Slashdot Mirror


Defeating Google's Perpetual Search Logging

heretic108 writes "Google's policy of storing everyone's search histories forever is causing concern amongst many, especially since Google stores a cookie on everyone's PC expiring in 2038. But at least one user is fighting back. His short and simple guide tells you how to set up any decent web browser so that it routes Google requests through an anonymous proxy, while sending everything else direct to the net for full-speed surfing. Follow these steps and get Google's nose out of your business once and for all."

51 of 251 comments (clear)

  1. Hilarious guide, using Tor.... by portmapper · · Score: 2, Interesting

    but still accepts cookies from Google, even if it just for the session.
    Besides, not one word about JavaScript......

    1. Re:Hilarious guide, using Tor.... by nmb3000 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not only that, but I find it just so picturesquely Slashdot that the summary says "tells you how to set up any decent web browser" and the actual article explicitly only works with Firefox. IE/Safari/Opera users just laugh at the submitter and "editors".

      That, and who thinks they are fooling anyone by doing this? If you have a Google account for other services like Gmail, then you must allow Google to set a cookie, and you are still identifying yourself. You're also giving up the ability to customize your searches (safesearch, number of results, languages, etc).

      Depending on how your cookie settings are set, the only thing Google will know is what you're searching for. If you're really that worried about it, just delete the Google cookie when you're finished for the day/week/month. If all you use is Search, then just blacklist google.com in your cookie settings. That, or you can send all your traffic through an anonymous third party who has no accountability. If you're concerned about absolute privacy with regards to Google, it seems unlikely you'd give the same information to some anonymous others.

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    2. Re:Hilarious guide, using Tor.... by Stellian · · Score: 2, Informative
      That, and who thinks they are fooling anyone by doing this? If you have a Google account for other services like Gmail, then you must allow Google to set a cookie, and you are still identifying yourself. You're also giving up the ability to customize your searches (safesearch, number of results, languages, etc).
      This can be circumvented as follows:
      It's true that if you don't accept a cookie from google.com, you can't login into Gmail. I've solved the issue by allowing google.com's cookie, but using google.ro for searching (with cookies turned off, you can block them for any domain you want both in IE and Firefox). So Google cannot associate my searches with my Gmail account. In fact, all my searches are only connected with my IP address, and this can be circumvented as described in TFA. Of course, when Google has all your mail, any search data is superfluous, so I only use Gmail for non-incriminating stuff.
      The method for saving preferences (disabling safe search) comes from paranoid Daniel "tinfoil hat" Brandt. Basicaly, you need to append a few parameters like "safe=off" to your search page (home page, in my case).
    3. Re:Hilarious guide, using Tor.... by NitsujTPU · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Another amazing but true fact... That doesn't negate the GPs point. If you want to use their services and use them by their rules, you can, on the other hand, you can opt out of using them. I'm fairly sure that that was covered by the original statement.

    4. Re:Hilarious guide, using Tor.... by desertrat_it · · Score: 3, Informative

      I use Google, I use Gmail, I use Firefox, I only ever allow Google to set session cookies. That way I simply close my web browser and my searches become just so much noise. Why is everyone making such a big fuss about this? Session cookies are the answer :)

    5. Re:Hilarious guide, using Tor.... by B'Trey · · Score: 2, Informative

      Or use GMail's pop3 capabilities. You can still check your mail via a browser from any other location, and at home (or work, if you prefer) you use a standard email client (Outlook, Outlook Express, Thunderbird, Evolution, KMail, pine, etc.) to get to your GMail.

      --

      "The legitimate powers of government extend only to such acts as are injurious to others." Thomas Jefferson.

  2. Pffff... by Five+Bucks! · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Using their service gives them the right to log your search... it's in their business model. Quite simply, if you want Google to keep their nose out of your business, you should keep your nose out of theirs.

    Use MSN Search instead! Ha!

    --
    52 52'23" W 47 32'07" N
    1. Re:Pffff... by jasen666 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Troll? My ass.
      He's absolutely right. Do you honestly beleive that other search engines do not save the searches you type into THEIR server? What just happened with AOL? At least Google is honest about it and made it publicly known that everything is saved, thus giving you the option to not use them if you don't like that.
      They're providing a free servivce to you, if you don't want them to know what you're searching for, don't use the service. Or waste time setting up proxies and whatnot. But as has been mentioned, you better proxy everyone, because every web service you use probably saves some information about you.
      Personally, I have too many other important things in my life to worry about other than the fact that google saved that search for "hentai porn" last week.

