Slashdot Mirror


Recording Skype Audio for Broadcast?

Jennifer Leonard asks: "I'm in desperate need of securing a way to record my Skype phone calls at broadcast quality. I just purchased a Plantronics Audio.85 headset with noise-reduction mic and 32-bit DSP ('enhances the audio signal for superior stereo sound and speech recognition') and used it for a phone conversation that's intended to be played for a radio show. What I got was totally unacceptable: the audio quality is horrible! There's a constant droney hiss sound over the entire track, which just ruins the interview. Unfortunately, my radio station doesn't have the capacity to do pre-recorded phone interviews. This is why I've had to go about doing it on my own. So far, what I've tried...sucks. Does anyone know how I can get broadcast quality audio by way of recorded Skype conversations?"

71 comments

  1. Really by rudy_wayne · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    "Unfortunately, my radio station doesn't have the capacity to do pre-recorded phone interviews."

    Your mother's basement is not a radio station.

    1. Re:Really by dottedlinedesign · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you're running this on a Mac, try Audio Hijack Pro. It's the best recording tool I've used for recording audio from applications. http://www.rogueamoeba.com/audiohijackpro/

    2. Re:Really by dottedlinedesign · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Tons of money for an expensive studio doesn't make a radio station either. Anything with a computer and an internet connection can be a radio station today. I also run a small radio station, although it's funded by a university, we don't have much equipment or money. We make due with what we have and that's what makes it fun.

    3. Re:Really by utopianfiat · · Score: 1

      Slashdot Is The New Google. Please search for the answer first...

      --
      +5, Truth
  2. The problem is Skype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a voip voice codec, not a broadcast quality one.

    1. Re:The problem is Skype by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the sound quality is decent until its recorded and played back.

    2. Re:The problem is Skype by CyberVenom · · Score: 1

      Can you please clarify how you are recording it now that results in a noisy clip?

  3. Identify the source of the problem before solving by gregmac · · Score: 3, Informative

    Where is the hiss coming from? Do you hear it while you're on skype, or is it only after you've recorded? Do you hear it when you record straight from your microphone, with no skype involved? What is the setup on the other end - do they have a good microphone and quiet environment to record in?

    At this point for all we know, you're trying to do this while sitting in the middle of a field on a windy day, or next to your 8-harddrive 12-fan full-tower PC.

    Figure out the exact source of the hiss, then figure out how to get rid of it.

    --
    Speak before you think
  4. Ask at Gamerswithjobs.com by Lucan+Varo · · Score: 4, Informative

    I reckon you should try asking at www.gamerswithjobs.com two guys there used to do a High Quality Pod cast Show together, via Skype.

    1. Re:Ask at Gamerswithjobs.com by ivi · · Score: 1

      Another Skype-connected pair of podcasters is Leo (from Tech.tv?) & Steve Gibson.

      [Isn't there already a podcast at ItConversations.com that addresses this topic?]

  5. two options by eobanb · · Score: 4, Informative

    Jennifer, you basically have two options. One would be to record it on your computer (which I assume is a Mac because that's what the Audio 85 is designed for) using a utility like Audio Hijack from Rogue Amoeba. The other way would be to use splitter cables for both the audio in and out and use a separate recording device, like a minidisc player or another computer, to record.

    I'm curious though, what method for recording were you using before (that resulted in the hissing)?

    --

    Take off every sig. For great justice.

    1. Re:two options by eobanb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, I just thought of another idea, which would be to just use a splitter cable and record the audio on your own machine from two sources at once (one from the USB audio in on the Plantronics set, and the other being one side of the splitter cable redirecting the audio out from Skype back into the analogue audio in on your Mac).

      --

      Take off every sig. For great justice.

    2. Re:two options by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why not do both?

      Record using Audio Hijack, but also put a splitter on the line out jack and run it into a tape recorder / DAT / MD / whatever. That way you have a backup -- if I was doing some interview over Skype that I was really concerned about getting a recording of, I'd make damn sure I was recording it in more than one way.

