Slashdot Mirror


Recommendations for a 50" (or Larger) Display?

An anonymous reader asks: "What display device should I get for a conference room? It can't be a front projection and it should be >= 50" and somewhat slim. If I go plasma, it seems like the burn-in problem could be serious if the unit is used as a monitor -- I don't want to look at either a 'Start' or 'KDE' button until the end of time. LCDs don't impress me since I can only get them in sizes of 45" or less. What about DLP? They make noise, but will it drown out a person trying to make a presentation to a room of 10-20 people? Overall, am I really stuck with a max vertical resolution of 768? Are rear projection LCD's or DLP's slim enough to not dominate a room?"

98 comments

  1. humm m LCD or DPL projector on to a screen. by Amouth · · Score: 3, Informative

    i know you said it can't be front projected but any projector that you would use for a confrence room has the ablitlity to be mounted on the ceiling and also set so that it is to be rear projected .. so you ahve progjector on the screen and then people looking at the other side of screen..

    go talk to a local av shop.. or msg me and i will give you part numebrs.. you can do it for a hell of alot lesss than a huge flat screen display..

    --
    '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
  2. DLP by Doytch · · Score: 2, Informative

    The "noise" a DLP makes is hardly something to worry about. I don't even have a top-of-the-line DLP from Samsung and I can only notice it when I'm straining to hear it. I own a 50" JVC that's doing very well for me and I would easily recommend a similar DLP if your only qualm is the noise.

  3. Agree with the parent by tanveer1979 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Used to work for TI(The DLP creaters) so saw a lot of DLPs beginning from the very first models. Noise was never an issue and the image was great. But as with all projectors, the only downside is expensive bulbs, which can go poof after a couple of years of use. Make sure you get a warranty/insurance plan which covers that unless you got loads of money to spend

    --
    My Aurora : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o91ZsGwJYyg
    FB : https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography
    1. Re:Agree with the parent by Kardall · · Score: 1

      Actually, since the bulbs are end-user replaceable in most sets, they are normally not covered under anything other than a manufacturers extended warranty or a REALLY good coverage plan from the retail store. The DLP bulbs are like $150 for a Panasonic... they last about 4 years with average usage, so... i don't see how that can be a big deal... I would rather spend $150 than $3,000 on a new tv every 4 years... unless technology changes (2026 = no more analog apparently) :S

    2. Re:Agree with the parent by itwerx · · Score: 1

      Aha! A little OT here but probably interesting to the original poster.
            I have a DLP problem - I'm all ready to plunk down some $$$ on a DLP projector for home theater but my wife is in that 2% or so of the population that sees the elusive "rainbow effect". Any advice? I have heard that the rainbow effect is from the light hitting the edges of the mirrors as they flip and there's no help for those folks that see it. But I've also heard it's from the intersections of the color wheel as it spins and that a faster spinning wheel (4x?) cures it. What's the real scoop on this?

    3. Re:Agree with the parent by Scaba · · Score: 2, Funny

      Probably easier to get a new wife. There's a pool of about 3 billion women out there, so I'm sure one of them will meet your criteria for wifehood, and not be so fucken sensitive to shit like rainbow effects or wheat gluten.

    4. Re:Agree with the parent by Jaruzel · · Score: 3, Funny

      You are single aren't you ?

      -Jar.

      --
      Together, We Can Make Slashdot Better. I Do NOT Mod ACs. - Check Me Out
    5. Re:Agree with the parent by billcopc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow now I feel special.. I'm very annoyed by the rainbow effect, I see it everywhere, whether it's a projector or television.. I've tried the high-end ones that are supposed to spin faster, still no improvement. Samsung is coming out with triple-DLP units within the next few months, they've already been announced, but at the consumer end it's likely that 3-DLP will cost as much as Plasma TV's. I'm playing the waiting game as I'm in the market for a large (60"+) TV. A projector could be an option, but I have yet to see an affordable projector that supports high resolutions as I will invariably be hooking it up to my PC some of the time.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    6. Re:Agree with the parent by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      But as with all projectors, the only downside is expensive bulbs, which can go poof after a couple of years of use.

      Actually, Samsung and a company called NuVision are due to be shipping LED-backlit DLP sets this year. They use 3 colors of LEDs instead of a single bulb. This significantly increases the longevity of the backlight, reduces power consumption, obviates much of the need for audible cooling, and supposedly eliminates the rainbow effect.

      I want one badly, but my HDTV needs are currently fulfilled, and I can't justify the cost of replacing what I've got.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    7. Re:Agree with the parent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I 1) work for TI (but not in the DLP group), 2) see the rainbows.

      The numbers bandied about here are more like 15% of people can see them, although I think more can see them but just don't notice or it doesn't bug them.

      The rainbows are not from the edges of the mirrors. The DLP is a sophisticated time-based dithering engine. The mirrors switch on and off (really on screen and off screen to an area that absorbs the light) to achieve different brightness levels, kind of like pulse-width modulation. But in most TVs there is only one micro-mirror device, so that same chip must be used for all three colors.