    2. Re:Pffff... by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Using their service gives them the right to log your search... it's in their business model.

      What's with the "Pffff"? Pshaw right back atcha!

      Anyway, the topic really isn't Google's right (or desire) to log your searches. It's about anonymizing your Google searches. They've still logged it, just not tied back to you in any way. If they're logging for purposes of statistical analysis, it's no problem for them, is it? Where's the agreement that I have to search under my own identity?

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    3. Re:Pffff... by shawb · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Exactly. I believe that Google is at least ATTEMPTING to minimize any evil that may come from storing that data. They have shown some backbone in dealing with warrantless requests for that information from the DHS, unlike just about any other organization.

      If you believe that storing the information is in and of itself evil, then you are free to attempt to set up competing services. If you aren't using the information garnered about users to deliver targetted advertising, you are likely going to have to charge a fee as internet search (and the other goodies that Google delivers) are fairly expensive to do. Very few people would be actually willing to pay for internet search when they can get it free (or advertising supported, to be more accurate) from many other places online, so your costs would be distributed among just a few people, meaning the per user fee will be quite high. Or you can simply not use Google, MSN search, Yahoo, etc. Good luck competing in today's society that way.

      I haven't seen Google do anything major to break the trust that they have earned (besides going public, which does mean that choices are in some way no longer strictly under their control.) Untill such time as they show otherwise, my experience is that they are more concerned about my privacy than any other data amalgamating corporation out there. I have decided that for me, the benefit gained from using Google is worth the risk that the data gleaned from my use presents. There are going to be people in other fields with other... shall we say interests for whom this does not hold true. I this is the case, be careful what you search for, and assume that anything you search or allow Google to search on your computer if you use Google Desktop or similar can be used against you. Anonymizing proxies and others may help to some extent as long as you are careful not to give any link to yourself through the proxy. And remember, sometimes being TOO paranoid mades you stick out and "THEY" will start watching you simply because "THEY" think you have something to hide... then you have to go VERY deep under cover, which means you no longer have a personal life, only a cause.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    4. Re:Pffff... by mikiN · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Simple solution: use a meta search engine. That way Google will still log what you type in the search box, but it will be linked to the IP(s) of the meta search engine server(s).

      (What meta search engines are and what their URLs are is left as an exercise for the reader)

      --
      The Hacker's Guide To The Kernel: Don't panic()!
    5. Re:Pffff... by Bios_Hakr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The best thing to do here would be to poison the well. Create a simple script that runs Google searches on random "hot" words.

      Se it up as a distributed.net style program and spread it all over the world. Within a few weeks, the top searches would be on words like "bomb" and "incest" and "child porn". Within a few months, Google's search analasys would be worthless. Not only that, but anyone trying to log the data to find a terrorist would be completely swamped.

      This could work for phones too. Set up Skype to dial your home phone number when you are at work or asleep. Have your computer read a list of "hot" words into Skype. Watch as the NSA begins to pull out their hair over the millions of hour-long phonecalls talking about bomb-making.

      --
      I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.
    6. Re:Pffff... by SocratesJedi · · Score: 2, Informative

      According to the Google Terms of Service this type of meta-searching is prohibited.

      Google TOS: http://www.google.com/intl/en/terms_of_service.htm l

    7. Re:Pffff... by siriuskase · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It may be naive, but I'm gambling on the fact that Google's database is large and I'm probably a very small, uninteresting part of it. If I do want to conduct research in **********, I'll invent a new pseudonym or access using my neighbor's open wifi.

      You have more to fear from slashdot's awesome comment saving system. All the baddie's must do is pay the nominal subscription fee and they have access to every inane comment you have ever posted here.

      --
      If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
  3. Why only Google? by andrewman327 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you are going to the trouble of setting up a proxy, why not use it for all of your web traffic? I mean, there are websites out there that collect just as much information as Google does, why do you want them collecting information about you?

    --
    Information wants a fueled airplane waiting at the hangar and no one gets hurt.
    1. Re:Why only Google? by prattle · · Score: 2, Interesting
      If you are going to the trouble of setting up a proxy, why not use it for all of your web traffic?

