Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft's Handheld Codenamed Argo

The Seattle Times reports that details on Microsoft's handheld gaming/music device are finally slipping out. The Argo project looks to be Microsoft's hedge against angry analysts, upset that the next versions of Office and Windows have slipped yet again. From the article: "As reported last week, initially by Bloomberg News, the device is expected to go on sale by Christmas. It has Wi-Fi capability so it can connect wirelessly to home and public networks and other players. Wi-Fi sounds like a big deal if you're comparing the player to the wire-bound iPod. But this is more than just another MP3 player. It will also compete with game players from Sony and Nintendo that have long had Wi-Fi and work as media players, Internet terminals and communication devices. Argo is likely to showcase another Allard project — XNA, a new toolkit that helps game developers create titles for multiple platforms."

31 of 101 comments (clear)

  1. Umm... by steveo777 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A bit off topic, but I fail to see why this article would appear under the Apple section. I suppose one could agrue that because it likely is a product made to go tete-a-tete with an Apple product, one might want it mentioned there. But shouldn't this be under Microsoft's section? Or handhelds?

    --
    This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
    1. Re:Umm... by SalaciousPucker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If this is what is being described, it is going against what the Ipod & PSP SHOULD be now, rather then what they are. Right now the Ipod is for music. The PSP does everything, but nothing good. What the market wants (and don't know it) is true convergence, the one device to unite them all...the OS of the pocket.

      It's hard to be humble, but I have to hand it to myself in a post from May 28th....

      Apple should be in handheld gaming. They should be shooting for the inevitable, a true convergence of the handheld market. That uber-Phone/PDA/Ipod/Gameboy - all in one - that geeks have dreamed about since the Star Trek communicator.

      Apple sells the most expensive device in our pockets right now. It has mass storage, a color screen, significant processing power and it's own OS. Of all the pocket based systems, the Ipod requires the least additional work to accomodate the features of all the others. What you have then is the OS of the pocket.

      Still, the path to obscurity or to becoming the overpriced but efficient 'niche' product, like Apple computers have always been to the PC, could be Apple going it alone in all aspects. Taking a leap into handheld gaming would mean directly competing with Sony and Nintendo in a cut throat & solidified market. They would have two options really, as I see it. Build the gaming OS/API's themselves (a tough route) or license it from Sony (the PSP) or Nintendo. How open Sony or Nintendo would be to digital distribution of its games or handing off much of the reins to Apple is questionable, but there is definitely some synergy for a collaboration like this.

      Apple should move quick on this. The talk about Microsoft's new IPod/XBOX-handheld product is already in the 'when' not 'if' stage. Microft could care less about builiding the different handheld products individually or as a whole -- they want to own the OS it all runs on. They want to be there at the point of convergence. If Apple doesn't secure their position here it could be a situation of deja vu all over again.

      http://apple.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=186874&c id=15420215
  2. My eyes deceive me... by VikingThunder · · Score: 5, Funny

    Did I read that correctly? The media forgot to call it an ipod-killer!? Heads are going to roll down at the Seattle Times.

  3. AirTunes by Lord+Satri · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Wi-Fi sounds like a big deal if you're comparing the player to the wire-bound iPod."

    Not exactly the same result, but AirTunes provides something most of us simply want...

    1. Re:AirTunes by necro81 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've been waiting for the day when the iPod will have WiFi capabilities that allow it to beam music to an Airport Express module via AirTunes, and then on to the stereo. The iPod then becomes not just the source of the music, but a wireless remote control for it as well. I believe that such things exist - add ons for the iPod Dock, etc. - but I don't think they use WiFi (and so have reduced range or are just line-of-sight), nor can they display the iPod menus to you as you navigate the music collection.

      Imagine hosting a party, walking from room to room, shmoozing, with your iPod in your pocket. You want to change the music playing throughout the house, you just pull it out and flick through the menus as you would if you alone were listening to it with headphones. A rare event, perhaps, but it's a gateway to very impressive (and useful) functionality.

      And, as the summary stated, using WiFi would free the music player (iPod or otherwise) from transferring music and data files through cables. Of course, it would be a lot faster to transfer using cables (compare the transfer speed of Firewire of USB 2.0 to 802.11b/g). A more advanced functionality would allow you to browse and download from iTMS without a computer entirely.

