Slashdot Mirror


F(OS)S for Learning a Musical Instrument ?

Anonymous Musician asks: "Recently I took up learning to play the violin (at age 37) and it is great fun. I found two little software tools to be of good help: Wired Metronome (Windows binary, free to download) to keep a steady beat, and TS-AudioToMIDI (Windows binary, shareware, 30 days free trial), using a microphone and built-in sound-card to detect in real time the note I am playing (I admit, sometimes it is more like a noise) and have it displayed on a piano keyboard to check and train my tuning. What tools, freeware or FOSS, are you using to assist you with learning to play an instrument?"

120 comments

  1. guitune by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 3, Informative

    The guitune project seems to do everything your second program does. Linux only at the mo' (but in gtk or qt flavours)

    There's loads of metronome free software around too.

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    1. Re:guitune by Wills · · Score: 2, Informative

      Since the official download page is currently down, here is another place to download the recent source version 0.5.2

  2. OLGA by darnok · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The OnLine Guitar Archive (OLGA) is a great resource for getting melodies and chord arrangements for zillions of songs. Although I play guitar, I find it very valuable for keyboard as well, and I suspect you would for violin.

    Also check out Audacity (audio editor) - runs on Windows, Linux and Mac

    1. Re:OLGA by advocate_one · · Score: 3, Informative

      OLGA has been shut down by the RIAA... however, their archive is out there in torrent form and also on foreign sites which don't care about the RIAA...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    2. Re:OLGA by tonigonenstein · · Score: 1

      You do realise a tablature archive has nothing to do with what the submitter asked for, do you ?

      --
      The sooner you fall behind, the more time you have to catch up.
    3. Re:OLGA by CyrusSukhia · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually it was shut down by the National Music Publishers' Association (NMPA).

    4. Re:OLGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a post has a parent link, you should click it *before* clicking reply.

  3. I need a metronome..... by Rank_Tyro · · Score: 1

    I am trying to learn how to play the drums, and I do great as long as I don't have to play with another instrument.

    I know I am supposed to be the timekeeper, but what I really need is something to help me keep time untill I can get the timing turned into muscle memory.

    I need something that I can load onto an mp3 player, because simply using a mechanical metronome doesn't work because I drown it out.

    Any suggestions?

    --
    Today's show is brought to you by the number 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0: 25
    1. Re:I need a metronome..... by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      I need something that I can load onto an mp3 player, because simply using a mechanical metronome doesn't work because I drown it out.

      Any suggestions?


      Download a metronome program, set it to the beat you want & redirect the sound output to a file, convert that file to mp3 & bob's your uncle!

      You could batch up a whole bunch of different BPMs too.

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    2. Re:I need a metronome..... by chiark · · Score: 2, Informative

      A lot of drummers use an earpiece with a simple click track to keep time... Complaints that it destroys a drummer's "groove" are fairly common, but on the other hand it does help pull you into a rigid tempo - use it as an aid, not a crutch.

    3. Re:I need a metronome..... by IceCreamGuy · · Score: 3, Informative

      I use a Boss DB-12 electronic metronome, it's got tons of features and is still really easy to use. It has a line out that I plug my Vic Firth drummer isolation phones into and that works much better than any mp3 type of system you could cook up, since you can change tempo, time signature, and accents. It works great with the isolation phones; both the drums and the metronome are clearly audible. You could also easily do the same thing with the Wired Metronome that is mentioned in the post.

    4. Re:I need a metronome..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're not the (only) time keeper, just the most audible producer of timing queues. The latter is what makes your time keeping skill less of an issue than your ability to read other players timing since you stick out like a sore thumb if you flam with them. If you play in a group you feed off each other to keep the time, constantly adjusting to each other. If you are the only one sticking rigidly to the beat when the others drifted a bit, you will (quite rightly) get flack for it.

      That said, for time keeping practice, nothing beats a metronome. Get an electronic one that flashes and tape it in front of you if you feel fancy, otherwise but the mechanical one level on your bassdrum. Or create an mp3 with just a beat on it... the point is that it Does Not Change - if you get out of sync with it its your fault. I wouldn't recommend playing along with recorded (non-electronic) music for this as it is a lot harder in comparison; you do not get the group vibe (hard to explain) that would let you adjust to their minute changes in their timing.

    5. Re:I need a metronome..... by rishistar · · Score: 1

      You can get electronic and portable programmable metronomes now with headphone sockets. Though watch out - a number of drummers actually get their deafness from using click tracks rather than the actual drumming!

      --
      Professor Karmadillo Songs of Science
    6. Re:I need a metronome..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      While it's true that the entire band must stay together, it's usually the drummer who's relied upon to keep a STEADY beat. After all, they're almost always playing a constant stream of eights or sixteenths, and when that's going on it's really easy to tell if the tempo is varying. When playing together, though, try to both keep a steady beat AND keep that same beat synchronized with everyone else. Otherwise you'll probably fall prey to russian dragon syndrome (rushing/dragging), and when that happens, it's usually everyone BUT the band members who can tell that it's going on.

    7. Re:I need a metronome..... by koa · · Score: 1

      Why not use your MP3 player? Most production music nowadays is recorded to a click-track. Simply get a nice pair of quality headphones (not entirely required but helps) and load some of your favorite music into it. Play along.

      You will accomplish 2 things:

      1) Your timing will improve.
      2) You will pick up technique from what you hear by tring to recreate it.

      --
      ....move along....nothing to see here....
    8. Re:I need a metronome..... by Eideewt · · Score: 1

      Nah, you're not the time keeper. Or at least you shouldn't be. Everyone has the responsibility to play in time. You're more like the time enhancer, since its you're job to accent beats for the audience in a way that other intstruments can't. Of course, in practice its often up to the drummer and bassist to keep the guitars near tempo.

      If you need to put together click tracks, try Hydrogen, a free software drum sequencer. Its overkill, but it should work fine. (Don't get too loud though, and wear hearing protection! Drums can easily destroy your hearing. I realize that your metronome may just be a quiet one, but that warning can't be overstated.) You could also use Audacity to export simple click tracks, but you can't make it click only on certain beats, so it's limited as a practice tool.

      A good trick for working on your time is to set the metronome to play only two beats when you're good with one, and every four beats after that, and so on. When you can go that long between clicks, and still be in time, you're pretty solid. Playing at extremely slow speeds is also good for this.

    9. Re:I need a metronome..... by MikeTheMan · · Score: 1

      Check out Metronome Online. It's free, functional, and easy to use, if you don't mind being near your computer while you practice.

    10. Re:I need a metronome..... by C0rinthian · · Score: 1

      Go to a music store, and get one of the cheap 'credit card' mets. Wear a hat/visor/headband while you play, and use it to strap the met over your ear.

      Another good idea to start to internalize tempos is to find songs that match different tempos. For example, any Sousa march is at approx 120 BPM. They're easy to remember, and are good for kick-starting your internal timekeeping.