      So there is a color wheel (think the slowly rotating color wheel with a light behind it, aimed at the the old silver Christmas trees, although this one is a reflective rather than a transmissive device) which switches between red, green, and blue (and sometimes white, mostly for business projectors that want very bright whites for Powerpoint presentations). Since each color is shown sequentially, this is done very quickly so you won't notice (you noticed on the silver Christmas trees). But the speeds they've chosen (which are limited by some physics and practical electronics) aren't invisible to all.

      The solution is a TV that uses three micro-mirror devices, one for each color. This is what is used in DLP Cinema projectors, and neither I nor your wife will see rainbows there. But these are few and far between and extremely expensive so far in home TVs. I wait with my (please don't think ill of me) CRT RP HDTV in anticipation of one of these units at a competitive price, so I can support my own company.

      Name withheld to avoid any appearance of impropriety....

    8. Re:Agree with the parent by ericspinder · · Score: 1
      Probably easier to get a new wife.
      The trouble with that plan is that after the divorce, he wouldn't have the money to buy the set.
      --
      The grass is only greener, if you don't take care of your own lawn.
    9. Re:Agree with the parent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He will be shortly. Again.

    10. Re:Agree with the parent by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "The trouble with that plan is that after the divorce, he wouldn't have the money to buy the set."

      That's why you never marry them!! At the very worst....just live with them, it is kind of like leasing with an option to buy....

      :-)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    11. Re:Agree with the parent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How exactly would you see an effect caused by a mechanical color wheel on a TELEVISION? You're deluded. You're probably just trying to make yourself and others believe how sensitive and special you are. Betcha you use Monster Cables...

    12. Re:Agree with the parent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How exactly would you see an effect caused by a mechanical color wheel on a TELEVISION?

      You sir, are slightly ignorant.
    13. Re:Agree with the parent by Miniluv · · Score: 1

      Just avoid the states listed at http://www.unmarried.org/common.html

    14. Re:Agree with the parent by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      There are relatively inexpensive extended service plans available that cover the cost of the bulb. Here is an example of one that is $260 for a projector $5,000. Depending on the projector, that could pay for the cost of the plan with just a single bulb failure.

      But if a company is considering spending $3-5k on a projector or TV, they should be prepared to spend a little on maintenance over time.

    15. Re:Agree with the parent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I wouldn't call a DLP projector a television, would you? A television is a direct-view CRT or LCD at most. You're an idiot.

    16. Re:Agree with the parent by _damnit_ · · Score: 1

      I've wondered for a while now why they don't use lasers for the colors. You can get red or green lasers pretty cheap and I supposed blue can be had as well and might be getting cheaper with Blu-Ray players creating a larger market. The color saturation from the laser I play with my cats with is great! Why not in a dlp with three reflectors? There's probably a good explanation that I hadn't considered, but thought I'd ask.

      --


      _damnit_

      It's my job to freeze you. -- Logan's Run
  4. If you're really serious by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 2, Informative

    and don't mind spending the money and don't mind looking around a bit, you can/could get the Grand Canyon Display from Liebermann Inc.

    They used to reside at http://www.go-l.com/ but that seems to be defunct now. Last I checked they had one that was even bigger (5 1600x1200 monitors in one I believe), but since it's gone, I'm not entirely sure what it was called.

    A teaser http://www.primidi.com/2003/09/25.html (that's a Roland link, sadly) for now though ;)

    --
    We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    1. Re:If you're really serious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      go-l.com works fine for me.

    2. Re:If you're really serious by deceased+comrade · · Score: 1

      I think the poster is looking for a more normal 50 inches of real estate, probably something closer to 16:9, probably not 240:9. Though going multiple with large format LCDs might be interesting, say 2x40" LCDs? That would be one way to alleviate the size complaints.

    3. Re:If you're really serious by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Liebermann got out of the computer business 2004-2005ish. Though I would be very surprised if that Grand Canyon Display actually shipped or was just some fanciful marketer's dream. (Very hard to describe Liebermann - the laptops they shipped were merely rebadged Sagers, that is, the models they could ship. In between the Apple-copycat site design, the wild products that just aren't possible realistically, and the overpriced laptops you *could* buy (hint: you think Apple was overpriced? Try Liebermann.).)

      They shut their doors because sites like Gizmodo were (rightfully) putting them down due to impossible-to-buy products, long shipping times, and well, you could get the same laptop for half price.

      Back on topic, there are places that sell racks of monitors - I recall one that had 3x2 configurations of LCDs or bigger. Though pricey - anywhere from $20,000 on up...

  5. all you need to know (nearly) by pz · · Score: 3, Funny

    I've found http://wwww.projectorcentral.com/ to be a very useful resource when wondering about projectors.

    Oh, and http://www.google.com/ as well. Amazing what information is out there.