      (Actually I probably wouldn't use Skype in the first place for anything that important, I'd just use a copper POTS line since I think it's more reliable and there are fewer failure points ... but that's a separate issue.)

      If you grab the line out from the computer via a tape recorder, you won't get the whole conversation; at most you'll get the other party's responses at full volume and then your own at some very reduced volume (by design, the sound of your own voice from the mic is suppressed in the output to the headphones), but what they're saying is the most important thing to record. You can always re-record your questions, if you're doing a Q&A style interview. Actually this is basically SOP in the commercial radio/TV world: you concentrate on recording the guest during the actual interview, and then you go back and re-record the questions if any of them were muddled, etc. It can get into ethical gray areas at times (I've seen it go way beyond 'gray'...), but it's how it's done. When you see an interview on 60 Minutes, those shots of Dan Rather looking all interested and concerned, shown while the other guy is talking, are likely as not probably just some B-roll they took when the guest wasn't even in the room.

      Your best bet when doing an interview, just as a general technique point, is to get the guest to repeat back the question as part of their response, and put it as a statement. So instead of this:
      You: "Why do you like foo?"
      Them: "Well, because of bar and baz, of course."
      You have it go like this:
      You: "Why do you like foo?"
      Them: "I like foo, mostly because of bar and baz..."
      The advantage of the latter is that you can easily cut your question and only play their response to the audience, whether video or audio, saving a lot of time. And, in the case of the whole Skype/VOIP recording, it only requires a record of the incoming half of the call.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  6. Audio Hijack by Snuffub · · Score: 1

    If you're using a mac Audio Hijack will let you record the audio at whatever quaility you want.

    --
    --aiee
    1. Re:Audio Hijack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can also use SoundFlower to redirect the output of Skype into the recorder of your choice.

  7. Gizmo! by tb3 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Try using Gizmo instead of Skype. Gizmo has the built-in ability to record conversations to disk.

    --

    www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

  8. I know how to record by bdoojin · · Score: 1

    there is a program that records every sound, emit from your speaker, or passing through your soundcard. find a program like that one. go download.com and search "sound record"

    1. Re:I know how to record by Lazbien · · Score: 1

      The program is called "Total Recorder". It basically records all sounds played on the computer. You can save to .wav or .mp3 from it, and there is no lost quality.

  9. TX quality? good luck with normal PSTN/POTS... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Er...

    "I'm in desperate need of securing a way to record my Skype phone calls at broadcast quality."

    Which bit of Voip, on a non-Free software source, over the public Internet, with (at best) semi-pro mikes/cans doesn't work at 'broadcast quality'? So much to choose from...

    What's not to like? Remember -

    'down the line is fine, in the studio is better' - and this on Skype?

    If it's that important, look at Asterix/ VPNs/ Qos/ decent mikes/ leased lines/ non-live TX - don't blame the (crappy, closed, but still not your major issue here) software

  10. Two Soundcard Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    You need 2 soundcards.

    Soundcard 1:
      - Speaker out: Not necessary
      - Mic: Primary microphone (your best!)
      - Line in: From Soundcard 2

    Soundcard 2:
      - Front out: To Soundcard 1
      - Rear out: To Headphones
      - Mic: Secondary microphone (your cheapest!)

    To record:
    1. Setup Soundcard 2 to use 4 speaker mode to output to both Soundcard 1 and your headphones.
    2. Have Skype use Soundcard 2 to record from mic. Your chat people won't care if they have a crappy mic nearly as much as your audience.
    3. Record (using Audigy / Garage Band / etc) using "What U Hear" or "Stereo Mix" on Soundcard 1. Make sure you have Line In and Microphone unmuted in your mixer.
    4. If you need a wide range of volume control (I know I do), you can also use front/rear balance on Soundcard 2 to do it.