    11. Re:I need a metronome..... by CrankyOldBastard · · Score: 1

      My suggestion would be to try to geta groove happening in your head when you're out walking. Right away from the kit. The timing thing has to come from your natural rhythms, so you have to learn to be able to feel the timing signals within your body. Once you can keep a steady beat happening inside you as you walk at a steady pace, try things like counting in 5 over 4 (so count 1 2 3 4 5 , so you come back to 1 evey 2nd time your right foot hits the ground. Once you've got that, practice keeping the beat inside you steady while you walk at different paces, changing speeds, stopping and starting. These are all thiings you have to deal with when playing, so learn to keep the time wi5hout the instrument. When you've got it then you'll find your playing will keep time.

      I do great as long as I don't have to play with another instrument tells me you're not listening to the "beats" inside (things like your pulse and breathing are a part of it, but it's more than that). You klnow why us old guys have tight grooves when we play (even if it's square dancing and polkas)? It's because we listen to the beats inside ourselvces, and keep time to that. Try it.

    12. Re:I need a metronome..... by Crabbyass · · Score: 1
      I am trying to learn how to play the drums, and I do great as long as I don't have to play with another instrument.
      So what exactly makes you think that ANY piece of technology will help play well with other instruments? Technology is all fine and dandy, sure, but there's no substitute for the practical experience of playing with others. You might start off rusty, sure....we all do. I highly doubt that there is ANY player of any instrument who's first experience in collaborating with other musicians went well. So my suggestion to you would be to keep playing, and keep playing with others. If you rely too much on all of this commercial software, you'll probably end up playing like a robot. Use the technology as a teaching tool. Don't let IT teach you. Experience is the key. Collaborate with other musicians who have more experience than you (and who are willing to put up with your "rustiness"). Trust me, you'll learn INFINITELY more after one jam with them then you would after using any piece of software. Oh, and find yourself a good teacher. And keep in mind that the best drummers aren't necessarily the best teachers. Disclaimer: I am not anti-technology. I am a musician with an extensive background in sound recording/audio editing, etc. As such, I've also seen the negative things that technology DOES to musicians,
  4. Hydrogen by egjertse · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm learning to play bass guitar at the moment, and I've found Hydrogen (Free, Open Source) to be of great help. It's a drum machine, which lets me quickly setup simple or more advanced drum-loops, even layout the drum patterns for an entire song. Granted, this is probably not quite as important for a violin player - although it can be used as a simple metronome as well.

    1. Re:Hydrogen by legoburner · · Score: 2, Informative

      Using drum patterns from Hydrogen is indeed useful and I use them along with dubbed recordings using Ardour which allows the usual multi-track recording, editing, etc. A requirement is the brilliant jackd audio connection kit which allows a crazy level of audio processing and manipulation. All in all, I have no need for anything other than linux when recording/dubbing music.

    2. Re:Hydrogen by Aypok · · Score: 1

      I second this recommendation of Hydrogen - it really is great. I use it to play simple beats in the background whilst I play guitar/bass, when trying to write songs - then use it to do the entire drum track for the recording.

      Not only that, but I also find it useful when practising drums; create a beat to which I can play along, then slowly add in more complexity and try to keep up. :)

  5. Hardware Tuner is ~$20 by billstewart · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I've never played instruments like violins, trombones, or fretless basses that require you to find your own pitch (other than voice) - it's hard enough on guitars, dulcimers, ukes, and baritone horns that play the notes you tell them to :-)

    For stringed instruments, I've found it really really helpful to have a hardware tuner, and most of them run about $20-30, and they're pocket-sized and last forever on a battery and fit in the accessories pockets of instrument cases or music folders. You _can_ also use them to find your note on a continuous-pitch instrument. The Korg model that I use has a meter (well, an LCD simulation of one) that shows how far above or below the nearest note you are, as well as red and green LEDs that tell you if you're sharp or flat. There are other shapes of tuners that clamp onto instruments, and some of them have backlights which can be helpful.

    I've used PC software versions in the past, mostly with names like "Guitar Tuner" or whatever, but dragging a laptop around was more trouble than spending the $20 for the tuner - your mileage may vary. On the other hand, with a dulcimer you tune it once and it stays in tune for a whole session until you want retune to change modes, and with a uke you tune it once and it stays only slightly out of tune for at least a little while, so either way you're not trying to get the feedback while you're actually playing, so you may need something different.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Hardware Tuner is ~$20 by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      yes, but such hardware tuners suck. a software strobe tuner is much cheaper than a strobe hardware tuner though.

      --
      Conservatism: The fear that somewhere, somehow, someone you think is your inferior is being treated as your equal.
  6. Firefox by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Who uses their computer to learn a musical instrument?

    Get Firefox, and use it to order scores and a real metronome---and to find yourself a real music instructor---online.

    1. Re:Firefox by apathyruiner · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, OLGA is/was great for learning guitar, it's many tutorials and tabs help quite a bit.
      Of course there is also educational software for instruments as well, though I've never used any.
      Audio editors are GREAT for learning to play, cut the tempo in half and retain the pitch to get those fast licks nailed and refine your technique. Record your playing and listen to what you thought were tiny mistakes become glaring errors.

      --
      -= I can't think of anything witty, creative, or insightful for my sig, so deal with this. =-
    2. Re:Firefox by Eideewt · · Score: 1

      Maybe more people would learn with their computers if there was more software available.

  7. for guitar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    having kguitar and dguitar installed is quite handy

    although i have some problems with kguitar 1.5, as it often crashes with my tabs - but it produces a really nice printout

    dguitar is easy to install, and has no problems to produce midi output in my settings (which is broken for kguitar atm, dunno why exactly)

    both can read the guitar pro 3 and 4 format files (which are most important for me besides ascii tabs)

    anyone has another tab viewer for linux in these formats?

    1. Re:for guitar by advocate_one · · Score: 2, Informative
      Kguitar midi output isn't broken, it assumes you're running timidity as a daemon. Dguitar can use either timidity or the java sound engine, when it uses timidity, it calls timidity explicitly.

      Once I discovered Tuxguitar, I dropped kguitar and dguitar...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    2. Re:for guitar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you cannot imagine how you saved my day ....

      its awesome i didnt find it earlier, its absolutely what i was looking for

      now i just need to find the option to print out the voices altogether and not standalone, but that is not a show stopper at least

  8. Tuxguitar by advocate_one · · Score: 3, Informative
    Tuxguitar...

    ignore the name...

    it's a crossplatform java program that funtions almost as Guitar Pro. It can read and write several available formats so there's plenty of stuff out there to load up and examine/play back. I use it to examine the Bass score for pieces. It does Tab input and conventional music notation (conveniently on the same window) and there a fretboard display as well which shows you where to stick your finger (unfortunately it don't show you which one is best though)

    --
    Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    1. Re:Tuxguitar by xtracto · · Score: 0, Troll

      Error in java lanucher. Error ocurred while attempting to find Java class org/herac/tuxguitar/gui/TuxGuitar

      Mmmm... so much for the Open Source is better than...