    --

    Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
  6. DLP/D-ILA/LCOS/RPLCD by Babbster · · Score: 2, Interesting

    First off, all of these technologies are being implemented in rear-projection, so there is some extra space in terms of thickness between the screen and back edge of the sets. But, all three of them are still thin compared to CRT solutions and, if "money is no object" (we'll just pretend it isn't) there are 1080p (1920x1080) sets available in the 50-70" range. One possible snag is that you'll want to make sure that these 1920x1080 sets will actually take such a signal - several of them will only up-convert signals to 1080p. Of course, in the case of a 1080i signal it will still look darn good since it's a simple line-doubling issue. Looking at a slightly older technology, there is rear-projection LCD. Sony offers 1080p HDTVs of this ilk.

    None of these items will be as sleek as a direct-view plasma or LCD, but none of them will approach the room-dominating size of an old-school CRT RPTV either. They also won't be inexpensive, though compared to direct-view plasma and LCD units in similar sizes (BTW- Sharp actually does sell LCDs in the 50+" range) they'll be at least competitive and often much cheaper.

    Finally, "burn-in" isn't an issue with any of these technologies, though each can have its quirks (for example, some people are sensitive to the DLP "rainbow" effect, though supposedly it has been minimized in the latest 1080p sets).

    1. Re:DLP/D-ILA/LCOS/RPLCD by aesiamun · · Score: 1

      I have a 50" sony sxrd (LCOS) set and I love it. My only qualm is it is a standard VGA input instead of DVI. I haven't hooked up the mac yet, as the set was delivered this week, but I imagine that it will look good :)

    2. Re:DLP/D-ILA/LCOS/RPLCD by skiflyer · · Score: 1

      I have the slightly larger version of that TV, and I agree it's a great TV... but prepared to be dissapointed in its computer support, it's dismal.

      The only way I've managed to get reasonable performance is from a DVI-HDMI cable and the fact that my NVidia card has Overscan correction (the TV itself only has underscan correction)

      Hope your experience with the 50" is better.

    3. Re:DLP/D-ILA/LCOS/RPLCD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Likewise with my 60". DVI to HDMI converter is the only way to get a decent picture on it, the VGA one maxes out at approximately 1/2 the screen real estate.

      It's a good thing that my roommate is the owner, so I can move on to a (hopefully) more PC-friendly true 1080p TV eventually.

      But, on the other hand, the picture quality is excellent, and in broadcast HD it's stunning.

    4. Re:DLP/D-ILA/LCOS/RPLCD by aesiamun · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, that's my other gripe...only one HDMI input. Right now it's not a problem, the only HDMI device i have is my cable box, but once the optional XBox360 cable comes out or the HD-DVD addon, I'll be using it there. I'll have to get one of those HDMI switch box...goodbye $400... :(

    5. Re:DLP/D-ILA/LCOS/RPLCD by skiflyer · · Score: 1

      Really, the 60" comes with 2... but why bother, the XBox360 only does 720p anyway, unless you're going an incredibly distance I can't imagine you'll notice a difference between component and HDMI.... heck I can't imagine there's a difference to notice.

    6. Re:DLP/D-ILA/LCOS/RPLCD by aesiamun · · Score: 1

      Not true, Battle For Middle Earth II does 1080i...at least that's what my TV reports and the box says it as well.

  7. DLP considerations by j-turkey · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Rear projection DLP is pretty good, and is less expensive than its alternatives. Whether or not it's appropriate for your requirements is up to you.

    I just went to Samsung's site and selected the first rear projection DLP monitor that was over 50". I got this. Whether or not it's too deep is up to you. Samsung is claiming 16.3" deep in their specifications. Some are thinner than others though. As far as noise goes, manufacturers seem to be listening to what their customers want and are competing to make quieter units. You may want to go to a showroom and hear what kind of noise these produce. Also, plug a laptop into a few to see what your presentations look like.

    It has been estimated that about 5% of people experience what is known as the DLP Rainbow Effect, where some viewers can see flashes of color separation on the edges of high contrast edges. To minimize this, manufacturers are speeding up color wheels and adding more segments to effectively increase the color wheel speed. As DLP chips become cheaper, I believe that we will begin seeing 3-chip solutions enter the consumer market to completely eliminate the issue. In any case, the rainbow effect is something that you may want to keep in mind when you consider whether or not to use DLP.

    --

    -Turkey

    1. Re:DLP considerations by iainl · · Score: 1

      I'd strongly recommend against using it for a conference room.

      5% doesn't sound like much, but if there are ten people in the room, there's a 40% chance that at least one of them is going to get the almighty headache that accompanies staring at the rainbow effects for more than a minute or so.

