Slashdot Mirror


18 Years in Software Tools, an Insider's View

calumtdalek writes "Newsforge (Also owned by VA) has an article on a talk given by Rico Mariani, an eighteen-year veteran at Microsoft, in which he speaks to the University of Waterloo Computer Science Club, sharing his unique take on the history of, and controversies surrounding, Microsoft and the industry in general. Particularly illuminating are his responses to advocates of free/open-source software. The talk can also be download from the csclub's media server"

102 comments

  1. Wow by bgog · · Score: 4, Funny

    Good talk but man that guy is whiney. He sound's like my four-year-old.

    1. Re:Wow by flumps · · Score: 2, Funny

      That would make him -14 when he joined Microsoft.

      Man, the foetuses are getting younger these days...

      --
      "So there he is, risen from the dead. Like that fella, E. T." - Father Ted Crilly
    2. Re:Wow by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 1

      It's not as bad as you think. How many people actually go to RTFA?

      --
      i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
    3. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Erm offtopic? My post was about him joining Microsoft 18 years ago (4 - 18 = -14 if you can't do the maths) and thats what the article is about...

      FFS mod me redundant but dont mod me offtopic.

      I think we have some troll moderators in today.

    4. Re:Wow by indifferent+children · · Score: 1

      In this case: LTFA.

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    5. Re:Wow by Zutfen · · Score: 1

      So the server met its.... Waterloo... ?

      Gah! I just said that, didn't I?
      Alas, poor Karma, I knew thee well.

      --
      I'm too lazy to enter a sig. Hey wait a second! You tricked me!
    6. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to be confused. The trolls (like your good self) are the stupid loosers.

    7. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He sound's like my four-year-old

      "sounds".

    8. Re:Wow by bluejay3132 · · Score: 1

      This guy's mind runs at hyperdrive. If he is any indication, it's no wonder that MS is #1. Terrific film. Worth watching the whole thing (which stopped before he was done). Not that I especially like MS products, but he gives detailed MS insights into many facets of the software/computer industry. Mac User

    9. Re:Wow by flogic42 · · Score: 1
      Good talk but man that guy is whiney. He sound's like my four-year-old.


      It's funny that even the most idiotic microsoft bashing posts get modded up. You don't even know what an apostraphe is for, and you don't know the difference between real criticism and a baby screaming. Please go back to 6th grade where you belong.
      --
      Check out my women's designer clothing store.
    10. Re:Wow by bgog · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I wasn't bashing microsoft at all. In fact I said the talk was 'Good'. I was commenting on how difficult the speaker was to listen to. Also don't you have anything better to do than to rip on my use of an apostraphe in a casual online post. Really, who cares.

  2. Unique, huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is this "Unique" in terms of "unexpected, enlightening and nuanced" or "Unique" in terms of "The 'Unique' Opinion Held By This Guy As Well As Everyone Else Who Has Been Immersed in Microsoft's Corporate Culture For Two Decades!"?

    It's kind of hard to tell. Since this talk is, unhelpfully, only available as an audio download, (1) I can't easily listen to audio where I am right now (2) I can't skim it (3) it's slashdotted. In other words, I have no idea what this talk says. A transcript would have helped a lot.

    This said, I can't help but shake the suspicion if I could listen to this talk, we'd come to the altogether shocking and unexpected discovery that veteran Microsoft executives don't actually think that Microsoft is the bad guy! Who woulda thought? You mean Microsoft doesn't internally hold the opinion that they're evil, world-dominating bastards? Wow! And here I always thought that bad things were only done by people who go home at night, polish their monocles, and cackle gleefully at their own evil while murdering cats.

    1. Re:Unique, huh. by kjart · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Is this "Unique" in terms of "unexpected, enlightening and nuanced" or "Unique" in terms of "The 'Unique' Opinion Held By This Guy As Well As Everyone Else Who Has Been Immersed in Microsoft's Corporate Culture For Two Decades!"?

      I'd say it's unique in that's it's a fairly candid hour and twenty minute discussion (used loosely since he does most of the talking) with an (allegedly) bright developer who has worked for Microsoft for the past 18 years.

      You mean Microsoft doesn't internally hold the opinion that they're evil, world-dominating bastards? Wow! And here I always thought that bad things were only done by people who go home at night, polish their monocles, and cackle gleefully at their own evil while murdering cats.

      Yup, that's actually one of his points - people in Microsoft don't think of themselves as evil and don't have "World Domination" on their todo lists - they're too busy doing their jobs. The people responsible for the whole IE debacle (he actually uses this as an example) didn't integrate IE that way because they wanted to destroy the competition - they made an engineering decision at the time that they thought made sense and ended up causing a big brouhaha.

      Since then, he says, people have obviously tried to be more careful with stuff like that, but the bottomline is that the people that do the bulk of the work at Microsoft are not bent on World Domination - they are bent on programming.

