Slashdot Mirror


UK Recording Industry Wants Allofmp3 An Issue at G8

alveraan writes "According to a the BBC, 'the UK recording industry is urging the foreign secretary to raise the issue of Russian bargain music download website allofmp3.com at the G8 summit'. British Phonographic Industry (BPI) chairman Peter Jamieson wants Margaret Beckett to 'urge the Russian government to take action against the operators of the site by insisting that it is removed from the internet'. Allofmp3 has insisted in the past that it is operating in compliance with Russian copyright laws."

43 of 248 comments (clear)

  1. Be Ashamed by SB_SamuraiSam · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seriously. Even wanting to bitch about piracy there and now is disgraceful when there are more important things at hand.

    1. Re:Be Ashamed by A+Dafa+Disciple · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh, you know how it is with all these political types. It's not about what's "important"; Importance is only relative anyways.

      You know what makes an issue seem important? Voices. Voices create the feeling of presence. And surely, if there is presence on behalf of a particular issue, then that issue seems important. Unfortunately for the masses, a small number of rich people can buy voices and create presence, thus promoting their own ideologies as important.

      I kind of feel that this post should be moderated as "Well duh," but perhaps a reminder never hurts.

    2. Re:Be Ashamed by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not to detract from your point, but the U.N. Security Council already has an emergency meeting planned.

      It isn't like most of the G8 countries aren't dealing with those issues.

      P.S. The international community can deal with more than one thing at a time. Economic issues represent 50% of the G8's mission statement.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    3. Re:Be Ashamed by pete6677 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In the end, it won't really change anything. The UN Security Council will continue to do what they do best: nothing. It will take a good 3 weeks for them to even agree on exactly what problem they're supposed to be discussing. After much debate from 3rd world dictatorships, they'll pass some meaningless resolutions that most of the world will ignore. Same shit, different day. Could the UN possibly be any less relevant?

    4. Re:Be Ashamed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh, you know how it is with all these political types. It's not about what's "important"; Importance is only relative anyways.

      You know what makes an issue seem important? Voices.


      Close, but not quite. Most politicians have learned to ignore voices pretty damn well. What makes an issue seem important is how much money, power, and/or fame they can use the issue to obtain, or how much money, power, and/or fame they stand to lose if they ignore the issue. For most politicians, unless you can promise them that listening to you will bring them one of those three things, they couldn't care less what you have to say.

    5. Re:Be Ashamed by ch-chuck · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Another bogus argument - just because one problem isn't solved does not mean everybody has to drop everything and focus full attention on it. Good grief, surely you don't think that if this gaggle of politicians would only focus and squeeze hard enough, they could solve a 2k yo religious war?

      Just because someone robbed a bank doesn't mean the police should stop arresting kids for stealing candy.

      --
      try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    6. Re:Be Ashamed by A+Dafa+Disciple · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Close, but not quite. Most politicians have learned to ignore voices pretty damn well. What makes an issue seem important is how much money, power, and/or fame they can use the issue to obtain, or how much money, power, and/or fame they stand to lose if they ignore the issue. For most politicians, unless you can promise them that listening to you will bring them one of those three things, they couldn't care less what you have to say.

      I definitely agree with you, 110%. I think an addendum to that would be that there are in fact times when politicians don't have an opportunity to pursue their self-serving interests, when the opposing pressure is too great and the spotlight is too bright; basically, a politician is only as honest as the people keep him.

    7. Re:Be Ashamed by Apotekaren · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's sad really that the UN has been belittled to such a unuseful role.
      People wonder why none of the dictatorships are being intimidated by the supposed power of the UN. The answer is simple. If the wester countries ignore the UN, so can they. *cough*War in Iraq*cough*.
      If the US can just trample UN resolutions without any sanctions, do you think the dictators have any reason to belive the UN can have any power over THEM?

      --
      She: Hey, are you a traitor? Me: No, I'm atheist.
    8. Re:Be Ashamed by Afrosheen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You make a good point which was underscored by the UN losing all credibility during the Iraqi invasion. The UN offices were abandoned faster than a French military outpost at the first sight of shelling and unrest in the streets. After all, the thin veil of authority the UN held over the Middle East was promptly yanked when the first US bombs fell from the sky. If the UN says stop, but everyone rolls in, it's obvious they have no power whatsoever.