      If you have to go rear-projection, then Sony's 52" SXRD is very good value, and does 1920x1080, rather than the 1360x768 that the original questioner was worried about.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    2. Re:DLP considerations by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      Not all rear projection TVs are DLP, but it's getting hard to find ones that still use the old high-intensity tubes. I had one, though; 40" 1080p with DVI input, so they do exist, and I know they existed in up to 60" models. For the curious, the one I had was an RCA, and I bought it about 2.5 years ago, while working for another division of RCA's parent company (Thomson). Now that I think about it, it may have had a GE logo on it. Not sure though, and the ex got it when we split.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    3. Re:DLP considerations by jandrese · · Score: 1

      It depends a bit on what you're using it for. The rainbow effect doesn't do anything on Powerpoint presentations, which is 95% of what conference room screens are usually used for. Frankly, it's harder and harder to find non-DLP projectors these days. We have DLP in every conference room here and as far as I know nobody has ever complained.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
  8. what abou LCOS? by __aaitqo8496 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    another technology out there that you didn't mention was LCOS. it's similar to a DLP in size. sony is just about to release thier a2000 series which will sport 1080p resolution and 1080p inputs (thereby satisfying your request for more than 768 vertical resolution). there are tons of input types, so you shouldn't have to worry about getting the video to it.

    the 50" should be available in the next week or so. they have a 55 and 60 inch projected to launch in the near future. there are a few reviews available with a quick google search, but for the most part, people are waiting (and anxious) to see this new model.

  9. I think by ShooterNeo · · Score: 2, Informative

    I say DLP, without a doubt. Crisp color reproduction, higher resolution than lcd or plasma.

    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82 E16889253029

    Dimensions : 18" deep. Unless your conference room is exceptionally crowded, a foot and a half shouldn't make any difference.

    And best of all, plug in a high definition disk player and watch HD movies, or an Xbox 360.

    Or, connect a PC up and the onscreen text readable since this is more of a monitor than a television.

    1. Re:I think by Skater · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine has that model and the picture is beautiful. He calls it "Mammoth."

      Another benefit - the unit only weighs 99 lbs. So, while it's awkward, it's definitely moveable by two people. He and I carried it down the steps at his place.

  10. DLP by HeXetic · · Score: 1

    My Toshiba 52" DLP TV makes next to no noise. The fan is almost inaudible over anything, and it's only after I've turned off the sound system that I can hear the fan for the few seconds it runs before shutdown.

    --
    http://www.chmodoplusr.com/
  11. Projector by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

    Why not a standard projector with a really clever system of mirrors and lenses? If you have room for a large non-flat device of any sort, certainly you have room to set up a projector reflecting back and forth once or twice before reaching the screen....

  12. Check with the companies by Yonkeltron · · Score: 4, Funny

    Check with the companies to see how big they are making LiteBrites these days....

    --
    Keep the faith, share the code
    1. Re:Check with the companies by booch · · Score: 1

      You forgot to provide the URL: http://www.hasbro.com/litebrite

      --
      Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
    2. Re:Check with the companies by _damnit_ · · Score: 1

      You need to go one further. Here's an online version of litebrite to practice getting screen refreshes up to .01 fpm. Not good enough for gaming, but I wouldn't notice the speed for a powerpoint presentation. [I usually sleep through those anyway.]

      --


      _damnit_

      It's my job to freeze you. -- Logan's Run
  13. HP 58" or 65" Microdisplay by anvilmark · · Score: 1

    I'm hoping to get an HP 65" microdisplay with wobulation someday. Review here. Wobulation blends the pixels together to almost eliminate screen-dooring.

    Not sure what your budget is, but a 58" inch version is also available.

    1. Re:HP 58" or 65" Microdisplay by Puff+Daddy · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, apparently my sarcasm detector is broken. Is "wobulation" an actual term? Normally, I'd be well into making fun of it by now... I just have this nagging feeling that I might be wrong. Anyway... so... "wobulation"?

    2. Re:HP 58" or 65" Microdisplay by Werkhaus · · Score: 1

      I've worked on oscilloscopes that have had internal wobbulators.
      See http://antiqueradio.org//trium01.htm for an elderly one.

    3. Re:HP 58" or 65" Microdisplay by SCdF · · Score: 1
  14. LCD by Nyall · · Score: 1

    Well here's a 57 inch lcd tv
    http://www.samsung.com/Products/TV/LCDTV/LNS5797DX XAA.asp?page=Features

    I have a 32' lcd TV from Samsung and I've been really impressed.

    --
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jury_nullification
    1. Re:LCD by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 3, Funny
      I have a 32' lcd TV from Samsung and I've been really impressed.

      I'd be very impressed to have a 32-foot lcd TV, as well. I knew Samsung was starting to make some big ones, but jeez, I'd have to get a bigger house for one of those bad boys.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    2. Re:LCD by Nyall · · Score: 2, Funny

      lol, I love making mistakes on \.

      --
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jury_nullification
    3. Re:LCD by AcidLacedPenguiN · · Score: 1

      backslash-dot???!? what is this bizarro world?

      --
      disclaimer: I've been known to store numbers in my ass for which to dig out when quantities are required.
  15. DLP.. or projector by schmiddy · · Score: 1

    If you've been waiting to buy a fancy DLP because the prices are astronomical.. looks like they might just be starting to come down. Tigerdirect has a Samsung HL-R5078W 50" DLP with 1080p (yes, real 1080p!) for a mere $1600. Plus you can watch broadcast HDTV with the built-in tuner when no one's looking :)

    Barring that, I'd go for a nice projector and a screen. Personally, I'm not such a huge fan of projectors, but they can be good with a proper setup (big, flat, custom-installed screen, everything aligned and focused correctly, etc.).

