Slashdot Mirror
Apple's Growing Pains
Tyler Too writes "Is Apple having an unusually large number of quality control problems since its switch to Intel? Ars Technica runs down the litany of problems MacBook and MacBook Pro users have experienced since their launch. From the article: 'Is Apple's quality control slipping through the cracks with this Intel transition? Given the volume of available evidence that has appeared in such a short timeframe, it's simply impossible to say that Apple isn't having problems.'"
I do not think it is as much as an issue that Apples Quality Dropped but just the fact their entire Macintosh Product Line is now Generation 1, systems. Normally Apple Spaces out their system releases and refresh their product line in 3 year cycles. This time they did major changes internally to their entire product line. Normally the rule of thumb is to wait for Gen 2 but with all their products Gen 1 there is little to choose from. The MacBook Pros seem to get some minor fixes.
If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
Is Apple having an unusually large number of quality control problems since its switch to Intel?
Sheesh. EVERY product of Apple's has unusually large number of quality control problems. From iPod batteries, to laptop fires, to cracks in the cubes, to motherboard defects, on and on and on.
Seriously, where does this idea come from that Apple never has problems? They have constant hardware problems.
Is it that there are so many problems per capita, or just that the company is so high-profile?
To me, it's arguable that these are no different than the other problems Dell or HP/Compaq have, there's just a somewhat higher profile when it's a Mac. Granted, no transition is seamless, and I know that there are a good number of people that are having issues, but I haven't spoken or interacted with anyone who's said that any issues they are having would make them rethink their buying decision.
... then they knock you down. Dvorakitis is spreading IMHO - Ars will get a lot of page-hits (and hence ad revenue) from people wanting to read about this. Sure, Apple have had problems, but not as many as Dell, and I doubt Dell are any worse than any other random manufacturer.
:-)
Apple actually have it worse than most - to an extent they sell on style, and "shiny goodness". People are *more* vocal when something goes wrong with something they like, rather than some random notebook work gave them to use at the weekend... I'm actually surprised the vocal minority haven't been louder. Perhaps Apple ought to release the figures for their return/repair rates - I seem to recall someone saying they were well below industry norms - even *with* all this hullaballoo.
Can I also just say I bought an MBP pro, and it hasn't exhibited any of the problems mentioned in the article... because normally you never hear about it when it works fine - only when it's broken in some way. As a software developer, I knew all about that
Simon
Physicists get Hadrons!
Unlike Microsoft, which has a lot of customers that are concerned about legacy application support, Apple has a customer-base that generally uses newer software, and tends to be more forgiving to these kinds of problems. OS X updates have frequently broken all kinds of old applications, but their market share continues to go up.
By now most folks know that purchasing Revision A hardware is a gamble - to be honest I think that some of the fun that comes with living on the "bleeding edge" is the knowledge that if things work, you've really survived something.
The biggest problem I have with the apple transition was that they had a 32-bit intel architecture that now must be supported for years to come. I honestly am not quite sure why they did that, as there will undoubtably be some support headaches for apple developers for the next few years.
It's Apple's supplier that's having the quality problem's. Their CM (Contract Manufacturer) is like all other companies in the EMS industry and suffering under the demand for price concessions and supply fullfilment. Like all OEM's Apple wants their product now, perfectly built and cheap, and like all OEMs doesn't realise they can only have 2 of the proverbial 3.
Working in the industry I can tell you that as the OEM demands you meet shipments, units that should stay behind for debug or rework tend to float out the door to meet revenue/demand numbers. Apple's resurgence in popularity probably has everyone in the supply line getting every possible unit out the door to meet demand.
What stupid IT manager figured to get Generation 1 Macs for your business. Any IT manager who knows anything it is to be more conservative and wait for Gen 2.
If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
Yeah, as if Dell doesn't have massive quality problems. Several Optiplex models have horrendously bad motherboards that fail within 2-3 years, Dell's warranty support is a real pain to deal with, and they never acknowledge quality problems. At least with Apple, you don't have to speak to Indian tech support who really doesn't give a shit.
