Slashdot Mirror


SanDisk Baits Apple And Woos Rockbox

An anonymous reader writes "CNET reports that SanDisk is courting open source developers to port Rockbox to its popular MP3 players. SanDisk is currently the world's second most popular MP3 player manufacturer after Apple. Rockbox is an open source OS for most major MP3 players. The article also talks about SanDisk's subversive new anti-iPod advertising campaign which calls iPod owners 'iChimps' and uses a 'street graffiti style' to create the illusion of a 'counter-culture uprising against the iPod'. The writer says, 'SanDisk is the first company to market its player as an ideological rather than technological alternative to the iPod. To do so is to fight Apple on their own terms.'"

63 of 374 comments (clear)

  1. Clever Campaign. by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Apple got it's dominant position largely through a clever (and cool, and the early) advertising campaign. They're firmly fixed as the 'cool' mp3 player to get.

    Everyone else who's tried to take on Apple has (as the article notes) has tried to differentiate themselves through technological features (doesn't work 'cause most people don't understand) or price (doesn't work 'cause people don't want a "cheap and nasty" music player). Differentiating by making iPod users seem like sheep is a pretty effective idea.... perhaps! (I am sure the inevitable replies will correct me).

    The rockbox news is far more interesting - vendor supported rockbox would be a cool thing to have (wish Rockbox worked on my 3g iPod - soon I will have ogg goodness). But (according to the article), its just a rumour, not a confirmed fact) - the submitter should perhaps have linked to another article?

    (Oh, and this was my favorite poster - allthough I think the "shackled" image is more appropriate for an iTunes Music Store mp4 than an ipod itself)

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    1. Re:Clever Campaign. by Distinguished+Hero · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Differentiating by making iPod users seem like sheep [idont.com] is a pretty effective idea.... perhaps!
      The funny thing is that anyone who changes their mind based on this stupid marketing campaign really is a sheep.

      --
      Uttering logically derived and empirically supported truths to the disciples of the orthodox establishment.
    2. Re:Clever Campaign. by ePhil_One · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Apple got it's dominant position largely through a clever (and cool, and the early) advertising campaign.

      Apple got its dominate position by creating a effective and user freindly UI to a useful and stylish bit of hardware. If the underlying UI & Hardware weren't up to the task, the ipod would have fallen flat when the first generation of users didn't like them. I owned a pre-ipod player, it had a painful UI, so despite its slick hardware, I hardly ever used it and bad mouthed it to freinds.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
    3. Re:Clever Campaign. by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 2

      *heh* - and look how that ad managed to unseat IBM & establish Apple as the dominant player in the PC space from the mid 80s on ;-)

      Guess it goes to show that a clever campaign by itself isn't going to be enough - lets hope they do support rockbox. Tt could become the firefox of firmware!

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    4. Re:Clever Campaign. by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The funny thing is that anyone who changes their mind based on this stupid marketing campaign really is a sheep.

      You know, now I think about it, perhaps such a negative (and as others have pointed out, blatantly astroturfing & subculture mining) campaign won't work so well.

      I do partially agree with you - I think anyone who changes their mind and buys a sandisk based on this stupid marketing campaign really is a sheep, but I think someone who sees this campaign and just thinks about it a little more next time they buy a mp3 player is not....

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    5. Re:Clever Campaign. by timster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Apple got it's dominant position largely through a clever (and cool, and the early) advertising campaign.

      Apple got its position by having the foresight to think of their product as a "premium" device. They put in lots of storage capacity, made the thing as small as possible, made more than half the case out of metal, and designed an interface very carefully. When that was done that had a player that was much more expensive than the competing players but much more useful, and the market responded.

      Consider that the supposed "iPod killers" today still often have plastic-only cases, are often twice the volume, and usually have a confusing interface (see the Zen Vision:M).

      tried to differentiate themselves through technological features (doesn't work 'cause most people don't understand)

      Nonsense; people know quite well what an FM tuner and a stopwatch and a voice recorder are. They just don't care, or not in large numbers (and various add-ons exist for the iPod anyway). I told my dad that other players included a built-in radio, and he told me that the reason he wanted an iPod was that radio now sucks.