    --
    http://cltracker.net -- powerful craigslist multi-city search
  16. Yes BIG LCD's Exist... Sharp 65 inch LCD LC-65D90U by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 4, Informative

    As the subject title says, Sharp has a 65" LCD. It even has a DVI input so your computers will be able to easily interface... It is pricy though, but if you don't want burn-in then it is your best option. Can be found for around $18k.

    --
    We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
  17. Another possibility by stonecypher · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It is both cheaper and more effective to get a pile of networked laptops, and have people look at their local copy. Other benefits include people being able to cut and paste, to participate and so on.

    --
    StoneCypher is Full of BS
    1. Re:Another possibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      This makes absolutely no sense at all since it is extra work and require more technical knowledge for all involved plus it does zilch for presentations. When you present, you want those pairs of eyes on you. People also don't want to hold up their notebook, point to a little dot, and hope everyone sees the same in front of their monitors - they want to point at a big screen and show their pie chart or whatever. Plus, if the boss is making an important presentation about next quarters earnings expectations, etcetera, he wants to know he has your attention, not that you are checking your email or some nonsense clandestinely.

    2. Re:Another possibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, presentations go awry often enough with 1 laptop and a projector, I'd rather use one of those big flip-pads and a pen than involve 20 laptops.

    3. Re:Another possibility by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      It is both cheaper and more effective to get a pile of networked laptops, and have people look at their local copy. Other benefits include people being able to cut and paste, to participate and so on.

      And drawbacks include people being able to play Solitaire and chat on Instant Messenger instead of paying attention, and the difficulty of collaboration when you have to tell every person "halfway down the page, second-to-rightmost column" instead of simply pointing the appropriate area on the Big Screen.

    4. Re:Another possibility by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      Well, as far as the difficulty of collaboration issue, it's not like it's hard to get networked interaction going in Windows; it's built in. You just go use your mouse cursor, and select the text. As far as people chatting and playing Solitaire, if they're doing that in a meeting, that sounds to me like a good reason for disciplinary action. If you can't trust your employees to pay attention during a 10-15 person meeting, you're in a whole lot of hot water.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    5. Re:Another possibility by cr0sh · · Score: 1
      This makes absolutely no sense at all since it is extra work and require more technical knowledge for all involved plus it does zilch for presentations. When you present, you want those pairs of eyes on you.


      Ah, so it is more about people looking at you, than it is about what you are presenting - look at me, I am head monkey here!

      People also don't want to hold up their notebook, point to a little dot, and hope everyone sees the same in front of their monitors - they want to point at a big screen and show their pie chart or whatever.

      That is why shared desktops exist. One guy is the "presenter", and the rest can easily follow what he is doing on their screens. If you absolutely need a big screen (and there are times), hook one up to the presenter's laptop, dual screen the thing, and then when needed (or when people need it), they can look at it. There isn't any need for somebody to stand up and point (and if you absolutely have to, they have these things called laser pointers, which can be used from a sitting position).

      Plus, if the boss is making an important presentation about next quarters earnings expectations, etcetera, he wants to know he has your attention, not that you are checking your email or some nonsense clandestinely.

      Maybe the boss needs to put more trust in the people that he has hired, and if those people break that trust, then maybe they need to be talked to, and failing that, let them go. Of course, I have a feeling this is more about point one (ie, being the head monkey), and less about whatever is being talked about. Vain monkeys tend to get upset when the other monkeys don't preen on about how good they look.

      Meanwhile, us humans just try to get the damn work done so we can go home at the end of the day to relax with a beer and some sex with our SOs.

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
    6. Re:Another possibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy crap, I bet you're a royal pain in the ass to work with.

    7. Re:Another possibility by cr0sh · · Score: 1

      Nah, I just don't believe the boss is better than me because of his fancy haircut, suit, and tie.

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  18. Re:Yes BIG LCD's Exist... Sharp 65 inch LCD LC-65D by j-turkey · · Score: 1

    Sharp also sells the PN-655U, another 65" 1080p LCD.

    --

    -Turkey

  19. Screensaver? Autohide? by labal · · Score: 1

    You could always use a screen saver, or the Auto hide feature on your task bar.....

    --
    hellboy1975 http://www.foutheye.net
  20. I like the Panasonics... by Kardall · · Score: 1
    I really really like the Panasonic 52" 3-LCD screen

    They are brighter and have a higher contrast than the DLP's which means if you're in a board room with flourescent lights, then it will be easier to see around the room. 3000:1 Contrast ratio is just cool. It also comes in a 61" flavour.

