Slashdot Mirror


Some Bands Still Refuse Music Downloads

Zelbinian writes "Wired News reports there are a number of artists, ranging from The Beatles to Radiohead, that are still holding out on iTunes. Some feel that per-track downloads hurt the artistic integrity of albums as a whole; for others it's simply a matter of negotiation troubles. From the article: 'Since record companies have realized the popularity of iTunes and other sites, many reworked contracts to give artists less money per download. Andrews said while record companies once offered artists about 30 cents for each song sold, now musicians are earning less than a dime.'"

15 of 545 comments (clear)

  1. Ohh the irony by iced_773 · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Beatles? On iTunes? What happened to Apple v. Apple?

    1. Re:Ohh the irony by Draconix · · Score: 5, Funny

      Apple won.

      --
      By reading this you acknowledge that you have read it.
    2. Re:Ohh the irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      That is hilarious that 2 out of 3 of the mod points given to your post were for "informative".

  2. Of Course! by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 5, Funny
    'Since record companies have realized the popularity of iTunes and other sites, many reworked contracts to give artists less money per download. Andrews said while record companies once offered artists about 30 cents for each song sold, now musicians are earning less than a dime.'
    Well, obviously when the record companies underestimated demand they also underestimated the rates of breakage and returns, so of course they would have to modify the artists' cut in order to better compensate the record companies for those costs.
    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  3. You should get it by XanC · · Score: 5, Funny
    BTW Taco, I want a raise.

    You deserve one; you post here all the time!

  4. Re:I can see both sides of this by The+Amazing+Fish+Boy · · Score: 2, Funny
    I can see how a band might prefer that an album be sold as a complete "work" and not picked apart.


    This is gonna tear Radiohead up, but I just listened to Idioteque. But I had my CD player on random, so Morning Bell didn't come up next.
  5. Re:So.. umm... by darkitecture · · Score: 3, Funny

    How much is a dime?

    So I see you're asking a rhetorical question.

    What type of smartass reply would you like to your rhetorical question?

    * Semi-appropriate mainstream movie quote - "More than you can afford, pal!"
    * Ignorant American - "ur so dum! we invented munny!"
    * Witty American - "How much is a dime?! More like "How much is a liter? Am I rite?! rofl"
    * Straight cut geek response - "10 Cents."
    * Family Guy quote - "Swing and a miss, Peter."

    Just fucking with you. With the answer being "The value of your average Slashdot post", the correct response we were looking for was "How much is a rat's ass?" We'll be back with more Jeopardy after the break.

  6. Re:I can see both sides of this by EvanED · · Score: 3, Funny

    Heck, for that matter, why not 50 cents for half the song? You give it a range of times during the track. Prorate the price according to the fraction of the duration you want.

  7. Re:So.. umm... by Khyber · · Score: 4, Funny

    How much is a dime?

    Ten to fifty bucks, depending upon the quality of the grass, man. ;)

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  8. 100% behind you guys... by Chaffar · · Score: 3, Funny

    Some feel that per-track downloads hurt the artistic integrity of albums as a whole

    Then they shouldn't complain when I download the .rar of their albums :)

  9. Re:I can see both sides of this by indifferent+children · · Score: 4, Funny
    You give it a range of times during the track.

    After all, two seconds of Michael Bolton is just about enough.

    --
    Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
  10. Re:Missing the point by Cederic · · Score: 2, Funny


    On the other hand, I've listened to OK Computer many times, usually without random shuffle, and I've never picked up an underlying album-wide story and message.

    On my portable music player I have 3-4 tracks from that album in my two most common playlists and love them as tracks; I almost never listen to the album itself.

    Maybe there is a message and the album represents a coherent body of work. Frankly it's wasted on me.

  11. Re:I can see both sides of this by Badfysh · · Score: 2, Funny

    They're already doing that. They call them "Ringtones".

    --

    I was conned by an old man in a cloak. It turns out those *were* the droids I was looking for.

  12. Re:Missing the point by the_xaqster · · Score: 2, Funny
    Just like films. Do me a favor, go to your nearest Blockbuster and rent any random DVD that you have not seen. Now, instead of playing it all select the "choose chapter" option and watch the chapters in the following order: "5, 4, 7, 3, 1", you skipped chapter 2 and 6 (and if there are more than 7 chapters, all those also). Did the movie made any sense to you?.
    I just tried this with Pulp Fiction, and I think it made more sense! Thank you!
    --
    I'm just here to regulate Funkyness
  13. Re:I can see both sides of this by thatnerdguy · · Score: 2, Funny

    and they charge $2.50 for those

    --
    I saw the Sign, and it opened up my eyes