      By the way, I like how you disclaimered yourself saying you didn't watch it at all and then went on to blast it. If it was because he was black, I'd call you a racist; since it's because he works for Microsoft, I'll just call you a Slashdot reader :)

      Cheers

    2. Re:Unique, huh. by OnanTheBarbarian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Right, because we hear frank talk from people who have been at _any_ tech company for 18 years all the time, this is obviously a non-event (this means that this guy was cutting code when a good proportion of Slashdotters were still crapping in diapers or watching Saturday morning cartoons). Face it, 18 years of actual activity (not just a few good years followed by 15 years of pontification or management or both) is a long time in this business and perhaps you should shut the hell up and at least listen, before shooting off your mouth. Even if the guy is from (shock, horror) Microsoft, and even if only you think that this guy is only useful as an insight into the enemies' camp.

      You're awfully free with your criticism of a talk that you haven't actually listened to. I too prefer transcripts for the same reason, but generally don't feel the need to critique content that I haven't actually heard. I think that it's interesting - but not entirely surprising - that you can get modded "Insightful" on Slashdot now for commentary on a talk that you didn't hear.

    3. Re:Unique, huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      this guy was cutting code when a good proportion of Slashdotters were still crapping in diapers or watching Saturday morning cartoons

      What do you mean were?

    4. Re:Unique, huh. by drsmithy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The people responsible for the whole IE debacle (he actually uses this as an example) didn't integrate IE that way because they wanted to destroy the competition - they made an engineering decision at the time that they thought made sense and ended up causing a big brouhaha.

      Not to mention an engineering decision that "everyone" (GNOME, KDE, OS X) subsequently copied. Doesn't that fit the category of "innovation" ?

    5. Re:Unique, huh. by eclectro · · Score: 2, Funny

      And here I always thought that bad things were only done by people who go home at night, polish their monocles, and cackle gleefully at their own evil while murdering cats.

      They would never kill any cats. They would just throw them in a box with some poison.

      You can't say that the cats are dead, because they aren't. Trust me. Just doen't open the box.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    6. Re:Unique, huh. by Tony · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The people responsible for the whole IE debacle (he actually uses this as an example) didn't integrate IE that way because they wanted to destroy the competition - they made an engineering decision at the time that they thought made sense and ended up causing a big brouhaha.

      That's why internal memos and emails from the top brass (Ballmer and Gates, for instance) bragged to each other about how the IE integration was going to kill Netscape. Not because they wanted to kill the competition, but because they wanted to kill Netscape.

      I'm not saying the engineers had anything to do with that. I'm just saying, people at Microsoft tend to do what Gates tells 'em.

      --
      Microsoft is to software what Budweiser is to beer.
    7. Re:Unique, huh. by AuMatar · · Score: 0

      Yup, those engineers are "just following orders". The excuse doesn't fly any more now than it did in the 40s. If you purposely help evil, you are evil.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    8. Re:Unique, huh. by TheDreadSlashdotterD · · Score: 1

      I think that it's interesting - but not entirely surprising - that you can get modded "Insightful" on Slashdot now for commentary on a talk that you didn't hear.

      Where have you been?

      --
      I have nothing to say.
    9. Re:Unique, huh. by Timothy+Brownawell · · Score: 1
      That's why internal memos and emails from the top brass (Ballmer and Gates, for instance) bragged to each other about how the IE integration was going to kill Netscape. Not because they wanted to kill the competition, but because they wanted to kill Netscape.

      From what I've heard, "Netscape" and "the competition" would have been pretty much synonymous back then.

    10. Re:Unique, huh. by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      That's why internal memos and emails from the top brass (Ballmer and Gates, for instance) bragged to each other about how the IE integration was going to kill Netscape. Not because they wanted to kill the competition, but because they wanted to kill Netscape.

      I wonder what the average anti-Microsoftie would do if emails and memos from the "top brass" of Apple talked about how new features like Quartz, Expose, Spotlight and Boot Camp were going to "kill" Microsoft...

      The ideas of IE integration being both engineering *and* strategic business decision are not mutually exclusive.

    11. Re:Unique, huh. by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      I wonder what the average anti-Microsoftie would do if emails and memos from the "top brass" of Apple talked about how new features like Quartz, Expose, Spotlight and Boot Camp were going to "kill" Microsoft...

      Argh. Must proofread. That should say:

      I wonder what the average anti-Microsoftie would do if emails and memos "leaked" from the "top brass" of Apple talking about how new features like Quartz, Expose, Spotlight and Boot Camp were going to "kill" Microsoft...

    12. Re:Unique, huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Argh, Insightful when he says he didnt read the article?! How about Off topic, or Bigot?
      Of course "Slashdotter" would be accurate these days

    13. Re:Unique, huh. by pyrrho · · Score: 1

      anyone that thinks Microsoft is the result of "just good engineering decisions" is not facing reality.

      It's easy to think that when you sit in a corner and paint, "there is no room, only this corner, and it made perfect sense to paint it blue, the blue paint was right here, it has nothing to do with the rest of the room being blue... I'm not sure there even is "the rest of the room"

      --

      -pyrrho

    14. Re:Unique, huh. by plover · · Score: 1
      they made an engineering decision at the time that they thought made sense and ended up causing a big brouhaha.

      Just as it was an engineering decision by these same folks to include "!seineew era sreenigne epacsteN" as a totally random string of bytes?