    For those who need the explanation:
    Soundcard 2 outputs the Skype conversation not including yourself. This goes to your headphones for talking, so you don't hear yourself. It also goes to Soundcard 1. Soundcard 1 then takes that and mixes it with your quality microphone to produce the mixed recording of both you and the people you're having a conversation with. The people you're conversing with will have a worse mic, but since it doesn't wind up in the end recording, what does it matter if they hear a little static?

    THOROUGHLY TEST YOUR VOLUMES BEFORE ACTUALLY RECORDING. Get at least 2 or 3 other people to test it! Skype will normalize the other users' voice, but you need to make sure that the master recording (your good mic + Skype) is on the same level or it will be weird and hard to fix!

    After recording:
    Use your sound editor to clear out hissing noise or apply other filters to make yourself sound better.

    In my experience, the best cheap PC microphone you can get are the Sennheiser PC series. (PC-130 or PC-150) I tried Logitech, Plantronics (the .90) and finally the Sennheisers. (no Altec Lansing) The Senns clobbered the other 2 so much, it's not even funny. Trouble is I'm not sure if they make them anymore. If you're serious though, please, get real equipment.

    1. Re:Two Soundcard Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s/audigy/audacity/

      I love Audacity. I use an Audigy 2 so I got a little mixed up there. If there is a better solution than this, or a free solution, please share it with us!

    2. Re:Two Soundcard Solution by Deathanatos · · Score: 1
      You need 2 soundcards.

      You need no such thing. There is always more than one way to solve problems, especially with computers. Here's two ideas that popped into my head with two minutes of thought:
      1) Hardware: Get a headphone splitter and a male-to-male headphone cable. (Oddly, I have the male-to-male cable, but not a splitter...) Put the splitter in the computers speaker port. Then your headphones/speakers in one split, and the male to male in the other. Plug the other end of the male-to-male into the wave in (not the mic) and record from wave in (which is really your waveout). Make your Skype call.

      I personally don't like the above since it a) involves hardware/some quality loss (depending on the hardware) and b) might cost $$$. (I'm a cheap-o. :P) The other solution: get some software that can record your local OS's waveout. Off the top of my head, I know Audacity will do this, and it's FREE. Start recording your waveout, and make your call.

      As for your low quality, I hear a lot of fuzz if I have my microphone selected in my audio settings. (I also don't have the worlds best mic.) Turning off the mic's feedback removes the fuzz, but I can't hear myself (nor would I hear myself in a recording). You can do post-record noise reduction, but that usually seems to make things sound harsh/metalicy. Finally, you're asking for broadcast quality audio from Skype? Skype works over the internet, and there will be quality loss to get the sound from point A to point B live. Let alone pray the sound should skip. I personally think you're asking too much. Professional TV channels doing phone calls aren't always perfect quality, and the satelitte broadcasts from the other side of the earth certainly aren't either. (Thought that's a bit more extreme.) If I knew I was listening to a Skype call, I could forgive a bit of quality. After all, it's just voice, not music.
    3. Re:Two Soundcard Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with skype, is even if you have your recording device set to wav or "what you hear" you will only capture one side of the conversation..

      so many people have responded to this question that haven't actually tried recording skype at 'broadcast quality'.. so many ideas.. most of them fail miserably.. I've tested them already..

      Skype DOES some strange things that prevent easy recording.. and even after getting the recording, having it sound bad.. I'm not sure what skype is doing yet.. but the "obvious" solutions absolutely fail..

      2 soundcards may work.. but I know that skype doesn't like you to change your recording device.. and it will take control and change things on you..

      The simplest solution I have found with absolute quality.. is to use a second machine.

      Line out from skype machine to line in on recording machine..
      or even mic in on recording machine..

      it works absolutely..

      other solutions have suggested running a recorded file through filters to clean them up.. the reduces quality.. and is a NON-OPTION for live broadcasts..

      2 machines works absolutely.. not just theory..

  11. Lots of tools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ok, there's a bunch of ways to do this... here's a couple easy ones:

    Skype + Podcast Recorder
    http://www.henshall.com/blog/archives/001056.html

    and for the Mac, Call Recorder For Skype
    http://www.apple.com/downloads/macosx/email_chat/c allrecorderforskype.html

  12. superior stereo sound by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    enhances the audio signal for superior stereo sound and speech recognition

    Wow, so it enhances the sound from both your left mouth and your right mouth!