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    2. Re:Tuxguitar by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      take it to their forums... I think you'll find the answer to your problem is already in there.

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    3. Re:Tuxguitar by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Mmmm... so much for the Open Source is better than...

      Exactly right! The failure of one Open Source program has ended the debate regarding the superiority of proprietary vs open source software.

      May's well close slashdot down now - you've settled the argument.

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    4. Re:Tuxguitar by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      Exactly. It's just like all the people who have a bad girlfriend or boyfriend and then give up on sex and relationships. Clearly the single example determines the whole.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    5. Re:Tuxguitar by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      ah look... here we are... the answer to his problem...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    6. Re:Tuxguitar by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      oh, I don't know. Generally, if there is a bad break-up enough to cause somebody to say enough, then it is generally, a good thing for the gene-pool. I have noticed that both parties contribute to bad break-ups.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    7. Re:Tuxguitar by treeves · · Score: 1

      if that's all slashdot's about, then I'll agree. . .might as well shut it down.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
  9. Learning an instrument... by Cryptnotic · · Score: 3, Funny

    Can't you just buy a six string and play it 'til your fingers bleed?

    --
    My other first post is car post.
    1. Re:Learning an instrument... by tepples · · Score: 1

      The summer of '69 was almost forty years ago.

    2. Re:Learning an instrument... by Scutter · · Score: 1

      There's no five-and-dime near me, either.

      --

      "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
    3. Re:Learning an instrument... by ninewands · · Score: 1

      I was '66 for me ... spent the money from my first summer job on my first guitar ... ah ... those were the days.

  10. Neither of the above. by fatrat · · Score: 4, Informative

    As a violinist, I'd not use either of these programs. The metronome one is handy, but why fire up a PC when a cheap bit of hardware is just as good and a lot more portable?

    Tuning software/gadets I'm against. I've known lots of people that learnt with them and I think they harm not help. You need to get used to *really* listening to what you are doing. Looking at notes on a screen actively hinders this IMO.

    1. Re:Neither of the above. by Riddler+Sensei · · Score: 1

      It's true, I rather dislike trying to teach or play with people who learned the rudiments of their instrument while being horribly addicted to a tuner. They rarely have any concept what-so-ever of how to fit into a chord, how to tune themselves on the fly, or to even know when they are wrong.

      There are too many "Moosik 4 Dummies" approaches and beginners books these days that do nothing but cradle you and never teach how to actually PLAY. This may, perhaps, be seen as a positive thing as to get people active in the creation of music and art instead of being so God awful passive (this really is a problem with our artistic culture these days, people need stop doing nothing but consuming and join in on the artistic creation). However, it mostly just creates a culture where people know where to put their fingers to make the pretty sounds come out, yet they still have no idea what they're actually doing which makes it impossible for them to create anything on their own.

      As a side note, I DO own a rather nifty three way metronome/tuner/pitch producer that I picked up for $25. It has a jack on the side for hooking up electric instruments to it for tuning. I've only used that particular feature once when a friend used it to tune a guitar which had every string nearly 75cents flat. Other than that, I use it mostly for the metronome feature and I don't see any sort of computer software replacing it any time soon. Convenience and portability are what truly matters here (I don't think even your fancy little Macbooks will fit on a music stand).

    2. Re:Neither of the above. by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      I have to second this. It seems that every few months there's another Ask Slashdot asking "How can my computer teach me to play an instrument." And every time the actual musicians in the crowd chime in with "It can't!" Like fatrat said, get a portable metronome for time-keeping. As for the tuner, get some tuning forks or a pitch pipe or maybe an electronic tuner that spits out various tones. And then use your EAR to match those notes (not your eyes). That's the only way you will really learn how to play in tune (as well as adjust your intonation as necessary).

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    3. Re:Neither of the above. by kfg · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Tuning software/gadets I'm against. I've known lots of people that learnt with them and I think they harm not help.

      Tuners are going to be the death of string playing, particularly with regards to traditional and baroque music.

      I've started to see electric fiddles with frets on them. People, there's a bloody damned good reason that violins don't have frets on them in the first place; and it isn't just to annoy you.

      It's so you can play the right pitch, whatever that pitch is; and it often isn't the one that the tuner tells you it is.

      Learn to hear intervals, not notes; and learn to tune by fifths. Then go out and get yourself a shitload of the oldest recordings of solo Irish and Old Time fiddle music you can find and learn to hear the microtones.

      This may rankle at first, but that's only because your ear has already been corrupted by the tuner/equal tempered piano. There's a whole lot more, even in western music, than the over rigidly defined 12 notes of the equal tempered chromatic scale.

      Like consonant intervals that are actually consonant and not merely almost consonant. When I've been playing solo violin for a few hours and then move to piano the piano actally hurts my musical ear. It takes some time to be able to not hear it as slightly out of tune.

      This doesn't, of course, mean that you shouldn't learn to play along with a piano and match its musical tones, but you should be aware of the fact that when you do so you are making a compromise with the music.

      And the best way to learn to play along with a piano is to play along with a piano, not using a tuner. In fact you should learn to play along with several different pianos, as in practice they'll actually all be in slightly different states of tune and you should be able to hear that and adjust for it.

      Music is sound and thus about hearing.

      KFG

    4. Re:Neither of the above. by JabberWokky · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Anybody over about 30 and many people over 20 who are learning their first instrument have to learn some pretty darn fundamental things. They aren't going to be able to get a groove or jam when they can't even keep a basic 4/4 beat. I've known plenty of people who couldn't separate out a Beatles bassline or find and keep the beat on a folk song. People who learned when they were kids or in their 20s have no problem whatsoever and can't understand that others just can't hear the fundamental basics of music. I grew up with a guitar playing father and learned the circle of fifths with my ABCs, but I recognize that many people who didn't have an interest in music early in their lives simply can't pick out individual instruments or the basic beat from even simple songs, or even tell a single note from harmony or a chord from a note.

      We're not talking about a teenager learning guitar... this is a older person learning to play, quite possibly for the first time in their lives. If so, they've been ignoring the basic things about music since Lyndon B. Johnson was president and Woodstock was just a bird in a comic strip. There's no problem with that, but things that "cradle you" are often needed just to relearn and slowly internalize what a teenager or child can pick up very quickly right from music.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    5. Re:Neither of the above. by NetRAVEN5000 · · Score: 1

      I see your point, but I still like TuxGuitar - it lets me not only listen to the music and play along, but also look at the guitar tabs at the same time. It's handy for beginners.

    6. Re:Neither of the above. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      since Lyndon B. Johnson was president and Woodstock was just a bird in a comic strip.