      --
      I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
    6. Re:Clever Campaign. by Ptur · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The contact between SanDisk and Rockbox is real, not a rumour.

    7. Re:Clever Campaign. by JonasH · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you need further confirmation (petur is a Rockbox developer), see this thread in the Rockbox forums.

    8. Re:Clever Campaign. by esper · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sorry, but he's dead on about the clickwheel. It flat-out sucks.

      "Hey, guys, let's make something that looks just like a directional pad, but, instead of moving down a list when you press down, have it do something completely different!"

      "Yeah, and then - get this - we can have people move through lists by using a circular motion around the pad, and make the rate that it moves through the list variable, so that it's absolutely impossible to keep track of how far you've moved unless you're looking at the screen as you do it."

      "Sweet... and I know how to make it better yet. Once it starts moving, crank the sensitivity up so high that people wil end up jumping the cursor back and forth over the item they want half a dozen times before they can actually get it to stop in the right place."

      "Good, but that might actually be useful when using it to fast forward or rewind within a song. In that mode, it should stay as slow as possible so that users are stuck there, going around and around the wheel dozens of times if they want to jump ahead by more than a minute."

      "Oh, yes! That is an absolutely perfect idea! The only thing that's missing is to just say 'move your finger around the pad' in the manual with no indication of what that actually means."

      Yeah, that's a terrific interface alright...

    9. Re:Clever Campaign. by LordPhantom · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So, um, that would be just about every apple user who thinks they're "cool" based upon apple's adverts?

      Nah, don't bother replying.

    10. Re:Clever Campaign. by esper · · Score: 3, Funny

      a G unit with an expensive pair of Nike shoes

      Damn... They're making Nikes in GUNDAM sizes now?

    11. Re:Clever Campaign. by NMerriam · · Score: 2, Informative

      So what if I have a big playlist ("My Top Rated 3+"), and I sort that by song name on my computer. Then on my iPod, I want that playlist to play by shuffling albums? Can't do it.

      Set shuffle by album on the ipod. Select "My Top Rated 3+" under playlists and press play. Congratulations, you're shuffling your playlist by album on the iPod.

      If you're talking about wanting to shuffle by album, but also play within those albums in alphabetical order by song title rather than album order, well sorry, you're SOL along with the other .00000001% of people who would consider such a feature important.

      This is a portable music player with a 3" screen and limited controls, not a supercomputer -- for 90% of the people buying an MP3 player, ease of use is far more important than Random Esoteric Feature #2,736.

      We should, as you say "look at iPod competitors as potential ways to make portable music more enjoyable than it already is". The problem is not that Slashdot is pro-apple, its that everyone who ever bitches about the iPod has clearly no sense of reality about what are features the mass market cares about, or how important the UI and simplicity are to the iPod's success.

      Things like gapless playback and more format support (I'd love FLAC/APE/OGG) should be easy to add without changing the UI much, if at all. And we should continue to harp on apple until those arrive (probably needing hardware upgrades in the case of format support).

      Better support for classical music is something that iTunes has been just lately getting upgraded for, so it will be another revision (or two) before the iPod inherits those features. It was a shame it took so long to get real attention. Unfortunately it seems a lot easier to add fields and options to iTunes than it is to get those new fields and options recognized on the iPod itself. It should be supported, but saying it would be nice to have is a far cry from most of the slashodt posts bitching about how "it doesn't sort by 14 things at once, therefore it suxxors and you are sheep for even looking at an iPod!!"

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    12. Re:Clever Campaign. by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Two of my friends recently purchased iPods specifically because they saw others on campus using them--nothing to do with UI and how stylish the hardware is. IMO, most people buying iPods these days are buying it to feel a belonging to a "movement"/culture or because it is some kind of new fad going on."

      I don't think anybody has any proof of this. People buy iPods because they LIKE them. If they saw others using them on campus and decided to pick one up, then obviously they DID see how easy the UI was and how stylish the hardware is, because as you just wrote, they saw someone else using it.