        It's really a shame for them because the UN actually used to keep alot of shit from erupting just by BEING in an unstable territory. Those days are over.

    9. Re:Be Ashamed by Eternauta3k · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I swear to fucking god I thought it was the pornographic industry until I read this post. Guessed it was the UK's RIAA

      --
      Yeah. Would you choose a neurosurgeon who pokes around people's brains in his spare time? I wouldn't.
    10. Re:Be Ashamed by gowen · · Score: 2, Insightful
      If the UN says stop, but everyone rolls in, it's obvious they have no power whatsoever.
      For small values of "Everyone". A few rogue states like the USA and the UK (don't forget Poland) don't constitute "everyone", regardless of what US network TV tells you.
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
  2. International Influence by A+Dafa+Disciple · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can see the RIAA drooling over this event.

    With the UKRI pushing their agenda in allofmp3.com's backyard, at a conference of international powers, this becomes an international issue.

    Whatever happens there is likely to serve as some sort of moral precedence and influence legislators in the US as well.

    1. Re:International Influence by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And the more they push it, the more people will hear about allofmp3.com. Some of them may visit the site, and see how cheap it is to distribute music online. They may start to realise that it's possible to distribute that 99 iTunes track for 10, cover all distribution costs, and still make a profit. They may start wondering if the recording industry really deserves to be getting 90/track for music that was recorded decades ago by people who are now dead, of if they deserve a 900% profit margin.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:International Influence by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Insightful
      some monitors that had "fallen off the truck". And they were only $100! This guy has really shown Best Buy that it's possible to sell a $1,000 monitor for $100, cover all distribution costs, and still make a profit

      You seem to be saying AllofMP3 are thieves. They pay licence fees under Russian law, basically operating under the compulsory licensing model as used for radio broadcasters in many countries. The various foreign music companies could get their cut, admittedly not as much as they'd like, if they filled out a few forms. As for the profit margin, obviously Allof MP3 is covering their costs with their very low prices. So that implies the bulk of iTunes, et al., fees for similar services are pure profit.

  3. Doubtful by rkhalloran · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Somehow I think this is a little too low-level to come up at a summit like this.

    But I'm sure it makes great press for the British recording association to push at their membership to show why they're paying them dues...

    1. Re:Doubtful by mobby_6kl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To me, it seems reasonably appropriate for the G8 to look at it. It's actually a rather serious conflict of copyright laws we're seeing here. Currently it's ok for Allofmp3 to unlimitedly export the music, and since their costs are minimal, they can easily undercut any other service. Fine, this would force the competition to lower prices, but with AMP3's costs consist of a few servers and bandwidth, compared to the recording, publishing, promoting, etc. costs of music labels, the latter would find themselves with no income if AMP3 expands further.

      BPI's motives are possibly simply "whaaa, they're taking our money!!1", but IMO there's a real issue here. What if Russia's copyright laws allowed GPL software to be unconditionally used as parts of commercial applications?

    2. Re:Doubtful by init100 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To me, it seems reasonably appropriate for the G8 to look at it.

      But what can they use to put pressure on the Russians? Mr Putin has threatened to turn off the gas before, and he might do it again if he don't like being pushed around by the MAFIAA.

    3. Re:Doubtful by arivanov · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What if Russia's copyright laws allowed GPL software to be unconditionally used as parts of commercial applications?

      More interesting question is what if they allowed AllofSoftware.com.

      I do not think they do, but the question is worth asking.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
  4. Copyright Holders by gid13 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yes, this is why our leaders have summit meetings these days. To protect the interests of the rich bastards that finance their campaigns. Somebody hurry up and get a Pirate Party up and running. Oh right, there's no such thing as proportional representation in most places. Wonderful.

    1. Re:Copyright Holders by gid13 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "There is nothing inherently wrong with being rich."
      Actually, distribution of wealth is a major problem. An even bigger problem is the fact that money apparently buys the rich the ability to push a political agenda that will make them more money and worsen the already problematic distribution of wealth.

  5. They have no shame. by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Come on, if they had some shame, they'd couldn't live with themselves. Their whole business model is basically to leech as much cash as they can off the works of people who are more creative than they could dream of being, and if this involves exploiting those same people and removing their rights to their own creations, they have no problems with that. They'd screw their grandmothers for an extra nickle.

    As far as they're concerned this is one of the most important things in the world...someone is impinging on their leeching! Their blind, rapacious greed is the overriding impulse in their miserable lives.