      World domination is certainly on their minds. They just don't see that as an 'evil' goal. There's a difference.

      --
      John
    15. Re:Unique, huh. by novus+ordo · · Score: 1

      I didn't realize Gnome and KDE were Operating Systems. But then again, the difference between the GUI and the OS is a minor one, don't you think?

      --
      "You're everywhere. You're omnivorous."
    16. Re:Unique, huh. by novus+ordo · · Score: 1

      Lo and behold! You are now modded Insightful!

      --
      "You're everywhere. You're omnivorous."
    17. Re:Unique, huh. by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      I didn't realize Gnome and KDE were Operating Systems.

      I didn't realise that was relevant.

      But then again, the difference between the GUI and the OS is a minor one, don't you think?

      In the context of this discussion, it's unimportant. We are, after all, talking about user space shared components. How they are packaged and distributed to the end user simply doesn't matter, when you're looking at architecture and design.

    18. Re:Unique, huh. by Nevyn · · Score: 1

      See the way criminal tying works is that you have a monopoly on something that people want (like, say, and OS), and you tie the sale of that thing with something unrelated (like, say, a browser). This is because it generally reduces competition (like, say, killing Netscape).

      Or, simply, it would be fine if Apple execs wanted to "kill MS" and they could do a lot of things to try to make that happen (like, say, "tying" their browser to their OS) ... however MS are held to a higher legal std., because they are a _monopoly_ so for instance stopping development of MS Office for Mac OS X would probably be not so clever.

      AINAL, I just play one on /.

      --
      ustr: Managed string API with ave. 44% overhead over strdup(), for 0-20B
    19. Re:Unique, huh. by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      See the way criminal tying works is that you have a monopoly on something that people want (like, say, and OS), and you tie the sale of that thing with something unrelated (like, say, a browser).

      Right. So no product created by a company considered a monopoly can be improved if a competitor already offers that functionality in another product.

      You seem to be ignoring the facts that IE was never sold and the technical aspect of a shared browser component is a perfectly valid piece of functionality for an OS to include (and has since become commonplace).

      Funny how people never seem to get their knickers in a twist about Windows including a TCP/IP stack, GUI and file manager. I've never been able to figure out if they simply can't see the hypocrisy or just ignore it.

      Or, simply, it would be fine if Apple execs wanted to "kill MS" and they could do a lot of things to try to make that happen (like, say, "tying" their browser to their OS) ... however MS are held to a higher legal std., because they are a _monopoly_ so for instance stopping development of MS Office for Mac OS X would probably be not so clever.

      The outrage from Slashdot readers comes from the idea that managers and execs in Microsoft are saying they want to "kill" the competition. This is largely because most of them have never been anywhere near an upper-level management meeting and hence don't realise that colourful language like that is commonplace and harmless. Much like a sports coach telling his players to go out and "kill" the other team isn't speaking literally - although the average Slashdot reader would probably be unfamiliar with that scenario as well.

    20. Re:Unique, huh. by Nevyn · · Score: 1
      You seem to be ignoring the facts that IE was never sold

      The OS was sold, and IE was tied to the OS. Please read what I said.

      ...and the technical aspect of a shared browser component is a perfectly valid piece of functionality for an OS to include (and has since become commonplace).

      Name one other OS that does. You can use/remove/change the browser on Linux/Mac OS X. You might be thinking of Konqueror, which comes with KDE, but you can remove KDE and you can remove konqueror and keep the rest of KDE.

      Funny how people never seem to get their knickers in a twist about Windows including a TCP/IP stack, GUI and file manager. I've never been able to figure out if they simply can't see the hypocrisy or just ignore it.

      They weren't a monopoly at the time they were writting their GUI/file manager and networking stack (TCP/IP might have come at the point where you could argue they were a monopoly, but I'm not sure). And those components were integrated into other OSes before MS did it. Both of which are a big deal legally.

      The outrage from Slashdot readers comes from the idea that managers and execs in Microsoft are saying they want to "kill" the competition. This is largely because most of them have never been anywhere near an upper-level management meeting and hence don't realise that colourful language like that is commonplace and harmless.

      I assume you are young, or in a small company. Because in large businesses the execs sure as hell should have known about illegal tying ... and deliberatley breaking the law isn't nearly as common as you suggest. Writting down that you intend to break the law and then doing it, even less so.

      --
      ustr: Managed string API with ave. 44% overhead over strdup(), for 0-20B
    21. Re:Unique, huh. by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      The OS was sold, and IE was tied to the OS. Please read what I said.

      Everything that comes with Windows is "tied to the OS". Yet no-one seems to care about all those other things.

      Effectively, you are saying Microsoft cannot add new functionality to Windows. If you cannot see the fundamental flaw in that position, then there's a serious problem.

      Name one other OS that does.

      OS X, any Linux distribution that includes KDE and/or GNOME. I think BeOS did, although I'm not 100% on its architecture without going back and reminding myself.

      You can use/remove/change the browser on Linux/Mac OS X.You might be thinking of Konqueror, which comes with KDE, but you can remove KDE and you can remove konqueror and keep the rest of KDE.

