Pluto's New Moons Named Nix and Hydra
Dean W, Armstrong writes "Pluto's two new satellites, previously identified as S/2005 P 2 and S/2005 P 1, received official names from the International Astronomical Union today. Nix and Hydra are named after the mother of Charon and the fierce nine-headed monster. The initials of the new names, N and H, call to mind the New Horizons spacecraft, on a fast trajectory to visit Pluto, just like Pluto's symbol calls to mind Percival Lowell."
This was after Goofy and Minnie were rejected.
Moons named after the ferryman of the dead's mothers place, and a "fierce nine-headed monster" doesn't sound like a good place to be! I'll probably never pass through there on my way though, it's not on my route.
...the're really meaning it'll go to the moon instead?
It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
no really!
bob. yeah, not as catchy if the entire planet were called "bob" but still!
bob the moon.
sad robot making broken music
Could someone more familiar with greek mythology please tell me how Pluto and the Hydra are connected?
I choose to remain celibate, like my father and his father before him.
They named both of these moons after mythical creatures that had almost everything to do with water. the Nix and the Multiple headed Hydra to which we owe many of our roots in the english language for water, I am assuming.
Go ahead and call me unreliable; reliable is just a synonym for predictable.
They originally wanted to name it Unix, but SCO threatened to sue.
(rimshot)
Thank you!
Pluto could use a hydrant.
The simple truth is that interstellar distances will not fit into the human imagination
- Douglas Adams
I for one can't wait for this craft to make it to Pluto. There's so much we don't know about that area of the solar system and even a fly-by mission could tell us so much. Wouldn't it be grand if we could pin down chemical makeups of pluto and other objects in the Kuiper Belt? We might get a better idea if the Deuterium and Protium Isotope proportions are dissimilar to the Earth's Ocean Water and help decided whether comets like Halley and Hyakutake are good represent sample (if they are, they're easier to study than the rest of the Belt.) What if we discovered that the ratio is closer to Earth's Ocean than the comet's have provided? It could lend quite a bit of credence to theoretical origins of atleast some of Earth's water as being Extraterrestrial! Who knows what other clues Pluto and its moons may hide about the origin and growth of the solar system. I wonder if these new moons plus Pluto and Charon would be massive enough (as one) to be above the controversy over Pluto's planethood?
Demented But Determined.
to Pluto, maybe Cosmonaut Li can land on Nix.
Li nix - a good thing.
-- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
So much effort to name rocks billions of miles away and yet our closest neighbor just gets called "moon." ok, "the moon." Well, you always take the familiar for granted.
The world is made by those who show up for the job.
Cerberus is already in use as an asteroid.
I'm not sure whether or not that has any bearing on the naming of planets and moons, but at least Hydra's better than Quaoar.
If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
There's an asteroid with a moon (Ida/Dactyl, as I recall), so I don't know why Pluto would have a problem :) A moon is really just a small thing orbiting a big thing, after all, and it doesn't matter whether the big thing is a planet it or not.
These moons, and those newly discovered ones around Saturn obviously did not just come into existence in recent history, we merely detected them finally, and gave them names. To extrapolate, there will be many more that we haven't detected yet, most likely around the last three: Uranus, Neptune, Pluto, simply because detailed analysis by dedicated spacecraft hasn't been done yet. I think the Voyagers did a fairly thorough job, though, so whatever is left should be quite small, but may merit the classification of "moon" none-the-less (not sure what the criteria is...Saturn has billions of "moonlets" in its rings).
This sort of begs the question, how many names are we gonna have to come up with. Surely Classical mythology has a finite supply...