      I don't doubt that Apple has been working on this. Who knows, it might be a feature of the 6G iPod (whenever that comes out). But, since they haven't released it yet, there are obviously still formidable obstacles (engineering and economic) that keep it from primetime.

      Personally, I'm surprised that Apple hasn't at least developed and released an add-on module for the iPod that provides all this WiFi capability (Airtunes, wireless synching, etc.) and plugs into the Dock Connector. Probably too much of a niche product for now.

    2. Re:AirTunes by sterno · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well that and wifi isn't a big deal really. What makes the Ipod so nice is that it's simple. It plays music/videos and that's it. The interface is minimalist but totally effective. Once you start making a device into a game playing wifi enabled gadget, it becomes harder to make it elegant. I mean, think for a moment what the device has to have available on it just to connect to a wifi network. You have to be able to enter an SSID, WEP key, etc. Already you're making things needlessly complicated.

      The one advantage I can see to wifi is the ability to buy and download music directly to the device. But how do you do that? How does the interface work? How do you pay for songs, etc? It's a simple problem to solve on a computer with a keyboard, etc, but on a compact device, it's really difficult.

      Frankly I think Microsoft's product is going to be a dud because it'll be too complicated.

      --
      This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
    3. Re:AirTunes by topham · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Considering the amount of time batteries last when using Bluetooth (for data transfers, not the occasional click), or WiFi what the heck is the point of having it 'wireless'?

      I have an iPod and, except for the anemic battery life, love it. I just don't see the point in adding wireless capabilities to it.

      I have a PocketPC, and I at one time wanted to use it to control whatever computer I had which was acting as my music server. To me that makes perfect sense and the connectivity already exists, etc. The problem? Microsoft and their damn OS and .Net issues makes it painful to do ad-hoc development for it as a platform, and none of the existing tools that I looked at (at the time, things may have changed) are very good. So, since they can't take advantage of existing hardware, why should I expect they'll do something right on another new platform????

    4. Re:AirTunes by nathanh · · Score: 3, Informative
      It plays music/videos and that's it.

      Yeah, music and video, that's it.

      And text files. It shows text files. But that's it.

      Yeah, and that breakout game. And the parachute game. But really, that's it. Music, video, notes, games... that's it.

      Oh right, the photos thing. It does photos too. Music, video, notes, games, photos... really, I think that's it.

      No wait, I forgot about the address book. Everybody forgets that one! Music, video, notes, games, photos, address book... is that it?

      Hey, its got a clock too! It's a world clock as well. Music, video, notes, games, photos, address book, world clock... anything else?

      Damn, it's got a calendar too. Music, video, notes, games, photos, address book, world clock, calendar... surely that's it!

      I mean, we all agree the iPod is "so simple". The iPod "plays music/videos and that's it" afterall!

      Frankly I think Microsoft's product is going to be a dud because it'll be too complicated.

      Yeah, stupid Microsoft, they'd do something complicated like put a stopwatch in their player!

      PS: I remember 12 months ago, people just like you saying that the iPod would never play video because that would be "too complicated".

    5. Re:AirTunes by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I really don't understand that part about "wire bound". It still needs to be charged, and even with USB1.1 (yes, I've done this), file synching with a portable device is plenty fast for a quick charge. Wireless networking takes a certain amount of power that's better used for longer play life because the networking adds little to the usefulness. On the other hand, I would accept wireless headphones, those standards reduce the entanglement of headphone cables, and current wireless headphones aren't so power hungry as a wireless network adapter.

  4. Re:news? by Mr+Jazzizle · · Score: 2, Informative

    follow the offsite links, engadget has a picture

  5. Origami? by nbannerman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Not wishing to sound like a nay-sayer, but what happened to Microsoft's last handheld device, the Origami?

    Anyone?

    Exactly, not much at all. I'm rather skeptical at this point to be honest. The only hardware that has an MS-badge on that I've found to be any good has normally been developed elsewhere and brought in and rebadged.

  6. Brilliant! by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 4, Funny

    Name your latest high tech gadget for a bronze age pirate ship crewed by illiterate drunks and thieves trying to stay one step ahead of that mad bitch Medea. Brilliant!

    --
    Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    1. Re:Brilliant! by reverseengineer · · Score: 5, Funny

      Even better is the end of the tale, where the rotten prow of the Argo falls on its owner and kills him.

      --
      "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
    2. Re:Brilliant! by rickward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hmmm... this new device sounds like a golden opportunity for Microsoft to fleece its customers.

    3. Re:Brilliant! by el+cisne · · Score: 2, Funny

      You'd have to be a blind cyclops to not get that joke.

  7. Could make it despite the Ipod and the DS by grapeape · · Score: 2

    This could actually work for Microsoft if its marketed properly. There are plenty of disgruntled PSP owners (myself included) who want a device that can do more than play games and plenty of Ipod users that are irritated that the repeated requests for features such as wireless continually fall on deaf ears. If they market the device as a media device that just happens to play games they really have a shot at making a dent.

    The PSP was a great idea but the Memory Stick Duo and UMD options really killed alot of its potential IMHO. The device had already been out a year before MSD 's of any size significant enough for music or video were affordable. Without the ability to output to a bigger screen, UMD was DOA, after all who the heck wants to rebuy their movies on a format that only works on a dinky little portable screen. The sad part is that if the UMD format had been opened up allowing the option of homeplayers and such the format could have really taken off.

    The IPod while a great device is at the Mercy of whatever bone Job's feels like throwing at the users. I love apples design and innovation but the tempermental artist who thinks he knows what you need better than you know what you want act is really getting old.

    A fairly generic handheld with a decent screen, standard memory format and decent capabilities would surely be welcomed by those who dont really need a full fledged pda but want something more than a game player.

    1. Re:Could make it despite the Ipod and the DS by Yahweh+Doesn't+Exist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      what's the obsession with wireless?

      sure, sometimes when I see a new podcast in iTunes I'd like to just have it on my 5G wirelessly. but thinking about it, would that mean my ipod would always have to have wifi turned on? would the ipod itself have to be turned on? and I'd still have to plug it in for large syncs, use as an external hard drive and of course charging.

      I think that if instead of every little sync adding to my battery life it actually took some away, then battery life would become an issue which at the moment it isn't.

      I have a DS lite for games.

    2. Re:Could make it despite the Ipod and the DS by ClamIAm · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think there's a common thread among the devices you mention: the ones that succeeded did one thing, and did it well. The Ipod plays music very well (plus video, but that feels tacked-on to me). Nintendo handhelds have always played games well. In addition, both have put an emphasis on portability and battery life.

      Then you look at devices that aren't doing that well. The PSP has some sweet specs, but (as you mention) it has some issues. The DS getting twice the battery life (or more) probably doesn't help either. As for portable audio players, wake me when the manufacturers that aren't Apple figure out how to design a user interface that doesn't suck.

  8. But is it a gaming machine? by RyoShin · · Score: 3, Funny
    Wi-Fi sounds like a big deal if you're comparing the player to the wire-bound iPod. But this is more than just another MP3 player. It will also compete with game players from Sony and Nintendo that have long had Wi-Fi and work as media players, Internet terminals and communication devices.
    So Microsoft is looking for another loss investment? What, the XBox doesn't lose them enough money?

    Nintendo does well in the hand-held market because they've spent almost 20 years learning what people want in a hand held device, as well as offering a large selection of software that is fun and speaks to a wide spectrum of people, not just your 14-24 male crowd.

    Sony has been able to break into the handheld market (where many others have failed) because they have the brand name recognition, as well as ports for a lot of popular franchises, not to mention the nice movie viewing capability. (However, even Sony is beginning to sink, as the number of people speaking against the constant remakes are beginning to grow, and UMD movies have all but sunk.)

    So Microsoft, which barely edged Nintendo out for second place in America, and is in third place in Japan by a far gap (even despite being the first "next-gen" system there), thinks that they can break into the handheld market with what sounds like another version of their "Origami" project, but geared more towards games? I would put down safe money that it sinks faster than the Game Gear. The idea of it being an XBox brand makes me think that the device will be bigger than the PSP, too.

    "My, that backpack looks heavy. What do you have in there?"
    "My eXtreme-Box portable gaming system."
    "And what else?"
    "Uh, that's it."

    Of course, no one would try to steal it, since the device would be useful as a bludguning instrument, as well. "Looks like the perp left a mark on his victim. What exactly is that?" "Looks like some sort of big X."
  9. Has to be said... by mbourgon · · Score: 3, Funny

    Argo? Not.

    --
    "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
  10. So, fellow Hobbits... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2, Funny

    From the fires of Mount Doom, is this the one gadget to rule all gadgets?

  11. But MS is making DS games! by 2008 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why on Earth would MS be developing games for the DS if it intended to come out with a competing device?

    MechAssualt DS - based on the Xbox games
    Diddy Kong Racing DS (a port from the N64, via MS-owned Rare)

    --
    I quit!
  12. Ho humm by presearch · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Won't this just be CE..I mean PocketPC...I mean Windows Mobile with a couple new bundled apps, an added API, and a hardware reference that specs a patent-safe imitation of the iPod click wheel? The tech press has latched on to this for some reason for the last few days, probably planted to take advantage of a recently weakened AAPL, but it makes no sense for M$ to alienate their phone and PDA customers by coming out with their own hardware.

  13. This will give Apple some idea's for ... by tetrode · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For the next version of their iPods.

    As we all recall (or perhaps you have forgotten about - it was launched in October 2001 , the first version of the iPod has had its share of problems. The iPod is not at its fifth generation and has lots of features that Microsoft can either dream of at their first incarnation or implement badly.

    In addition to that, there will be features that Microsoft will not implement.

      - support for Apple? No way
      - Calender integration with Mozilla Sunbird? No way

    etc.

    Plus - they need to cut deals with the record companies; Apple has already done this.

    Furthermore, there are currently more than 50 million iPods on the planet. Not to count the millions of other players. So it is a very hard market to get into.

    * Wireless would be nice - when it is working correctly, and noone can connect to my iPod/Argo to snoop my data.
    * Games? I don't know, this would probably drain the battery life, so not for me...

    And, if this is typical Microsoft quality software (and I'm not talking virii here, although this is a possibility), you probably need to restart the thingy on a daily basis (I restarted my iPod twice in one year) and there will be upgrade after upgrade.

    Microsoft, you need to convince me ...

    Mark

  14. I was worried at first, but now I'm not... by 7Prime · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When MS started talking about creating simpler infrastructure, and more ellegent solutions, I got a little worried that maybe they were really in the right headspace to compete with the iPod. But now I see that those original ideals were just words, and this thing is going to be just another PSP: "It's a game device, it's a PDA, it's a video player, it's a music player, WOW!" You'd think that MS would have learned its lesson from Sony on this one, but it seems like they haven't. Their decision to make a handheld gaming system will be their biggest downfall, now they're not only competing with Apple (and Yahoo, and Creative Labs, and iRiver), but with Nintendo and Sony as well. At this point, if you manage to piss off Nintendo and Apple in the same punch, you're likely to just strengthen their unspoken alliance to the point of them officially joining forces against you, and I wouldn't want to be on the other side of that battle.

    What's so difficult to understand? The two most successfull handheld entertainment devices, in their respective fields, are the iPod and the Nintendo DS. Both of these devices succeded because they were aimed at only one market, were designed to do one thing, and they did it extremely well. And because of it, they slaughtered every other competative device that tried to throw in the kitchen sink. Meanwhile, the PSP, N-Gage, and all those other little "3 in 1" type gadgets are foundering.

    The first thing this device is going to kill (if anything at all), is all the iPod's competitors, which are trying to do exactly the same thing as MS is here. The irony is that these are MSs biggest allies, many of them use WMA as their primary file type, and thus have contracts with MS worked out. But there's no way that MS is going to be able to compete with the iPod, head-to-head from the get-go, these other devices stand like a helpless rank of unarmed soldiers standing just in front of the huge army that is the iPod.

    --
    Multiplayer Gaming (defined): Sitting around, discussing single-player games with my friends, at the bar.
    1. Re:I was worried at first, but now I'm not... by mgblst · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are spouting a lot of nonsense. I am glad most people don't believe what you are saying, or we would never have had any interesting devices in the first place. You can argue against extra funcitonality for devices, but it is going to happen. The only reasons it is not hapening now, is due to battery life, CPU power, and memory. These are quickly being overcome, even today a number of devices can be successfully merged (Telephone, PDA, mp3 player). Right now these devices aren't the best, because a lot of tech companies spend all the money on creating new technologies, and not a lot on interfaces, making thins intuitive and a pleasure to use. This will change, and will have to change. Even Apple is working on tech like this. Imagine an ipod sized device, with a full screen on one side, and able to take phone calls, movies, pda, wifi, and with a pleasant UI - it will happen.

      (Just because you can site two popular devices, you seemed to be convinced that the world will never change)

  15. Missing the point? by genedefect · · Score: 5, Informative

    A lot of people seem to be completely missing the details of the product here...

    1) Unlike Origami, MS is actually making the hardware and software here. They are not bound to the hands of a lot of crappy Consumer Electronics device makers and PC OEMs that historically make ugly hardware (and huge hardware)

    2) This is coming out of the team that made the Xbox and the Xbox360. They have proven that they can write lean/mean software that just works and has pretty and good UI

    3) This device is not (currently) a video game player. As pointed out above, MS is still obviously making games for the DS, and no respectable news site has stated that it plays games, just that it might at some mysterious point in the future.

    4) The leaked pictures show a fairly small device with a small attenna on the top. It has some blurry UI that doesn't look like Portable Media Center software, which implies that they wrote something specially for the device to go head to head with the iPod

    5) Its not just a device, but also appears to include an iTMS competitor. In light of this, it looks like they aren't going to use the horrid "Play for Sure" crap. Instead, they are doing what needs to be done. Make something that actually just works well together. Not something they somehow make work together (like WMP in general with media devices)

    6) MS already has relationships with most record labels due to the old MSN music store. They also have relationships with most movie studios due to the VC-1 codec that is in both Blu-Ray and HD-DVD.

    All in all, it sounds like MS did look at the market and realized that they had to make something that is small, is focused at just media (audio and video, no games). They also appear to be trying to innovate ever so lightly by adding WiFi and a lot of the potential that brings. One need only look at what MS did with Xbox Live and the 360 to think about what can be done with a permenant Internet connection on a Consumer Electronics device. There is a lot of potential here that if they live up to, could mean the next step in Portable Media Devices.

    Worst case, MS shows what not to do with things like WiFi, then Apple comes out with the iPod WiFi and does it right.

    Either way, it only benefits us, the consumer.

  16. Re:semi-on-topic by Fnord666 · · Score: 5, Funny
    what happened to Origami?
    It folded.
    --
    'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
  17. A music player? by decadre · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wouldn't it have to be a "music player" to be an i-pod killer? This is a hand held gaming system, so of course it has a larger screen, of course it has wifi. PSP and DS have both of these but it wouldn't be considered an "i-pod killer", even if it did have a music store. This is like saying "the 360 is the same as a media PC". Yes, it can be used as a media centre, but in fact it is a game console. Marketing it as both is just that, marketing. I would still rather have devoted devices in *some* cases. I like being able to take my nano anywhere with me without having to worry about how much space it will take up. "No I have to wear a jacket on a 35 deg. c day just so I can carry my Argo/PSP/whatever in my pocket" - doesn't make sense

  18. Re:Apple-Nintendo Alliance?! by 7Prime · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No, there is no official relationship between the two companies, but the similarities, especially in business philosophy are uncanny. Share no interests? Think again, they seem to share almost identical innovation philosophies: KISS (keep it simple, stupid), when in doubt, go back and try something completely different (iPod wheel, Nintendo DS & Wii), make one gadget that does one thing very well, the list goes on and on. This all at a time when the word on the street is "features, features, features!", complexity is better than elligance, and innovation is risky business. I don't know any companies who share more similar business philosophies than Apple and Nintendo. Now, that doesn't mean that next year they won't turn around and become huge competitors, but I think they share an almost identical ideology. It does mean that if there is any interest in doing any joint business venture, there is a deffinite compatability there to do so. So, if both of their livelihoods are threatend by the same company in one swoop, if it's worth their while, from a business standpoint, I could easilly see them doing a joint project. I don't think there's any need for one for the time being. Although, it's become fairly clear that Nintendo has taken some cues from Apple: the footprint for the iPod Mini and the GameBoy Micro is identical (even their naming convensions suggest some looking over eachother's shoulders), and the Nintendo DS Lite's styling is way too close to the iPod to be mear cohincidence. But these are not really unexpected, and don't really have anything to do with the business's overall mission statement. Now, their makeup might be quite different, I don't know, but having such an uncannilly similar ideology makes up for some interesting speculation, don't you think?

    --
    Multiplayer Gaming (defined): Sitting around, discussing single-player games with my friends, at the bar.
  19. iPod Killer? by LKM · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah, I'm gonna strap that to my shoulder and take it with me when jogging.

    Something the size of a PSP will never ever be competition to something the size of an iPod nano.