Slashdot Mirror


Bacterial DVD Holds 50TB

CAMags writes to tell us that a Harvard Professor is claiming to have developed a new variant of a protein called bacteriorhodopsin (bR) that, when layered on a DVD, can store up to 50TB of data. From the article: "The light-activated protein is found in the membrane of a salt marsh microbe Halobacterium salinarum and is also known as bacteriorhodopsin (bR). It captures and stores sunlight to convert it to chemical energy. When light shines on bR, it is converted to a series of intermediate molecules each with a unique shape and color before returning to its 'ground state.'"

60 of 268 comments (clear)

  1. My God! by helioquake · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's alive!

    1. Re:My God! by dotwhynot · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's the new DRM, be nice or you'll be infected ;)

    2. Re:My God! by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, dude... it's got an oral biointerface, you just lick it and it transfers the data directly into your brain. I had a copy of Yellow Submarine on it once, but I accidentally swallowed it. The fidelity was intense, man.

      Intense...

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    3. Re:My God! by 3vi1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      "My God, it's full of SARS!"

    4. Re:My God! by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny

      That amount of storage is obviously nothing to sneeze at!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    5. Re:My God! by gumpish · · Score: 2, Informative

      SARS is caused by a virus, not bacteria.

  2. remember... by justkarl · · Score: 5, Funny

    bacteria, not a virus. Your data's safe.

    ....or is it? MWAHAHAHA!!!

    1. Re:remember... by yourOneManArmy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Your data's safe. Not if the PATRIOT act has anything to say about it.

    2. Re:remember... by Dannon · · Score: 5, Funny

      Only as long as you keep it away from the Lysol....

      --
      Good judgment comes from experience.
      Experience comes from bad judgment.
  3. Bacterium DVDs? by DaveM753 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I heard they're buggy.

  4. See... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    My apartment isn't messy -- it's just data backup.

  5. Professor's name... by nganju · · Score: 5, Funny


    ... is Venkatesan Renugopalakrishnan. His main motivation is to create a storage system big enough to fit his name on a single disc.

    Disclaimer: I'm Indian as well.

    --
    There are 2 kinds of people in this world. Those that can keep their train of thought,
    1. Re:Professor's name... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thank you! Come again!

      Disclaimer: I'm not :)

  6. I read this in a science book by Goblez · · Score: 4, Insightful
    About 10-15 years ago when I was just a young one, about time we see some harnessing of biological complexity for our own use.

    Now I want to program in RNA so that it generates the DNA automatically for me. And then, watch the ____ out!

    --
    - Kal`Goblez
    1. Re:I read this in a science book by detritus` · · Score: 4, Informative

      Creating an RNA sequence is not that hard, nor transcribing it to DNA (heck, its just as easy to build the DNA sequence) The problem is building one that's useful, that where the protein folding problem comes in (See folding@home) becuase what the point of having DNA/RNA if the encoded protein is useless?

    2. Re:I read this in a science book by detritus` · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They're doing amazing work with protein folding, but even if you can semi predict how the protein is going to fold, it doesnt help as we cant currently say this is the configuration we want, with these amino acids at these sites, how would we make it? It getting there but there's still a lot of work to do

  7. Don't need Degausser by oliana · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just a bottle of Lysol.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, asses suck this joke.
  8. Ah, what's the point? by Red+Samurai · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's probably gonna be extremely impractical and mega expensive. We'll have forgotten about it in 36 hours anyway.

    1. Re:Ah, what's the point? by DaggertipX · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't worry, Slashdot has built in precautions against that. They aren't dupes, they are reminders.

    2. Re:Ah, what's the point? by Mayhem178 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We'll have forgotten about it in 36 hours anyway.

      As though this didn't apply to 99% of the things we read on /.

      --

      "You will pay for your lack of vision..." - Emperor Palpatine to Ray Charles

  9. Gads, this is years old by WindBourne · · Score: 2, Funny

    I remember this stuff from the mid 90's. They were layering it on WORMs back then.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  10. I bet these will have the same problem as CD-RWs by basil+montreal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Any time you use an organic compound for storage, you need to worry about the organic half life of the device. Writable optical media uses organic dye, and will only last several years in storage. I didn't see anything in the article that indicated this technology would be any better...