      You cannot remobe WebCore/WebKit from OS X. Nor can you remove khtml and gtkhtml from KDE and GNOME, respectively. At least not without hbreaking things that use them.

      They weren't a monopoly at the time they were writting their GUI/file manager and networking stack (TCP/IP might have come at the point where you could argue they were a monopoly, but I'm not sure).

      That you would even consider Microsoft not being allowed to incorporate such basic functionality as a network stack and file manager, because of "monopoly" status, is ridiculous.

      And those components were integrated into other OSes before MS did it. Both of which are a big deal legally.

      It's quite arguable that Apple did it first with Cyberdog and co. Although both projects were created at basically the same time, so it's hard to say for sure. If you just want to talk about bundling of standalone applications (like the first two versions of IE), OS/2 did it before Windows.

      However, the simple fact is Microsoft weren't the only company at the time componentising and integrating a web browser. An architecture which has since been duplicated on every major platform.

      I assume you are young, or in a small company.

      No.

      Because in large businesses the execs sure as hell should have known about illegal tying ...

      It's difficult to see why a web browser would be any different to the myriad other pieces of functionality that have moved from the purvue of 3rd party application to OS-included in the 15-odd years beforehand.

      and deliberatley breaking the law isn't nearly as common as you suggest. Writting down that you intend to break the law and then doing it, even less so.

      That wasn't what I was suggesting. What gets Slashdot readers upset is the language - like "killing them" is someone an uncommon phrase in management meetings and actually means something like assassination.

  3. 18 Years? Wow... by demongeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm not a psychologist, but surely 18 years in a single organization is going to brainwash you to some limited extent. You will either be (a) the corporate lovebug, touting everythign you do as infalliable, or (b) the corporate naysayer, whose sole response to anythign the company puts out is "it isn't read" or "this won't work".

    makes for an interestign thought though -- how would one get objectivity (or a close approximation). Someone outside the organization could never truly understand the internal workings, but someone exposed to the internal workings would always hold a pretty strong bias (one way or the other).

    1. Re:18 Years? Wow... by kjart · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Actually, so far he seems to have a relatively objective perspective. Obviously he likes Microsoft (he does work there) but his perspective on OSS is interesting (somewhat paraphrasing):

      I like open source..I'm a great fan of Stallman's....I think open source has definitely a place in the world and that linux has a place in the world and I hope linux continues to do a great job, and do you know why? Because to the extent that Linux does a great job it forces my guys to do a great job.
    2. Re:18 Years? Wow... by killjoe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      All religions have words that mean "not us". It could be heathen, infidel, goyem or whatever.

      I find it interesting that he uses the phrase "my guys". He doesn't say "us" or microsoft or "commercial software manufacturers" or anything else.

      Maybe I am reading too much into it but that phrase really struck me.

      What about the other commercial vendors though? Don't they force "your guys" to do a great job? I mean the development efforts of MS have been driven by apple and google more then anything else. Like clockwork windows implements two year old apple technology and adopts the latest apple GUI paradigms. These days it's virtually impossible not to hear an MS executive talk about implementing something google is doing. It seems to me MS is much more focused on chasing apple and google then what OSS is doing.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    3. Re:18 Years? Wow... by chrisranjana.com · · Score: 0

      Bill has to love him ! Wow 18 years in a single organization ! Good for him

      --
      Chris ,
      Php Programmers.
    4. Re:18 Years? Wow... by kjart · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I find it interesting that he uses the phrase "my guys".

      I don't really find this odd at all. If you like your company/friends/coworkers you tend to identify them as "yours". I wold imagine since he has worked there for 18 years there are probably many people there that would be like family. Anything that is part of so large a chunk is bound to become personal - heck, you'd probably refer to "my wife/husband" instead of Mr/Mrs Doe after a much shorter period.

      What about the other commercial vendors though? Don't they force "your guys" to do a great job? I mean the development efforts of MS have been driven by apple and google more then anything else. Like clockwork windows implements two year old apple technology and adopts the latest apple GUI paradigms.

      Yes, that is his point entirely. He wants to have healthy competition because he feels that Microsoft does it's best work when they have serious competitors. The part I paraphrased was specifically about open source software, but he does discuss competition in general and the whole "healthy ecosystem" (and makes fun of himself for using that term) thing being good for business.

      Also, just to give them a little benefit of the doubt, I think Vista has been in development for more than two years. So it's conceivable that they aren't "stealing" Apple's ideas, for example, but that Apple just beat them in releasing those features. I'm not saying that it's necessarily the case, but I don't think people should be so quick to condem - good features are good features.

    5. Re:18 Years? Wow... by zootm · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Also, just to give them a little benefit of the doubt, I think Vista has been in development for more than two years. So it's conceivable that they aren't "stealing" Apple's ideas, for example, but that Apple just beat them in releasing those features.

      I think that, in more cases that not, you'd be right here. A lot of the features Vista has been lauded for "stealing" from Apple have been obvious advances for a while (prevalence of search over browsing, 3D-accelerated desktop systems, etc. are all fairly predictable). Vista steals very few design ideas from Apple, in any case (search? that was obvious - it's stolen from Google as much as anyone; desktop widgets? available for Windows and Linux as third-party systems well before Dashboard made people think that Apple "invented" them). As much as I like OSX, I hate the fact that Apple are hailed as so "innovative" to the exclusion of other hard-working companies who do work just as good, simply because they market themselves so well. I feel a lot of companies and organisations doing good work (and I'm gonna controversially include Microsoft here) are being a little hard done-by in this regard.