      You know, just because you're all technical geeks posting on Slashdot doesn't mean everyone else is a "sheep" or following a "movement" when they adopt something that is popular. The iPod really is a great product.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
  2. Al Gore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hear Al Gore puts all his music in a Rockbox

    1. Re:Al Gore by jhsiao · · Score: 2, Funny

      I presume he has the "I'm So Ronery" song from the Team America: World Police soundtrack in his playlist.

  3. Might as well cut out the middle man by Jeremi · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Oh goody, a corporate-manufactured "cultural backslash" to a corporate-manufactured "cultural movement".


    I vaguely remember the days when culture had something to do with people, not just competing marketing departments...

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    1. Re:Might as well cut out the middle man by McNally · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Oh goody, a corporate-manufactured "cultural backslash" to a corporate-manufactured "cultural movement".
      I vaguely remember the days when culture had something to do with people, not just competing marketing departments...
      Or maybe you just think you do..
    2. Re:Might as well cut out the middle man by shawb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What you say? Apple would never do anything like THAT, would they? Taking community created and tested technology and putting it in a slick package would simply be unthinkable.

      What are they gonna do next... take on open source operating system, put a slick UI on it and call it their own?

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    3. Re:Might as well cut out the middle man by GlassHeart · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I vaguely remember the days when culture had something to do with people, not just competing marketing departments...

      Would this be the days when a diamond was forever, or the days when an apple a day kept the doctor away? Corporate manipulation of popular culture, despite your low user ID, probably predates you.

    4. Re:Might as well cut out the middle man by k4_pacific · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Does this mean that all the demonstrations and civil unrest of the sixties and early seventies weren't about buying the world a Coke?

      --
      Unknown host pong.
    5. Re:Might as well cut out the middle man by kchrist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What are they gonna do next... take on open source operating system, put a slick UI on it and call it their own?

      You say that like there's something wrong with it.

      If the developers didn't want their code reused, or reused in commercial products, they would have released it under a different license.

  4. Who to support?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I... don't know who to support! It's Apple vs open source software! My world is crumbling - fanboy fighting fanboy, zealot fighting zealot. Cats and dogs living together!

  5. Facts by MrSquirrel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    SanDisk is the second most popular mp3 player? I thought Creative held that (with about a 5% market share).

    --
    A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing.
    1. Re:Facts by moorcito · · Score: 5, Funny

      Second most popular? Hell, I didn't even know sandisk made an mp3 player.

  6. NEWS FLASH: iPod "Killer" Product/Campaign Launch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dear Rockbox,

    Oh no, not that! Nobody has ever accused iPod owners of being slaves to fashion before! I'm sure everybody in the world will now rush out to buy your heroic piece of shit music player now. What ever will we do???

    Love,
    Steve Jobs

    P.S. Why not just make unlicensed stickers of Calvin pissing on the Apple logo while you're at it? The rest of your ads are almost, but not quite, that cool.

  7. Re:open source vs. single license locked itunes fi by Megane · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I like the idea of a music player that is open source and will allow you to play any time of music as well as copy it off and use it in another player. vs. iTunes proprietary format.

    The only "proprietary" format is the DRM from the Music Store, and maybe ALAC lossless (I don't know if ALAC is open or not). It plays industry standard MP3 and AAC files just fine.

    As long as you don't care about buying music online, there is nothing proprietary about an iPod.

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  8. iZZZZZZZ by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 5, Funny
    The article also talks about SanDisk's subversive new anti-iPod advertising campaign which calls iPod owners 'iChimps'

    What was the executive meeting for that one? "Hey, boss! Let's insult the hell out of our target market!"

    and uses a 'street graffiti style' to create the illusion of a 'counter-culture uprising against the iPod'.

    And nothing says "street cred" like a modern Western corporation. Hey, I be down wit dat, um, dogg... or word, or whatever. Shizzle-something.

    The writer says, 'SanDisk is the first company to market its player as an ideological rather than technological alternative to the iPod.

    Thanks SanDisk! I was just thinking this morning that, gosh, there simply is not enough mental illness^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H ideology in this world.

    1. Re:iZZZZZZZ by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The article also talks about SanDisk's subversive new anti-iPod advertising campaign which calls iPod owners 'iChimps'

      What was the executive meeting for that one? "Hey, boss! Let's insult the hell out of our target market!"