  11. Caveats? by Vo0k · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now I wonder what caveats are there to overcome.

    Normal CDs are actually "damaged" by the laser during recording. Here it's about photochemical effect. Much lower power may be needed which may allow for more data but also for really fast erasing the DVDs by simply exposing them to light. More, how to return it to base state? Seems not to be rewritable. The data lasts a few years. Would there be some "refreshing process" needed?

    And last but not least: Is there anyone interested in manufacturing it, or will the harddrive makers buy the patent, then bury it to prevent competition?
    There were quite a few such "revelations" like TESA-ROM (1TB on a roll of transparent adhesive tape) but they all vanish without trace... why?

    --
    Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    1. Re:Caveats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There were quite a few such "revelations" like TESA-ROM (1TB on a roll of transparent adhesive tape) but they all vanish without trace... why?

      Because they learned that making something work in a lab in small amounts is very different from mass manufacturing it for popular use.

  12. A whole new era for Sneaker-Net by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Imagine the datarate if I were to hop into my car, drive across the country, and load this disk into a computer in California.

    Even if the trip takes me 48 hours, that is still 303 MB/s!

    --
    Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    1. Re:A whole new era for Sneaker-Net by bcat24 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, but just think of the ping times.

    2. Re:A whole new era for Sneaker-Net by The-Bus · · Score: 2, Funny

      There's an easier way to do this. Just sneeze on some unsuspecting passenger headed to LAX, send their description to your recipient, and then have them steal the passenger's handkerchief upon arrival in Los Angeles. Then just wipe the handkerchief on an empty Agar-DVD, and presto!

      Saves on gas, too.

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    3. Re:A whole new era for Sneaker-Net by AgentPhunk · · Score: 2, Funny
      You can drive the width of the continental USA in 48 hours? Wow

      A friend of mine did this (not sure exactly how long it took him, but it was basically non-stop from Los Angeles to Boston), sustaining himself solely on Jolt (sic) soda, clove cigarettes, and an old Bob Segar tape. And oh yeah, he's a non-stop talker who just waits for you to finish so he can start talking again, about whatever it is that interests him.

      I imagined being in the car with him for the trip. If that's not hell on earth, I don't know what is..

    4. Re:A whole new era for Sneaker-Net by not-enough-info · · Score: 2, Funny


      dn2120a:~ moe$ ping almaden.ibm.com
      PING almaden.ibm.com (198.4.83.38): 56 data bytes
      64 bytes from 18.4.83.38: icmp_seq=0 ttl=47 time=187295623.931 ms
      64 bytes from 18.4.83.38: icmp_seq=1 ttl=47 time=176477755.816 ms
      64 bytes from 18.4.83.38: icmp_seq=2 ttl=47 time=169536790.894 ms
      64 bytes from 18.4.83.38: icmp_seq=3 ttl=47 time=170008876.973 ms
      ^C
      --- almaden.ibm.com ping statistics ---
      4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss
      round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 169536790.894/175829761.904/187295623.931/8273855. 886 ms
      dn2120a:~ moe$


      What? Everything seems to be in order.

      --
      ---k--
      </stupid>
  13. 50 TB? by eebra82 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wonder why these numbers are so greatly exaggerated. Why can't scientists leave the theoretical figures behind and talk about realistic numbers?

    Anyway, once we actually reach data storage of that magnitude on a disk, we'll have to face the problem of seek time and transfers. It would be ridiculous to post so much data on a disk, so when this technology is mature, I'm sure disks will be obsolete.

    Scientists should spend more time on figuring out how to leave the world of milliseconds and approach the nanoseconds. Remember, the only thing that's running on milliseconds in a computer is based on platters. I'd rather move on from that and get my 50 TB later.

    1. Re:50 TB? by SEMW · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >I wonder why these numbers are so greatly exaggerated. Why can't scientists
      >leave the theoretical figures behind and talk about realistic numbers?

