Slashdot Mirror


New Clues for Antikythera Mechanism

fuzzybunny writes "The Register reports that British and Dutch scientists located a previously undetected word on the Antikythera Mechanism which seems to confirm its nature as a tool for astronomical prediction. This device is one of the world's first known geared devices; while its purpose is still not 100% clear, according to the article, 'Athens university researcher Xenophon Moussas is reported as saying the "newly discovered text seems to confirm that the mechanism was used to track planetary bodies."'"

40 of 183 comments (clear)

  1. Not just the first known geared device by brian0918 · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's also one of the earliest, if not the earliest, -known example of an analog computer.

    1. Re:Not just the first known geared device by pestilence669 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This makes me wonder what future civilizations will think about all of these silicon squares (semiconductors) once we're gone. Jewelry?

    2. Re:Not just the first known geared device by thePig · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Another thing which makes it this so unique is that it uses differential gears ...
      This predates the current inventions by nearly 2 millenuim.
      Actually, it seems, the current differntial gears even took data from the Greeks for the same.

      They really knew what they were doing.
      If a civilization knew maths, they knew quite a bit.
      Makes me wonder how much information would have been lost of the earlier civilizations, esp. the Indus Valley civilisations etc
      The civiliztion which was the epitome of mathematical knowledge at the time.

      --
      rajmohan_h@yahoo.com
    3. Re:Not just the first known geared device by sbaker · · Score: 2, Informative

      No - it's neither the first known geared device - nor the first use of a differential gear nor the first analog computer. The chinese had them beat by close to 2000 years...read and learn:

      80BC Antikythera mechanism:

          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antikythera_mechanism

      2000BC South pointing chariot - a geared mechanism with a differential.

          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Pointing_Chario t

      The south pointing chariot subtracted the number of revolutions of one wheel from the number of revolutions of the other and multiplies by some constant that relates the diameter of the wheels to the distance between them. It had to have used a differential to do that because a 'differential' by definition is any mechanism that computes a difference.

      Technically, the South pointing chariot was an analog computer...well, as much as the Antikythera contraption was - albeit on a smaller scale.

      --
      www.sjbaker.org
    4. Re:Not just the first known geared device by indifferent+children · · Score: 2, Funny
      This makes me wonder what future civilizations will think about all of these silicon squares (semiconductors) once we're gone. Jewelry?

      Obviously pieces of some elaborate boardgame. One player would be 'Intel', the other would be 'AMD'. The rules are not known to us, but we presume that they bear some resemblance to checkers. This theory is supported by the Pacific-Northwest legends of a tribe called 'G4m3ers'.

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
  2. Art by Umbral+Blot · · Score: 4, Funny
    I've always been of the opinion that it was some sort of Greek modern art piece.
    Heraclitus: Don't you see the way the gears symbolize man's oppression by the machine?
  3. Portable Sky by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's a navigational device that used the night sky, available to everyone in perfect sync, instead of the many calendars that many Old World societies didn't even have. Maps with directions could encode "turning points" or durations in terms of stars and planets, then limit access to them to only those with the antikythera tech.

    The really interesting question is how that portable machine relates to the ancient monuments like the Pyramids, Chichen Itza, and Angkor Wat which replicate star patterns on the ground for the ages.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  4. In other news, Scientists exaggerate findings by Sentri · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Scientist One:
    "The outstanding results obtained from X-Tek's 3-D X-rays are allowing us to make a definitive investigation of the Mechanism. I do not believe it will ever be possible to do better."
    Scientist Two: "newly discovered text seems to confirm that the mechanism was used to track planetary bodies"
    Scientist One:"It's still up in the air, and there's plenty of work yet to be done.""

    "'What was the device actually for?' Was it a used to predict calendars? Was it simply a teaching tool?"

    The last questions seem more interesting. What it did is certainly important, but what they used it for is more important. If it was intended as an amusement it is of an entirely different significance to if it was intended as a navigation aid, and different again if it was a scientific tool intended for research.

    More info on the actual examination here: http://www.xtekxray.com/antikythera.htm

    --
    Can't we all just get along
  5. 80 B.C. by Joebert · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wow.
    For somthing so old, it looks remarkably similar to my grandpops 1900s pocket watch.

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  6. Not Surprising by blank89 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The greeks made similar considerable advances soon after the death of Alexander the Great. Astronomy, chemistry and mathematical advaces were common because of the information and resouces shared after Alexander the Great united what was thought to be the civilized world.

  7. What is it with Scientists not releasing findings? by Audent · · Score: 3, Interesting

    from the Wik:

    It was inscribed with a text of over 2,000 characters, of which about 95% have been deciphered. The full text of the inscription has not yet been published.

    Why? Go on, I DARE you... publish the text. Let's all have a look, particuarly if it says "All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy" over and over... Tell us what it says. We can handle it.