    If you haven't considered projection as an alternative, you could always go for an Optoma front projector. They are very very cool. Half of their lineup doesn't go under 3500:1 contrast ratio, with most around 4500:1, and they are VERY inexpensive to replace the bulbs. Alot of their lineup also contains DVI Inputs as opposed to the Component sets that the older projectors have. Great for dual monitor supports on a desktop. Laptops, you would probably just look for the wonderous VGA's on a similar model from them to the

    Then there's the Optomoa BigVizion which is ... amazing? Awesome? Killer!! Check this baby out... BigVizion

    Anyway you look at it, burn in is going to be a factor with a plasma, the bulbs will go in a projector, and you will get ghost images on an LCD with constant "dashboard" displays like the start menu. I do know that the panasonic LCD's have this "true black" thing, where in the blank pass in a progressive display mode, it does a black fill of the screen, so that when you go from say a dark room scene, to a snow scene to a dark room scene, the black is as black as possible when switching color brightness that way. It's hard to choose, but those are my pics anyway, I like them and I have been looking around for a product to beat it within the price ranges. $3,199 for the 61" 3LCD and $2,199 for the 52" is tough to beat for the brightness you get out of it. DLP's are a bit more money, but I do have to say that they seem to be a lot clearer on the 1080i than the 3LCD's, but they don't have the vibrant colors :/ So it depends if you're doing slideshows or movie clips heh.

  21. Sony SXRD rear projection displays by Keeper · · Score: 1

    Look at the new Sony KDS-xxA2000 line just starting to roll out ( http://www.sonystyle.com/is-bin/INTERSHOP.enfinity /eCS/Store/en/-/USD/SY_DisplayProductInformation-S tart?ProductSKU=KDS50A2000 ). They'll be sold in 50", 55", and 60" versions. Or, if you've got the dough to blow, you can look at the XBR2 sets that will have 60" and 70" screens.

    They are all 1080p 3 chip rear projection lcos based displays with a 10,000:1 contrast ratio. They all have an HDMI input will actually accept a 1080p signal (all you need is a DVI->HDMI cable or adapter).

    They are among the better displays on the market, though they certainly aren't the cheapest (the KDS-50A2000 MSRP is $2700).

  22. Or maybe even a 65" LCD by p7 · · Score: 1

    How about Sharps LC-65D90U. 65" and 1080p.

    1. Re:Or maybe even a 65" LCD by Nyall · · Score: 1

      The contrast ratio of that sharp is 1200:1, the samsung model has a 4000:1.
      Its sort of subjective but I'd prefer the Samsung model.

      --
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jury_nullification
  23. And for everything else theres... by cloricus · · Score: 1

    Ask Slashdot! :D ...And in this case I think this question really does come down to 'I need that guys personal opinion' even if I'm not going to tell him the rough size of the room.

    --
    I ate your fish.
  24. Get a bigger vehicle... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    It's funny when you're in the parking lot at a big box retailer and you see someone is trying to shove a huge TV box into a very small vehicle. Around Christmas time, I've seen empty TV boxes in the parking lot since people had to get the TV home somehow.

    1. Re:Get a bigger vehicle... by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      Cripes, at the price levels of these thing, spend the extra $50 to have the set delivered. Or wait for a free delivery special.

    2. Re:Get a bigger vehicle... by cr0sh · · Score: 1
      I agree with you on this - for something that expensive, I would rather have the other guy drop it than me.


      However, I still wonder why many people, who usually have at least two cars, never make a truck one of them. It doesn't have to be a big truck, either - a small Ford Ranger, a Nissan Frontier - hell, even an old Datsun - and you can handle 90% of the loads you will ever likely come across, even as a homeowner.

      No, you won't be moving big loads of rock or brick with such a small truck, but you can haul wood and other building materials, and all sorts of other large loads like refrigerators, TVs, and washing machines. Get a 6 or 4 banger, and you won't even have to worry about using much gas (still more than most small cars, but it isn't that bad).

      The first boss I ever had (doing yardwork and home alarm installation as a kid) told me some sage advice: "Get a vehicle that can work for you, not a vehicle you work for". In just about all areas of life, that means a truck (or a van) - something that even in the most dire of times where you can't find a job, you can at least do delivery jobs of some sort with (or construction, or welding, or plumbing, or yard maintenance, etc).

      Seems like a lot people never get this advice, or if they do, they don't understand it and take it to heart...

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
    3. Re:Get a bigger vehicle... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      That's nothing. I heard horror stories from friends that they got this big TV home only to find out that it would cost another $500 to have it mounted on the wall and the wires hidden properly. That's why I stuck to the conventional 20" CRT TV. Even then, I almost had to take the front seat out to get it in back.

  25. Just get an LCD projector... by blorg · · Score: 1

    ...problem solved. (Most of the historical "issues" with LCD such as screen door, etc. have been solved and they are more than competitive with DLP.)

