Slashdot Mirror


New Web Browser Leaves No Footprints

eastbayted writes "InfoWorld reports a new web browser designed to protect users privacy is available for download. Called Browzar, it 'automatically deletes Internet caches, histories, cookies and auto-complete forms.' It also boasts a search engine, which the company will use to generate income. The 264KB application is the brainchild of Ajaz Ahmen, known for creating the U.K.'s first ISP Freeserve. The forthcoming version is for Windows only, but Mac and Linux versions will be available eventually."

32 of 388 comments (clear)

  1. Safari has similar capabilitites by stego · · Score: 5, Informative

    Safari has a 'Private Browsing' mode that creates no history, cookies, cache.

    1. Re:Safari has similar capabilitites by b1ufox · · Score: 2, Informative
      A simple cltr+shift+del is available under firefox too, which clears all your sessions, cache, authenticated sessions, browsing history etc.

      So just a browser which says it does it automatically perhaps know how to market on this issue,its not a very big deal now for other browsers too.

      --
      -- "Genius is 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration" - TAE --
    2. Re:Safari has similar capabilitites by lmcplatte · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, Safari's Private Browsing mode does a good job of not creating history and not remembering what was typed in search boxes, but it still builds cache and still accepts and stores cookies.

    3. Re:Safari has similar capabilitites by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can have firefox clear out all private information every time you shut it down. It's one of the standard options. Not sure what the procedure is if it crashes, but then again, when has firefox ever crashed? :P

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    4. Re:Safari has similar capabilitites by quantum+bit · · Score: 2, Informative

      Use 'End Process' on the processes tab rather than 'End Eask' in the applications tab.

      'End Task' sends the application's window a WM_QUIT message and gives it a chance to exit gracefully before timing out and prompting you to kill the process.

      'End Process' kills the process immediately, like sending a kill -9.

      FYI, xkill only seems to be fast because it causes the X server to immediately delete the target window. The actual process that was creating the window may or may not exit in a timely fashion when its connection is closed (if it's deadlocked, perhaps never). Regular kill, followed by a kill -9 if that doesn't work is the only sure way to go. Even then kill -9 may not work if the process is stuck in the kernel somewhere (e.g. NFS server disappeared).

    5. Re:Safari has similar capabilitites by robosmurf · · Score: 2, Informative

      Although it does accept cookies, any cookies that were created while Private Browsing was switched on are automatically deleted when Private Browsing is switched off.

  2. Not-a-fact! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Informative
    Ajaz Ahmen, known for creating the U.K.'s first ISP Freeserve

    Freeserve was far from the UK's first ISP. There were hundreds of ISPs, including large players like Pipex, Demon, Compuserve and AOL in the UK, along with much smaller ones like Eclipse before Freeserve came along.

    Freeserve was the first ISP not to charge a monthly fee, but not the first to exist.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    1. Re:Not-a-fact! by phreakv6 · · Score: 4, Informative

      From TFA

      "..Freeserve, the first U.K. Internet service provider (ISP) to offer free Internet access to customers in the late 1990s."

      I dont know how that became..

      "..Ajaz Ahmen, known for creating the U.K.'s first ISP Freeserve."

      hats off to the /. editors

      --
      fifteen jugglers, five believers
    2. Re:Not-a-fact! by MooUK · · Score: 3, Informative

      It still wasn't free.

      In this country, local rate (0845) calls are not free.

    3. Re:Not-a-fact! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      In this country, local rate (0845) calls are not free.

      Worse than that, they aren't even local rate! Freeserve was, however, the first ISP to run off their share of the call charges.

  3. Browser with more honest PR department by sznupi · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heatseek

    At least they are more upfront with their mission... ;P

    --
    One that hath name thou can not otter
  4. Nothing new by davidbrit2 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm not trying to be an OSS zealot here (honestly), but how does this do anything that Firefox doesn't do already? Preferences/Options, Privacy, Clear Private Data tool settings button. (The way to get there might be different in the Windows version, but you get the idea.) You can have it blow away history, forms, passwords, download history, cookies, cache data, and authenticated HTTP sessions automatically when you quit. And a few of those can be disabled outright from the start. And of course, Safari has a similar option too.

    1. Re:Nothing new by HansF · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's small and you can run the exe straight from the site. No install needed.

      --
      --> Insert Funny Sig Here
  5. Re:Browzar is based on IE? by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well, it does require at least MSIE 5.5 in order to run.
    So yes, this is only a new frontend.

  6. Re:Best idea I've heard all decade by rtyall · · Score: 2, Informative

    Or they find out about when the unproven software ends up giving someone full access due to a dodgy exploit.
    I suppose only the same will happen with other browsers though.

  7. Firefox plugin by a_nonamiss · · Score: 5, Informative

    There's a Firefox plugin that does the same thing. Stealther claims to do the same thing, but what I don't know is how well it really covers its tracks. A forensic investigation into a hard drive can easily reveal browsing history, even if one cleans his or her history and deletes cookies, etc. I have heard of a browser that actually "shreds" this information (similar to Eraser but I can't seem to find any information on this browser.

    --
    -Arthur
    Cave ne ante ullas catapultas ambules
  8. Re:Browzar is based on IE? by hclyff · · Score: 5, Informative

    Quick check with process explorer shows that it uses mshtml.dll as well as MFC.