      Some folks say that tor browsing is slower but I haven't really noticed that. What I have noticed is that, when I surf slashdot through tor, I bump into the "can't login 'cause this ip is banned" thing much more often. Go figure: tor surfers are also slashdot abusers. :-)

      --
      "We are here on Earth to fart around. Don't let anybody tell you any different!" -- Kurt Vonnegut
  4. Text before slashdotting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Protect Your Privacy from Google

    Abstract

    A simple HOWTO for stopping Google from logging your search history.

    The Problem

    While Google.com is a brilliant search site, and while its proprieters claim to abide by their 'do no evil' motto, there is one practice that threatens to expose you to much evil down the track.

    Google places a cookie on every user's computer, timed to expire in 2038. With this cookie, they can track you and log your entire search history. In fact, Google has recently indicated that they won't be deleting people's search histories.

    While this cookie may not directly identify you by name, an analysis of your search history over time can definitely help an attacker (or abusive government authority) to identify you personally.

    Many people fight back by setting up an anonymous proxy for all their web surfing, but this can slow down their accesses terribly. Such slowness sooner or later drives most people to revert to direct non-anonymous internet access.

    A Solution

    In summary, the solution is to clear all long-lasting cookies, set your browser to not keep cookies between restarts, and divert all google requests out through an anonymous proxy.

    This will protect your privacy as far as google is concerned, but allow you to enjoy full-speed browsing with other sites.

    Follow these simple steps:

    Get access to an anonymous web proxy. A common favourite is the Tor network

    Be using Mozilla Firefox.

    Install the FoxyProxy extension for Firefox

    Within FoxyProxy configuration, add an entry for your anonymous proxy. Within this proxy, add 2 whitelist wildcard rules, with the patterns:

    http://.google.com/*

    http://google.com/

    Clear out all your browser cookies

    Set Firefox so that it only keeps cookies till you close Firefox (Edit/Preferences/Privacy/Cookies)

    If there are any other sites that may be unduly logging your activity, and don't have a refular log deletion policy, add some entries for these sites into your anonymous proxy matchlist in FoxyProxy.

    With these measures in place, all your regular web requests will go out directly to the internet, while all requests for *.google.com will go via the Tor anonymity network. Also, since your cookies are getting deleted every time you close/restart Firefox, then Google will no longer be able to build a history of your web surfing.

    I appreciate that for some amongst us, this is like closing the barn door after the horse has bolted. But at least we can arrest the extent of the privacy violation which Google is perpetrating.

    Conclusion
    The searches you send out to Google are your business. You have the right to prevent Google from accumulating a perpetual history of your web searching. Use that right.

    1. Re:Text before slashdotting by Zwaxy · · Score: 3, Funny

      You can set a preference to say you want Google in your own language.

      I believe the preference is stored in a cookie...

  5. slow site by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 5, Funny

    The site seems to be slow. Anyone got a link to the google cache?

    --
    This guy's the limit!
    1. Re:slow site by WilliamSChips · · Score: 2, Funny

      Your nick fits in so perfectly with this. I salute you.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  6. Oh goodness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    So what you're saying is that if I allow Google to store a cookie on my computer to track the history of all searches I make, they'll... track the history of all searches I make?

    Heavens to betsy! This is big! How is it no one ever noticed this "cookie" thing before this Slashdot article?

    I wonder if any other websites are doing this as well.

    1. Re:Oh goodness by click2005 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was going to but I found a hash in my cookie.

      Then i became obsessed with finding snacks & shiny objects.

      --
      I am a free slashdotter. I will not be modded, blogged, DRM'd, patented, podcasted or RFID'd. My life is my own.
  7. gmail? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you log into gmail then won't your search be linked anyway? (since mail.google.com would be proxied)

    In the end, the simplest is to stop using google if you feel your privacy is compromised and try to find a company with a better policy.
    I tend to trust google enough to keep my search history, so what that they know you search for killing your wife or drowning barbie dolls, let them assess all they want, because you cannot be found guilty of thinking about a crime.

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
    1. Re:gmail? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 4, Interesting

      because you cannot be found guilty of thinking about a crime.