  26. My suggestion by Klaidas · · Score: 1

    I suggest using a projector - it would be cheaper, you could carry it with you. Besides, you will be able to change the size of the image it makes. I mostly use those for my presentationt, and hardly have any problems
    Also, if you take him home, you can watch TV/DVD with it ;)

  27. How dark is the room? by Andy_R · · Score: 1

    If you are considering any type of projection system, you need to think about how dark the room can be made, and how much disruption you are prepared to put up with to darken the room. If you don't have blackout curtains, then you need to think about factoring in the cost of installing them. This may also be the case for LCD/Plasma solutions if you have a room with floor to ceiling windows where the sun hits the wall you want the screen to be on.

    Another potential option is to use something like a 42" display at one end of the room and a pair of slaved 'repeater' 32"s at the sides of the rooms nearer the back. This can work out a lot cheaper than a single 65", solves the problem of a round boardroom table pointing people the wrong way and has the benefit of a bit of redundancy for the day something breaks.

    Lastly, don't rule out renting a plasma screen for a few months, then swapping it. Prices of big displays are always going down, and quality is always going up, so this might prove very cost-effective as well as countering the plasma's possible burn in problems.

    --
    A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
  28. I must be getting old.. by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1

    My first thought was 'why not sit closer to a normal TV?'.
    I'm going backwards. Ten years ago I had a full Dolby Digital (or AC3 as it was back then) surround system, laserdisc player and a 40inch back projector. Now I'm stuck with an el-cheapo DVD player and a 30inch LCD screen and just the TV's built in speakers. I think the cause was wife & kids...

    --
    I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
  29. Worse than the DLP rainbow is the DLP headache! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It has been estimated that about 5% of people experience what is known as the DLP Rainbow Effect, where some viewers can see flashes of color separation on the edges of high contrast edges.

    Much worse than the annoying rainbow effect that some people get with DLP is the headache effect! This goes beyond merely annoying to something approaching torture if you need to look at it for more than a few minutes.

    The danger of fixed-spot icons burning in on LCD and plasma screens for all eternity is nothing compared to suffering a cracking headache every time you turn on a DLP. For some people it's just utterly unwatchable, quite painful as well as dizzying. If you have a varying audience where you can't guarantee that everyone is immune, this should be a matter of some concern.

    My advice is to stay well clear of DLPs until they bring out 3-device solutions for direct RGB and so eliminate the multiplexing color-wheel. In any event, the wheel is just another moving component to go wrong, and belongs back in the day of Baird television before we had 3-gun CRTs.

    1. Re:Worse than the DLP rainbow is the DLP headache! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not a fan of serving the lowest common denominator with special set-asides. Suffer and be glad that me beating the back of your head isn't part of your job.

  30. Try a Westinghouse LVM-47W1 by professionalGeek · · Score: 1

    I know you said 50" plus, but you might want to check out Westinghouse brand LCDs. They are absolutely amazing value for money. The top of the line is currently a 47" LCD panel, but they are rumored to be adding a 56" some time this year. I just picked one up and it's great - plenty bright enough even in a daylit room, good anti-glare coating on it. And best of all it's 1080P, which if you're using a PC or Mac to drive it means you get a really crisp and clear picture at a reasonable resolution!

    They're relatively cheap too. Westinghouse is trying to establish itself and make a name in the consumer electronics market so they are consistently selling way under their competition. You might want to check out the AVS Forum on the topic. If you like what you see, you can pick it up from Crutchfield (30 day satisfaction guarantee and free shipping included) for $2499.

    --
    Stripes:Making Java web development easy like it should be.
  31. Sharp has 65" FullHD LCD's by MrWorf · · Score: 1

    If that's big enough for you.

  32. Re:humm m LCD or DPL projector on to a screen. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

    What type of AV shop? If it is home theater, then that's no good unless they also sell presentation projectors. For others reading, home theater projectors are optimized for contrast ratio, presentation projectors are optimized for brightness for presenting in a lit room. You can mix the uses, but the results aren't necessarily as good, nor is the money necessarily as well spent.

  33. Wait for LED DLP by PrvtBurrito · · Score: 2, Informative

    DLP technology, as others have mentioned, is really cool and has a lot of potential. It is also less expensive than LCD/Plasma, but it is not without problems. (For anyone interested in really researching this, go to AVS Forum, the bible on this sort of thing.) If going DLP, I highly recommend looking into waiting for LED light based models. The first one is coming out right about now. Lots of DLP owners are having trouble with lamps breaking within 1 year at costs of >$200 -- sometimes as high as $400. Other complain about fan noise, rainbow effects, or breaking color wheels. LED based models, in theory, should solve all of these problems, and finally create a large 1080p wide screen tv technology that doesn't lose significant picture quality over time.

    --
    Laboratree - Scientific collaboration based on OpenSocial.
  34. Burn-in by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    Actually, DLP and LCoS are all immune to burn-in as well and are much, much cheaper than an $18K direct LCD.

    You only have to worry about burn-in with plasma, CRT, and (supposedly) projection LCD. Direct & projection CRT is a dying technology. Projection LCD is hard to find. All you really need to do is to avoid plasma, and you'll be fine on burn-in.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re:Burn-in by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 1

      Yes, that is true, but if you notice he asked for a flat panel that can possibly be wall mounted.... With LCoS and DLP projectors, he would need to either take up floor space, or cut out part of the wall and have a wallbox built to house the set.

