Slashdot Mirror


Molecules Spontaneously Form Honycomb

Science Daily is reporting that University of California Researchers have discovered a new process in which molecules assemble into complex patterns without any outside guidance. From the article: "Spreading anthraquinone, a common and inexpensive chemical, on to a flat copper surface, Greg Pawin, a chemistry graduate student working in the laboratory of Ludwig Bartels, associate professor of chemistry, observed the spontaneous formation of a two-dimensional honeycomb network comprised of anthraquinone molecules."

17 of 106 comments (clear)

  1. Honeycombs Big? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Honeycombs Big?

    1. Re:Honeycombs Big? by nosredna · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah yeah yeah

    2. Re:Honeycombs Big? by aprilsound · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's not small.

    3. Re:Honeycombs Big? by slapyslapslap · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, no, no!

  2. Re:crystals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Leave some sodium and chlorine together and let the rest of the solution evaporate and you will spot a cubical arrangement of molecules. This concept is new?

    Yes, it is. The nifty part is the SIZE of the arrangement. If you bothered to read the article, you would notice that the hexagon pattern is in a very unusual size range.

  3. Really cool, but surprising? by QuantumFTL · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is really awesome, however carbon spontaneously forms many different shapes, not the least of which are C60, nanotubes, and graphite (which has a honeycomb shape). As cool as this is, what part of this is "news?"

    1. Re:Really cool, but surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      As cool as this is, what part of this is "news?"

      You must have missed this part:

      Anthraquinone molecules, however, form chains that weave themselves into a sheet of hexagons on the copper surface, forming a network similar to chicken wire.

      Obviously this is big news to farmers who raise little tiny chickens.

    2. Re:Really cool, but surprising? by dwhitman · · Score: 4, Insightful
      carbon spontaneously forms many different shapes, not the least of which are C60, nanotubes, and graphite (which has a honeycomb shape). As cool as this is, what part of this is "news?"
      All the examples you give are covalently bonded molecular structures, where the observed regularity is derived from the symmetry of the orbitals forming the bonds.

      What's cool about this (as near as I can tell from the junior high-school level article) is that the structures are supramolecular, many orders of magnitude larger than the anthraquinone molecules they are made of. The structures seems to be held together only by (weak) van der Waals interactions between the molecules, influenced by the copper substrate. This is interesting and unusual, if you know enough chemistry to appreciate it.

      I'd love to see x-ray diffraction of these layers, to see how the anthraquinones are packing, and how the symmetry of the molecules is reflected in the much larger honeycomb.

  4. Re:"Honycomb?" by Linker3000 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Almost good enough spelling for Digg.

    --
    AT&ROFLMAO
  5. Re:crystals by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This doesn't seem any more unusual than a crystal lattice.
    Its just doing it in another molecule.

    I'm with the GP, its not earth shattering.

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
  6. importance? by mapkinase · · Score: 3, Informative

    I am failing to grasp the importance of this. Molecules form regular structures? This have been observed for many types of molecules starting from atoms (metals), small molecules (have you heard of ice) and things as huge as ribosomes (itself 100nm).
    How's this thing is unqiue? In what aspect?

    The answer to this question is probably, huge pores compared to the size of the monomer, but I am still not impressed.

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  7. Re:crystals by Gospodin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is pretty cool stuff. Makes me wonder how exactly it works (IANAC). Suppose you set up the lattice and then dropped a new molecule right in the middle of an existing pore. Presumably it would be attracted to one of the edges, but what then? Does the whole lattice get rearranged as the new molecule is shuffled into place? Where does the energy come from for all of that?

    Way more interesting than a salt crystal, btw.

    --
    ...following the principles of Heisenburger's Uncertain Cat...
  8. Wow by Dan+East · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Spreading water, an inexpensive and common chemical, on to a flat surface, Dan East, a Slashdot reader with Excellent Karma, observed the spontaneous creation of individual droplets as the molecules self-organized themselves to form larger complex structures."

    Dan East

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:Wow by frickendevil · · Score: 4, Funny

      Please tell us the chemical composition of this "water" and what type of "flat surface", and I'm sure we can arrange you with your PhD. Today our PhD's come with some hony. Please enjoy.

    2. Re:Wow by ichigo+2.0 · · Score: 4, Funny

      2 heydrogn atoms and one oxgen

      Send without hony, allergic to pees

  9. Saturday morning cartoons by Nick+Driver · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If the moderation of the above four comments is any indication, Slashdot is populated by the same demographic which watches Saturday morning cartoons.

    Nope. Rather, Slashdot is populated mostly by the same demographic who grew up watching Saturday morning cartoons many, many years ago before they all turned into lame crap.

    1. Re:Saturday morning cartoons by dfenstrate · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ever catch one of your old favorites replaying on TV?

      They're crap. What we watched was crap then, and what kids watch nowadays is crap as well.

      It's just that we were kids and couldn't tell it was crap, so we developed fond memories of it.

      --
      Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.