    Nothing would suprise me, coming from them. I literally can't imagine a depth that they wouldn't sink to, given the opportunity.

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    1. Re:They have no shame. by dlim · · Score: 5, Insightful

      By "They", do you mean the RIAA/BPI or allofmp3.com?

    2. Re:They have no shame. by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      allofmp3.com is at least providing a service that people are willing to pay for.

      The RIAA & its ilk have to use the power of the government to _force_ people to pay them.

      Any true capitalist would know that this is not a viable free-market business model.

    3. Re:They have no shame. by Score+Whore · · Score: 3, Insightful

      allofmp3.com would not have a service anyone would pay for if it wasn't for copyright and the general lack of an automatic "everything goes into the public domain at the moment of creation" situation.

    4. Re:They have no shame. by Petrushka · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You know, I disagree with you completely. Allofmp3.com provides a valuable service which is far, far better than was ever available by making illegal use of a p2p network. It's quite unique. Even if we didn't have copyright in my country, I'd probably still be paying for allofmp3.com's service.

    5. Re:They have no shame. by Phisbut · · Score: 2, Insightful
      allofmp3.com is at least providing a service that people are willing to pay for.

      Providing a service that people are willing to pay for doesn't make it any more legal or moral. Hired killers also provide a service that people are willing to pay for, is their business any more legitimate because of that?

      I know the analogy is terrible, and that "copyright infringment isn't theft and it isn't a crime", but nonetheless, it is still breaking the law. You have the right to not agree with the law, but you must still abide by it. You can also go the "civil disobedience" way, breaking the law to make a point, but "civil disobedience" also means accepting the consquences, which include to get fined and sued.

      Or you can just admit that you are selfish and want everything for free right now and deserve to get whatever you want by whatever means necessary. True, people are actually paying allofmp3.com, but allofmp3.com has no right to sell you what you buy from them, and you know it. Similar to paying someone to go steal a car, since you paid, you bought it, right?

      Remember. The RIAA is not forcing anyone to pay them. Nobody forces you to buy CD's, nobody forces you to buy music. If you don't like the RIAA or don't agree with the price they put on CD's, the alternative you have is to not buy the music, not to go and infringe copyright.

      That's how the market works. They have something you want (copyrighted music) and you have something they want (money). Either you agree with the terms of the exchange (X amount of money in exchange for the right to own one copy of the song, and use it according to laws, including fair use but also copyright), or you don't. If the deal can't be agreed upon, one of 3 scenarios should happen : They want your money badly enough, so they lower the asking price ; You want their music badly enough so you fork the money they ask ; Neither of you care wants what the other has badly enough, so you don't give them your money, but you don't get the music.

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    6. Re:They have no shame. by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know, your argument would have a little more "oomph" behind it if allofmp3.com was actually breaking the law - in Russia, where they are located. Since they're satisfying their home country's laws & being good entrepreneurs by providing a _legal_ service that people are willing to pay for, then you're happy with them, right? Or are you just a hypocrite willing to use any means to rationalise sacrificing private property rights in the name of IP?

      "Intellectual Property" is _socialism_, not free market. It's an artificial restriction placed on private property rights to support a social experiment (supposedly encouraging creativity and innovation), although many people seem to have accepted it as dogma & a "right" rather than actually verifying that it is doing what it was supposed to do.

  6. All this Hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When eastern Europe, India and China provide replaceable bodies for cheap labor, big business is first in line to hail globalization and boost their profits.

    But when the same countries come up with innovative ideas and start beating the same business giants at their own game, they suddenly scream bloody murder and plea to their governments for protection from "unfair" competition.

  7. Victory lap for Putin by amightywind · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Yes, this is why our leaders have summit meetings these days. To protect the interests of the rich bastards that finance their campaigns. Somebody hurry up and get a Pirate Party up and running. Oh right, there's no such thing as proportional representation in most places. Wonderful.

    The purpose of this meeting seems to be to give the gangster Putin a victory lap. He liked Yukos so much he made it a country and got it into the G8. To think Putin and his cronies will be making champaign toasts while Khordokhovski rots in jail makes me sick. Russia leading the G8 democracies. What irony!

    --
    an ill wind that blows no good
  8. Sweet! by Luscious868 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We've potentially got World War III brewing in the Middle East but let's go ahead and spend some time discussing allofmp3.com. Jesus H. Christ on a bicycle the world has it's priorities screwed up.