      Did you RTFA? This is a discovery. There are no realistic numbers because the product doesn't actually exist yet, and probably won't in a useable form for quite some time. The only thing they've actually done so far is the genetic modification of the protein. The numbers are theoretical because the disc is theoretical.

      --
      What's purple and commutes? An Abelian grape.
    2. Re:50 TB? by evilviper · · Score: 2, Informative
      I wonder why these numbers are so greatly exaggerated.

      I wonder how you know these numbers are exaggerated.

      Anyway, once we actually reach data storage of that magnitude on a disk, we'll have to face the problem of seek time and transfers.

      That's not a huge hurdle. I can easily envision a drive with more than a dozen fully-independant laser assemblies. Not only do you get 12X+ throughput, but you can get seek times ~12X faster/smaller. And if you get desperate for performance, you can spin that platter of laser assemblies at 40X in the opposite direction the disc is spinning.

      Plus increased data density on physical media means you'll see proportional increases in throughput.

      Scientists should spend more time on figuring out how to leave the world of milliseconds and approach the nanoseconds.

      Scientists should spend more time finding a cure for cancer, and not bother with all this fancy digital crap. Right?

      What you want, is not what most people want. Video playback/encoding won't go any faster no matter how low you get the seek times, but having far smaller space to store it would be a huge problem/limitation.

      If you need ridiculous seek times, grab more DDR RAM, store this data on a $130 4GB Flash card, get a high-end controller that can accept massive ammounts of battery-backed drive cache, etc.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  14. Bacteria... by TrevorB · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why don't we just store all our data in strands of DNA and be done with it.

    Then we could carry arround our entire porn collection in a small cancerous lump on our neck. ;)

  15. Extent by eronysis · · Score: 2, Funny

    PFY to BOFH "The database is growing too fast!" BOFH "Stop feeding it."

  16. Re:Drawback ? by SashaMan · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think I'm too perfectionnist

    Good thing it wasn't a written interview.

  17. Vaporware by loxosceles · · Score: 2, Informative

    I remember reading about this compound or something very similar back in ~1995, in one of the popular science or computing magazines. It claimed there would be organic 3d memory cubes in 8 years.

  18. Re:I bet these will have the same problem as CD-RW by fishybell · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Writable optical media uses organic dye, and will only last several years in storage. I didn't see anything in the article that indicated this technology would be any better...


    FTA:

    Since the intermediates generally only last for hours or days, Prof Renugopalakrishnan and his colleagues modified the DNA that produces bR protein to produce an intermediate that lasts for more than several years.

    Straight from the horses mouth: not really. Honestly, I don't really need archival quality retention of 50+ years, I'd be fine if my removable media lasted reliably for 10+ years. As it is, I'm not convinced that database backups my company makes on CDs will last more than 5. Arguably we don't need data that's older than five years, but for accountability purposes I'd rather it be a gauranteed shelf life of 10 years, or at least as far back as the IRS would look in case of an audit.

    --
    ><));>
  19. Re:Hmmm, interesting by cyborg_zx · · Score: 2, Funny

    It would evolve DRM?

  20. In a related story. . . by kimvette · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In a related story, MPAA requests an injunction against a harvard professor in attempt to block production of a 50TB storage device for consumer PCs. When asked for the basis for such action, an MPAA spokesperson stated "There is absolutely no legitimate use for such large amounts of storage, the only use we can ascertain is hosting of illegal movie downloads for re-sharing on P2P networks."

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  21. Quit repeating the stupid myth by Ogemaniac · · Score: 2, Insightful

    of someone buying a patent to "bury" a good technology. Just about every elementary economics textbook clearly demonstrates how that if the technology truly has a benefit, the company would make MORE money by using the new technology than hiding it.

    1. Re:Quit repeating the stupid myth by WillyPete · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's true as far as it goes, which is right out the window.

      If we can agree that fuel efficient cars were are a good idea now, they would have been an even better idea in the 70's (or earlier). It might have even made a significant impact by now.

      We didn't, and it wasn't because we couldn't.

      The real myth is that textbooks provide hard rules that actually translate universally into the real word. If people were satisfied with following the rules, we'd all be communists.

