Slashdot Mirror


Interview with IE Lead Program Manager

crackman writes "Matasano Security is running an excellent interview with Christopher Vaughan, a lead PM on the IE team. Christopher has worked on every release of Internet Explorer since version 2. He discusses IE7, security lessons learned from IE6, the future of .NET managed code in IE, and more."

22 of 289 comments (clear)

  1. Christopher Vaughan ... by vogon+jeltz · · Score: 5, Funny

    a relative of Protestnic Vaughan Jeltz?

  2. Strangely enough.. by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 4, Funny

    ..that page looks a lot better in Firefox.

    1. Re:Strangely enough.. by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, my personal page looks equally good in any browser, with the power switched off and a good book in front of the screen.

  3. Re:You forgot one question... by PFI_Optix · · Score: 4, Funny

    After versions 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, the man needed a vacation. Cut him some slack.

    --
    120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
  4. responsible for handling...security requests. by Threni · · Score: 5, Funny

    > At Microsoft, I'm one of several Lead Program Managers on the IE team. My team and I are
    > responsible for handling all of the incoming customer & security requests.

    Q: Can you make it secure please?
    A: Sadly, no - as I've been asleep for the last 5 years! Why else do you think nothings happened on the IE project since 2001?

  5. Twice Daily Status Meetings? by d3ik · · Score: 5, Funny

    I couldn't get through the second sentence without a wtf moment:

    "We met while working on Windows Server 2003 at the twice daily status meeting."

    Morning meeting: "I'm planning on writing some code today"

    Afternoon meeting: "I had planned on writing some code, but I was busy preparing my presentation for this meeting"

    This explains a lot...

    1. Re:Twice Daily Status Meetings? by contrapunctus · · Score: 3, Funny

      Did you have TPS forms? :)

    2. Re:Twice Daily Status Meetings? by ahsile · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'll go ahead and get you another copy of that memo.

  6. That long eh? by TheVidiot · · Score: 5, Funny

    Christopher has worked on every release of Internet Explorer since version 2

    And he's kept his job?!?

    1. Re:That long eh? by ChrisGilliard · · Score: 2, Funny

      I am happy (and proud) to say that only 58% of the visitors to my various websites use IE.

      Hmmm, since your url is: http://nerds.palmdrive.net/, I'm not surprised you have fewer IE users.

      --
      No Sigs!
  7. 'Trending'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    we're trending in the right direction as a company

    Did he mean 'tending', or is this some horrible fusion of trend and tend that I was previously unaware of?

    A brief search reveals that I am out of touch. But everyone else is wrong, I should add.

    1. Re:'Trending'? by DataCannibal · · Score: 4, Funny

      Surely you mean: "all nouns are fair game for verbing."

      --
      No but, yeah but, no but...
  8. Re:Need a /. interview with this guy by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 5, Funny

    I just opened a browser what do you think my intensions are?

    Oh oh oh oh. I know this! To go to msn.com!

    --
    This guy's the limit!
  9. Credit where credit's due by joebutton · · Score: 5, Funny

    Microsoft gets a bad rap here on Slashdot, but for the record I'd like to publicly thank them for one of the best, most altruistic decisions in tech history.

    I'm talking about the decision to discontinue Internet Explorer for Mac. As a web developer this has made my life far easier. God knows how many man-decades of work this has saved the world's html coders.

    The cloud to this silver lining is that I still spend a good proportion of my working life abusing my code so that it'll work on IE without breaking on real browsers. Multiply that up by the number of web designers / developers in the world and that's got to cost a few lives.

    So, Microsoft dude, when, oh when, can the world's developers expect a joyous, fully IE-free existence?

  10. Re:Active code by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah, I can see that dialog box now:

    "This website wants to take advantage of an unpatched buffer overflow in the browser itself, an Active-X component, or an underlying DLL. Is that OK?"

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  11. Re:Need a /. interview with this guy by hackstraw · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's still an extra step. I just opened a browser what do you think my intensions are?

    Probably the same as everybody that opens up a new IE browser window.

    Stare at the ads on the MSN and get mentally prepared to buy everything in sight.

  12. Re:Need a /. interview with this guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    I just opened a browser what do you think my intensions are?

    Porn?

  13. Re:The business argument by FyRE666 · · Score: 2, Funny

    BTW, what *is* the IE alternative to CSS?

    Open a web page with Explorer. There's your answer...

  14. Re:Why not start a "marklar project?" by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1, Funny

    Thanks, that's pretty much exactly what I meant. Plus:
    1) "We added 200 new keywords to the language which will nameclash with your code".
    2) "We added 400 new classes to the library which will nameclash with your code".
    3) "That function/class no longer does what it used to do".
    4) "That function/class is no longer available".
    5) "That function/class has been replaced by X".
    6) "That function/class has been renamed to X".
    7) "That function/class now takes a different number of parameters".
    8) "That function/class is no longer compatible with that other function/class".
    9) "We changed that parameter datatype to X".
    10) "The new tool won't import your projects properly, so you have to recreate them from scratch (with absolute pathnames) (tied to the user login who created them) (and cryptically stored in the registry) (and you can't run the old tool to see what it looked like)".
    11) "You can only do that with our new brain-dead wizard".
    12) "The tool is smarter than you are, do it the tools way".

    They've been doing this crap since the early 80s.

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  15. Re:Need a /. interview with this guy by drsmithy · · Score: 2, Funny
    Oh, I'm not saying it's a bad interview; it's quite good. It just goes in a different direction than I think a slashdot interview would.

    Well, yeah, but that's because a Slashdot interview would focus primarily on a software engineering decision made a decade ago and whether or not IE7 will support PNG transparency...

  16. Re:Need a /. interview with this guy by dgatwood · · Score: 2, Funny

    GoogleFight. Question answered.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  17. Re:Need a /. interview with this guy by Mercano · · Score: 2, Funny
    In other words, he's not even a project manager - he's works with the guys who takes all the complaints from people (from the helldesk/helpdesk), organizes them, and gives them to someone else ... but giving him a title of "Lead Project Manager" sounds better. Just how many "Lead Project Managers" are working on the IE7 project, anyway?

    So what you do is you take the specifications from the customers and you bring them down to the software engineers?

    I deal with the goddamn customers so the engineers don't have to!! I have people skills!! I am good at dealing with people!!! Can't you understand that?!? WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE?!!!!!!!

    --
    #include <signature.h>