  9. Having solved other problems... by RyoShin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yeah. This should definately be a priority at the summit.

    Because, you know, there aren't third world countries with rampant militants who will shoot anything, and children going hungry, and human rights violations, and the middle east isn't breaking out in all hell.

    I mean, since we have all those big problems taken care of, now we can get down to the little petty issues. Right?

    Right?

  10. Re:Global economy/government? by fish_in_the_c · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not like we haven't done it before.

    As I recall there was a Russian programmer arrested in the united states from violating the DMCA when he was in RUSSIA under the direction of his employer for the actual purpose of COMPLYING with RUSSIAN law.
    ( although I suppose arguably he was arrested for telling people about it on U.S. soil)

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dmitry_Sklyarov

    If I'm not mistaken we also went into a small country called Panama and arrested it's dictator( read the guy who made the laws in that country and couldn't be accused of breaking his own laws) for trafficking Drugs in the country HE ran. We then took said president, ran him through a trial for crimes he DID NOT COMMIT ON US SOIL OR US JERISTICTION and he is now permanently in Jail for drug trafficking.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manuel_Noriega

    Ever heard of the Roosevelt corollary to the Monroe doctrine.
    The U.S. has been disrespecting autonomy of other nations for years.

    --
    âoeTolerance applies only to persons, but never to truth. Intolerance applies only to truth, but never to persons.
  11. Hey, I want something too by Shihar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I would like the G8 summit to address the lack of good sci-fi TV shows (with the exception being BSG). Somehow though, I think global health, poverty, and energy is going to get what I want pushed to the bottom of the list, right next to discussions about AllOfMyMP3.com.

    This isn't news. This is a PR stunt. If they actually do discuss this at the G8 summit (they wont), I would call this news worthy. At best, the US might make a quick speech about curbing piracy in the context of improving global trade and then sit down.

    The music industry can want and wish all it wants. As the old saying goes though, wish in one hand and shit in the other. See which hand fills up first.

  12. Pay no attention to world hunger by MECC · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Or AIDS, flu pandemic, nuclear proliferation, or climate change. Just give us other people's money for free.

    Greedy shitheads.

    --
    "We are all geniuses when we dream"
    - E.M. Cioran
  13. All the things she said, erm, USED to say by tepples · · Score: 2, Insightful
    If AllOfMp3.com IS following Russian copyright law, not a thing [the MAFIAA] can do.

    Other than not ship to Russia? What about dropping all Russian artists (such as tATu)? What about threatening to restructure the record companies to pay less tax to the United States (and more to foreign countries) if the US Department of State (and foreign counterparts) do not act to persuade Russian governments to recognize MAFIAA copyrights more thoroughly? Do you intend to underestimate record industry think tanks?

  14. Re:Asian Software Piracy by smitingpurpleemu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The RIAA will never blame the public opinion backlash for declining sales; they'll blame iTunes for selling cheap music and pirates for distributing it for free. This will cause them to mess with iTunes, and more aggressively go after pirates. I think the only things that will make them stop are more court rulings like the recent one that completely shot down the RIAA's prosecution of some random person, and Apple resisting the RIAA's pressure to jack up their prices.

  15. Re:G8? Saving lives? by arivanov · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not all G8 countries are behind agricultural subsidies.

    You have a whole spectrum of opinions on this. You start with France which is furthermost on the "pro subsidy" and "screw the africans, oh god they will flood us". On the other side you have UK and Germany which would like to see the subsidies abolished because they do not produce a lot, but provide Uncle Jacque with financial means for screwing the aftricans via their contributions to EU Common Agricultural Policy. Then you have the Russians, Canadians and the Americans which would like to see these abolished for a completely different reason. They think that they can outcompete everybody else on sheer scale and industrial methods in the absence of subsidies.

    So on, so fourth. G8 is definitely not uniform on this. If it was it would have reached to an agreement on agricultural issues very long ago. That is not the case. They are on the agenda every time. Both in G8 and in the EU budget hearings.

    Anyway, if you have objections to this, France is the right country to bitch about. They are clearly the worst as far as subsidies are concerned.

    --
    Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
    http://www.sigsegv.cx/
  16. Re:I'm a allofmp3/alltunes user by badmammajamma · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I buy from allofmp3 simply because they offer me what I want. Price has nothing to do with it. As soon as another site allows me to set what encoding I want and what bitrate with no DRM, they will get my business. Unfortunately the music industry doesn't understand any of this.