      More widely, though, I'm not opposed to "idea theft" in the IT field. There's a reason so many people are opposed to software patents.

    6. Re:18 Years? Wow... by indifferent+children · · Score: 2, Interesting
      What about the other commercial vendors though? Don't they force "your guys" to do a great job? I mean the development efforts of MS have been driven by apple and google more then anything else.

      Looking at Microsoft's core business, OS and Office, Google has intruded hardly at all and Apple has intruded into the OS business. To some extent, Apple's OS is based on an OSS flavor of BSD (someone feel free to provide a better explanation; I don't know much about OS X). If an OSS BSD wasn't available, would Apple have created their own from-scratch OS to replace MacOS9 and compete with Windows? Would it have been any good under the hood if it hadn't been *nix-based?

      Sun is largely responsible for the availability of OpenOffice (thanks to their StarOffice acquisition and code-release). But even there, would Sun have bothered with StarOffice in the absence of an OSS option? I would wager that in terms of use, OpenOffice is wildly more successful than StarOffice, and that without OpenOffice, StarOffice would go nowhere. Sun's ability to say, "Look, here is a corporate-supported package based on OpenOffice." should give them a boost in sales.

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    7. Re:18 Years? Wow... by muhgcee · · Score: 1

      OSX is based on FreeBSD. And I am pretty sure that the BSD license allows you to do pretty much whatever you want with the code, which is why OSX is not forced to be open source.

    8. Re:18 Years? Wow... by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 4, Funny

      My guys. My friends. My paisans. They're very smart guys. Wise, even. You could call them my wiseguys.

      Now, Don Stallman, he's a very smart guy too. And you know, me and my guys, we got respect for him and his guys. Cause you gotta have respect.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    9. Re:18 Years? Wow... by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      surely 18 years in a single organization is going to brainwash you to some limited extent
      I like the way you sneaked in that "limited" so that you couldn't be excused of over-exaggeration...
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    10. Re:18 Years? Wow... by SolitaryMan · · Score: 1
      I don't really find this odd at all. If you like your company/friends/coworkers you tend to identify them as "yours".
      I think parent found it odd that he uses the phrase "my guys" as opposed to "we". It does sound somewhat unnatural: the person works 18 years for the company and still does not identify himself as a part of it.
      --
      May Peace Prevail On Earth
    11. Re:18 Years? Wow... by RedOregon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not really. I spent 20 years in the Air Force, and I (and most retirees for that matter) turn into neither. Generally speaking, after that much time you know the organization well enough that you can both call BS on the BS parts, and support the good parts.

      --
      Skivvy Niner? Email me!
      HEY! Look left just ONE MORE TIME!
    12. Re:18 Years? Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It seems to me MS is much more focused on chasing apple and google"

      So the list actually actually is:

      - Get pattents
      - Chase linux
      - Chase apple

    13. Re:18 Years? Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      ...surely 18 years in a single organization is going to brainwash you to some limited extent. You will either be (a) the corporate lovebug, touting everythign you do as infalliable, or (b) the corporate naysayer, whose sole response to anythign the company puts out is "it isn't read" or "this won't work".

      First off, that's a ridiculous assumption. I'm sure there are lots of people who fit one or the other of your two descriptions, but to suggest that those are the only two possible outcomes of working for a single company for 18 years is unimaginative, reductionist nonsense.

      Secondly, you might as well have left the phrase "to some limited extent" out of the first sentence. What you describe in the second sentence would more aptly be described by the phrase "to an extreme extent."

      I know it's tempting to think of yourself as somehow being "above the herd", but you really should resist that temptation. Most human beings (even ones who've been employed by a gigantic "evil" corporation for 18 years) aren't mindless automatons, such that you can predict what they're going to say and think 18 years from now.

    14. Re:18 Years? Wow... by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 1

      If he's a manager or team lead, some level of separation is to be expected in most organizations.

      --
      Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
      The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
    15. Re:18 Years? Wow... by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 1
      surely 18 years in a single organization is going to brainwash you to some limited extent.

      I suspect that depends to a large extent on the nature of the organization in question.

      Some organizations are homogeneous, and have a single overriding "culture" throughout, while others use a wide variety of platforms and have a correspondingly wide variety of cultures sprinkled throughout the company (some of them *quite* different from others within the company).

      --
      Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
      The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
    16. Re:18 Years? Wow... by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      I suspect that depends to a large extent on the nature of the organization in question.

      I'd have to say it depends on the individual.

      If you're prone to drinking the Kool-aid, you're usually not discriminatory about whose you start drinking.