*shrug*
Apple is the most closely scrutinized hardware company *ever*. If my MacBook appears to make an elusive noise beyond the hearing range of the average dog, it makes the cover of Time. If my Packard Bell shitbox releases its magic smoke and dies, it doesn't even get on Digg.
It's just the story of the month, and people will get bored of it eventually. The alternative conspiracy theory, of course, is that it could keep being fuelled by Microsoft's astroturf budget.
"Be nice, veer left, and never stop thinking" Iain Banks - Walking On Glass
It's more apt to compare Apple systems to those low-to-midrange workstations from Sun and IBM.
Price or performance?
paintball
(See subject.)
There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
No, these are not growing pains or any other phenomenon with a common unusual cause. They are all unrelated QC issues that could've happened and do happen with all products of such complexity. The only correlation due to a common cause related to Apple the company is the fact that these are all first generation products with radically new engineering compared to the old Macs all released within a short period of time.
Most of this apparent correlation is due to the fact that the Intel macs are getting unprecidented attention. The attention and scrutany is also amplified by the fact that forums and things like flickr are more popular now then they were during the previous launches of Apple's producs such as the original iMac and iBook lines - both of which had their share of QC issues. I would argue that Apple's Intel Macs have received orders of magnitude more publicity and attention then any of their previous products, as well as their competitors. I mean when was the last time a Dell product was featured in /. WITHOUT it having to first explode or something...
So, no, ars technica - your article is a non-story about a non-issue.
PS: Not that this is suprising - /. has been featuring many of these lately...
www.tribalnetworks.org - helping tribal people around the world to own their own means of high-tech communications
As a designer I tend to question Apple's practice of prototyping and testing hardware and software.
It would seem that time constraints and secrecy overshadow the cycle of design > prototype > data collection > design (repeat).
I can't imagine they're able to get enough real world data under such a vale of secrecy. They seem to test products in the market place... which means rev 1 Apple products are almost always questionable.
"Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
Here's my experience with my MacBook...
I bought it.
It works.
I know that it's in vogue to criticize Apple now, and I know that Apple is high profile, but their QC issues are no different than they've usually been. The first-gen products have a higher lemon rate.
Woohoo.
Anyone remember the first-gen TiBooks, where the antenna design sucked so much that getting beyond 50 feet of Airport range was a miracle? Or the cubes with the power button that was so sensitive it would sometimes trigger itself? Or the cube's cracking acryllic? What about the PB 5200's Lion battey?
Moral of the story: first-gen products have high failure rates. Courtesy of the architecture switch, most of Apple's product line is first-gen. Therefore, much of Apple's product line has a higher than normal failure rate. Apple's not suffering, they're not dying, and they haven't decided that "Hey, why don't we take our reputation for quality, and flush it down the toilet? Let's shaft all our customers just because!" To Dvorak, and indeed pundits all around the world (like the author of TFA, for example) I have this message: grow the fuck up.
The real litigious bastards...
I'm not saying that all the problems people are having are made up, but I'm just not seeing any of them. Then again, I custom ordered my MacBook from Apple and I did not buy one from the Apple Store.
:-)
;-)
I bought mine at the beginning of July. It arrived on the 17th. I have been using it non-stop since then for software development, and I haven't seen any problems at all. No yellowing. No heat issues. No scuff issues (although I'm not tossing it in a backpack--I have a satchel I use with all sorts of nice padding). It works fine. As a matter of fact, I love it
Does it run pretty hot? Sure. But no worse than my PowerBook (same really). Battery life? Same. Screen? Soooooo much more beautiful
My understanding from talking with one of the store guys is that they had some assembly issues at first with the MBPs in terms of heat. They were apparently leaving the plastic on the parts even when they were put together--thus blocking the vents. But that was apparently resolved.
I have seen scuttle butt around about not getting machines direct from the Apple store and getting a custom build through Apple. The idea is that they have to assemble one fresh from China for you (well, that is where they ship from--I can dig up my shipping label from around here somewhere). I guess the thinking is that there were some kinks in the assembly line/supply chain, and that "fresh" systems don't suffer as bad.
In my case, that seems to have worked--no issues here.
