Slashdot Mirror
Viral Music Videos A Problem For RIAA
prostoalex writes "A few years ago music videos were considered promotional, a tease to get the viewer to buy the whole album. However, now that a commercial market for music videos is springing up, the music industry is not quite happy with YouTube, iFilm, Google Video and other video sharing sites distributing the music videos of famous artists. Billboard magazine says: 'The RIAA estimates that sales of music videos topped $3.7 million in three months, after being introduced in October. Meanwhile, the major labels also are sharing in the profits of ad-supported video-on-demand offerings from AOL, Yahoo, Music Choice and others. That is revenue the music industry is keenly interested in protecting. Hopes are that YouTube and others will ink similar deals with the industry in the long run.'"
I hope YouTube isn't hosted in sweden.
For a moment I though this was about some kind of "sony-rootkit" fiasco from the MPAA...
The best test environment is production. - Me
chrome://browser/content/browser.xul
What the fuck does this even mean? HAVE YOU STOPPED FAILING ENGLISH YET?
These people are off the deep end. Maybe they should cut to the chase and get laws passed that force us to buy their crap at gunpoint.
"Time for your new Brittany CD, citizen!"
The RIAA and MPAA remind me of an old Peanuts cartoon, where Lucy takes all of Linus' toys away, and leaves him a rubber band to play with... I've got to dig that up, it's so appropriate (do you remember it?).
Careful! Someone may want to start selling comics online next!
Music videos are advertisements - commercials, and charging for them is the best idea I have heard in decades! Perhaps the idea will catch on, and all advertisements will be withheld from us unless we pay. Poor us, life will be so boring just watching our programs without the joy commercial interruptions bring.
The MPAA could learn a lot from this! That's right, keep those movie trailers under lock and key! They usually show all the interesting parts of the movie, and they are condensed into just a few minutes! Who would pay to see a bloated movie when the Cliff Notes version is available?!? They should be charging more for the trailers than the movies. Pull them from the theaters and TV! That way, people will want to see the movies even more.
Oh, and someone check the water coolers at the RIAA. I suspect that some joker has been dropping LSD in with the bottle deliveries.
Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.
I don't have anything to say, but I just wanted to applaud you for being the first person in the history of Slashdot to spell "lose" correctly. Bravo, sir.
If moderation could change anything, it would be illegal.
I would love to see them start trying to get guitar manufacturers to pay the RIAA tax because the istruments could be used for stealing "stairway to heaven" and "smoke on the water"...
ymmv
That, and whistling in public.
lemme kno when the RIAA is happy.
It might be news then.Just take the Numa Numa video on the internet from a year ago. This is a potential hit song made popular in the US from the "Numa Numa" video at http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/206373 that went nowhere on the buying charts due to pure stupidity of the recording industry. If you liked this song, you couldn't buy it.
I know this is slashdot and the culture is to be inward nerd looking, but even then I think you are vastly overestimating the general public's interest in non-uniform memory architecture.
When information is power, privacy is freedom.
What a future.
How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
STFU
"No Stairway? Denied." - Wayne Campbell
In further proof that Analee Newitz is a goddess, last year she got Jack Valenti to autograph a Beta cassette- containing a recording of Valenti's Boston Strangler speech.