      Woodstock the comic strip bird was named after Woodstock the festival, which had a bird in its logo.

    7. Re:Neither of the above. by supertsaar · · Score: 1

      So maybe you don't like the 12 tone scale, but if you play more than one scale in one song you are in BIG trouble if you don't use the system that J.S. Bach introduced.....how do you deal with that?
      BTW, most fiddles _had_ frets on them before the days of old Johan Sebastian, if I'm not mistaken. (i might be, I may play fretless bass & upright but I'm no expert)
      All that medieval stuff that never leaves the one key drives me barking mad after half an hour, mind you, and the same goes for Irish music even though I do like those long licks that they all play unisono, very nice especially if you have a guiness (or two) while you listen to it :). But after two songs I always think the rest just sounds the same. Don't take it personal, I have the same problem with most Salsa. I guess you'd say I don't understand the music. That's fine with me.
      On my fretted bass I have always been struggling to get the frets to match the notes they should play, this is more a physical problem (different strings, different thicknesss, different pitch change when pressed down etc. ) : it takes a sh*tload of carefull adjusting to get it right, and on some of the cheaper makes you just never get it right. Normally you don't notice it unless you go way up to the 12th fret though....(12th fret should be at almost exactly half string length but you need to compensate for the pitch increase you get when pushing the string down, so it is usuallly very very slightly _before_ the actual exact middle, but i'm drifting off here...)

      --
      The Bigger The Headache The Bigger the Pill
    8. Re:Neither of the above. by Bozzio · · Score: 1

      That's not the point. He wasn't saying these books taught the basics, and that using them was a waste of time. He was saying the books skipped the basics, and cradled the reader through the hardest part of picking up an instrument. Learning the basics of an instrument, and music, is crucial and incredibly hard. These books generally skip a lot of basic steps in favor of getting the student to make some sound, but in doing so robs the student of a deeper understanding of his/her instrument.

      If a violinist learns to play in tune with a tuner, and never learns to adjust his/her tuning for the mood of a piece or for who he/she is playing with, then that approach to tuning is USELESS! What the GP was trying to say is that most of the "Music for Dummies" books don't offer the strong musical foundation required for growth on instrument later on. That is to say, if these 'book students' keep playing for years, they will find themselves held back by shoddy technique and a poor understanding of the subtleties of their instrument. It is not uncommon for musicians to have to 'unlearn' their technique after years of playing, simply because their first instructor didn't notice a critical flaw in their technique (embouchure, grip, etc...).

      --
      I just pooped your party.
    9. Re:Neither of the above. by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      Tuners are going to be the death of string playing, particularly with regards to traditional and baroque music.

      I've started to see electric fiddles with frets on them.


      I'd be as shocked and outraged over that as you seem to be, except I can see that an "electric fiddle" is not the same instrument as "a violin". You're not going to see Jean-Luc Ponty playing Vivaldi with the London Philharmonic.

      Learn to hear intervals, not notes; and learn to tune by fifths. Then go out and get yourself a shitload of the oldest recordings of solo Irish and Old Time fiddle music you can find and learn to hear the microtones.

      That's great advice, but I'm not sure it's all that applicable to a n00b musician who hasn't yet mastered the difference between B flat and B natural. Twelve-tone equal temperament may not be the last system of intonation a musician should learn, but it should be the first.

    10. Re:Neither of the above. by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      have you actually read Guitar for Dummies or Bass Guitar for Dummies??? they're solid on theory and practical... they intend you to play it right and to know why you're doing it that way as well. They're a heck of a lot better than the other "non-dummies" beginners books out there.

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    11. Re:Neither of the above. by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      So maybe you don't like the 12 tone scale, but if you play more than one scale in one song you are in BIG trouble if you don't use the system that J.S. Bach introduced.....how do you deal with that?

      That's only an issue for instruments with fixed intonations: pianos, harps, fretted guitars. Other instrumentalists--wind players, brass, fretless strings--are easily able to change intonation by adjusting embrouchure or finger position.

    12. Re:Neither of the above. by advocate_one · · Score: 1
      it takes a sh*tload of carefull adjusting to get it right, and on some of the cheaper makes you just never get it right. Normally you don't notice it unless you go way up to the 12th fret though....

      pages 248 to 251 of Bass Guitar For Dummies... it's an easy job once you see how and can play harmonics. Set the action up correctly first, then go for the intonation.

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    13. Re:Neither of the above. by Bozzio · · Score: 1

      Some of the dummy books may be good, some may be bad, but you said it yourself, there are a lot of bad beginner books out there.

      It could also be that the guitar is an instrument suited to be taught by book. Violin, on the other hand, is NOT.

      --
      I just pooped your party.
    14. Re:Neither of the above. by dbc001 · · Score: 1

      can you point us to some particular recordings?

    15. Re:Neither of the above. by supertsaar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's only an issue for instruments with fixed intonations
      No it's not. (?)...I remember that if you keep playing perfect fifths you end up half a note sharp when you get back to your starting note.
      The trick is to spread that difference out without it becoming too annoying (granted: this way you are always playing slightly out of key).
      Does it matter if you do this by ear on your fretless or leave it to mr. piano tuner? (BTW, on a bass it ain't all that critical, but on the high notes you'll notice immediately)

      --
      The Bigger The Headache The Bigger the Pill
    16. Re:Neither of the above. by gymell · · Score: 1
      There are many different temperaments which use a 12-note scale. And you're confusing well temperament with equal temperament. Bach did not introduce or use equal temperament. In fact Bach wrote the Well-Tempered Clavier to exploit the different sonorities of the 24 major and minor keys as demonstrated by a well-tempered instrument. In well temperament, each key is playable but has its own unique quality, as opposed to the concept of equal temperament, where every key sounds exactly the same (and inherently out of tune.) Listen to a recording performed on an instrument tuned in a well temperament, and the difference will be apparent.


      Also, I'm not sure what you mean by "All that medieval stuff that never leaves the one key". First, there was no concept of key in the medieval period - everything was written in modes which is an entirely different type of theory from modern keys. Second, I think your statement shows that you haven't listened to much medieval music. A musical period that covers almost 1000 years (500 - 1450) does have a lot to offer in variety on many levels, if only you take the time to pay attention.
       

    17. Re:Neither of the above. by supertsaar · · Score: 1

      Second, I think your statement shows that you haven't listened to much medieval music.
      You're right. I cant find the mp3's anywhere. I was referring to the stuff that i _did_ hear (the typical stuff with the draailier (sorry, can't think of the english word)
      But don't take it personal man, lots of music drives me barking mad after 30 minutes. Charlie Parker, Frank Zappa, Phillip Glass, Milt Jackson, the Ramones, Penguin Cafe Orchestra, Scott Joplin, Barry Manilow, Jimi Hendrix. Guess I have a short attention span.

