Slashdot Mirror


Real to Offer Open Source Windows Media for Linux

cpugeniusmv writes to tell us News.com is reporting that RealNetworks plans to release an open source method to allow Linux users to play Windows Media files. Currently Linux users are able to play the two main Windows Media formats (wmv and wma) but only if they install closed-source modules. The ability to launch this initiative comes from a recent licensing deal between RealNetworks and Microsoft and the antitrust settlement against Microsoft.

15 of 228 comments (clear)

  1. Satan: by Winckle · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Brrr, it's getting chilly!"

    1. Re:Satan: by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 4, Informative
      Actually, I personaly doubt they will release it using GPL, in whatever incarnation of the license. They are more likely to get OSI approval for an open source license of their own, just like SUN and IBM did. And considering the stakes here, the approval (or not) should be handled by the OSI board as high priority.
      It's going into Helix Player, which is multilicensed. The two open source licenses it currently supports are the GPL and RPSL, their own OSI-approved license. You can also license it under a commercial license. The question is will they continue licensing Helix in this manner? Will they stop support for GPL? Or will they make the Windows Media Support a separate plugin that's not part of Helix and available under RPSL? I agree with you in that I think the last scenario is the most likely, IMHO.
    2. Re:Satan: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
      Maybe I'm wrong about this, but this is how I've aways thought it worked.
      Unfortunately you _are_ wrong. Case point: Go to http://www.mp3licensing.com/royalty/ and behold the royalty rates for a "decoder". Note that this patent is generally ignored but some more careful distributions like Ubuntu do not support mp3 playback out-of-the-box for that very reason.
      I assume your misunderstanding is the result of the situation with the LZH-algorithm, or in practical terms, the GIF format. Thos, now expired patents only covered the LZH encoding not decoding, hence one could make, use and distribute a decoder but not an encoder. However this was just the special situation with regard to these 2 patents covering this particular algorithm, i.e. they were luckily (from the patent holder's point of view, unluckily) worded in such a way that they only covered the encoder.

      Nota bene: Yes, there were indeed two patents covering exactly the same algorithm, one was held in its latter days by Unisys and was the more notorious one due to Unisys' active enforcement. The other one was held by IBM and just recently expired but IBM never actively enforced it (It would've probably fallen due to prior art anyway but it does illustrate the utter stupidity of the USPTO specifically and the patent system, especially with regard to software, generally).
  2. That's really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    (buffering... buffering)... gr....(buffering...buffering)..eat new (buffering)s.

  3. False Summary by brunes69 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Currently Linux users are able to play the two main Windows Media formats (wmv and wma) but only if they install closed-source modules...

    Totally false. ffmpeg / mplayer / vlc etc. can all decode WMV files *natively* using the ffmpeg libavcoded libraries.

    The problem is not decoding the files, that is trivial. The problem is dealing with the copy protection. Another open source library is not going to help this, because it will still never be allowed to decrypt the copy-protected files.

    1. Re:False Summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Totally false. ffmpeg / mplayer / vlc etc. can all decode WMV files *natively* using the ffmpeg libavcoded libraries.

      Well, mostly. ffmpeg can decode WMV 7/8/9 and WMA 7/8. There is no decoder for WMA Pro, WMA voice, or WMA lossless. WMV8 decoding has bugs and may drop certain keyframes.

  4. That'll be great by also-rr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    For 20 minutes before Microsoft break the spec.

    (You need 4 years of engineering graduate school to acquire this level of cynicism folks.)

    I've been very impressed with Real's approach of late (ever since Helix, really, although they did some good things before then). They are showing a very cooperative attitude - enough to overcome any ill will I might have felt towards them - and I hope that they get a warm reception for this contribution that encourages them to embrace the open source/free software community further.

    I do wonder though if any of this open source love is being pushed by the BBC? They are after all proabbly one of the biggest single drivers of Real installations and have demonstrated in the past their ability to push Real to change their stance.

    I'm thinking particuarly of the fact that the BBC cancelled it's Ogg testing aboiut the same time that the whole Helix thing started - could Real opening up a bit in return for no migration to open source or free software codecs have been the price?

    1. Re:That'll be great by ledow · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Possibly. I just wish that they wouldn't do everything possible to make their primary piece of software (at least by downloads) so obnoxious.

      1) Try to instruct a novice user to find and download the free version on their website. Not an easy task but doable.

      2) Try to install it without it inserting stuff into Windows startup - I use Startup Control Panel but not everyone is so lucky.

      3) Try to remove the messages/popups etc. from a standard installation - again, not for the novice.

      I applaud any attempt at open-sourcing software but I would worry about the quality of the code if their primary app is in this much of a mess.

  5. Re:already there? by freshman_a · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yes, but I think the legality of the way mplayer does it is questionable since it uses Windows DLLs directly. It sounds like this is going to be completely separate code written by Real.

    I do love mplayer though.

  6. Re:already there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually, the latest ffmpeg can play WMV3, no windows dlls needed.

    You will need to check out the latest ffmpeg svn and compile it tho.

  7. Re:...err by Red+Flayer · · Score: 4, Funny
    It could be a trojan horse ...(in the Greeks bearing gifts sense...not script kiddie sense)
    Just a note, the original Trojan horse was a gift bearing Greeks, not the other way around :)
    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  8. Dear RealPlayer, by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Please open up your own format first before going and opening up other peoples' formats. Windows Media is already easy enough to play most anywhere. Streaming (or even non-streaming) RM is a pain to convert to another format - and most of the downloadable converters require you to have RealPlayer itself already installed (so it can use the DLLs). This is as much a "solution" as Captive NTFS, and it doesn't work on platforms other than x86/Windows.

    (My underlying complaint is that you don't have a half-recent version for Windows Mobile. I've tried to convert these to WMV but it doesn't work well. Releasing a WM5 player - or even a J2ME player - would shut me up for now, but your real problem is you have the obscurest, proprietariest file format ever.)

  9. Re:already there? by kidgenius · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When Redhat or Suse ship their distro, they are not allowed to include the DLLs. The location you downloaded them from is not allowed to distribute the DLLs. You are not allowed to download the DLLs. It has not stopped me from doing it for xine, mplayer, etc., doing this is in violation of copyright. What Real is doing is providing a LEGAL way of acquiring these codecs.

  10. Re:...err by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 5, Funny
    the original Trojan horse was a gift bearing Greeks, not the other way around :)

    It was Greeks bearing a gift bearing Greeks. And if a few of those Greeks was carring presents, say birthday presents to give to somebody after the battle or something, then it would be Greeks bearing a gift bearing Greeks bearing gifts.

    --
    Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
    You cannot wash away blood with blood
  11. Re:...err by Red+Flayer · · Score: 5, Funny
    It was Greeks bearing a gift bearing Greeks. And if a few of those Greeks was carring presents, say birthday presents to give to somebody after the battle or something, then it would be Greeks bearing a gift bearing Greeks bearing gifts.
    And if instead of a horse they had built large wooden bears, it would be Greeks gifting bears.

    Plus, with the proclivity of Greeks to be naked, you could end up with:
    Greeks gifting bears bearing Greeks being bare bearing gifts.

    My head hurts now. But "What if we build a large wooden badger..." will be stuck in my mind all day, at least that's a plus.
    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai