Slashdot Mirror
Children Arrested, DNA Tested for Playing in a Tree?
skelator2821 wrote in with another account of a police action gone way overboard. From the article: "To the 12-year-old friends planning to build themselves a den, the cherry tree seemed an inviting source of material. But the afternoon adventure turned into a frightening ordeal for Sam Cannon, Amy Higgins and Katy Smith after they climbed into the 20ft tree - then found themselves hauled into a police station and locked into cells for up to two hours." skelator2821's basic question in all of this: "What is this World coming to? Do you think they went to far?" Well? Do you?
and Yes
You go out and buy a tree, plant it in your yard, watch it grow and make things beautiful for many (this was a 20-ft tree) many years, and see if you don't get upset when three twelve year olds come by and start ripping off branches. Trees take time to grow and I can understand if people get upset when they are damanged.
Insert "loggers" for "children" and "forest" for "cherry tree" and see how the public opinion would turn. Sure, more trees are harmed but many more human lives are harmed as well. Seems to have a few things in common.
And police die everyday to protect people so these people can be called corrupt pigs.
</rant>I'm not trying to make people mad; I'm trying to make people think!
>Forgive the analogy, but your position is a little like implying that paedophilia
>is a "healthy counterpoint" to violent child-abuse, since one is motivated by
>exessive anger and the other by excessive "love".
Thats a crap analogy. Everyone has opinions and papers express those opinions. Very very few people are paedophiles. Theres no such thing as unbiased reporting because by the nature of the job reporters give a subjective view of what they're reporting on. Therefor all points of view are required to give a full spectrum of opinion for people (if they wished) to evaluate.