    1. Re:superior stereo sound by grondu · · Score: 1

      Wow, so it enhances the sound from both your left mouth and your right mouth!

      It must have been designed to record politicians.

      --

      I'm the urban spaceman babe, but here comes the twist... I don't exist

  13. Get rid of Skype by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 2, Informative

    Skype is noisy - period. If you listen to most podcasts that try to carry on "phone interviews" over Skype, you'll soon realize that they're all noisy, too.

    Try downloading a copy of Ventrilo and running a small server and allowing your guests to log into that. It's a little less convenient than Skype, but the audio quality is limited only by the quality of your equipment.

    Some MMORPG friends and myself use Ventrilo as our voice chat method. We tried using Skype the other night and not only is it adversely affected by the presence of other net traffic and high CPU use, it was N-O-I-S-Y, and so after about 3 minutes we switched back to Ventrilo and it was blissful.

    --
    A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    1. Re:Get rid of Skype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For gaming, you also might want to check out TeamSpeak. I don't have a link but it's on google. Not sure if it's got any really unique features Ventrillo doesn't, but TeamSpeak does seem to be a standard of sorts for gaming voice chat.

      Just a thought ;)

    2. Re:Get rid of Skype by Cecil · · Score: 1

      Well, compared to Ventrillo, it has a missing-in-action official Mac client, for one thing. I don't know if I'd consider that a feature, though.

      Also TeamSpeak is not nearly as popular as Ventrillo in World of Warcraft, or at least it wasn't when I played. Probably because of the Mac issue. A good number of people play WoW on Mac, you'd be surprised.

    3. Re:Get rid of Skype by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't. WOW is an addictive game. Mac users who don't boot into Windows have very few gaming choices. That's a bad combination likely to lead to massive Mac WOW addicts.

  14. Record from the wave-out. by Jacques+Chester · · Score: 2, Informative

    On Windows one can use the Sound Recorder applet that ships with Windows to record anything coming off the system-wide Wave Out device. On Mac OS X one can download programs that do similar. On Linux there're probably two or three godzillion programs for this purpose.

    Although you are recording for a radio show, others ought to bear in mind the laws related to recording such conversations. In Australia at least it is an offence under the Telecommunications Act 1997 (Cth) to record a conversation conducted via telecommunications devices (including VOIP) without all parties giving their express or implied consent (s 289, 290). Check with your lawyer (since IANAL) to be sure of your position.

    Oh, unless you're the NSA. In which case, do what you like, the judge won't care.

    --

    Classical Liberalism: All your base are belong to you.

    1. Re:Record from the wave-out. by Bob+Cat+-+NYMPHS · · Score: 1

      one can use the Sound Recorder applet that ships with Windows to record anything coming off the system-wide Wave Out device

      How?

    2. Re:Record from the wave-out. by Baricom · · Score: 1
      These are the steps for Windows XP. The actual process varies slightly for different operating systems and different sound card drivers.
      1. Open Volume Control. (It's usually in Start - All Programs - Accessories - Entertainment; alternatively, Start - Run - sndvol32)
      2. In the Options menu, click Properties.
      3. Click the Recording radio button.
      4. Make sure "Wave Out Mix", or your equivalent, is checked.
      5. Click OK.
      6. Make sure the appropriate channel's Select check box is checked.
      Now, most apps that try to accept sound will do so from the output of your sound card.
    3. Re:Record from the wave-out. by Bob+Cat+-+NYMPHS · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I figured it out myself before your post, but others might be helped. OBVIOUSLY the setting to RECORD SETTINGS starts with a trip to VOLUME CONTROL. ;)

      I just installed "FREE Hi-Q Recorder Version 1.9" http://www.roemersoftware.com/free-sound-recorder. html and it's very nice, timed recordings and other goodies, and no 60 second limit of Sound Recorder.