      Your knee hath jerked too soon. First, engage brain.

      The primary target market for Sandisk is people who don't have an iPod. Why? Because they already have a fucking mp3 player. Their targeted market segment (with this campaign, especially) is the people who can't afford an iPod, or who don't want to patronize Apple because of the lingering air of fanboyism that permeates their products.

      These people will likely respond favorably to being led to believe that they are not sheep (though clearly anyone who buys based purely on advertising is indeed a member of the sheeple at large.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:iZZZZZZZ by mobby_6kl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >"Hey, boss! Let's insult the hell out of our target market!"

      The iPod owners aren't their target market. Those people are a lost cause.

    3. Re:iZZZZZZZ by EvanED · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What was the executive meeting for that one? "Hey, boss! Let's insult the hell out of our target market!"

      As opposed to the recent Apple commercials that feel as mudslinging as anything you see around election time?

      "Finally, the Intel chip is freed from dull little boxes performing dull little tasks"

    4. Re:iZZZZZZZ by Atzanteol · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And nothing says "street cred" like a modern Western corporation. Hey, I be down wit dat, um, dogg... or word, or whatever. Shizzle-something.

      I think you give suburban middle-class kids with lots of 'guilt money' *far* too much credit. Take a trip to a local high school - you'll see more walking billboards than at a NASCAR event...

      Corporations have figured out teens for some time now.

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    5. Re:iZZZZZZZ by Tim+Browse · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I actually really don't like the Think Different campaigns - at least, not the ones with pictures of famous people. It always feels like a totally cynical marketing ploy (wonder why) - the accomplishments of these people seem cheapened by the underlying message that if these people had been around today, they probably would have used Macs. Because, you know, you do, and you're just as cool and creative as them, aren't you? It stands to reason.

      When Apple dedicated its front page to Rosa Parks when she died, I found that even more icky. I know it was supposed to be a noble and respectful nod to the woman, but it just felt like some marketing bod said "Rosa Parks died yesterday? Cool!". Probably due to the uncontrollably insufferable smugness that permeates every goddamn piece of Apple's marketing copy. It sets my teeth on edge. It's like Apple really wants to hang out with the popular kids.

      It's probably just me, though.

  9. More Info: by shrapnull · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I "accidentally" stumbled onto the iDon't website the other day when I was researching Ogg alternatives to iPod.

    It's not so much that the iPod is without it's flaws, but for them to masquerade as a "revolution" counter-culture and have me find out that it's a sponsored astroturf really pissed me off. Not only that but the link to the SanDisk player on the site, also went to a SanDisk-sponsored page Anything But iPod.

    I can judge for myself based on the qualities and features of a player for myself, but blogs are getting more and more worthless every day since big media will simply continue to masquerade with a false list of "satisfied customers" for everyone to see. A previous employer of mine has actually added astroturfers to their PR team that do nothing but spam forums with their excellent experience with the product they secretly happen to sell.

    sigh...

    --
    If you're half as beautiful naked, you'd be 4 times as beautiful with twice as many clothes on.
    1. Re:More Info: by siegesama · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Slightly off-topic, but I'd like to mention (regarding your search for Ogg alternatives to iPod) that Rockbox runs awesome on my 5G iPod. Originally I would have preferred that apple would have stepped up and provided the Ogg support on its own, but the features and UI of Rockbox are actually better than the stock Apple firmware. There are some bugs and missing features to contend with (lack of video playback), but if necessary you can have rockbox boot back to the original firmware!

      --
      what the hell is a 'junk character', anyway?
    2. Re:More Info: by ElGuapoGolf · · Score: 3, Informative


      Anythingbutipod.com is not a sandisk site. They're an independent site that reviews MP3 players, as long as they're not iPods.