      A group in Canada was arrested for thinking about bombing a Hudson tunnel. A group in Miami was arrested for thinking about bombing buildings in Chicago. Not only didn't they have bombs, they didn't have materials or knowledge of how to put one together. They didn't even have money or connections, just that, as sick as they were, they wanted to perform bombings, at the time of the arrests, they simply didn't have any capacity to carry it out. Given that these were effectively pre-crime, it's not much of a leap as you think.

    2. Re:gmail? by Capybara · · Score: 2, Informative
      you cannot be found guilty of thinking about a crime.
      Oh really?
    3. Re:gmail? by click2005 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think under the Patriot Act, it would be illegal for Google to tell people if they'd given the government anything.

      --
      I am a free slashdotter. I will not be modded, blogged, DRM'd, patented, podcasted or RFID'd. My life is my own.
  8. Simple Solution by rangeva · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Use Customize Google:

    Customize Google For Internet Explorer
    Customize Google For FireFox
    Both will anonymize your google cookie, click tracking and much more.
    Both are free open source projects.

  9. Defeating Google... by PoconoPCDoctor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wrote a while back about concern's with Google's Desktop search, as it relates to HIPAA regulations, but never thought much about my own right to privacy when using Google's searches. I guess there could be a future version of a Joe McCarthy witch hunt, where the government could supoena Google and force them to release search data.

    I bookmarked his site and will implement the methods at my workplace, since Google's responce was less than satisfactory, IMHO. It was along the line of "no patient information would EVER leave our servers!"

    Yeah...right

    --
    "Let us raise a standard to which the wise and honest can repair" - George Washington
  10. RTFS: "for full-speed surfing" by Jeff+Molby · · Score: 5, Informative
    The summary itself answers your question, and TFA goes even further to say
    If there are any other sites that may be unduly logging your activity...add some entries for these sites into your anonymous proxy matchlist in FoxyProxy.
    Next time spend atleast 30 seconds reading before you post.
    1. Re:RTFS: "for full-speed surfing" by andrewman327 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But what about those sites that you don't even know are monitoring you. I think it is far easier to proxy all basic webtraffic rather than trying to list every single site that collects information about you.

      --
      Information wants a fueled airplane waiting at the hangar and no one gets hurt.
  11. clusty by bcrowell · · Score: 5, Informative

    Clusty has an excellent privacy policy. I'm going to try using them for a while and see if the results are comparable in quality to google's.

    And before anyone says that you don't need to worry if you aren't doing anything illegal, try reading up on the history of the FBI. They had a massive file on Einstein, who, e.g., belonged to "communist front" organizations like the the American Crusade to End Lynching. Check out the Wikipedia article on COINTELPRO, especially the part about the murder of civil rights activist Viola Liuzzo (by a carload of Klansman with an FBI agent riding along), and the FBI's subsequent smear campaign against Liuzzo.

  12. Summary is misleading by tksh · · Score: 3, Interesting
    His short and simple guide tells you how to set up any decent web browser...

    No it doesn't. It tells you how to set it up with Firefox and only Firefox via the FoxyProxy extension. That's a far cry from what you're claiming; no instructions for Safari or Opera.

  13. No need for a Firefox extention by DosBubba · · Score: 4, Informative
    A Proxy AutoConfig (PAC) script is well suited for this task:
    function FindProxyForURL(url, host)
    {
    if (shExpMatch(url, "*http://*.google.*"))
    return "SOCKS 127.0.0.1:9050"; //Proxy here
    else
    return "DIRECT";
    }

    Place the above in a text file, and set it as the automatic proxy config file for your web browser (for Firefox users, Preferences>General>Connection Settings).
    The matching string *http://*.google.*" should be used instead of http://.google.com/* as a foreign proxy will cause Google to redirect you to its respected cctld.
  14. Re:Easier ways to do it by mobby_6kl · · Score: 2, Informative

    Cookies are the easy part. The hard part is that they log the IPs/hostnames and can link your searches to you without any cookies. Now, one IP != one user, especially in a NAT office/school environment, but can be quite accurate for home users.

  15. Getting Google's nose out of your business... by mobby_6kl · · Score: 2, Funny

    To be fair to G, it's your nose that is in their business ;)

  16. "Privacy" my ass. by Riding+Spinners · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So, instead of sending your search results to Google to be recorded, you're sending them to both Google and some unknown third-party?

    Explain to me how giving some stranger all your search results will protect your privacy, Slashdot.