"Doubt your doubts and believe your beliefs." -- Switchfoot, Ode to Chin
The key here is to lower your expectations. (well, not you, but the public).
I've been a tech for years now, and for a while I was a ground-pounder (on-site service). No matter where I was, home, office, or elsewise - people ask "What's a good computer to buy?". Appearantly, when you do it for a living, people value your opinion. Even though the shop I worked for sold (relatively solid) computers, I always gave the same answer:
"Figure out what features you want, then pay the lowest price you can to get those features. Plan for the computer to have problems and don't expect any service from the retailer or the manufacturer for free."
That's it.
It saves you from paying too much or too little, and it saves you from the shock of "it's going to cost how much?!? What about the warranty?!?".
If your feature list is "I need to get onto the interweb tubes", then.. pretty much anything will work for you. If your wishlist is a Micro-UXGA TFT 1900x1200 screen and a Centrino setup, then look at those models. If your wishlist is "looks good on the coffee table and is powerful and easy to use", then there's nothing wrong with buying a Mac.
But, expect it to break, and expect to pay someone to fix it. Software, hardware, whatever. If it never has a problem, congratulations you won the lottery. They're all made from the same parts, folks*
~Wx
*the SOLE exception to this is computers with those magical letters on them - IBM. Granted, one: I haven't worked with post-Lenovo IBM, and two: IBM sells a lot less computers than dell and they cost a lot, but in my time of hands on groundpounder tech work, I never once saw an IBM thinkpad with a hardware problem. I'm sure they existed, but... those computers just wouldn't give up.
sig?
This is probably one reason they upgrade so much, although in reality it is either to show off, and/or just part of their addiction.
More on topic, I have a 2Ghz White Macbook and it is the best machine I have ever owned. In the last month the only issue I had was waiting for my 2GB of RAM to arrive and dealing with slowness. After the upgrade all has been good. Technically I may have the moo, very occasionally, typically on battery, I hear the fans pulsing. It is very quiet though, and I would never try to get the machine replaced just for that.
I also have two friends with Macbook Pros, one has had his for several months, and the other for less than two months. The later is a switcher and bought it on my recommendation, so if anything goes wrong I'm certain to hear about it. So far neither has had any serious issue other than installing old software drivers or startup apps that caused lag or flakiness in specific applications.
From what I can tell, having researched the Macbook for a while before i bought mine, and reading up everything I can, the Macbook and Macbook Pro both have failure/defect rates similar or lower than other companies, and even other Apple products historically. The issue at hand has more to do with the vocal users, and a lot more switchers at this time who are also vocal as to their disappointment. For some reference, Macintouch recently did a survey on these machines. Just take that info with a grain of salt, as the vocal elite and a number of vocal switchers are involved, and many people not having any problems have a tendency not to respond to these sorts of things.
Shawn's Tech Articles
I have to second that.
The Agency I work for bought 100 Dells in 2000 - all GX-240s. Before the first year was over, we had the following failures:
7 failed HDD
2 failed mobo
2 failed power supplies
2 failed cd readers
2 failed floppies
over 5 failed mice
In all, over a 20% failure rate in the first 12 months. Of course, Dell replaced everything with overnight replacements, but putting up with it all was a pain, especially the failed hard drives. We lost a lot of data, since this was a transition period where we still had a lot of people using the HD for storage of data instead of the newer server storage online. Things settled down a bit after the first year, but we still saw failures in those machines.
Now, I work for a different org within that same Agency, and now we use Thinkpads (IBM outbid Dell!). In the last year, in a group with fewer than 30 Thinkpads, we have seen over 5 Thinkpads, either T-23s or T-30s, experience sudden catastrophic hard drive failure. One lost the mobo and had to be sent back twice before it came back fixed. Took over a month!
I think that a lot of what we're seeing is that Apple gets a lot of press because of the Apple slogan It Just Works. Writing about Apple failures sure gets the attention, doesn't it?
I mean, jeeze! If you're gonna claim that kind of thing, people are certainly going to notice when they don't...
"Money is truthful. If a man speaks of his honor, make him pay cash." Notebooks of Lazarus Long, Robert A. Heinlein