    3. Re:More Info: by Keebler71 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      It is a shame that the vast majority of the mp3 player market treats the consumers as if we all have precisely the same requirement... I was in the market for one a several months ago and I settled on a 2gb nano. I hated it as it was completely ill suited for my needs. Before I get castigated as a troll, let me explain. I use my mp3 player to listen to music while exercising, listen to language lessons, and listen to podcasts. The latter two drive a requirement to be able to frequently pause and resume, have a large capacity, and have a display (I can think of nothing more painful than to try to find a specific podcast on a shuffle). The exercise requirement dictated that it had to be rugged (I will drop it) or so cheap that I don't care about scratches. What.I founf was that the Ipod interface, while great for playing playlists while strapped to you arm, was very difficult to navigate with one hand while running and sweating on it. There is no tactile feedback to tell you thaqt you have your finger on the right button and presuming you want to do a lot of pausing and playing (language lessons) it can be awkward to hold. The player I ended up exchanging it for (iRiver) fit nicely in my hand and I can easily control playback and song selection without looking at it (and while running).

      . Moreover, and this isn't flamebait, I prefer to use windows media player on my pc. I realize that this is not the norm, but I hated the itunes app. It took two updates and three restarts to install, forced me to dl quicktime, and of course was incompatible with my ogg and wma files. My nano had a smaller capacity than my collection, so itunes decided to just randomly select mp3s to synch and then I found it surprisingly non-intuitive to select music to be synched (keep in mind that I was more comfortable with WMP).

      Finally, the image thing, looking around my gym I sort-of generated a stereotype for the type of person that used an ipod. It is a very stylish device, but I am not a stylish person... So it just felt too metrosexual for me. By no means is the iRiver perfect, I have lots of complaints... but they mostly fall under categories that are minor to me and it gets the important things right. Forgive typos... Blackberry.

      --
      "It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance." - Thomas Sowell
    4. Re:More Info: by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How can we trust, then, that their reviews are both accurate and meaningful if they do not review iPods? That means their reviews are effectively unable to compare to an iPod because they cannot review an iPod to the same standards as the rest of the MP3 players on that site.

  10. Re:open source vs. single license locked itunes fi by mveloso · · Score: 4, Informative

    You mean proprietary formats like mp3 and AAC? While iTunes only sells protected AAC and audible tracks, you can in fact use your normal mp3 and AAC encoded files on your iPod.

    I think what you mean is you'd rather have Microsoft Plays-For-Sure DRM'd files instead of Apple's FairPlay DRM'd files, which is something totally different.

  11. Yuck. by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "'SanDisk is the first company to market its player as an ideological rather than technological alternative to the iPod. To do so is to fight Apple on their own terms.'"

    "Fighting Apple on their own terms," they say? I see it as more of a "sinking to their level."

  12. Who's the sheep? by deltagreen · · Score: 4, Funny

    Don't be a sheep and copy everyone else. Be an individualist and buy a completely unique looking MP3-player that resembles nothing else :-P

  13. Re:open source vs. single license locked itunes fi by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 2, Informative

    he only "proprietary" format is the DRM from the Music Store, and maybe ALAC lossless (I don't know if ALAC is open or not). It plays industry standard MP3 and AAC files just fine.

    mp3 & aac are both proprietary formats too.

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
  14. Sad individual who needs to get with the program by kindbud · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Their propaganda site www.idont.com used to have a message when you logged in with Javascript disabled that said "You're a sad individual who needs to get with the program." Really. This message was surrounded by a bunch of slogans like "Think For Yourself" and "Resist Conformity."

    They've changed it to say "This site requires Flash and a sense of humor" but I thought the earlier message was a lot more funny.

    --
    Edith Keeler Must Die
  15. the campaign is quite hysterical by X_Caffeine · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Since it has that sort of stink of knee jerk "anti-corporate subversion" advertising (see David Foster Wallace's E Plurabus Unam), it fails to astroturf. The graphic mentally reinforce "ipod ipod ipod ipod" in the viewers subconscious. In the end, it just makes you feel sorry for all of Apple's competitors.

    --
    // I will show you fear in a handful of jellybeans.
  16. I don't get it... by craigtheguru · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Siding with Microsoft and a conglomeration of other Plays For Sure companies sure sounds like stickin' it to the man and independent thinking to me! *shakes head*

    It is obvious that these companies don't get it. Instead of trying to compete by offering a compelling and highly integrated product they've moved on to what is essentially name calling. Next they'll say that every time you buy an iPod Jesus cries and kittens die.