      --
      The Bigger The Headache The Bigger the Pill
    18. Re:Neither of the above. by supertsaar · · Score: 1

      Draailier: something went upf*cked with that link. I probably made a mistake.
      I meant this instrument : http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draailier
      I meant _that_ sort of medieval music...

      --
      The Bigger The Headache The Bigger the Pill
    19. Re:Neither of the above. by gymell · · Score: 1
      Don't worry, I'm not taking it personally.


      The English word you were looking for is "hurdy gurdy." Don't judge all medieval music based on that one instrument. Very little instrumental music was notated before the Renaissance and what has survived isn't typically solo material. Certainly not with the hurdy gurdy, which was (and still is) used more as an accompaniment drone. For something more interesting, check out ensembles like Anonymous 4, Sequentia, or David Munrow's Early Music Consort.

      Lots of music sounds the same to me and/or drives me crazy. As far am I concerned, everything went downhill after 1750 (death of Bach.) But being an organist, I guess I would be a bit biased about that.

      Oh BTW, I'm not man. ;-)

    20. Re:Neither of the above. by supertsaar · · Score: 1

      Ha, thanks for the tips. I'll see...
      And tell you what: when I wrote 'man' I was thinking : what if this is one the 2 non-male users of slashdot? Ain't that something....

      --
      The Bigger The Headache The Bigger the Pill
    21. Re:Neither of the above. by bughouse26 · · Score: 1

      You string snobs love to complain about equal temperment. Those of us who play woodwind instruments are very thankful western music evolved beyond just temperment years ago. Without it we would either be constrained to play in fewer keys or require ~20 more fingers to cover the exploding number of toneholes just temperment would require.

    22. Re:Neither of the above. by jafac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Learn to hear intervals, not notes; and learn to tune by fifths.

      You're asking too much from most people, who may or may not be moderately musically inclined, but frankly, just plain can't hear that shit. (hell, at my age, I'm lucky I hear anything higher than 10,000 Hz anymore).

      Ironic that you cite "folk music". What you call "folk music" plainly has it's origins and style in actual folk music, taken over by virtuosos.

      Nothing wrong with virtuosos, mind you.

      But not everyone can be one.
      Most people don't even have the ability to appreciate one when they hear it.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    23. Re:Neither of the above. by quisph · · Score: 2, Informative
      That's only an issue for instruments with fixed intonations

      No it's not. (?)

      Yes it is. Two good trumpeters (or violinists, or flutists, or singers, etc.) can play a major third in perfect tune if they listen to each other and adjust their intonation. But a pianist *cannot* play play a major third in perfect tune on an equal-tempered piano, period.

      I remember that if you keep playing perfect fifths you end up half a note sharp when you get back to your starting note.

      This is true, but it's a non-issue for most instruments. The performers aren't stuck with whatever frequency the instrument gives them; they can adjust it on the fly. It is only a problem for fixed-pitch instruments like the piano.

    24. Re:Neither of the above. by quisph · · Score: 1

      I've got news for you... Woodwind players don't play in equal temperament any more than string players do. String players make adjustments with their fingers, you make adjustments with your embouchure and breathing.

    25. Re:Neither of the above. by kfg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      frankly, just plain can't hear that shit.

      Because they haven't learned. You learn things by doing.

      I'm lucky I hear anything higher than 10,000 Hz anymore

      You are speaking here of range, not pitch sense. The two are unrelated.

      Ironic that you cite "folk music". What you call "folk music" plainly has it's origins and style in actual folk music, taken over by virtuosos.

      I did not cite "folk music." I cited field recordings of actual traditional muscians who learned to play music before the advent of such recording. Myself I'm just old enough that in my youth I was able to hear, live, a few people who learned to play in the late 19th century.

      After one of my concerts a year or so ago a gentleman came up to me and said, "Incredible! I didn't even know anyone still played like that." Some of us who learned traditional music traditionally still do.

      To hear one of the starker contrasts between traditional music and virtuoso "folk" music listen to a modern recording of of Scotish "traditional" music and an older recording of Cape Breton music (which is very close to what Scottish music sounded like before the virtuosos "improved" it).

      Nothing wrong with virtuosos, mind you.

      But not everyone can be one.
      Most people don't even have the ability to appreciate one when they hear it.


      This gets back to some statements I made a couple of weeks ago (and took a fair amount of heat over), that anyone who does not have any actual physical or neurological disability can learn to play within a few percent of the abililty of a virtuoso, i.e., not so well that an "expert" cannot hear the difference, but so well that the average listener cannot tell the difference.

      All it takes is a certain amount of properly applied dedication, over the course of about a decade.

      A story is told that after a concert a woman once walked up to Isaac Stern and said, "I'd give my life to be able to play like you."

      Stern replied, "Madam, that's exactly what I did."

      There is a lesson to be learned in that reply.

      KFG

    26. Re:Neither of the above. by supertsaar · · Score: 1

      But a pianist *cannot* play play a major third in perfect tune on an equal-tempered piano, period.
      Yup, you re absolutely right. But my line of thinking is that we may be so used to the equal tempered tuning that we will intonate the same way on our 'fretless' anyway.
      And the sense of 'perfect' seems to vary with culture as well....

      the performers aren't stuck with whatever frequency the instrument gives them
      Like I said: you have to leave it to Mr. Piano Tuner to pre-intonate your instrument for you. That's where he makes his money...

      --
      The Bigger The Headache The Bigger the Pill
    27. Re:Neither of the above. by C0rinthian · · Score: 1
      Yup, you re absolutely right. But my line of thinking is that we may be so used to the equal tempered tuning that we will intonate the same way on our 'fretless' anyway.
      Not if you have a decent ear. You should hear the intonation problems and correct it. You can only tune an instrument so well, and the rest of it is on the fly adjustments.
      And the sense of 'perfect' seems to vary with culture as well....
      Yes and No. Yes, the traditional tonality set down by Bach that western culture is based on is very different from what you find elsewhere. However, consonant and dissonant intervals are simply a function of how sound waves interact. It has nothing to do with culture and everything to do with physics. Tonality is simply how those consonant and dissonant intervals are used to make music.
    28. Re:Neither of the above. by kfg · · Score: 1

      You string snobs love to complain about equal temperment.

      Actually, I'd have to claim guitar as my primary instrument with my classical training almost entirely focused on piano (I had a handful of violin and flute lessons as a child). I do love my fiddle though, perhaps because I'd have to claim my primary musical "talent" is as a singer, not as an instrumentalist, and fiddle is the most "vocal" of the instruments.

      Those of us who play woodwind instruments are very thankful western music evolved beyond just temperment years ago. Without it we would either be constrained to play in fewer keys or require ~20 more fingers to cover the exploding number of toneholes just temperment would require.

      Get the hence and buy a penny whistle. Under ten bucks in a brick and mortar. Learn to play the chromatic scale on it by combinations of alternate fingerings, partial holing and breath control. Learn what you lost by relying on mechanical devices, rather than on the skill of the player.