  17. Re:Can't help but ask... by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Which is really hard to do on 32-bit Linux. I'm not sure how windows handles this situation. However, just deleting the cookie would also work. I imagine you could easily make a firefox plugin that would destroy all cookies from either a whitelist or blacklist of domains every time you start/shutdown the browser.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  18. Re:confused? Is it just me, or .... by Edward+Teach · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Correct, sort of. Perhaps I should have said that Google invades your privacy. Considering that, at least in the United States, the right to privacy only applys to your right to privacy from government entities (even that is a right bestowed by the SCOTUS rather than being spelled out in the Constitution), one really has no right to privacy from a private or even public company.

    However, Google is an advertisement supported service and they still collect the search queries, even if they are annonomized. So, one could argue that unless Google wants to be able to later be able to analyze that data to find a specific individual, they should have no problem with the data being annonomized, since, in fact, they still get the same data, but in an annonomized form which cannot then be targeted back to a specific computer.

    --

    Setting his threshold to 5, Sparky eliminated most of the trolls on /.

  19. First they came for the Jews... by Travoltus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    and I did not speak out
    because I was not a Jew.
    Then they came for the Communists
    and I did not speak out
    because I was not a Communist.
    Then they came for the trade unionists
    and I did not speak out
    because I was not a trade unionist.
    Then they came for me
    and there was no one left
    to speak out for me.
    - Pastor Martin Niemöller

    The lesson? Speak out NOW, while someone else is being persecuted in violation of your Constitutional liberties. Eventually they always get around to coming after YOU.

    In Germany, your neighbor typically turned you in because they didn't like you. Not because you were a Jew, a gay, or a commie.

    Right now, today, someone you don't like - perhaps someone you don't even realize - can accuse you of being a terrorist - and at the very least there'll be a file on you. Good luck with flying after that... if you're lucky.

    God, I hate apathetic people.....

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    1. Re:First they came for the Jews... by BoberFett · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Given a seemingly limitless amount of information regarding everything you have ever done or said, who will be better able to prepare a case that will sway the jury in their favor:

      A) The prosecution who has a small army of attorneys, the entire local police force, and the FBI working diligently to prove you're a hardened criminal

      B) Your free-of-charge public defender

      Here's a hint. That public defender is already overworked and underpaid.

      Given a vastly increased amount of information, unless you have pockets as deep as the prosecutor, the situation goes downhill for the defendant.

    2. Re:First they came for the Jews... by Snaller · · Score: 3, Funny

      God, I hate apathetic people.....

      But you don't do anything about it ;)

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  20. Since you're already on the list... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    Personally, I have too many other important things in my life to worry about other than the fact that google saved that search for "hentai porn" last week.
    ... would you mind posting your 5 favorite sites so we don't have to search for them?
  21. Some suggestions... by MBC1977 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There is a real easy solution (for those who have a problem with Google's practices)

    1) Use a different search engine: Google (and most businesses) I'm sure will not care what you say until a critical mass
    of users using other search engines (or any other product) lose customers. Of course, since they have not changed their
    business model or practices since their inception, I don't think that is really going to happen anytime soon.

    2) Execute a technological workaround: However that has the drawback of if (and I say if) Google decides to become nasty,
    they just ban you from their system, which they could legally do, since you are violating their company policy (which again forces
    you to use another search engine, but this time not by choice).

    3) Complain: Perhaps they may listen, perhaps they may not, but as a soverign business unless it affects their revenue stream
    (which I don't think will happen, as they happen to be one of the best at execution of both their software and business practices)
    I don't personally see their revenue slowing down anytime soon.

    Last thing about this subject, it is true there is no such thing as a totally secure system, but Google does a pretty good job at what they
    do, why hassle them when nothing has happened (not that it won't), but for now let Google run its ship, and just be happy with the service they
    provide.

    As one reader said earlier... you could use MSN Search.

    Regards,

    MBC1977,
    (US Marine, College Student, and Good Guy!)

    --
    Regards,

    MBC1977,
  22. Re:Can't help but ask... by savala · · Score: 3, Informative
    I imagine you could easily make a firefox plugin that would destroy all cookies from either a whitelist or blacklist of domains every time you start/shutdown the browser.

