratches. What.I founf was that the Ipod interface, while great for playing playlists while strapped to you arm, was very difficult to navigate with one hand while running and sweating on it. There is no tactile feedback to tell you thaqt you have your finger on the right button and presuming you want to do a lot of pausing and playing (language lessons) it can be awkward to hold. The player I ended up exchanging it for (iRiver) fit nicely in my hand and I can easily control playback and song selection without looking at it (and while running).

      . Moreover, and this isn't flamebait, I prefer to use windows media player on my pc. I realize that this is not the norm, but I hated the itunes app. It took two updates and three restarts to install, forced me to dl quicktime, and of course was incompatible with my ogg and wma files. My nano had a smaller capacity than my collection, so itunes decided to just randomly select mp3s to synch and then I found it surprisingly non-intuitive to select music to be synched (keep in mind that I was more comfortable with WMP).

      Finally, the image thing, looking around my gym I sort-of generated a stereotype for the type of person that used an ipod. It is a very stylish device, but I am not a stylish person... So it just felt too metrosexual for me. By no means is the iRiver perfect, I have lots of complaints... but they mostly fall under categories that are minor to me and it gets the important things right. Forgive typos... Blackberry.

      --
      "It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance." - Thomas Sowell
  9. Re:open source vs. single license locked itunes fi by mveloso · · Score: 4, Informative

    You mean proprietary formats like mp3 and AAC? While iTunes only sells protected AAC and audible tracks, you can in fact use your normal mp3 and AAC encoded files on your iPod.

    I think what you mean is you'd rather have Microsoft Plays-For-Sure DRM'd files instead of Apple's FairPlay DRM'd files, which is something totally different.

  10. Yuck. by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "'SanDisk is the first company to market its player as an ideological rather than technological alternative to the iPod. To do so is to fight Apple on their own terms.'"

    "Fighting Apple on their own terms," they say? I see it as more of a "sinking to their level."

  11. Who's the sheep? by deltagreen · · Score: 4, Funny

    Don't be a sheep and copy everyone else. Be an individualist and buy a completely unique looking MP3-player that resembles nothing else :-P

  12. Re:Facts by moorcito · · Score: 5, Funny

    Second most popular? Hell, I didn't even know sandisk made an mp3 player.

  13. the campaign is quite hysterical by X_Caffeine · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Since it has that sort of stink of knee jerk "anti-corporate subversion" advertising (see David Foster Wallace's E Plurabus Unam), it fails to astroturf. The graphic mentally reinforce "ipod ipod ipod ipod" in the viewers subconscious. In the end, it just makes you feel sorry for all of Apple's competitors.

    --
    // I will show you fear in a handful of jellybeans.
  14. Variety of Models can be Confusing by abscissa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Psychologists have consistently shown that people actually prefer fewer choices to more choices. It just makes life easier and more straightforward, even though it is counterintuitive.

    Part of Apple's strength is that there aren't ten trillion different models with model numbers to purchase, only 3 that come in difference sizes. Has anyone seen Creative's lineup of MP3 players? They have an MP3 player for every occasion.

    Copying one part of Apple's marketing strategy alone is not sufficient to match their unparalleled marketing genius.

  15. On Apple's Terms by bahwi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Apple's terms haven't been popularity, "counter-culture" or anything else. Yes, that's helped, a lot, but the biggest thing about it is it is easy. It's a music player. Nothing more. It's not a strange new fangled USB device that connects to the computer in some weird way, and you have to load weird software and jump through hoops to get it to work. Apple integrated everything it could, made it as simple as your CD player, and then sold it.

    It's cool for geeks to have an iPod cuz they're expensive, but for most of the world, iPods work. I've known people who have bought most others and spent days figuring it out. With an iPod you go home, install iTunes, rip a CD, plug it in(or sit it in the dock) and that's it. You don't have to click through 15 menus to copy music over, you just connect it with the computer and it does the rest for you.

    Not trying to sound like an Apple Fanboy here, but it looks like SanDisk is only targeting geeks with this. The counter culture thing is cool, but when you tell your friends you're gonna go get a sandisk whatever it's called, they'll say "Oh, that's really hard to use. I just sold mine on ebay and got an ipod" what's all that counter culture crap gonna do for you?

    I don't say this to say "Apple Forever!" I'm saying that everyone else needs to make it simple. I'm tired of calls from friends and relatives who got an MP3 player and can't get it to work, the others I tell to get an ipod and poof, no trouble. Just cuz you have an MP3 player doesn't mean you know what an MP3 is, what a computer is, or how or why the CPU is not the big black box that everything plugs into with the Dell logo.

  16. Their right but by Coeurderoy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Currently the SanDisk line required Window XP and WMA 10+
    So let's say it's tito raging against staline, or Franco against Musolini.
    If they offer a rockbox version and find some distributors willing to support music and video distributions in some open format i'll be able to aplaud.

    Right now I'll keep my PMA400 (archos PDA+Player Linux based :-))

    1. Re:Their right but by prockcore · · Score: 4, Informative

      Currently the SanDisk line required Window XP and WMA 10+

      No it doesn't. I have a sandisk player, it mounts on my ibook as a regular drive.. I drag mp3s over to it, and when I unplug, the player itself automatically indexes the new files.

      That interface is waaay better than iPod which requires special software.

  17. Re:Clever Campaign. by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The funny thing is that anyone who changes their mind based on this stupid marketing campaign really is a sheep.

    You know, now I think about it, perhaps such a negative (and as others have pointed out, blatantly astroturfing & subculture mining) campaign won't work so well.

    I do partially agree with you - I think anyone who changes their mind and buys a sandisk based on this stupid marketing campaign really is a sheep, but I think someone who sees this campaign and just thinks about it a little more next time they buy a mp3 player is not....

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
  18. If chosing 30GB over 6GB makes me a sheep by unassimilatible · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    Slashdot "libertarians": Small government for me, big government for those I disagree with. -1, I disagree with you