      The fact of the matter is that you do not need a single key to play a chromatic scale.

      Yeah, they make life easier. You can always have a few instruments instead of one. Not a terrible financial burden, since much of the cost of you instrument is for the keywork itself. You can get a set of 6 penny whistles online for under 30 bucks.

      Put a reed on a whistle and you've got yourself a keyless clarinet (you can actually buy six hole, keyless clarinets).

      While you're in the store aquiring you penny whistle walk over to the keyboard department and have a look at the modern, high end digital pianos. You'll find they have presets for various temperaments (some even have the ability to individually tune keys as well) and pitch bending wheels for microtonal control.

      Ironically while string players are going through the process of forgetting their craft there is a whole new gereration of "piano" players that are in serious danger of rediscovering the joys of total control of pitch (the ultimate irony will be when the modern generation of string players start bitching at the keyboard players for not having perfect intonation).

      Why not learn how to join them?

      KFG

    29. Re:Neither of the above. by bughouse26 · · Score: 1

      The point was that woodwinds are designed to replicate equal temperment, not just temperment. Earlier woodwinds from this millenium did try and replicate just temperment. These of course had way too many tone holes and were impossible to master. This, along with similar complications on piano predecessors, is of course why western music adopted equal temperment in the first place. Of course the limits of physics and human engineering mean that woodwinds are inexact in their replication of equal temperment, but this fact is entirely beside the point.

    30. Re:Neither of the above. by C0rinthian · · Score: 1
      Learn to hear intervals, not notes; and learn to tune by fifths.


      That's great advice, but I'm not sure it's all that applicable to a n00b musician who hasn't yet mastered the difference between B flat and B natural.
      The difference is an interval of a half step. :P
    31. Re:Neither of the above. by bughouse26 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately I haven't found many composers and arrangers calling for penny whistles. If brass, piano, and woodwind players of former centuries complained about it being too hard, you can certainly bet the majority of today's players would as well. This is of course the reason why equal temperment was adopted in the first place.

    32. Re:Neither of the above. by kfg · · Score: 1

      Twelve-tone equal temperament may not be the last system of intonation a musician should learn, but it should be the first.

      My experience is that it is generally best to start noobs with "Do Re Mi."

      If, in the process, you can impart to them what Do, Re and Mi are they have knowledge that they can build on for the rest of their lives. Otherwise all they learn is some particular fingering by rote.

      In my previous round on this topic I was criticised for claiming that anyone can learn to play a musical instrument extremely well, that it was a matter of training in skills, not a matter innate "talent."

      Someone responded with the observation that there are some people who can pick up an instrument they've never seen before and play it within a few minutes. Well, as it happens, I am one of those people.

      Therefore I know something that perhaps people who do not have this "talent" do not know. This ability is purely psycological. It comes from an intellectual understanding of the properties of sound production, music and certain innate properties of all musical instruments.

      My mom once won a bet on this. She and my step dad were in the Ecudoran Andes and came across a street peddler hawking Quenas (an end blown flute; and particularly hard to play). Neither he nor she could get so much as a squeak out of the thing. My mom avered that I would be able to play it in short order. My step dad demured and the bet was on.

      When it was presented to me I could tell how it was to be played by looking at it (I'd never played an end blown flute before, but I understood the principle of its sound production and scale layout), blew it a few times to get the mechanics of tone production down, then played Haste to the Wedding on it. I didn't play it great, but I did play it.

      If you learn concepts you can later apply them anywhere.

      The problem is that it is actually relatively easy to learn something, anything, no matter whether that thing is correct or not, but damnably hard to unlearn something. If you learn things by pure rote, this is a "right" note, this is a "wrong" note, this a "right" fingering, this is "wrong" fingering, that will color the way you perceive everything after that.

      Now the core of my claim that anyone can learn to play is that it is a simple rote process. Just patterning, as any dog is capable of, but that does not imply that learning music is only patterning. You can learn to understand what you are doing and why you are doing it at the same time. The two are not mutually exclusive.

      KFG

    33. Re:Neither of the above. by quisph · · Score: 1

      No, you missed the point. A good woodwind player will naturally resist playing in equal temperament, even if his/her instrument is designed for it, because equal temperament is audibly out of tune.

    34. Re:Neither of the above. by quisph · · Score: 2, Interesting
      But my line of thinking is that we may be so used to the equal tempered tuning that we will intonate the same way on our 'fretless' anyway.

      It doesn't quite work like that. Musicians adjust intonation to slow down and/or eliminate the audible "beats" that occur when an interval is out of tune. All equal-tempered intervals, apart from the octave, create audible beats. We tend to resist playing them.

    35. Re:Neither of the above. by kfg · · Score: 1

      So maybe you don't like the 12 tone scale, but if you play more than one scale in one song you are in BIG trouble if you don't use the system that J.S. Bach introduced.....

      Not if I'm not playing an acoustic piano I'm not.

      how do you deal with that?

      Through the simple expediant of varying my pitch so that it sounds right. Most instruments other than pianos can do this (and most modern digital pianos can as well). Go listen to a "fixed pitch" harmonica player wailing the blues. Go listen to Hendrix, Stevie Ray, Miles, Bird. . .

      These boys are almost never playing the "correct" pitch.

      Now go listen to Kenny G (just for educational purposes. I'm not trying to drive you to suicide or anything like that). That souless, whiteboy sound is the result of playing to the tuner. You can have it.

      But "Aaaaaaaah!" I hear you cry. There are piano players with soul as well. Yes, there are, although they are far more rare (there is a reason blues players like guitar and harp; and a reason the Irish like fiddles). I was talking to Earl Hines about this once. He had an interesting technique; and soul.

      He told me it was actually rather simple. He learned how to play in road/whorehouses where the pianos were always broken and out of tune. He had to learn to how to play and sound good on any piano in any state of mal-mainetenence. He could do things with and to a piano that most players don't even know are possible.

      In short, he played it "wrong."

      BTW, most fiddles _had_ frets on them before the days of old Johan Sebastian, if I'm not mistaken. (i might be, I may play fretless bass & upright but I'm no expert)

      You are wrong. The violin arose about two centuries before the birth of JS and even before that mostpartially fretted (it actually evolved from the guitar, not the fiddle family, by guitar players who wanted to emulate the sound of the fiddle) and those frets were applied on a temporary basis by the player. He could change the intonation given by the frets and was not considered a decent player until he could play fretless above the fret range.

      All that medieval stuff that never leaves the one key. . .

      I'm not even sure I understand this statement.

      the same goes for Irish music . . . But after two songs I always think the rest just sounds the same. Don't take it personal, I have the same problem with most Salsa.

      I'd guess you've only heard modern players. They have a tendency to "overlike" reels, which is really a kind of "white boy" Irish music they adopted from the "Big Island."