    --
    Any man who afflicts the human race with ideas must be prepared to see them misunderstood. -- H. L. Mencken
  17. Re:Global economy/government? by rts008 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I read you loud and clear, as I headed a Secial Forces team in that Panama f*skup.

    I'm just getting fed-up with our (USA) gov't. upholding big business at the detriment of individuals, and wondering where to apply the oath I took (and seriously took to heart-I cnsider myself a patriot) to defend the USA Constition against enemies foriegn and DOMESTIC.
    It has become really stressful for me at a personal level. I can't decide where to draw the line, but am afraid that my indecision is already PAST the line. I just don't know anymore, and this dismays me.

    To me, it seems a fine line between protecting your country's existance and keeping same nose out of other country's existance, I am afraid we are rushing across that fine line with a veangeance at the behest of some of our powerful corp.'s/lobbyists...and that disgusts and angers me.

    I dunno, something has to give, I'm just afraid of just what gives anymore.

    --
    Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  18. Re:Am I the only one... by shark72 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "...who reads that as "British Pornographic Institute" every time I see an article about them? Say what you will about the RIAA, at least their name is clearer."

    Not hardly; each time the BPI is mentioned, somebody does the "phonographic / pornographic" joke.

    "Damn anachronistic Brits. Who the hell says "phonograph" any more? :-)"

    If you want to be modded up again, the next time somebody mentions AT&T, you can point out that nobody says "telegraph" any more. And if the NAACP should happen to come up, you can point out that "colored" is also an archaic phrase; in fact, in the wrong context it's offensive. If the ACM has a chapter on your campus, you can point it out to them that "computing machinery" is rather old-fashioned. No mod points for real-life corrections, though.

    --
    Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
  19. Re:But is AllOfMP3.com really legit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Whether they win or lose, I am glad they are increasing awareness of allofmp3.com. Legality aside, allofmp3.com shows one thing very clearly; the operating costs of a music store. It is possible for them to sell tracks at 10 each and still make enough to cover their operating costs and make a profit on top. This shows the average consumer exactly how much profit the labels are making on a 99 iTunes track (or a $1.45 iTunes track if you buy it from the UK music store).

    Seriously? Well, yeah, you can definitely charge less if you don't pay the artists anything. What's your point? If your not worried about the artists getting paid you can distribute tracks for free on p2p networks.

  20. They're related by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    "The British Phonographic Industry" always looks like "The British Pornographic Industry" at first glance. IMO, this is a huge image/credibility issue with the BPI that must be addressed ASAP

    Since both are primarily the purveyors loud grunting and other crude and tasteless noises, one could argue that they might in fact be the same entity.

  21. Re:Oh the Howwuh... (said like Elmer Fudd) by shark72 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "That means they'll only clear a few billion this year instead of the extra hundred million or so that never makes it to the hands of the people who matter most in all this: the artists themselves. The most important people in the music business are the composers and musicians who write and perform the music and the producers and engineers who put it all together."

    Allofmp3.com does not help this situation. I find it highly doubtful that allofmp3.com is paying them anything close to what's fair. And they are most certainly not paying the producers or engineers; those people are salaried or contractors and the record company pays them whether the record makes money or not. Buying from allofmp3.com ensures that a couple of Russian guys get money (which I suppose is a good thing), but it leaves the record company to foot the bill for making the music a reality. Or, in other words, "payback."

    "For those of you out there who like say... Nelly Furtado, if she put her songs online at her own site for legal download at $.25 a track, she'd be a very rich woman."

    This is a very common claim. Slashdotters are often quite full of advice for people in the recording industry. While there are certainly plenty of examples of musicians who've managed to eke out a living selling their music without a recording contract, and instances of bands releasing stuff on their own after their contract is up or they're dropped from their label (TMBG is one example), the fact is that there are still many, many more people who want recording contracts than actually get them. Why haven't Nelly and countless others done the right and proper thing? Broadly speaking, one of three possibilities is correct:

    1. Slashdotters are smarter than musicians about the best way to make money in the industry. If only they'd listen to us!
    2. Perhaps they know something we don't,
    3. ...or perhaps they are simply not interested in coming up with the money to produce, record, engineer, market and sell their own music.
    --
    Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.