    Just produce a must-have product and the sales will take care of themselves! Until that time I'll keep buying iPods because that is what iPod+iTunes is!

    --
    Check out BARTsmart BART Widget, the best BART schedule widget for Mac OS X.
  17. Sandisk who? by Infernal+Device · · Score: 2, Funny

    Good luck with that advertising campaign, Sandisk.

    adjusts iPod earbuds for slightly more comfort. Goes back to happily munching grass ...

    --
    "My God...it's full of trolls!"
  18. Variety of Models can be Confusing by abscissa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Psychologists have consistently shown that people actually prefer fewer choices to more choices. It just makes life easier and more straightforward, even though it is counterintuitive.

    Part of Apple's strength is that there aren't ten trillion different models with model numbers to purchase, only 3 that come in difference sizes. Has anyone seen Creative's lineup of MP3 players? They have an MP3 player for every occasion.

    Copying one part of Apple's marketing strategy alone is not sufficient to match their unparalleled marketing genius.

    1. Re:Variety of Models can be Confusing by penguinstorm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Indeed. Meaningless distinctions between products in the end create confusion more than anything else.

      I was just shopping for a Thinkpad for work - figured an R43 would be good. Turns out there's a bunch of R43's, with some silly distinction on the end. Different drives, different screens etc.

      Apple's computer marketing has been very succesful for the same reason it's iPod marketing has been. You buy an iPod that holds 4,000 songs. Not an jPod II Model 3-8 with the optional FM transmitter.

      --
      Skot Nelson music is my saviour / i was maimed by rock and roll
  19. On Apple's Terms by bahwi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Apple's terms haven't been popularity, "counter-culture" or anything else. Yes, that's helped, a lot, but the biggest thing about it is it is easy. It's a music player. Nothing more. It's not a strange new fangled USB device that connects to the computer in some weird way, and you have to load weird software and jump through hoops to get it to work. Apple integrated everything it could, made it as simple as your CD player, and then sold it.

    It's cool for geeks to have an iPod cuz they're expensive, but for most of the world, iPods work. I've known people who have bought most others and spent days figuring it out. With an iPod you go home, install iTunes, rip a CD, plug it in(or sit it in the dock) and that's it. You don't have to click through 15 menus to copy music over, you just connect it with the computer and it does the rest for you.

    Not trying to sound like an Apple Fanboy here, but it looks like SanDisk is only targeting geeks with this. The counter culture thing is cool, but when you tell your friends you're gonna go get a sandisk whatever it's called, they'll say "Oh, that's really hard to use. I just sold mine on ebay and got an ipod" what's all that counter culture crap gonna do for you?

    I don't say this to say "Apple Forever!" I'm saying that everyone else needs to make it simple. I'm tired of calls from friends and relatives who got an MP3 player and can't get it to work, the others I tell to get an ipod and poof, no trouble. Just cuz you have an MP3 player doesn't mean you know what an MP3 is, what a computer is, or how or why the CPU is not the big black box that everything plugs into with the Dell logo.

  20. Definitely not taking them through price... by guice · · Score: 2, Interesting

    0.o

    Sansa(TM) e270 MP3 Player 6GB Price: $279.99
    Sansa(TM) e260 MP3 Player 4GB Price: $229.99
    Sansa(TM) e250 MP3 Player 2GB Price: $179.99

    A bit high there. My music collection won't even fit on their highest end product. Not to mention any videos you might want to load. They do realize it takes a little bit more than direct attacks against "the fad" to gain customers over.

  21. Their right but by Coeurderoy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Currently the SanDisk line required Window XP and WMA 10+
    So let's say it's tito raging against staline, or Franco against Musolini.
    If they offer a rockbox version and find some distributors willing to support music and video distributions in some open format i'll be able to aplaud.

    Right now I'll keep my PMA400 (archos PDA+Player Linux based :-))

    1. Re:Their right but by prockcore · · Score: 4, Informative

      Currently the SanDisk line required Window XP and WMA 10+

      No it doesn't. I have a sandisk player, it mounts on my ibook as a regular drive.. I drag mp3s over to it, and when I unplug, the player itself automatically indexes the new files.