    17. Re:18 Years? Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For us to live any other way was nuts. Uh, to us, those goody-good people who worked shitty jobs for bum paychecks and took the subway to work every day, and worried about their bills, were dead. I mean they were suckers. They had no balls. If we wanted something we just took it. If anyone complained twice they got hit so bad, believe me, they never complained again

    18. Re:18 Years? Wow... by greggman · · Score: 1
      Just thought I'd pass this on but the funny thing is, Windows has had a indexed plugin compatible search built in since NT4.0 (1997?) It's called the Windows Indexing Service. It comes with NT4.0, 2K and XP and has default plugins for searching Office docs (And of course text files). The docs for adding new plugins have been on MSDN since it's release.

      What Apple got that Microsoft missed is that it needed a good interface and lots of promotion. Instead they just made the tech and then didn't have a clue what to do with it except list it as a bullet point.

    19. Re:18 Years? Wow... by zootm · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the search promotion these days is (I think) largely an influence of the web, so it's not something that would've been so apparent back then. I'm not sure that Windows Indexing Service was really designed to handle the high-performance querying which is necessary to make these systems work, either. But yes, they've had full-text indexing for a while.

    20. Re:18 Years? Wow... by greggman · · Score: 1

      Yes, I agree with your point. The funny thing is that actually Windows Indexing Service is website search engine. It was created to allow IIS to have a search feature for websites hosted by IIS including high traffic sites.

      http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url= /library/en-us/indexsrv/html/ixintro_03l1.asp

    21. Re:18 Years? Wow... by zootm · · Score: 1

      Nice, I didn't know that. Interesting.

    22. Re:18 Years? Wow... by aCapitalist · · Score: 1

      I'm not a psychologist, but surely 18 years in a single organization is going to brainwash you to some limited extent. You will either be (a) the corporate lovebug, touting everythign you do as infalliable, or (b) the corporate naysayer, whose sole response to anythign the company puts out is "it isn't read" or "this won't work". ...or 5 minutes working at the FSF

  4. Rico writes the most interesting blog on MSDN by jeswin · · Score: 5, Informative

    For those of you who are new to .Net, Rico Mariani used to be the performance architect in the .Net team. His blog Performance Tidbits, will give you tons of insight into making that .Net application run faster. For the naive, it also tells you when performance matters (which is not all the time). This feed sits right at the top of my subscription list.

    --
    Life is a conviction.
    1. Re:Rico writes the most interesting blog on MSDN by novus+ordo · · Score: 1
      He also has some responses to some of the posts there

      "I thought I'd respond to some of the comments I found most interesting here on my blog. Call me crazy but it seems safer than visiting slashdot personally :)"
      --
      "You're everywhere. You're omnivorous."
  5. Wow by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 3, Funny
    > The talk can also be download from the (University of Waterloo Computer Science Club) csclub's media server

    They could've saved time and simply set fire to their server themselves.

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  6. Torrent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    seed plz

    1. Re:Torrent? by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

      Parent is a bit curt, but not off topic. A torrent is exactly what is needed to make this article comprehensible, as nobody can reach the server.

    2. Re:Torrent? by SoapDish · · Score: 1

      To quote a friend from CSC who directed me to this: "see, the csc isn't allowed to use bittorrent; MFCF has a huge fit everytime we try." MFCF is essentially in charge of all the servers, etc. for University of Waterloo.

      So, they would Torrent if they could.

  7. Interesting talk (and not just about tools) by kjart · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Still in the process of watching it, but he has interesting perspective on Windows 95 and it's role as a bridge from 16bit to 32bit programs. He also points out that though it wasnt the best OS they knew how to make at the time (points at NT) it was the best release of Windows that Microsoft ever did (in his opinion). Whether you agree or disagree, it's an interesting look at Microsoft over (nearly) the past two decades.

    1. Re:Interesting talk (and not just about tools) by dzfoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >> He also points out that though it wasnt the best OS they knew how to make at the time (points at NT) it was the best release of Windows that Microsoft ever did (in his opinion).

      Maybe he meant "release" literally, as in the marketing extravaganza and all the hoopla and parties that ensued when Windows 95 was first released. No other product has since been able to match the long lines, desperation, and tremendous hype^H^H^H^Hexpectation of that version.

            -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    2. Re:Interesting talk (and not just about tools) by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      Still in the process of watching it, but he has interesting perspective on Windows 95 and it's role as a bridge from 16bit to 32bit programs.

      ? Seems to me he was pretty much repeating what everyone (who was actually interested) already knew.

      In fact, it might even help to get across to some people what a tremendous achievement Windows 95 actually was.

      He also points out that though it wasnt the best OS they knew how to make at the time (points at NT) it was the best release of Windows that Microsoft ever did (in his opinion).

      He said "successful", not "best". In fact, he specifically goes on to say that being "the best" in terms of technical features and design was very much a secondary priority.

  8. Re:burn...burn..burn... by Bromskloss · · Score: 1
    Slashdot has just linked to a site containing video clips larger then 1gb. I'm sure its server can take it!
    I'm actually getting 517 K/s. I guess one just have to come early to the queue.
    --
    Swedish plasma phys. PhD student; MSc EE; knows maths, programming, electronics; finance interest; seeks opportunities
  9. No transcript, media download by Betabug · · Score: 4, Informative

    There seems to be no transcript, nothing to read.