    There's absolutely no reason to use a plugin for that, Firefox can do this just by itself (as can SeaMonkey, and even Mozilla could do it already). You can either create a blacklist of domains that are only allowed to set session cookies (tools -> options -> privacy -> cookies -> exceptions -> "allow for session" (which downgrades all cookies to being valid for the session only), or a whitelist of domains that are allowed to set cookies ("allow"), while everything else will honor "keep cookies: until I close Firefox".)

    (So to put it in other word, Exceptions override any other settings, so you can use it as both whitelist and blacklist, while general settings govern all other sites.)

  23. Pollute the history? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How about instead releasing a program that thoroughly pollutes the user's search history regularly with so many randomly generated search phrases that it becomes impossible to link anything back to your particular searches?

  24. Not quite so sufficient by btempleton · · Score: 2, Informative

    One useful feature of Mozilla is "profiles" You can create alternate user profiles, with their own set of passwords, cookies, history, and proxy. So set up one profile to use your anonymizing proxy and give it a distinctive theme, so that you can be clear about when you are doing anonymous surfing and when you are doing direct surfing.

    Then keep one window available with the anonymous browser and use it when you want to be private. Keep others around when you want the speed of direct connection.

    --
    Has it been over a year since you last donated to the Electronic Frontier Foundation
  25. How to access your gMail -without- needing Cookies by ivi · · Score: 2, Informative

    gMail is about the only (non-ISP) web mail service that also
    provides access via eMail clients, eg, Eudora, OE, etc.

    So, using a "real" eMail client, no cookies aer required.

    QED ;-)

  26. Cookie myth by megaditto · · Score: 4, Insightful

    'Deleting the cookie' does nothing to remove your stored search history crosslinked to your IP address

    Having a dynamic IP does not help if you use your computer regularly to check email, log in to slashdot, or visit your unique collection of news sites: anything that can link your particular IP-of-the-day to your identity.

    --
    Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    1. Re:Cookie myth by quentin_quayle · · Score: 2, Informative
      Megaditto
      'Deleting the cookie' does nothing to remove your stored search history crosslinked to your IP address

      Having a dynamic IP does not help if you use your computer regularly to check email, log in to slashdot, or visit your unique collection of news sites: anything that can link your particular IP-of-the-day to your identity.

      Oh, but there's more. It's not just searches. Just today I noticed that Google is serving css and javascript from www.google.com for third-party sites such as blogs.

      So in other words, they can track you across the web unless you foil this too. Prior to this, you could avoid being tracked from site to site by (a) controlling cookies (I never allow beyond-current-session cookies for any site, ever) and (b) black-holing advertising and tracking sites including pagead2.google.com and google analytics, etc.. But now it's either filter www.google.com too, and not have access to their main site; or leave it unfiltered and let Google map all your searches to your IP *plus* the fact that you visit site A, then site B etc. (maybe even what you do there, if they're using XmlHTTPRequest to the max).

      So now the practical privacy protection is use the kind of solution the link in the story recommends (FF extension) or maybe searching via something like blackboxsearch or scroogle.

      The better solution would be a way to selectively block third-party accessory files - JS, CSS, images ( blacklist/whitelist and 3rd party vs. current site). The Mozilla browsers have an option to disallow third-party images but it doesn't work. Users also need control over XmlHTTPRequest, including optional notification of when it is used, option to turn it off (it's supposed to be same-site-only but iframes are a big loophole).

  27. Re:non isp email you can use with a client by cabjoe · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hotmail can only be used with Outloook Express, and to get POP access with Yahoo mail you have to pay.
    GMail is the only free web mail service that I know of that you can access through any email client.

    --
    If I hadn't seen such riches, I could live with being poor.
  28. ARTICLE IS INCORRECT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm posting this in reply to an unrelated comment, because it seems important enough to have visible near the top. I don't know why this hasn't been mentioned by other comments.

    IMPORTANT

    The settings in the article are wrong, and if you use them you are likely under the mistaken impression you're going through TOR when you're not.

    The correct wildcard setting should be something like "*google.*/*" (this is conservative, meaning it'll catch some things that aren't from google.com, but at least the google addresses will all be TORed).

    If you use the settings in the article, then not only will your browser directly access www.google.com, but if you happen to go through an international TOR outlet (like in Germany), which is quite likely, you'll be redirected by Google to "google.de" which your browser will access directly.

    To summarize, do not use the settings in that article. You are not necessarily passing through TOR if you do.