      --
      Shaw's Principle: Build a system even a fool could use, and only a fool would want to use it.
  22. Re:Indian reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    That depends, is he a Little Indian or a Big Indian?

  23. Re:I bet these will have the same problem as CD-RW by waferhead · · Score: 5, Funny

    How about another application---
    Discs that "auto expire" if not kept in the fridge ;)

    No, seriously.

  24. Re:Drawback ? by thesandtiger · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's not a very good answer - it reveals a bunch of negatives that are likely deal-breakers:

    1) You're a perfectionist, which means you may find it difficult to handle mistakes made by co-workers.
    2) You're a perfectionist, which means you may find it difficult working on a team with people who are not perfectionists.
    3) You're an admitted perfectionist, which makes it likely that you will attempt to cover up any mistakes you do make, rather than admit them.
    4) You're a perfectionist and you take extra time to try to accomplish a task, rather than doing it as well as it needs to be done and having it in on time. Most employers don't expect or actually want perfection - they know it isn't attainable.
    5) You're full of shit and just told the interviewer what you thought they'd want to hear, meaning that you're much less likely to be candid in other areas as well.

    The best answer, of course, would have been "FUCK YOU YOU CUNT I have Tourette's Syndrome ASSLICKER!" It would allow you to scream anything you like with impunity, and they'd be worried about getting sued if they didn't hire you.

    --
    Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
  25. Re:I bet these will have the same problem as CD-RW by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does this mean my stack will grow uncontrollably? What about garbage collection? Will this storage medium be under threat from BASIC instincts? Sic 'em, Friskit!

    --
    Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
  26. 50 TB = p0rn addiction by Wizard+Drongo · · Score: 2, Funny

    WOW.... 50TB of porn on a single disc. That's a lot of hot XXX action. You could put an entire internet's worth of porn on one disc. hmmmmm.... 1) Get hold of 'bacteria-ray' discs. 2) Download all internet (Or just get Slashdotter to bittorrent their stashes-same thing) 3) ?????? 4) Profit!!

    --
    The truth shall always be free: Boris Floricic is Tron.
  27. An embarassment to chemists everywhere by liegeofmelkor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    His claim of terabyte storage shows an extreme naivety (or one could argue ignorance) of fundamental physical principles the good doctor should be aware of. It is true that there must be some medium capable of handling data storage on such a small scale, but the real hang-up, at least in terms of commercial viability, is the light source which reads the medium. Any dolt who knows next to nothing about high definition dvd's at least knows the major technological innovation involved is a commercially available blue light source (blue puts the Blu in Blu-Ray), not any groundbreaking technology involving the discs (though to save myself from flamebait, there have been advances here). Now, traditional dvd's/cd's are in the 700nm range, high def systems are around 400nm, and the industrial systems used to make microchips (yeah, these are expensive and not at all portable) can only burn chips 45nm thick. A light source of a couple nanometers (the quantity he uses for his predicted size) puts us into the soft x-ray range. Big deal if we have a storage medium. We won't be able to read or write to it (cheaply enough for consumers, that is) for decades. If I were this guy's employer, I'd investigate whether he ever completed a bachelor's degree in science, much less a PhD. This is a fundamental oversight on his part.

    1. Re:An embarassment to chemists everywhere by liegeofmelkor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Doh, making myself look as big an idiot as Dr V. The property of bacteriorhodopsin he's manipulating involves absorption/reflection in the visible spectrum, meaning you must use a visible light source to read/write... meaning you won't ever be able to use rhodopsin to read at the ~1nm length scale, because you can't focus a 400nm wavelength spot to 1nm. A focused, soft x-ray source does you no good. What an idiot (him and me both).

  28. Italics.....come on.... by Edge00 · · Score: 2, Informative

    For the love of Pete, its Halobacterium salinarum. Can we please use latin binomials properly.

  29. Re:Actually, the "Exxon is hiding the 100 mpg engi by Vo0k · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Exxon has huge infrastructure of refineries, tankers, oil fields. This all would go worthless the moment they start selling these cars.