    Scientists seem quite keen on delaying the release of their findings until such time as they Know Everything There Is To Know about [insert whatever it is here]. Haven't they heard of beta?

    --
    I am a leaf on the wind
  8. The Word by StikyPad · · Score: 4, Funny

    For those wondering, the text they discovered was "...etarium Pat. Pending (1)"

  9. Re:Its an analog computer... by joeyspqr · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... and then build a Beowulf cluster?

    --
    +1 fashionably cynical
  10. What's new? by sbaker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've been hearing about all of these new discoveries about the device over the past week - but I don't see *ANY* new knowledge. We hear that there is finally proof that it's an analog computer - and that finding this word proves it's an astronomical calculator - but I have a book printed 15 years ago that says exactly that. The mechanism that calculates sun and moon positions is completely well understood and has been for years. There are working replicas of the device in several museums that demonstrate how it works.

    Check out the Wikipedia article.

    So if these guys have really learned something new - they are failing to communicate whatever it ACTUALLY is that they've found.

    --
    www.sjbaker.org
    1. Re:What's new? by DrKyle · · Score: 2, Funny

      The thing they don't want leaked out is that the insciption actually says " (c)80 B.C. Piltar the gearmaker, all rights reserved". How he KNEW it was 80B.C. is anyones guess, what did they think they were counting down to?

  11. Obligatory by MrNougat · · Score: 2, Funny

    Best. Mechanism. Evar.

    --
    Web 2.0 == Giant Blogspam Circle Jerk
  12. My officemate had this has his 'honours thesis' by OnanTheBarbarian · · Score: 3, Informative

    Back in 1993, I had an officemate (Bernard Gardner, working for the late Allan Bromley) who worked on doing a 3D reconstruction of this mechanism using the tomography images that had recently been done. From what I recall, they made a bit of progress, discovering that two gears that were previously thought to be joined were merely next to each other and on independent axles; the previous assumption would have resulted in a mechanism that couldn't operate (locked together). But they still really didn't know what it did, and sadly, Allan Bromley (who was one of the main people interested in this device) died in 2002.

    Overall, it's a fascinating find - I never cease to be amazed at the complexity of many pre-industrial artifacts.
    I'm curious as to what sort of mechanical insights - not just inscription reading - the new analysis technique can provide.

  13. I'm amazed by Simon+Garlick · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... that so many of the comments made thus far are attempts at humour.

    The Antikythera Mechanism is either JOYOUSLY UPLIFTING or SOUL-CRUSHINGLY DEPRESSING. It isn't funny.

    Uplifting because the human race developed the differential gear and incredibly intricate machinery TWO THOUSAND YEARS earlier than we thought, and used that technology for science.

    Depressing because the human race then lobotomized itself and we practically went back to living in caves.

    We had something amazing, and we lost it so utterly that we forgot we'd ever had it. Go humanity.

    1. Re:I'm amazed by Moridineas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Only that's not really true. Nobody who studies history today would use the term "Dark Ages" for instance. human progress never stopped, it may have slowed at times and certain areas may have have fallen behind temporarily, but on a whole, the world has seen a never-ending march forward. Much of the technology available a thousand years later (when you think people were living in caves?) was far ahead of what the greeks had in many other areas.

      Not to mention, there's a tradition of automata similiar to this machine that has continued to the present day..wasn't exactly lost.

    2. Re:I'm amazed by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 2, Funny
      Nobody who studies history today would use the term "Dark Ages" for instance. human progress never stopped, it may have slowed at times...

      Reminds me, I have to go finish my documentation...

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    3. Re:I'm amazed by davidgay · · Score: 2, Interesting
      "Dark Ages" was always an anglo-centric concept. The French think about Charlemagne (look him up if you don't know him, i.e., if your European history was anglo-centric) when they think about that time period.

      David Gay

    4. Re:I'm amazed by jd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If it were the only example, I'd agree with you. The Greeks had working steam power (not surpassed until the Industrial Revolution), an idea the solar system was centered on the sun, the beginnings of a theory of robotics, high-ranking female scientists, possibly a printing system (the Phaios Disk is printed, not written or carved) and maybe any number of discoveries we don't even know they had. The "dark ages" were not truly barbaric - art flourished then as it had never done before or ever since - but the total collapse of science and the loss of knowledge was a terrible tragedy. Not only did it put humanity 2,000 years behind on technology, but the re-learning devastated the environment and it is entirely possible that human civilization will not be capable of undoing the damage fast enough.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  14. English grammar by caitsith01 · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Register reports that British and Dutch scientists located a previously undetected word

    May I recommend the present perfect simple tense? I think you'll find that nuanced grammar adds a delightful twist to the English language.

