Slashdot Mirror


Learning to Love the Cable Guy

An anonymous reader writes "The New York Times and C|Net are reporting on new good will gestures from big cable companies. As service monopolies increasingly became the norm, quality of service began to decline across the board. Now, though, with a number of alternatives cropping up, cable companies are beginning to realize the need to ensure customers say with the often imposing service companies." From the article: "[As] service has improved slowly as satellite providers, upstart phone carriers and cell phone companies have provided attractive alternatives. And now that cable and phone companies are starting to sell similar bundles of phone, broadband Internet and television products--known in the industry as a triple play--they risk losing subscribers forever if they do not keep them happy."

10 of 291 comments (clear)

  1. How about just letting me buy what I want? by jcr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have a pretty spiffy DLP TV, and all I use it for is watching DVDs. I haven't bought any cable or satellite service because nobody will just sell me the channels I want, without insisting on bundling in all the bible-thumpers and home shopping network crap. It feels like getting spammed, and it just pisses me off.

    I'm convinced that IPTV is the future, and that's mainly because the cable vendors SUCK.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:How about just letting me buy what I want? by Smidge204 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Perhaps you should write a letter to the local cable TV service and tell them that. After all, if they really are concerned with making customers happy, your request does not sound like that big a burden to their system.

      And frankly, I'd like that option too.

      Since Verizon has been adding cable TV to their FioS service, it is looking like a much better alternative to Cablevision/Optimum Online. Verison's phone and internet is already available on FioS in my area, and as soon as TV is there I'm probably going to switch. Hooray for competition!
      =Smidge=

    2. Re:How about just letting me buy what I want? by Sporkinum · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I program out the channels I don't watch. Works kinda like adblock.

      --
      "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
    3. Re:How about just letting me buy what I want? by truthsearch · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I know one person whose sole source of television content is iTunes. It's exactly the video-on-demand we've all wanted for years. Pay for only the exact shows you want to see, and get a discount for buying a whole season. When enough content enters the on-demand services cable companies will likely see a massive drop in customers.

    4. Re:How about just letting me buy what I want? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      > Pick your favorite 11 channels.

      I don't have 11 favorite channels. I have two. (There were three before TechTV bit the dust.)

      A la carte would be a nice option for people like me.

    5. Re:How about just letting me buy what I want? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I program out the channels I don't watch. Works kinda like adblock.

      You're still paying for them, though.


      I very highly doubt that. I have C-Band satellite (the huge dish type) without a paid subscription except for Comedy Central, SciFi and Cartoon Network.

      Despite not having a subscription to the religious or shopping networks, I can get them, even if all my subscriptions lapes, they still come through. That type of channels are unencrypted, meaning that I don't have to buy a subscription to watch them. I doubt that the cable systems are giving those networks any money.

    6. Re:How about just letting me buy what I want? by MerrickStar · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Long ago I lived in an area that had a company called WanTV (pronounced with emphasis on want.) I don't know whatever became of this company as I moved away, but it provided, at a reasonable price (often cheaper than other cable companies) non-packaged channels. You selected which channels you wanted and those were the ones you got. It seems to me that if you rated the cost of a channel based on their popularity, you could design a pretty effective business model. In turn, if studios started to shoot you down, it would result in bad publicity for them. Dening the consumer what they want and all.

  2. And this just proves it. by darkonc · · Score: 3, Interesting
    This is pretty much proof that having an effective monopoly is bad for customer service. As long as they thought that they had their customer base by the short and curleys they did whatever they wanted -- but now that the possibility of competition is cropping up, they're starting to play nice.

    I think that the same can be extrapolated for Microsoft, don't you?

    --
    Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  3. Re:Cox cable by Osty · · Score: 3, Interesting

    During the winter, it was so bad and so regular, I could predict the signal dropoff time to within 1/2 hour, based on the outside temp.

    Soudns almost exactly like a problem I had with Comcast when I first moved into my house. The previous owners used a dish for TV, and since the house is just out of DSL range I have to assume they used dialup for an internet connection. That's relevant because when I moved in I switched everything over to cable (cable TV, cable internet, screw the phone line). During the day, the cable connection was rock solid. Which was useless to me, since I work during the day. During the night, the cable internet connection (but not TV!) would go out as it cooled down. After 8 tech visits, three cable modems, and four months a tech finally thought to check the line at the street. Turns out there was some water damage (rust!) that caused an intermittent connection. During the warm day it would expand just enough to make a connection, but at night as it cooled down the connection would go away. Apparently it still made enough of a connection for TV to get through, but not for internet. A minute later, he had repaired the connection and left, and I haven't had problems since. This was during the spring, so I can just imagine how bad it would've gotten if they hadn't found the problem by winter.

    Temperature-related issues like this can be very hard to diagnose, specifically because the techs will never come out at night. If the issue is caused by cooling temperatures at night and the techs come at 10 in the morning, of course the problem's not going to reproduce. I just had to keep getting them to send out techs until I got one that actually knew a thing or two.

    In your case, the damage may have been farther up the line, especially if the entire neighborhood had the same problem. In that case, the only thing you can do is to get your neighbors to call in and complain as well. It's like a power outage. If only one person calls in, they're not going to do anything. If three people call in, they might be able to triangulate the position of the problem and think about fixing it. If hundreds of people call in, they know they have a problem and a tech will be immediately dispatched. So, when you have problems like this, call! And get your neighbors to call! If you don't, the service company isn't going to give a crap because you're not making any noise.

  4. The upshot of this is that ... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    monopolies don't care about customers and charge whatever the hell they want, and companies that have to compete at some level will exhibit concern about what their customers want. The only variation on this theme would be a heavily-regulated monopoly (ala the old Bell System) that has enforced service standards. This is hardly news.

    Too bad that the FCC doesn't understand something so basic to any economy. Somebody in law enforcement really should take a look at the Commissioners' bank records for the past few years.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.