    Junk all the tankers. Sell worthless oil fields. Shut down the useless refineries. Build infrastructure for the new cars. And explain to your competition that they should shift from mining oil to growing corn instead of uniting and performing a hostile takeover. Exxon might start making more money per unit sold, but their current property becomes worthless. Would you rather have $1mln in your pocket and earn $30k/year or have just debts, earning $40k/year?
    The new technology would kill current oil industry. An independent startup selling such cars is just as dangerous as a rogue oil company in the lobby making use of such a patent. One profits, all lose. They won't remain inactive. And even if none of the competitors stepped in, Exxon, would take years to pay back for shutting down oil operations and starting the ecological ones.

    Seems the textbooks assume zero investment, zero value drop in related market segments, and perfectly honest competition.

    --
    Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
  30. OT: Small World... by evilviper · · Score: 2, Interesting
    From TFA:
    Sydney, Jul 8 (ANI): An Indian born scientist in the US is working on

    Does anyone else find it ironic that /. (which is a US-based site--with readers from around the world) posts a link to an article from an Australia news site, talking about developments of an Indian-born scientist, working in the US?
    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  31. Re:I bet these will have the same problem as CD-RW by fafalone · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So what if it degrades? I'd still love to have 50TB discs that last for 2-3 years instead of a few GB that lasts a few years. This is a new technology designed to give higher capacity, not longer shelf life.

  32. Wow... by MsGeek · · Score: 2, Funny

    A dirty DVD that really *can* give you VD!

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  33. My God! by x2A · · Score: 4, Funny

    Finally, a disc with some culture on it!

    --
    The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
  34. Re:Agreed, that's a silly concern. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't think it will. It may fail for a lot of other reasons, but "a lot of information can get stolen" won't be one of them.

    That whole line in TFA reeks of a journalist trying to find some 'flip side' to write about, just so he doesn't come off like he's plugging a vaporware product. Rather than actually do any research, he asks the inventor a dumb question about the downsides and prints the guy's underwhelming response.

    This sort of cheesy manufactured controversy is pretty popular, and it's a sign of poor journalism.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  35. Only Problem Its Destructive Readout by fedrive · · Score: 2, Informative

    Must rewrite the data after reading it every time. sloooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooow !

  36. Re:I bet these will have the same problem as CD-RW by waferhead · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How about another application---
    Discs that "auto expire" if not kept in the fridge ;)

    I thought we already decided with the original DivX that this was not such a good idea.

    CONSUMERS decided it wasn't a good idea.

    The **AA would probably LOVE it.
    Imagine:digital data that degrades...

    Your 3 day rental from Blockbuster wouldn't ever have to go back...

  37. Re:I bet these will have the same problem as CD-RW by arivanov · · Score: 2, Informative

    Rhodopsin is a very interesting protein.

    It was a favourite model of protein scientists in the 80-es because it is one of the very few proteins that will easily form crystals. It is also extremely stable (for a protein) in its non-excited form. So if any photosensitive protein is ever used for storage it is possibly the best candidate.

    --
    Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
    http://www.sigsegv.cx/
  38. Inorganic materials used by (first) DVD successors by D4C5CE · · Score: 2, Informative

    Manufacturers have moved to inorganic materials only, e.g. silicon-copper alloys, which seem to offer much better stability than organic dyes, for the first generation of the new 30-50 GB disks at least.
    Here's an article on a disk that stacks several different types, each of them inorganic:
    TDK develops 200GB recordable Blu-Ray disc with six layers

  39. Re:I bet these will have the same problem as CD-RW by Phat_Tony · · Score: 3, Informative
    All organic compounds don't inherently degrade faster than all inorganics. Some are very stable. In fact, there's only one writable digital media I know of that's been certified by The Library Of Congress and other similar associations as an archival storage medium, and it's a CD-R that uses organic phthalocyanine dye. It's made by MAM-A (used to be Mitsui). They used to have a web page up all about it, but I can't find it now, but there is some information provided by resellers, such as inkjetart.com

    It's considered to be more time stable than hard drives, conventional mass-produced CD's and DVD's, flash-RAM, and others.

    --
    Can anyone tell me how to set my sig on Slashdot?