    4. Re:Record from the wave-out. by exaudio · · Score: 1

      It's possible to record anything coming off the system-wide wave out device using the excellent open source and cross-platform Audacity http://audacity.sourceforge.net/. Audacity will also allow you to edit the recording—including removal of noise.

      --
      "When you see one of your old ones trip and fall down, do you not point and laugh, just as we on Earth do?"

  15. Virtual Audio Cable by Uberwangen · · Score: 1

    You need to get Virtual Audio Cable (http://nrcde.ru/music/software/eng/vac.html). This emulates a virtual sound card that will let you record Skype calls.

  16. Virtual Audio Cable by deranged+unix+nut · · Score: 1

    I have had decent results with a little utility called Virtual Audio Cable.

    I haven't used it specifically with Skype, but I have used it with half a dozen other audio applications.

  17. Noise Reduction by alazor · · Score: 1

    You could use the noise reduction filter in something like Audacity. You highlight a section of the file that has no talking to take a profile of the noise. Then apply to the entire file.

    --

    -
    Systems Administrators: We read the manual so you don't have to.
    1. Re:Noise Reduction by megla · · Score: 1

      I came here to post exactly that.
      It's the most obvious solution without spending hundreds (or thousands) on fancy equipment. With the best will in the world no equipment is going to magically make VoIP anywhere near FM quality broadcast material - all you can do is filter out some of the crap.

      As the parent suggested, get an audio processing package, grab the noise profile, and strip it. You'd be surprised how good the results can be.

  18. M-Audio baby by nnet · · Score: 1

    I use an M-Audio Delta 44, and can broadcast Skype calls live to an Icecast stream server, works excellently. This uses the Winamp Oddcast v.3 dsp plugin. The plugin uses the cards mixer out, and since the card has 4 channel simultaneous input, I can play music AND talk on Skype when necessary. Also, Winamps disk writer plugin can write wav files of the calls to disk.

  19. Audacity has decent noise removal by brett42 · · Score: 1

    Audacity has a noise removal effect that was able to remove a really horrible hiss after a hybrid decided to stop behaving before an interview (shameless plug for University Radio Hilo). It takes a sample segment that should be the noise by itself and can then be applied to the rest of the file. It won't improve the source quality, but it might help with the hiss, especially if it's really constant.

  20. Recording...and playback by bayankaran · · Score: 1

    What I got was totally unacceptable: the audio quality is horrible! There's a constant droney hiss sound over the entire track, which just ruins the interview.

    If your broadcast is interesting and insightful, the poor audio quality will not prevent you from getting early converters.

    --
    Tat Tvam Asi
    1. Re:Recording...and playback by Tweekster · · Score: 1

      bzzt wrong answer.

      i dont care how insightful and intelligent a show is, presentation still counts.

      --
      The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
  21. microphone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the sound could be coming from your microphone. the #1 best thing you can do for yourself is buy a USB microphone, it will eliminate virtually all mic noise

  22. High quality Skype recording (Windows only) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Skylook: http://www.skylook.biz/
    Unlike other techniques such as Virtual Audio Cables, records the direct digital sound stream.
    New beta version (1.6) records directly to PCM Wave files (one channel for each side of the call) - contact them for a copy of the beta (it's currently private).

  23. I am the admin for a live online station... by shadwwulf · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...and in my opinion, the first thing you need to do is drop Skype and get something more robust such as Asterisk.

    I am the system admin for Wide Awakes Radio and we use a combination of Asterisk and Icecast to make our streams work. Asterisk is capable of DIRECTLY sourcing an Icecast server so it's an all digital audio path.

    I highly recomend you check it out.

    MTW

    1. Re:I am the admin for a live online station... by MythoBeast · · Score: 1

      While this is decent advice for streaming and whatnot, what precisely does this have to do with recording long-distance interviews? Are you suggesting that she ask her guests to set up an astrisk telephony environment in their home or place of business? I can see how that might be an improvement, but it's a bit much. Even if she sets up astrisk in her home and the guest calls in over the POTS, it still doesn't answer her question about how to record it.