      That interface is waaay better than iPod which requires special software.

  22. Apple shouldn't complain by m874t232 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Apple has made a career out and a fortune out of portraying their competitors as evil and dominating, and people who buy their competitors' products as boring and conforming. It is only fair that when Apple dominates a market, others do the same thing to them.

    1. Re:Apple shouldn't complain by General+Lee's+Peking · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Apple hasn't complained so far, that I know about anyway. Were you expecting them to do so? The way you've put your comment makes it sound like Apple has already been whining about this. Is that fair to paint them that way?

  23. SanDisk not the first to approach Rockbox by ZipR · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Neuros has chatted with the Rockbox developers too, last fall: http://www.rockbox.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/NonArch os#Upcoming_Models

  24. I agree.... advertising had little to do with it. by King_TJ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I remember skipping the first 2 generations of iPods as completely irrelevant. (I already had a nice in-car MP3 playing stereo system, as well as a nice MP3 music collection on my shared LAN at home. I couldn't really grasp why I'd want to spend hundreds on the ability to take yet another copy of those same files around with me in my pocket - especially since most of my music listening happened at home or in the car.)

    Then, a friend of mine actually invited me to play around with his new 3rd. gen. iPod, hands-on. I was immediately fascinated. The scroll wheel made it so easy to navigate the menus, and everything was on an easy-to-read display screen. It even had some basic PDA type functionality (contacts and calendar synching), making it more justifiable to carry around than I anticipated. Then I realized one could even boot a Mac from one of these things and use it for emergency recovery in case of a drive crash. A quick look at the available accessories for it made me realize another key point; the iPod was the industry standard! Anything you could imagine wanting to add on to a portable player was available in an iPod friendly version. They even had clock radios with iPod docks on top of them.

    Then it struck me. If you can't find some use for an iPod, you're just not trying hard enough. That's the beauty in these things. Photographers can take one around as a mass storage "vault" for their digital photos, instead of juggling a handful of memory sticks or cards. In the current form, you can watch podcasts with training videos for software products like Photoshop, or just the latest comedy skit while you're on the bus or train. It can totally replace music CDs (or even CDRs full of MP3 files) in your car. Take it camping with external speakers... 21st. Century Boom-Box! Battery life is excellent and they "just work", as Apple always promises of their products.

  25. How About Someone Actually BEAT the iPod?!!! by Einstein_101 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You know what would really kill the iPod? A better product! iPod has one heck of a marketing campaign, but let's face it that isn't the only reason for it's sucess. I'm a techie just like most of you, and I'm borderline anti-Apple. I been wanting an mp3 player for a while now. After about 18 months of researching it, I went with the iPod for numerous reasons.

    1)It has by far the most accesories of any portable player.

    2)It's by far the thinnest of any Mp3 player. The closest resemblace to the iPod is the Samsung Z5. The only problem is the 4Gb Z5 isn't much smaller than my 30Gb video iPod.

    3)Quality. Before video was a factor, the only serious competitor to iPod was the Creative Zen Sleek. I'm glad I didn't get one. It started out nice, but let's just say it wasn't built for durability. Consumers were posting all over the net (it should still be on CNet and Amazon) about rattling noises. It seems that the earphones jack wasn't soildered properly, and thousands of people where having problems about it comming loose and falling inside the player. That's a great way to steer people away from Apple.

    But it wasn't only hardware quality that was in question. The "Plays For Sure" nonsense was wreaking havok, and several people weren't able to install the software on Windows 2000. If that wasn't bad enough, the people that COULD install the player complained about being forced to keep the songs on their harddrive (no manual update like the one present in iTunes).

    Now before I hear any of the usual iPod propaganda, let me dispell some of the most common rumors:

    1)You do NOT have to purchase music from iTunes. It sounds obvious, but I actually heard a saleman in Radio Shack tell someone that the only way to get music in the iPod was to buy it. You would think he was just trying to sell more pre-paid cards for iTunes, but once I spoke with him, he actually didn't know. As a matter of fact, you don't even have to use iTunes at all.