    For instance:

    Slashdot contributors and editors have discovered that applying simple grammatical principles can significantly enhance their audience's comprehension of stories posted on the site

    --
    Read Pynchon.
  15. Re:Its an analog computer... by gbobeck · · Score: 3, Funny
    but does it run linux? ;-)


    Most likely, it runs NetBSD. The 2006.1 release of Gentoo Linux will support it too.
    --
    Navicula hydraulica plena anguilarum est. Omnes castelli tuus nostri sunt. Ed elli avea del cul fatto trombetta.
  16. Re:Its an analog computer... by siberian · · Score: 2, Funny

    I hear that compile times are a real bitch on this old hardware.

  17. Re:Its an analog computer... by gbobeck · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah... but the wait is worth it. Do all of the necessary optimizations and use the proper ricer gcc flags, and it will make that old hardware screaming fast.

    --
    Navicula hydraulica plena anguilarum est. Omnes castelli tuus nostri sunt. Ed elli avea del cul fatto trombetta.
  18. Re:Curious by kfg · · Score: 2, Informative

    The device was found in a shipwreck. The ship appears to have been a Roman trader on its way back to Italy. By dating the goods on the ship the wreck has been dated to the later half of the first century B.C.

    The device is inscribed. The typography is the sort that was prevelant in the later half of the first century B.C. So are the words and the grammatical structure.

    Two independant means of dating accord with each other.

    The specific figure 80 B.C. comes from an estimate of its age being 65 B.C. +/- 15 years, so 80 B.C. is actually the youngest it is estimated it could be. The most conservative number to cite, not an exact age.

    KFG

  19. No, we don't know what they knew by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 3, Insightful
    From TFA:
    If the Antikythera Mechanism is indeed what the investigators believe it is, then there are further suggestions that it may be based on a heliocentric view of the solar system - highly unusual at a time when most Greeks accepted Aristotle's view that the universe revolved around the Earth.

    And what makes us think that most Greeks believed in a geocentric universe? We know precious little about what they knew back then, since we have only a handful of their writings. To insinuate that we have anything like a complete map of the intellectual landscape of the time is sheerest puffery.

    A minute's thought might convince us that a heliocentric model was available to them: They knew the earth was a sphere; they knew its size; they knew the sun was far enough away that its rays arrived parallel for all intents and purposes. Add to that that as soon as someone tried to build something like the Antikythera Mechanism they must perforce have noticed (as did Kepler a millennium and a half later) that it's far easier to model the heavens if you place the sun in the center rather than the earth.

    Even this mechanism itself cannot be unique, as some articles about it have hinted. An automaton/clockwork/astronomical model this complex cannot have leapt full-formed from the mind of a single inventor. There must be an entire lineage of similar devices. That we have only a single example is simply a hint that there was much more to their technology than we're currently aware of. It's also an indication of how easy it is for a cultural calamity to erase collective memories of high tech; a warning for our times if nothing is. Not to mention that the correct ideas are not necessarily those which survive such a calamity. After all, when the Roman Empire fell, Medieval Europe inherited the Ptolemaic model. Of course, by then Ptolemy was writing (ca. 150) he probably had to work without the benefit of the bulk of the Royal Library at Alexandria so he may have been left to his own devices when considering a model of planetary motion.

    --
    And the brethren went away edified.
  20. Clear Skies by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 4, Informative

    I haven't heard whether the antikythera actually worked to accurately show the sky, but I expect that further tests will show that it did.

    The Pyramids aren't "incorrectly placed" to represent the stars of "Orion". Their positions are different from Orion's exact shape today, but are exactly correct for their slightly different positions 13.5Ky ago - and again about 12Ky in the future. Discovering that correspondence allowed the discoverers to find 2 previously undocumented pyramids buried nearby, corresponding to other stars in the constellation. FWIW, the "Greek" who knew the Earth was round, even calculating its circumference within 1% accuracy, was Eratosthenes, actually an "Egyptian" (or neighboring "Libyan").

    Angkor Wat is sync'ed to "Draco", also 13.5Ky ago. Other global monuments reflect other constellations, including all kinds of Greek monuments.

    Stonehenge wasn't merely a sundial, but rather a calibration to various celestial events throughout the year and the centuries.

    These devices were used to navigate around a global civilization that shared a celestial framework. Not just markers, but also a consistent framework of stories of supernatural characters that ensured their perpetuation across the world and through time. Because that knowledge was accepted on faith by most, just like most people accept GPS, watches and Web reservation systems on faith today, they're "religious" objects. I hope our exposure to more ancient versions will help us examine our own mystification of current practices at least as much as it demystifies ancient practice.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Clear Skies by qwijibo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If we all disappeared, how much of what we have done would survive the test of time? A thousand years of neglect would take its toll. Even concrete won't last forever. A few hundred years is good enough for our current purposes, but that's hardly a blip in history. If 95% of the population died off, it wouldn't be possible to maintain what we have right now. Combined with climate changes, it's easy to imagine how even our modern society could waste away. I imagine stories of Silicon Valley would sound a lot like Atlantis if the oceans rose a few hundred feet.