    "Coming soon" to linux indeed.

  9. Re:It sounded good until... by Beale · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's only 10% the size of Links because it uses the IE engine.

  10. Re:It sounded good until... by multipartmixed · · Score: 5, Informative

    Smells like it's using the IE engine to render the pages.

    There's no way you could pack a full graphical browser into 264K on a windows box.

    And, without graphics, a porn browser is hardly useful.

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  11. Re:Browzar is based on IE? by bendy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Given that the acid2 standards compliance test http://www.webstandards.org/action/acid2/ produces identical results in Browzar and IE (well, the version 6 I have installed anyway) I'd say it's a pretty good bet. It will be interesting to see how they go about producing a Mac or Linux version if they're just wrapping the IE renderer in some way.

  12. Re:and Opera too. by phooka.de · · Score: 5, Informative

    Not the same: In Safari, you don't create a footprint of what you don't want recorded frst, just to later erase it together with the rest of your browsing history, it just doesn't write anything about your web-surfing onto the disk while in "private surfing" mode.

  13. Re:Knoppix? by phreakv6 · · Score: 5, Informative
    Regarding this "Browsar", does it delete all caches/cookies, or not save them at all?
    From the browzar FAQ
    Does Browzar store cookies? If so, why?

    Browzar only ever stores cookies temporarily, automatically deleting them when you close the programme. For many sites, such as internet banking or shopping sites, it is necessary to store cookies to keep you logged into the site or hold shopping cart contents while you perform your transactions. If you visit a site using Browzar where a cookie for that site already existed on the computer prior to you using Browzar - the cookie will not be deleted. However the cookie's 'Last Accessed' date and time stamp may be updated to the date and time you visited the site associated with the cookie using Browzar.
    --
    fifteen jugglers, five believers
  14. Re:It sounded good until... by Eivind · · Score: 2, Informative
    It's not a browser. It's an extremely thin shell around an IE-component. It's an add-on for IE, basically.

    Firefox and Safari doesn't need this add-on, as they have by default options in their configuration to delete all sensitive information on program-exit.

  15. but I already have one... by pointbeing · · Score: 4, Informative

    I already have a browser that leaves no footprints - Firefox Portable. Loaded on my 1GB Swiss Army knife the only thing it leaves on the host machine is a pluginreg.dat - which contains nothing about my internet use.

    --
    we see things not as as they are, but as we are.
    -- anais nin
  16. Strange privacy protection by foggy · · Score: 5, Informative

    1. Enter IE, go google.com, logoff if necessary, close IE
    2. open browzar, go google.com, autheticate with your gmail account
    3. close browzer
    4. open IE, go google.com.... still authenticated!!!

    perhaps it needs some more debugging.

    hth

  17. Re:Wow... by MooUK · · Score: 2, Informative

    Relatively simple to answer. What they have created, in essence, is just an extension for IE. And an IE extension has a much larger likely userbase than an FF one.

    Unfortunately.

  18. Re:Best idea I've heard all decade by ignatus · · Score: 5, Informative
    If you got root at your pc at work, I suggest creating an additional account for you "personal recreation". An if you're really don't want anybody to see it, encrypt the home directory. I think that's a good protection against accidentally revealing uncomfortable information on your pc.

    However, You have to take into account that all your internet traffic passes through IT-departments gateway. So you better check wich policy they got on non-workrelated internet traffic. Best thing you can do is set-up an encrypted tunnel to some server outside your network (use HTTP-encapsulation if you can only use HTTP).

    I fail to see the benefit of using a supposedly secure browser. Any reasonably competent IT guy will see right trough it.

    --
    - Never underestimate the power of human stupidity.
  19. Avant Browser? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I'm surprised no one has mentioned Avant Browser (http://www.avantbrowser.com/). It sounds like it works exactly the same as this program (uses IE's renderer API and allows you to block images/flash and cleanup cookies/etc when you close the program). It is a little bit larger than this browzar claims to be, but I remember when it used to be under a MB (getting close to 2 MB now as they add features like tabbed browsing and mouse gestures).

  20. Re:Best idea I've heard all decade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Reminds me a of the time when I was 12 years old...

  21. Mac users already have this.. by Divx · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you're on a mac, using safari, you just click on the 'Safari' menu item, then click on 'Reset Safari'. Viola, all of that stuff is erased for you. There are also a dozen utility programs that do this for you too.

  22. Distrust by apharmdq · · Score: 2, Informative

    Firefox already has an extension for this called "Distrust." When it's off, you browse normally, gathering cookies and the usual thang. When it's on, it enters "distrust mode" and takes note of all the cookies added, cache changes, etc. These changes are all deleted when distrust is turned off, or when Firefox exits.
    I can't say for certain whether Opera has something like this, and I'm pretty certain IE doesn't, but in any case, what's the point of having yet another browser which touts a "feature" that's already available in a more popular browser?
    It seems to me we've been getting a lot of these specialized browsers implemented lately (Flock being another), so I'm rather suspicious about the intent of the developers. (Though maybe it's just paranoia.)

  23. Based on IE - confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    It sure is based on IE. I ran sysinternal's filemon on browzar - browzar loads IE

    12:26:09 PM BrowzarBlackWin:2804 OPEN C:\Program Files\Internet Explorer\IEXPLORE.EXE SUCCESS Options: Open Access: 00100080