    The only option is a couple of media files to download - at least they have options that should work on a variety of platforms.

    1. Re:No transcript, media download by BestNicksRTaken · · Score: 1

      i'm getting really fed up of everything coming out of microsoft as some sort of audio or video stream - you can't even view sample code without downloading an .exe

      what's wrong with plain old text?

      --
      #include <sig.h>
  10. Comments about Slashdot by kjart · · Score: 2, Funny
    Slashdot gets a mention around the 37 minute mark (paraphrase)

    Slashdot is kinda gratuitously over the top. On the other hand, there is great content there too - great minds go to Slashdot....Really, you could argue about the signal to noise ratio, but it's definitely not zero.

    He must be new here...:)

  11. He's a programmer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The programming is important, everything else is secondary. He isn't against doing things as a community and has embraced a Wiki. His comments about it are quite positive. http://msdnwiki.microsoft.com/en-us/mtpswiki/defau lt.aspx

    1. Re:He's a programmer by novus+ordo · · Score: 1
      "I think open source has definitely a place in the world and that linux has a place in the world and I hope linux continues to do a great job..."
      --
      "You're everywhere. You're omnivorous."
  12. 18 Years? Wow...Back in the day. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "I'm not a psychologist, but surely 18 years in a single organization is going to brainwash you to some limited extent. You will either be (a) the corporate lovebug, touting everythign you do as infalliable, or (b) the corporate naysayer, whose sole response to anythign the company puts out is "it isn't read" or "this won't work". "

    God I love the cynical attitude early in the morning.* One (+5:insightful) for calling someone a shill.

    *The thing about cynicism and hate is that they both get into your bloodstream and poision your entire outlook on life.

  13. At least he's not running off curing malaria by gelfling · · Score: 0, Troll

    Because honestly, my stock can't take any more do-gooderism. I think it's wonderful that MS is a bunch of guys who like George Bush, you might think is a dolt but you'd sure like to have a beer with. Yeah that's like cool and shit but first:

    a) get any product out the door in less than 2 years past its due date
    b) get any product out the door that people are impressed by
    c) try to at least think about security architecture
    d) think of your customers instead of just fortress Microsoft
    e) create anything that doesn't give us all the creeps that you're just sucking dollars and rights out of us

    Then yeah, we can all nerd out in the AV squad room.

    1. Re:At least he's not running off curing malaria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3 insightful? This post is just a bunch of pointless MS bashing.

    2. Re:At least he's not running off curing malaria by gelfling · · Score: 1

      Actually it's the comments I sent to them more or less for their last stockholders meeting. See unlike /. nerdorama - MS is a real life corporation with accountability. And you can whine and you can moan that no one take you seriously because your 12th Best C++ programmer in Tulsa or whatever but first and foremost MS is a public corporation with a responsibility to shareholders. And we are sick and tired of Bill Gates wandering the world to innoculate children while he still held the reins at the home office.

  14. UWCSC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I attended Waterloo for a few years back in 96-99, and just as an interesting side note (since I can't seem to access the CSC media server, probably due to the /. effect), while a lot of people were members of the CSC to have access to another UNIX system and the tools they provided, the active CSC members were perhaps the most looked down upon people in the entire Math and Computers building. They epitomized everything negative about being a CS geek: essentially, they were a group of perhaps six guys and one girl, and while they were all incredibly savvy, they required emergency remedial lessons in personal hygiene (people actually avoided the stretch of 3rd floor hallway off which the room was located because the... aroma... was so potent), and even more amusingly, the girl, who was perhaps the antithesis to Natalie Portman (think grotesquely overweight, sporting a healthier quantity of facial hair than one would want in a woman, and entirely lacking any grooming whatsoever) was the entire focus of the males, who appeared to be trying to woo her in some sort of hyperCS ritual which involved much talk of network topologies, UNIX, and computer programming.

    I don't know if the author is admitting an active membership in that club (as I still can't seem to be able to access the server), but if so, it's nothing I think I'd be bragging about :-).

    1. Re:UWCSC by 1a1n · · Score: 1

      ummm. i think you just described /. as well.

    2. Re:UWCSC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was there from 00-05, they have a new girl now.

    3. Re:UWCSC by uw_dwarf · · Score: 1

      Calum T. Dalek is the permanent honourary head of Waterloo's CSC. They needed a name to put on the ACM charter, and given that the composition of the CSC changes every four months (ain't co-op grand?) figured that one would do. He is the voice of the CSC. Mr. Mariani served on the executive of the CSC for a few terms during his undergrad career, so the fine dalek is drawing attention to a distinguished alumnus.


      There were a few female members in the CSC when I was at Waterloo ('81-'87). Certainly not many, but a few. The CSC was a microcosm of folks fitting within the hacker culture described by esr in The New Hacker's Dictionary. And there were enough women in the math faculty that one CSC member cracked, "It's harder to find a free terminal in this building than a date for Saturday night!".


      CSC members without other affiliations weren't as despised as WATSFIC (Waterloo Science Fiction Club) members or mathNEWS editors. But then, the truly cool are always misunderstood, sometimes even by themselves.