      I have the same problem with disco though. All these forms of music have one thing in common; and in common with early rock music as well (which our parents (or maybe it was the great grandparents of the average Slashdotter) thought was just all "noise" that sounded "the same").

      They're dance music. In dance music the steady beat is king, not the melody.

      Go listen to some Irish airs.

      I guess you'd say I don't understand the music.

      Although you may well understand them even less, since they not only do away with "Western" intonation, but "Western" rhythm as well. I put western in scare quotes because Ireland is actually the western most European nation and it's music is an amalgam of European traditional music. There's very little around now that is more western than Irish music.

      When we say "western" music what we really mean is modern European classical music and its descendents, which is just a subgenre, not the whole, but the "art" music people have been on a two century long binge to make their genre the only "right" one.

      On my fretted bass I have always been struggling to get the frets to match the notes they should play, this is more a physical problem. . .

      Exactly! Your fretted bass is trying to defy both the physics and psychology

    36. Re:Neither of the above. by jafac · · Score: 1


      It's probably true for a significant portion of people that a lot more hard work and dedication is required to master a skill.
      However, there's probably another significant group for whom no amount of "practice and work hard" will produce skill mastery, let alone virtuosity.

      I had an illustration teacher who thought that way too.
      He figured that it was all just a matter of having a good protestant work ethic, and drawing 10 hours a day for 5-10 years.
      (the lazy were punished by failure, of course).

      Didn't work for me.

      I dropped out of art school and I work in computers now. And, I might add, I work very hard. But because I am relatively good at what I do, I actually ENJOY the work. Unlike drawing, where because I sucked, I did not enjoy it, and after a time, couldn't bear to spend the time. Okay, I don't suck at drawing that bad - obviously I had to be good to a certain degree, because the art program I was in was reputed to be very hard to get into. I guess I was a pickier critic of my work than was the review board.

      The point is - if one is talented, one will enjoy the drudgery work required to build the skill to virtuosity. If one is not talented, not only is that "hard work" harder, because it's not enjoyable, there's no reward, no goal in sight, for that work investment.

      I guess it's just hard for people with talent to imagine what it's like to not have it.
      (honestly, I encounter "programming gurus" who are like this as well. They assume that everybody understands the depth of their particular area of speciality implicitly. So when trying to explain something, they'll dive right into the deep stuff and assume you're following them. Tiresome.)

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    37. Re:Neither of the above. by kfg · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately I haven't found many composers and arrangers calling for penny whistles.

      Play what you want on what you want. I play the Mozart horn concertos on keyless flute. Of course if you are playing at the behest of someone the piper plays what the piper is paid to play.

      That has nothing to do with my suggestion, which was about learning, not performing.

      If you don't mind the expense try getting a hornpipe. There's actually a fair amount of late baroque early classical music that was orginally scored for that. They generally have the clarinets play it nowadays. Very few people actually pay much attention to what the composer/arranger originally had in mind, although they may well make a certain amount of noise about doing so. Noise is not practice.

      If brass, piano, and woodwind players of former centuries complained about it being too hard, you can certainly bet the majority of today's players would as well.

      Only the piano players complained (and brass players still don't have anything that can be truely considered termperament; valves just change the fundamental pitch). When (which wasn't until the mid/late 1800s) they "won" they forced everyone else to follow suit. You'll find that's when all the modern keybedecked woodwinds also arose.

      Keys do solve various "problems" (which are mostly a matter mostly of 19th century classical music fashion), but being about playing in different keys isn't really one of the primary ones. It's mostly about timbre and volume.

      You are putting the cart before the horse. You see a lack of keys as a problem because you see the keys as the source of notes. Thus to get more notes you think you need more keys. Holes are the source of notes; and most of your holes only have to exist because you have keys. If you take away the keys you still have these things called "fingers" which are actually much more versatile than keys.

      The "Concert" flute of the early 1800s only had four to six keys, and two of those were merely to extend the range beyond what fingers could easily reach. Only the remaining two to four keys were what was deemed necessary to easily produce a chromatic scale.

      You can't even play music of the period on modern instruments the way the composer intended them to be heard, because you cannot produce the quality of tone that he chose many of the notes specifically for. Modern woodwinds are designed not primarily to be chromatic, but to be bland. That is what your keys are for.

      KFG

    38. Re:Neither of the above. by kfg · · Score: 1

      He figured that it was all just a matter of having a good protestant work ethic, and drawing 10 hours a day for 5-10 years.
      (the lazy were punished by failure, of course).

      Didn't work for me.


      You were "taught" wrong by someone who was taught wrong.

      I only had a handful of violin lessons as a child because my "teacher" was an elderly German who believed in the "Weekly Beatings Method" of instruction. I quit; and taught myself. I didn't say it was simply necessary to labor. I said that labor must be properly applied.

      . . .if one is talented, one will enjoy the drudgery work required to build the skill to virtuosity.

      Ahhhhhhhh! No. You have it exactly backwards. If you enjoy the drudgery work, you will build the skill to virtuosity. This is why I do not teach those who are being forced to study by an outside force (say, a parent). Most of what is considered "talent" is simply the end result of doing what it is you like to do. Not liking something is not the same thing as being innately incapable of it, it's just that you won't learn is all, 'cause you don't really want to.

      Okay, I don't suck at drawing that bad - obviously I had to be good to a certain degree, because the art program I was in was reputed to be very hard to get into. I guess I was a pickier critic of my work than was the review board.

      This a psychological problem, not an issue of "talent." You don't need more talent. You need counseling. :)

      . . .because it's not enjoyable. . .

      Bingo! If you found it enjoyable you could not fail to reach the goal. . .after about 10 years of hard work. You likely won't even know what your actual limits are going be before about 5 years of hard work.

      Please don't take this wrong, because it's of no nevermind to me. I don't even know you and don't care about what you do to make yourself happy, but your "problem" seems to be that you don't much like work, so you follow the path of least resistence, but you mistake this for having something to do with what sort of end goal you might achieve. People do, for various reasons, procede at different paces. Some have a hard beginning, but breeze through the middle patch, while others start easy and then "plateau" at the middle patch. Both have the same talent. Both, if they stick it out, will achieve the same goal, but the former is more likely to quit than the latter simply because the latter is protecting an investment, not because he's more "talented."

      Most of my work as a teacher really has nothing to do with teaching. People are perfectly capable of learning things on their own (with suitable aids); and in fact, when it comes to issues of motor skills can only learn things on their own. I find my primary job is that of motivating.

      I guess it's just hard for people with talent to imagine what it's like to not have it.

      I can't see that I have any particular talent for music. Certainly not actually for the physical act of playing instruments. I have a lifelong battle with neurological disorders and arthritis (as a seconday symptom of genetic disease).

      I simply enjoy the process of expanding my skill set (which is a goaless goal, since nearly every day I can reach that simple goal, thus I am never really disapointed in not reaching some goal "way out there." Keep your goals close at hand, where you can grab them).