    (Disclaimer: I must warn you that I've heard stories of 3rd party software corrupting iTunes.db. It works fine with everything else, but once iTunes detects the .db file has been edited by a 3rd party, it might not recognize the file anymore.)

    2) You do not have to buy QuickTime Pro to import movies. That was true once upon a time, that was changed in iTunes 6.02. However, iTunes is still slow, and neither iTunes or QuickTime can encode muxed videoes with audio, so you're better off using a free alternative.

    3)There is an easy way to get your music back off of your iPod, but it isn't free.

    Let's face it people : The iPod isn't perfect by anyone's standards, but it's the best player on the market by a landslide. If you want to bring Apple's domination of the mp3 market to a halt - give it some decent competition. Creative started now, so hopefully after a few years they'll have all the kinks ironed out. Until then, I can't recommend anything else.

  26. If you are to read one post, pick this one! by dafing · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hey guys,

    Whats with us, I thought /. was for nerds? How come every discussion of the iPod, which is still every other day, we have the same arguements. Again and again. And again.

    Examples like "iPod locks you to iTunes music store/iTunes the program", and that "iPods can actually play many open formats, like mp3......." etc? God, its 2006, "the consumers still pissed, can't take it anymore so i'm writing a list...", how so many of us dont know what the iPod CAN and CAN'T do?

    I love my iPod dearly, wouldnt part with it for 10K, still rocking on my 15GB 3G, with like 2 hours of battery life.

    --
    --- ...or a new slashdot signature. Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
  27. I'm Mo'Blogging this. by delire · · Score: 3, Funny

    From where I sit, I welcome the competition.

    It's rush-hour on a Friday night. The train carriage I'm in has an odourous ambience of smug techno-arianism and revolting self-ordained hipness. I look over either shoulder and realise the source of my discomfort. All my fellow passengers have little or no surface features. To put it more clearly, they are in fact all silhouettes striking obtuse dance poses in what appear to be exaggerated representations of a person enjoying music in the privacy of their own home... the entire carriage is full of 2-Dimensional Private Dancers..

    One of these creatures hands me a single white earpiece and says something like "Do you feel it?". I hear what appears to be RadioHead's "Ok Computer" coming from the earpiece. Barely suppressing a sudden onset of nausea, I sidle away. I reach into my pocket and crank up an Ogg Vorbis rip of New Order's 'Bizarre Love Triange' on my iAudio and breathe deeply.. i'm going to make it. Down the other end of the carriage I make eye contact with the only other three-dimensional being on board. She smiles nervously and points to her Sony Discman..

    SanDisk, Bring The Humans Back.

  28. Re:How About Someone Actually BEAT the iPod?!!! by Dragoonmac · · Score: 2, Informative

    yamiPod can play, rename, and retransfer music off of an iPod for free.
    http://yamipod.com/

    --
    Shots: A Populist Parable
  29. It's nothing cultural by goldcd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    there's an awful lot of people looking to get away from iDRM
    I've bought music from iTunes. If I stop buying iPods between now and the end of my life, I've got to either lose that music on the go, or re-buy it (and add that cost to replacing my iPod).
    The MS system isn't as slick - but at least I know I'll have more choices of vendors to buy from in the future (who might actually try to compete with each other) and sooner of later one of them is going to produce something much better than the iPod of that time.

    1. Re:It's nothing cultural by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Insightful
      but at least I know I'll have more choices of vendors to buy from in the future (who might actually try to compete with each other) and sooner of later one of them is going to produce something much better than the iPod of that time.
      No, you don't know that. I mean, it hasn't happened so far, has it?

      Face it: you're still just as locked in with "Plays For Sure [sic]" as you are with "FairPlay [sic]." The only good DRM is no DRM at all.
      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  30. If chosing 30GB over 6GB makes me a sheep by unassimilatible · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    Slashdot "libertarians": Small government for me, big government for those I disagree with. -1, I disagree with you
    1. Re:If chosing 30GB over 6GB makes me a sheep by DrEldarion · · Score: 3, Informative

      You're comparing apples to oranges. The e270 is more comparable to the iPod Nano than to a regular iPod.