      --
      Wake up - the future is arriving faster than you think.
    2. Re:I am the admin for a live online station... by shadwwulf · · Score: 1

      To answer your question, Asterisk is capable of using either hard (physical) phones or soft phones, much like the Skype client. There is also the option of bridging the POTS lines in via a FXS/FXO interface or getting a phone number through a VOIP provider and peering it into Asterisk.

      As far as recording it, once you have Asterisk setup, it is highly trival to record a conversation. As I mentioned in my previous post, streaming to an Icecast server is directly supported for live broadcasting and a multitude of streaming recording programs (StreamRipper being one of the best) out there that can record the stream 'off the air'.

      MTW

  24. Hissing in audio can be controlled by rocjoe71 · · Score: 1
    Having many failed recordings from my garage-band days I'd suggest that the hissing is a symptom of an audio source that has a very weak signal/low volume and a recording device that's got its gain turned very high.

    I don't know Mac so good but I'd look for a master audio applet, and check if the volume control for your WAV output is set too low, and check the microphone applet's volume control for being set very high.

    --
    Height: 38U, Weight: 0 Newtons, Eyes: #0000FF, OS: Gray Matter 1.0 (Alpha)
  25. Skype-rec by Kraken137 · · Score: 1

    skype-rec works great.

    1. Re:skype-rec by Kraken137 · · Score: 1
      I don't know how high quality this is going to be for you, but it may be a start. http://sf.net/projects/skype-rec/ It will record the calls for you, and can then convert them to mp3 or anything else sox can handle.
      It actually uses sox for mixing both ends of the conversation into one wav file, and then uses lame or oggenc to convert to the final result (or, you can not encode it at all, and leave it as a mixed wav). You can give it arbitrary options to lame or oggenc.
  26. skype-rec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know how high quality this is going to be for you, but it may be a start. http://sf.net/projects/skype-rec/ It will record the calls for you, and can then convert them to mp3 or anything else sox can handle.

  27. Join AIR by rueger · · Score: 1

    Jennifer,

    Over the last two years many of the members of the Association of Independents in Radio (AIR) have been exploring options which would allow them to use VOIP for broadcast purposes. Skype is among the packages that some of our members have worked with.

    If you are a broadcast journalist, especially with an interest in Public broadcasting, you should consider an AIR membership which will allow you to join our superb member e-mail list and access our mentorship program.

    Seriously, if you need broadcast advice, talk to broadcasters, not computer geeks.

    1. Re:Join AIR by smvp6459 · · Score: 1

      Be sure to contact him and join AIR if you need spam/condescension. No doubt AIR will solve all your hiss problems...you're probably not dealing with a hardware/software problem that people who regularly do sound engineering on computers would be able to help you with anyways. Since you're a student you can go pay AIR $35 to help you with "broadcast" advice; like how far you need to stick the microphone up your ass.

  28. Link to Virtual Audio Cable by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1
  29. Don't use Skype by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

    Weigh the hassle, and messing around with hardware and software to fix Skype against just making an ordinary phone call over a normal wire.

  30. Absolute Solution - Highest Quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem with skype, is even if you have your recording device set to wav or "what you hear" you will only capture one side of the conversation..

    so many people have responded to this question that haven't actually tried recording skype at 'broadcast quality'.. so many ideas.. most of them fail miserably.. I've tested them already..

    Skype DOES some strange things that prevent easy recording.. and even after getting the recording, having it sound bad.. I'm not sure what skype is doing yet.. but the "obvious" solutions absolutely fail..

    2 soundcards may work.. but I know that skype doesn't like you to change your recording device.. and it will take control and change things on you..

    The simplest solution I have found with absolute quality.. is to use a second machine.

    Line out from skype machine to line in on recording machine..
    or even mic in on recording machine..

    it works absolutely..

    other solutions have suggested running a recorded file through filters to clean them up.. the reduces quality.. and is a NON-OPTION for live broadcasts..