      --
      The Seventh Rule: Take others more seriously than yourself, particularly when you are leading them.
    4. Re:UWCSC by pigscanfly.ca · · Score: 1

      Check out tehladies your source for teh ladies (some of them are CSC members even :-)).

    5. Re:UWCSC by SoapDish · · Score: 1

      I currently attend UWaterloo (Mechanical Engineering), and I have to say, UWCSC isn't quite that bad anymore. Many of them keep proper hygiene - or at least rudimentary - and there isn't that unpleasant aroma any more.

  15. Why are you pointing to newsforge? by Mr.+Droopy+Drawers · · Score: 1

    Seems a bit gratuituos to send us to newsforge that only then sends us to the waterloo site. Are you needing to raise the hits on newsforge?

    Now, the site is hoplessly timed out. Next time, spend the extra minutes mirroring the stinkin' thing.

    --

    To Copy from One is Plagiarism; To Copy from Many is Research.

  16. All video? by Refried+Beans · · Score: 1

    I was hoping to download just the audio so I could listen to it on the way to work today.
    If anyone has just the audio track, please post it.

  17. Windows 95 was the most Windows by Zigurd · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Looking back from today, Windows 95 looks like a hack, and not in a good way.

    But it was a tremendous accomplishment. At the time, Apple was adrift and Windows 3.1 sucked and was looking very old. In that environment, Windows 95 provided a pretty good alternative to Apple: A usable desktop, A 32 bit API, a decent class library, good developer tools, darn good hardware detection, even for the many devices for which it had to be ad hoc.

    Or look at it this way: Windows 2000 was a "better" OS, but normal end-users could not install it and run it. Without Windows 95, Microsoft would have left the field open for Apple or some other alternative.

    1. Re:Windows 95 was the most Windows by renoX · · Score: 1

      >Looking back from today, Windows 95 looks like a hack, and not in a good way.
      >But it was a tremendous accomplishment [cut the part about other suck]

      Bah, it was still a hack because it didn't provide a good memory protection.

  18. hard vs good by ConfusedVorlon · · Score: 1

    Interesting to me to hear his rant about the fact that customers were more impressed by his 'easy-to-build data tips tool', than they were by his friends 'very-hard-to-build better call stack display tool'.

    To him, that was just wierd and crazy.
    To me, it makes the point that it's important to think about what the user wants/needs as well as worring about the engineering.

  19. Off topic - WTF is up with Slashdot summaries by bark76 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Why did you bother linking to the article on Newsforge when your summary of it was the entire article? I'm getting sick of all these summaries on Slashdot being nothing more than the first paragraph from the linked article. How hard is it to read the article and write a f#%@*n summary?

    I'm done with my rant, you can go back to whatever you were doing now.

  20. Re:burn...burn..burn... by fmoliveira · · Score: 0

    The original post was only 2min before this one, to this redundant -1 mod was pretty unfair.

  21. He seems to resent users by DavidinAla · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm not quite finished watching the video, but I think the most interesting thing about watching this guy is the unspoken attitude that he seems to have toward users. The most telling thing is when he expresses irritation that developers cheered a "crap" feature that it took him 10 minutes to write in a developer tool (but which those developers thought was very important) but didn't care much about another feature that was very difficult to write and took a lot of time and effort. He seems almost angry that users of his software don't appreciate how hard something was to do. He seems disdainful of the fact that the users have their own needs and desires for what is most useful to THEM. The attitude seems to be that the users are too stupid to understand what's important and what's not.

    To me, he seems like a perfect example of a really smart person who doesn't understand that software is judged by how much easier it makes the user's life, not by how impressive the work is to his geek friends.

    David

    1. Re:He seems to resent users by drsmithy · · Score: 3, Funny
      To me, he seems like a perfect example of a really smart person who doesn't understand that software is judged by how much easier it makes the user's life, not by how impressive the work is to his geek friends.

      So you're saying he moonlights as an OSS developer ?

      (Sorry, cheap shot - but I couldn't resist.)

    2. Re:He seems to resent users by DavidinAla · · Score: 1

      Whether it's fair or not, that's VERY funny. :-)

      David

    3. Re:He seems to resent users by novus+ordo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Where else would he get his ideas..?

      (Sorry I couldn't resist either ;)

      --
      "You're everywhere. You're omnivorous."
  22. Re:burn...burn..burn... [webcam of server] by pigscanfly.ca · · Score: 1

    You can clearly see from the webcam (hosted on a different machine) clearly shows the server is not yet on fire.

  23. Reinforces my experience... by drsmithy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That when you objectively listen to what *real people* from Microsoft are actually saying (and look at what they're doing), rather than apply biased feelings to out of context soundbites and "media analysts" with chips on their shoulders, they're just a bunch of geeks writing the best software they can.

  24. MacOS has had full text searching for a long time by dmoen · · Score: 1

    the funny thing is, Windows has had a indexed plugin compatible search built in since NT4.0 (1997?) It's called the Windows Indexing Service

    Another funny thing is, the Macintosh has had full text searching for just as long. It was called Sherlock , and it was heavily promoted by Apple back in the day.

    Doug Moen

    --
    I have written a truly remarkable program which this sig is too small to contain.