      --
      We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
  35. Wobulation by anvilmark · · Score: 2, Informative

    is a real technology. :)

    Read about it at PopSci online

  36. Re:humm m LCD or DPL projector on to a screen. by Amouth · · Score: 1

    Well where i live the AV shops i am talking about are the ones that go into schools and biz to do full av install for classrooms.. It takes some hunting and you woln't find bargin prices - but there are alot of them out there and not to hard to find.. basicily if they have a retail store front.. you are in the wrong place.

    --
    '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
  37. Re:Yes BIG LCD's Exist... Sharp 65 inch LCD LC-65D by fisternipply · · Score: 1

    Too bad it looks like shit.

  38. Short throw by GoRK · · Score: 3, Informative

    Woah! Why exactly is front projection not an option? People often throw out front projection because they want to stand in front of the screen to present and rear projection is not a good option.

    Don't give up on front projection until you at least learn a little bit about short throw options. There are front projection systems that can deliver 100" diagonal images in as little as 2' (NEC WT610). If you are projecting from the ceiling to a 60" screen, you could be standing riciculously close (e.g. closer than one usually stands next to a wall) and not even cast a shadow.

    1. Re:Short throw by GoRK · · Score: 1

      Yeah I just calculated it; 60" diagonal from a NEC WT610 is a throw distance of 10.8" Resolution is XGA

      With a moderately high gain screen this will give you plenty of brightness even with the lights on in a conference room.

  39. It's called rear projection... by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    ...and is the same as a DLP or LCOS (or CRT RP) TV that is being discussed, but is custom made. They're very common in high end settings because you just have a screen built into the wall and the projector sits in a room behing the screen with a mirror. Practically all front projectors can be set to project a mirror image for RP usage. You are limited if you want 1080 resolution, as there are still only a few available. This may be more cash than the OP wants to spend, and he'll need space behing the screen wall, but it does fit his requirements.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  40. Re:humm m LCD or DPL projector on to a screen. by bahwi · · Score: 1

    Aye, I'm using my projector at home ($899) with screen goo, and I've got a 126" HDTV, for $899. Need curtains though, but I'd need those without. Haven't hooked my computer up to it yet, mostly for playstation and TV/DVDs. Waaaaay cheaper than many of the alternatives out there, and for 120". =)
    (I have tall ceilings, heh)

  41. Re:humm m LCD or DPL projector on to a screen. by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
    "What type of AV shop? If it is home theater, then that's no good unless they also sell presentation projectors. For others reading, home theater projectors are optimized for contrast ratio, presentation projectors are optimized for brightness for presenting in a lit room."

    I dunno...the mixed uses ones are getting MUCH better. I just got an Optima EP739....good contrast ratio...and great even with ambient lighting...

    Not to mention between 3000-5000 hours bulb life....

    I got the whole thing for $1299, plus an extra bulb....no tax, no shipping.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  42. HP MD5880n 58" 1080p DLP TV by holt · · Score: 1

    I use HP's MD5880n 1080p 58" TV as the primary display for my home computer (which happens to be a Mac). It works spectacularly well, with the exception that if your eyes aren't quite good the 1080p resolution can be hard to read from 10-15 ft (fonts, especially on the web and particularly in web images, can be too small). I bought it for about $3000 shipped, but I think prices are coming down. HP also makes a 65" version, the MD6580n.

    These TVs accept a 1080p signal over HDMI. I currently run ADC->DVI and then DVI->HDMI to get the signal from my Mac's ADC (Apple Display Connector, Apple's mix of DVI and power in one cable) output to the HDMI input on the TV. This works with the standard resolutions between 800x600 up to 1920x1080. The TV knows that it's getting its signal from a computer and has a special PC aspect mode, which makes the pixel mapping 1:1 and eliminates overscan. This means that there is a slight area of the screen that doesn't get illuminated, but it's hardly noticable. Apparently you can use one of the other aspect modes and a custom resolution to fix this, but it's not worth the trouble to me.

    The HTPC forums at AVSForum.com (this is the Mac forum) and the HP 1080p DLP forum have been particularly good resources for me.

    Good luck!

  43. DLP all the way by Avatar8 · · Score: 1
    I researched plasma, LCD, CRT projection and DLP for a year before purchasing a Samsung 50" DLP rear projection screen. Hardly makes any noise, we attached a computer to it using DVI and the only negative I or any of the articles I read about DLP had to say was the cost of the replacement bulb ($300-500), but they last for nearly three years.

    Samsung, Mitsubishi and Toshiba all have reliable DLP screens. I'd recommend Mitsubishi for an office environment strictly because of the numerous connections Mitsubishi's have. All are only about 18" deep and they're extremely light weight. My 50" is about 80 lbs.

    Treat a DLP as you would a projector. 15 second lamp warm up time, there's a cool down time and you cannot turn it off and on quickly.