      The idea of a nuclear war in antiquity is preposterous. They didn't have atoms back then. =)

    2. Re:Clear Skies by qwijibo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Anything made of stone has the best chance of standing the test of time. I think the pyramids demonstrate that. While the faces of the pyramids have been destroyed, there's no mistaking huge mounds of rocks that look out of place.

      Knowing that there is iron in the concrete may lead to the conclusion that someone put it there, but not necessarily to why. One of the limitations of archaelogy is that the most believable story that incorporates all of the evidence wins. Knowing that something was a 3000 year old Anasazi field may be somewhat interesting, but generally isn't the level of detail people are looking for. While that may be true, it only tells us a little about how they lived. It doesn't tell us much about their culture, other than they farmed, which means they likely weren't nomads.

      I remember an example used in class of how this process would work if it were applied to us. Some future archaeologist who came across the remains of our society would find most of it destroyed. Artifacts are rare, which is why they need a story to fill in the blanks. Many of the bodies found from our time would have groups of trinkets in close proximity, or in the clothes if they were still in tact. The number and types of these trinkets may be associated with someone's social status or religious beliefs. It would be curious because each group of trinkets would have similarities, but be different. In fact, no two identical sets of trinkets would be found across all of the bodies found. Someone could look at all of this and conclude that these were indications of social status and develop some intricate theory. Without someone from the present time to say "these are keys, they go in locks, we lock things because we don't trust people", the theory may sound solid.

  21. My God! by multimediavt · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's full of stars!

    Sorry, had to.

  22. Anyone noticed the Arab racist troll? by colenski · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I saw this on the Wikipedia entry:

    "It also adds support to the idea that there was an ancient Greek tradition of complex mechanical technology which was later transmitted to the Arab world, where similar but simpler devices were built during the medieval period. Of course, they had to copy it. Jawas would never come up with such a white device on their own."

    I couldn't believe what I was seeing, and I refreshed, and it dissapeared. But I found it again in the edits and that blew me away.

    Shame on the racist troll asshole that put that up. (NB: it wasn't me!)

  23. Re:What is it with Scientists not releasing findin by The_Wilschon · · Score: 3, Informative

    At Fermilab, no data gets released until the entire experimental collaboration (500-700 people in the case of CDF and D0) has approved, or "blessed" it. Why is this? One is scientific credibility. You don't get to publish a paper and then send out bugfix updates. Once something is published, it is published for all time (well, until civilisation collapses at least). You can retract it by publishing a retraction, but that is looked upon as evidence of a rather bad failure. The second reason is that since it is a US national laboratory, the government owns the data. The department of energy, as I understand it, requires this blessing process before any analysis of their data is published.

    --
    SIGSEGV caught, terminating

    wait... not that kind of sig.
  24. I call moderation shenanigans! by voss · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Labelling me overrated before anyone else had rated me and
    labelling me redundant when I was the first comment.

    I call Shenangians!

  25. Let's stick with fact, not legend by laura20 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Legend, rather than fact. The article says:

    2634 BC According to Legend, Huang Di, the Yellow Emperor designs the South Pointing Chariot. It is built for him by the craftsman Fang Bo.

    I'll point out that the Yellow Emperor is also credited in Chinese lgeend with inventing the cart, the boat, and the calendar. He's a culture-hero and myth, not history to be cited. The Duke of Chou is similiarly legendified.

    Note that the 'reinvention' of it (most likely, the actual invention) dates well after the Antikythera mechanism. And even then, there don't appear to be any surviving plans or carts, and at least one claim that it was an actual person in the cart, not a mechanism.

    1. Re:Let's stick with fact, not legend by cp.tar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      On the other hand, even today, in a team of scientists discovering something new, the head of the project gets most (or all) of the credit...

      In any company, managers take credit for the work done by others, but blame them if anything goes wrong.

      I wouldn't say things have changed that much.

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
  26. Too quick with the Submit button by cp.tar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Forgot to mention... how many of Edison's inventions were really his own, and how many (should have) actually belonged to some lab worker/assistant in his labs?

    --
    Ignore this signature. By order.
  27. Re:First Name by Lars+T. · · Score: 2, Funny

    Xenophon - sounds strange to me. No, really.

    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  28. Bloody Romans! What have they ever done for us? by spun · · Score: 2, Insightful

    REG: All right, but apart from the sanitation, the medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, a fresh water system, and public health, what have the Romans ever done for us?

    XERXES: Brought peace.

    REG: Oh. Peace? Shut up!

    (If you don't know what that's from, well, hand in your geek card on the way out.)

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton