Indian Satellite Lost in Launch Explosion
An anonymous reader writes "BBC News is reporting that the recent communications satellite launch in India has met with disaster. The satellite, designed to enhance India's telephone and communications network, was lost when the rocket carrying it veered off course and exploded. This is the second disappointment in recent launch attempts, coming just one day after the failed long-range ballistic missile test launch."
Monday's flight was also supposed to set the stage for an Indian mission to the Moon.
Something tells me there may be a lack of volunteers for this now...
I keep telling myself I'm not the desperate type.
Rockets is hard!
Homer Simpson who said it best .... "DOH!"
-- Brought to you by Carl's JR
Building rockets is as hard as rocket science.
The Kruger Dunning explains most post on
I'm not surprised. It sounds easy to launch a rocket (hell, we've been doing it since forever, right?), yet in the light of this failure, North Korea's blown ICBM launch, and SpaceX's spectacular failure a while back, perhaps the difficulty of such things needs to be reassessed in the minds of the average Slashdot reader.
:).
Certainly, the ESA and NASA have something to be proud of when they actually manage to get stuff into orbit
-Erwos
Plausible conjecture should not be misrepresented as proof positive.
I have a lot of respect for countries which have a space program and attempt to launch rockets into space, whether they succeed or not.
In other news, Pakistan is reporting that it will not seek retribution for the explosion which rocked their capital earlier this morning, as no casualties have been reported. Pakistani Prime Minister Shaukat Azis was quoted as saying, "Satellite my ass, you missed bitch"...
I'm not fat, just big boned...
Outsourced the shuttle to a private company
Nasa is looking to outsource even more!
The article title made me laugh in light of your comment.
Like almost every other branch of the government, NASA does outsource. They contract out the building of almost any sort of vehicle out to private companies who are all competing for it.
Now if you think I'm just picking apart your statement for fun, you're only half right, look at this:
In light of this article, scary.
Go ahead and call me unreliable; reliable is just a synonym for predictable.
Anyone else reminded of "1999 was the year that the Indian nuclear satellite went out of control."?
Wil
wiki
It was a communications satellite, right? Anything that limits the possibility of my tech support calls getting routed to India is just fine by me.
The GSLV had 2 successful launches before, launching the GSAT experimental satellite and the EDUSAT educational satellite. India's moon mission is unmanned and will use the PSLV rocket which has had six successful launches so far.
They have had 12 successful commercial launches in a row, a good record. But now they're 0 for 2 in their last to big launch attempts.
Note to self, stay out of the Bay of Bengal when they're launching. ;-)
--- Just another Code-Monkey
Even though this launch failed, I would think the Indian Space Research OPrganizaiton is doing a tremendous job. Given their meagre budget ($700 million ISRO Wiki ) , their past record is definitely impressive . Most of their launches so far have been in polar orbits (remote sensing and spy satellites). They used ESA's Ariane rockets till yesterday for their geostationary communication satellite requirements.
Maybe you should read this.
"India's six remote-sensing satellites - the largest such constellation in the world. These monitor the country's land and coastal waters so that scientists can advise rural communities on the location of aquifers and where to find watercourses, suggest to fishermen when to set sail for the best catch, and warn coastal communities of imminent storms (see "Eyes in the sky"). India's seven communication satellites, the biggest civilian system in the Asia-Pacific region, now reach some of the remotest corners of the country, providing television coverage to 90 per cent of the population. The system is also being used to extend remote healthcare services and education to the rural poor."
Or this about PSLV
"It was developed to allow India to launch its Indian Remote Sensing (IRS) satellites into sun synchronous orbits, a service that was, until the advent of the PSLV, commercially viable only from Russia"
There was a small, secret "hey, our new invisible space-based laser has worked three times in a row now" party at Vandenberg AFB.
Offtopic I know, but just wanted to say my thoughts are with India after the bombings today. Fucking terrorists :(
Well, military applications aside, the truth of the matter is that satellites of all kinds have had a tremendous positive impact on economies and populations the world over. Communications, weather-monitoring, resource exploitation, scientific research ... no, I can't fault India for trying to use near-space to its advantage. Why not ... everyone else is. Besides, if you want to alleviate issues of social networking and education (two big steps towards improving living conditions in general) advanced communications are important. Satellite technology is one way to get that, and given the size and population of India, I would rather think that building out surface infrastructure would be prohibitively expensive, at least in the near term. Hell, it took the United States decades and billions of dollars to put a phone in every house, and I don't think India wants to wait that long.
The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
Very good reply! Well done. /. when I decide to give up on it due to the inane, kneejerk, blatant fanboy, etc. posts that are getting more numerous all the time.
:)
This is what keeps me coming back to
Your post was:
concise, informative, not insulting/derogatory, and directly addressed the point.
I heartily give you A+ since I have no mod points to give.
Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
the satellite dint just explode but was made to explode when its path deviate from the intended one... thats a big difference.. http://www.outlookindia.com/pti_news.asp?id=398107
"Following this, the vehicle deviated to about 10 degrees, leading to the mission control giving the 'destruct command'."
While I'm always up for an opportunity to bolster my sense of baseless, nationalistic superiority, NASA's had some strings of bad luck, too.
The Loss of Mars Observer. Oops.
Whatever Happened to the Mars Polar Lander? Double Oops.
NASA's metric confusion caused Mars orbiter loss. Durh...
Space exploration -- even just putting stuff into orbit -- is a risky proposition at the best of times. Any agency pushing the envelope of what they've done before is bound to have some failures, but this is sometimes the price you pay for eventual success.
"Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."