    2 machines works absolutely.. not just theory..

  31. What platform? by munpfazy · · Score: 1

    Tip for *ask slashdot* posters - if you're going to submit a question of the form "how can I make my computer do X," you're much more likely to get useful answer if you tell us what kind of computer your using. If you're going to pose a question of the form "why doesn't what I'm doing work?" then you better give us a reasonably complete description of what you're doing.

    If the quality you get through your headphones from both sides of the conversation is good enough, then messing around with hardware solutions is just silly - you just need to convince your software to dump your audio to a file. How exactly you do that will depend on your operating system, but it shouldn't be hard. (I could name several trivial ways to do it in linux - will that help you? We have no way of knowing.) If the remote audio isn't good enough, then you'll have to use something other than skype. See other posts for suggestions. If it isn't good enough on the local side, then the problem hasn't got anything to do with skype - you need to figure out what's wrong with your hardware.

    Also, if you're in a genuine recording studio, you might want to think twice about starting out with a gizmo that has built-in DSP. Depending on the purpose for which it was intended, you may end up doing a lot of work trying to *undo* the artifacts the device injects into your audio. Using even a very modest studio mic and preamp going into a sound card will probably give you far better results.

    1. Re:What platform? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least it lets the OP dodge silly blanket-fix suggestions like 'Buy a Mac!' or 'Install Linux!' - for all they know, the OP is using that platform already.

  32. Re:Identify the source of the problem before solvi by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

    I've heard a couple of people whinge about the sound quality on Plantronics headsets, so that might be somewhere to start looking for that hiss. I haven't tried that headset, but I use a Logitech headset for Skype and it seems to work well - I certainly get no problems with noise or hiss.

    As for the poster's insistence on "broadcast quality", that's another thing altogether, since it means different things to different people. One shouldn't expect too much from a phone conversation by comparison with a recording made in a proper studio, after all. However, having said that, he might be able to filter the noise out of his recording by using Audacity.

  33. Options and an example... by soulhuntre · · Score: 1

    You have many software options aside from the hardware ones.

    For our podcast we decided to use Hot Recorder because it "just works",. It also nicely puts my voice on one channel and all the other Skype users on another. This makes later mixing easy if there is a volume mismatch. You can also just use the mix output on your soundcard but honestly its so much easier to use a tool thats made for this its silly to mess with it. For the $29 or so just do it.

    If you want to hear an example the latest podcast on "Power In Practice" (warning,. nsfw audio) was recorded this way via a Skype 3 person conference call.

    --
    --> Fight tyranny and repression.... read /. at -1!
  34. did you try Pamela? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    some key vords for googling:
    Pamcasting-ReadMe File
    for Pamela for Skype - Professional Version 1.3

  35. a wideband handset? by avi33 · · Score: 1

    Not to troll or astroturf...in full disclosure, I work at USR, but:

    USRobotics has a new wideband handset that's Skype certified. I don't know if it will fit the bill for your needs, you might be able to mic up a hi-fi handset and get better results than digitally capturing crufty audio. These wav files reflect the difference between the lo-fi and hi-fi quality.

    Shameless product plug: USRobotics USB Internet Mini Phone

  36. Pre-production, post production by ursabear · · Score: 1

    I'll defer the Skype aspects of the question to the Skype-knowledgeable.

    It is a smart idea to run recordings through something that gives good signal strength. (I'm sure your headset is great for real-time listenting, but voice mics are significantly better at recording good sound and ignoring noise.) If possible, using a true voice microphone (like a Shure SM58 (industry standard), or the Nady CM-100 (excellent value for the price))) will genuinely and dramatically improve the sound of voice. Also, using a microphone pre-amp will actually let you have more flexibility of tone and sound warmth. (I'm not associated with, nor do I have ties with Musician's Friend. I'm just using their links because they have good write-ups, good pictures, and the clientele usually writes good reviews. I also am not an affiliate.)

    If you have recordings that have ambient noise, this is caused by a myriad of things. One of these is device self-noise, another is room noise, and another is microphonics, and another is line/proximity noise. If you spend a few minutes reading about these things, and get familiar with noise factors, your recording capability will improve dramatically - even with a small investment of time.

    An excellent and easy-to-use sound cleaning (post-production) tool to remove tons of noises from your vocal recordings is Sound Soap. I can't begin to sing enough praises to this software for audio clean up. It has drastically improved many impromptu, non-studio recordings. The basic version of SoundSoap is great for the budget-minded or for the person who doesn't want to have huge, variable control of channels and frequencies for noise reduction (means: it's a great easy-button solution). The more advanced SoundSoap and suite is good for professional applications.

  37. Switch to SIP by Jon-o · · Score: 1

    I was looking to do something similar - I ended up just ditching Skype, because the closed nature of it meant it just didn't have the flexibility to do what I wanted. Now I'm using SIP calls, with various programs on various platforms, using a server running asterisk to do the recording (and a huge pile of other things too). When you switch to an Open platform, it's much easier to do things like this.

    If you *just* need to record, and don't have any experience with the other tools, it might be a lot simpler to just use one of the other suggestions, but anything going through skype is going to be much more limited than a Free solution.

    One other thing to keep in mind is that phone networks just have cruddy sound - I'm sure you know that, but anything on a phone network isn't going to even approach CD quality or anything. This has nothing to do with VoIP, but is the nature of the telephone network that the VoIP service connects to.

    (of course, calls going directly over VoIP, with no PSTN termination can potentially get much better quality by using codecs like speex, but that won't help if you need to talk to a landline).

  38. Soundcard direct by phorm · · Score: 1

    Assuming that the story poster is connecting right through the PC without some weird PC-to-phone stuff (I'm not sure what the plantronics headset looks like), why not just get a soundcard that allows direct audio capture. I know my SBLive card has a "what u hear" option in the recording area, which basically lets you capture all the audio going through the card. This should give the same quality as whatever you're hearing during the actual conversation.

  39. You have options... by MythoBeast · · Score: 1

    I produce a podcast called Intellectual Icebergs, and have gone through exactly what you're talking about. We've performed Skype interviews across the country and across the Atlantic, and have run into the quality issues that you describe. We purchased Pamela which pulls the audio straight from Skype's audio stream, so you don't have any issues with format conversion. Our guests have been at least smart enough to set Skype up on their personal computers, and used a variety of microphone setups.

    Here's the caveats to this setup.

    * You have to do a few trial calls to see how their levels are set. Something that sounds perfectly good in your headset may be stored far too quite in the audio files, and the only way to check them is to stop the call and listen to the file.

    * Skype calls being stored by Pamela tend to cause severe jitter after about 20-30 minutes into the call. This can be fixed by hanging up and starting a new call.

    * The resulting sound quality is still somewhat questionable, largely due to jitter. I wish there was a program that would record the voice on one side, send it over, and store it on both sides in original recorded form regardless of how late the data packets showed up, but that's not how it works.

    * People really don't know how to talk into a microphone that's sitting on a desk. They tend to lean forward when they start a sentence, then lean back and talk more quietly (both and at the same time) as their sentences complete. This results in some highly varied volume levels in the resulting recording. Strongly suggest to the guest that they use a headset mike to at least limit the distance to the mouth problem.

    The general consensus of the podcasters that I've talked to is that it's just not worth it. If you want to do an interview over Skype, then do this instead.

    * Have both people run Audacity instead of Skype
    * record both sides of the conversation into their own mono track while talking on a normal phone connection
    * Have your guest email their side of the conversation to you
    * Splice it together in Audacity.

    The two tracks can be lined up fairly easily if you have the guest put the earpiece of their telephone to their microphone while you speak the word "beep" into your handset and your microphone at the same time.

    I hope this helps. If you want further suggestions, I'm reachable from the email addresses found on www.intellectualicebergs.org.

    -Robert Rapplean

    --
    Wake up - the future is arriving faster than you think.