Slashdot Mirror


Space Shuttle Gains Remote-Control Landing Capability

rufey writes "An article over at Space.com mentions two new tools that Space Shuttle Discovery will have aboard during its upcoming flight, designated STS-121, scheduled to lift off on July 1, 2006. One tool is for tile repair. The other tool is a 28-foot-long cable that would be used to connect an avionics bay located on the mid-deck with the flight-deck controls. The cable enables flight controllers on the ground to land the Shuttle completely by remote control, including the ability to lower the landing gear. The remote control landing would be used in the case where the Shuttle was damaged to the point that it would be too risky to land it with humans aboard, but could be landed without humans aboard in an attempt to save the vehicle. The astronauts would take refuge on the ISS while mission control in Houston attempt to land a damaged Shuttle."

17 of 248 comments (clear)

  1. 28 ft ? by Spliffster · · Score: 4, Funny

    A 28 ft long cable to "remote-control" the shuttle ? they are not gonna go far this time, are they ? ;)
    -S

    1. Re:28 ft ? by gbobeck · · Score: 2, Funny
      they are not gonna go far this time, are they ?


      They will be able to go far enough to take a pee break, grab a beer (read: a Space Brewski, or Tang), and make a decent sandwich. In ideal conditions, they won't even miss the big game.
      --
      Navicula hydraulica plena anguilarum est. Omnes castelli tuus nostri sunt. Ed elli avea del cul fatto trombetta.
  2. Including the ability to lower the landing gear by Ours · · Score: 4, Funny

    including the ability to lower the landing gear
    Yes, I suppose that's sort of a "must have" feature when landing a big glider-like object.

    --
    "You superiour intellect is no match for our puny weapons" - The Simpsons
  3. Re:Filling the ISS over capacity a good idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I have dibs on the movie rights

  4. A better picture of the interface by tacarat · · Score: 4, Funny
    --
    "Common sense will be the death of us all"
  5. In soviet russia by Yvanhoe · · Score: 5, Funny

    the shuttle lands you !

    --
    The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    1. Re:In soviet russia by Jaruzel · · Score: 2, Funny

      You must be new here. :)

      --
      Together, We Can Make Slashdot Better. I Do NOT Mod ACs. - Check Me Out
  6. Obligatory joke ... by vogon+jeltz · · Score: 5, Funny

    " ... including the ability to lower the landing gear".

    You know you're landing gear up when it takes full throttle to taxi.

  7. Old news indeed... by dpmapping · · Score: 4, Funny

    Does no-one remember seeing the prototype for this being demonstrated in Airplane II (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0083530/)?

  8. Re:Buran by Zemran · · Score: 2, Funny

    I now have a mental image of a guy in an anorak, standing on a small hill with a little black box (8" x 8") with a long aerial sticking out the top and two joysticks on the front, guiding the shuttle in to land... but I do not think the short cable was a good idea...

    --
    I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
  9. R/C Shuttle by scherrey · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Well at least we got the vehicle back! Let's get some beer!"

  10. Re:Shuttle Orbiter Automatic Landing by tomknight · · Score: 4, Funny

    Shagging in the toilet's pretty challenging. I'll agree it's not that interesting (after the first time) but it's always a tricky manoeuver...

    --
    Oh arse
  11. Cargo? Please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You seem to be stating that tractor trailers are the best vehicle ever for running to the gas station to pick up a gallon of milk.

  12. No, I'm New Here by New+Here · · Score: 3, Funny

    No, I'm New Here

    1. Re:No, I'm New Here by EMH_Mark3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Touché, salesman

      --
      Burn the land and boil the sea, you can't take the sky from me
  13. meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Meanwhile the Russians have not lost a crew since Soyuz 11, in 1973. They have flown more than a hundred of the capsules since and lost no crew while the US was busy flying nowhere with a 100-tn orbiter with an empty payload bay - and 14 astronauts died.

    Oh. And lets not forget. One soyuz flight (today) = ~20Million. One shuttle flight (today) = ~450 Million. Bummer, and I thought this was the country that looked at price tags.

    Good luck using Bondo and "battleship grey" primer in orbit - I guess it could be a space first!

  14. Re:Buran [Cue new Slogon] by tyrione · · Score: 2, Funny
    NASA: We're always looking for a few good Monkeys.

    And this time they could mean it!