Some Bands Still Refuse Music Downloads
Zelbinian writes "Wired News reports there are a number of artists, ranging from The Beatles to Radiohead, that are still holding out on iTunes. Some feel that per-track downloads hurt the artistic integrity of albums as a whole; for others it's simply a matter of negotiation troubles. From the article: 'Since record companies have realized the popularity of iTunes and other sites, many reworked contracts to give artists less money per download. Andrews said while record companies once offered artists about 30 cents for each song sold, now musicians are earning less than a dime.'"
The Beatles? On iTunes? What happened to Apple v. Apple?
When information is power, privacy is freedom.
You deserve one; you post here all the time!
This is gonna tear Radiohead up, but I just listened to Idioteque. But I had my CD player on random, so Morning Bell didn't come up next.
How much is a dime?
So I see you're asking a rhetorical question.
What type of smartass reply would you like to your rhetorical question?
* Semi-appropriate mainstream movie quote - "More than you can afford, pal!"
* Ignorant American - "ur so dum! we invented munny!"
* Witty American - "How much is a dime?! More like "How much is a liter? Am I rite?! rofl"
* Straight cut geek response - "10 Cents."
* Family Guy quote - "Swing and a miss, Peter."
Just fucking with you. With the answer being "The value of your average Slashdot post", the correct response we were looking for was "How much is a rat's ass?" We'll be back with more Jeopardy after the break.
Heck, for that matter, why not 50 cents for half the song? You give it a range of times during the track. Prorate the price according to the fraction of the duration you want.
How much is a dime?
;)
Ten to fifty bucks, depending upon the quality of the grass, man.
Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
Some feel that per-track downloads hurt the artistic integrity of albums as a whole
Then they shouldn't complain when I download the .rar of their albums :)
After all, two seconds of Michael Bolton is just about enough.
Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
On the other hand, I've listened to OK Computer many times, usually without random shuffle, and I've never picked up an underlying album-wide story and message.
On my portable music player I have 3-4 tracks from that album in my two most common playlists and love them as tracks; I almost never listen to the album itself.
Maybe there is a message and the album represents a coherent body of work. Frankly it's wasted on me.
They're already doing that. They call them "Ringtones".
I was conned by an old man in a cloak. It turns out those *were* the droids I was looking for.
I'm just here to regulate Funkyness
and they charge $2.50 for those
I saw the Sign, and it opened up my eyes