Holographic Storage a Reality in 2006?

vitaly.friedman writes "What do you do when you're getting close to the limits of 2-dimensional optical technology? Well, how many dimensions do we have to work with?" From the Ars Technica article: "How much greater data density? In the Hitachi Maxell device, a single disc about 1 cm larger in diameter than a CD will buy you 300GB. By way of contrast, HD-DVD currently offers a maximum of 30GB on a 2-layer disc, and Blu-ray tops out at 50GB. Although upgrades are in the works that promise to increase the capacity of both of those formats, even the most pie-in-the-sky predictions fall short of what is planned for merely the first commercial generation of holographic storage. Future plans for that medium include boosting the capacity to 800GB in two years, and 1.6TB per disc by 2010."

Comments

1 CM larger?

[insanarchist]

Wouldn't it make sense to keep it the same size so they can still use existing cd cases & so we don't have to buy new CD racks/holders? I mean, what's an extra ~50GB between friends? :p

Re:1 CM larger?

[julesh]

Not to mention the fact that one of the reasons CDs/DVDs are the size they are (12cm) because it's the widest that can fit in a standard 5 1/4" drive bay (about 14.5cm) with enough space left at the sides for a tray open/close mechanism. These new disks are the same size as a 5 1/4" disk (13cm), which leaves just enough space at the side for guide mechanisms. So we're going to have to push these disks in like floppies. Hope they're not susceptible to scratching.

now one scratch will cost you

[Anonymous Coward]

your entire pr0n collection

Re:I don't want a disc 1cm larger than a CD!!!

[Anonymous Coward]

Did you read the article?

It says at the end that the consumer version they are looking at would most likely be the size of a postage stamp and have 75G to 100G of storage.

Well, how many dimensions do we have to work with?

[AWeishaupt]

Give it a few years... 11 dimensional storage. Oh yes.

DIsc?

[JanneM]

I don't want a disc. I want something small we're able to use in smaller portable devices, something where the medium doesn't need to move.

I want a cube. I want a cube about 1cm^3 in size. If that's too thick, a 2x1x0.5cm sliver is OK. Preferably translucent moss green, but other colors are of course also acceptable as long as they've appeared for futuristic storage in at least one reputable sci-fi movie.

To be slightly serious, there's non-aesthetic reasons for this as well. With optical storage it's much faster to move the beam around than the media, and with rotating media your seek and read times alike are limited by the rotation speed.

But mostly I just want a translucent green block because it's cool. Bonus points if there's a small LED inside making it glow.

Re:DIsc?

[Finn61]

Maybe this IBM Millipede thing would float your boat. It uses nanotechnology to push indentations into a plastic card.

I think they're working on the translucent green part now.

Still Disc

[Doc Ruby]

Why do these discs have to rotate? How about rotating just the spindle, inside the hub, directing the read/write laser? The reference laser for interference can shine from a fiber around the circumference, or from one side or the other. Rotating the disc is a waste of energy and time.

Re:I don't want a disc 1cm larger than a CD!!!

[hummassa]

Did you read the article?

You must be new here :-)