      I cannot draw worth crap. In part this is due to my neurolgical disorders, which limit the ultimate goal I can reach, but mostly it's simply because I do not draw. If I ever turn my focus in that direction I will learn, and I will learn to do it rather well.

      The only "talent" I can see that I have is simply liking to do shit. Lot's of shit. And the more shit you do, the better you become at doing shit.

      It's nothing more than the way you learned to walk and talk and wipe your own

    39. Re:Neither of the above. by supertsaar · · Score: 1

      Now go listen to Kenny G
      NOOOOOOOOO!!!!!
      "Western" intonation, "Western" rhythm
      I like a bit of flamenco or some rumanian folk music from time to time...but we're hopelessly drifting off topic here, could be that on my fretless when I play by ear I just play the right notes (sounds good to me, anyway, but I'm not even close to having absolute hearing)

      --
      The Bigger The Headache The Bigger the Pill
    40. Re:Neither of the above. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      exactly

      i tune up or down the piano a third or less of a halftone cause its mistuned ... ;)

      pardon me, pianos which are used in duetts or fuller settings should be tuned -before- playing, not while playing

      of course your argument still holds for the rest of the instrument, which all have to be tuned to the synth/piano used together with them

      and you are absolutely right, that you should do it with your own body equipment - ears ....

      but adjusting a piano while playing ^^ never heared a more funny thing before

    41. Re:Neither of the above. by supertsaar · · Score: 1

      It has nothing to do with culture and everything to do with physics.
      I hope you arent' claiming that physics dictates what sounds good...:)
      For instance: some of that ' le Mystere des voix Bulgares' stuff is both clearly dissonant yet very very pleasing (to my ears, at least)
      Anyway, I'm just faking it: I'm a Bass Player. Here's a little joke for you

      A Guitar player has a serious Car Crash. After a week he wakes up in Hospital. His Band is there, wainting for him to wake up.
      The Singer says: we have good news and bad news. What would you like te hear first ?
      The Guitar player says
      Give me the bad news first!! I can take it!!
      The singer says: well, the crash was very bad, they had to surgically remove two thirds of your brain!!
      The guitar player thinks about this for a while and then asks, 'so, what is the good news then?'

      .

      .

      .

      .
      ....wait for it....
      .

      .

      .

      .
      ......drumroll........
      and then the singer says:

      The good news is we bought you a Bass Guitar!!!!!!

      --
      The Bigger The Headache The Bigger the Pill
    42. Re:Neither of the above. by C0rinthian · · Score: 1

      [blockquote] hope you arent' claiming that physics dictates what sounds good...:)[/blockquote] In the sense of consonant and dissonant intervals, yes I am. A minor second doesn't sound 'good' to the ear on it's own. (Compared to a perfect fifth or octave) However, how that minor second is used in a broader work may be pleasing.

    43. Re:Neither of the above. by bughouse26 · · Score: 1

      Nonsense. Playing solo or with strings perhaps, but not in an ensemble. Especially not with piano.

  11. some more tools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have seen denemo and solfege used for music studies. Not exactly the things you asked for but might be good aswell...

  12. some exemples by tonigonenstein · · Score: 3, Informative

    DansTuner - Tells you if you are playing a pitch in tune
    GNU Solfege - Eartraining program for GNOME
    Gtick - Digital metronome

    --
    The sooner you fall behind, the more time you have to catch up.
  13. A free tuning program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For tuning I recommend MiniTuner (win32 binary).
    It is a free program to tune the guitar using a microphone. I have tried guitune and some other linux projects, but I couldn't get them to correctly recognize all the tones of my guitar. (Probably due to my rather poor build-in microphone.) At the moment I use MiniTuner under wine, which seems to work correctly.
    I got it from a dutch site http://akkoord.be/downloads/software.htm, and it seems there is a newer version on http://www.hitsquad.com/smm/programs/MiniTuner/ (disclaimer, I have not tested that version.)

  14. MusicTheory.net by Lord+Satri · · Score: 5, Informative

    Nice, the comments provide tools I didn't know before :-) Here's another one:
    http://www.musictheory.net/
    It's a free bunch of good flash-based music trainers (downloadable for offline use).

    1. Re:MusicTheory.net by C0rinthian · · Score: 1

      Nice link! Learning the theory behind music is one of the most important things that amateur musicians often skip. I'll have to go through it and check out the actual lessons, but it looks like it covers what a music student would get in their first semester of theory.

  15. My suggestions by niceone · · Score: 1

    I'd say the fastest way would be to get a teacher, although I came to music late and never felt comfortable with that (although I did try it).

    If you're not going to get a teacher then get a mic and some recording software (there's loads of free stuff out there - audacity for example). It really hard to hear what you're doing wrong while you're doing it.

    On the tuner front, I'd go with a hardware one - the best ones IMO are the clip on ones that sense vibration. I have an Intellitouch one but there are other models now.

    Other than that, practice and have fun!

  16. There is none! by crhylove · · Score: 1

    Well, next to none. As a professional violinist, and long-time teacher as well, I've been devestatingly disappointed with nearly every FOSS app for music. Audacity is good for recording yourself, so you can gauge your progress over months, and hydrogen is great for a metronome/drum machine. Other than that I've found NOTHING.

    Sibelius is simply devestating all the other notation programs in particular, and even Finale and some of the others are eons and light years ahead of any of the FOSS alternatives.

    Hell, there still does not exist a decent nero alternative for burning cds that is FOSS. And no FOSS player rates next to winamp, which I give a C- over all.

    I'm generally a huge FOSS fan, as well, so this is all sad to me. All my computer related tasks are FOSS now (Firefox, thunderbird, nvu, filezilla, gimp, open office, shareaza, zsnes, and 1964), but anything to do with music is for some reason grossly behind.

    rhY

    --
    I hold very few opinions. I hold information based on observation and fact. If you wish to disagree, please use facts.
    1. Re:There is none! by t3553r4ct · · Score: 1

      You need to try out Miller Puckette's Pure Data. It's an open source dataflow language for audio and video processing, capable of such goodies as pitch and event detection, phase vocoding, granular synthesis, and interactive composition. Miller was the person who invented the popular Max software, which is expensive but widely recieved in academic circles. Pd is capable of anything you can imaging. See more on the Pd Wikipedia page.

    2. Re:There is none! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CD Burning: K3B works pretty well for me replacing NERO, but have you ever tried Amarok as a Audio Player? Winamp who?

    3. Re:There is none! by Simon80 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, seriously eh? Take note, people, you do not know just how much free software exists if you've only seen the stuff that runs on Windows. This from someone who only switched about a year ago.

      Don't assume that just because you can't find a good FOSS app running on Windows that the type of app you're looking for doesn't exist, there's a lot of free stuff that only runs on *nix.

    4. Re:There is none! by bkeeler · · Score: 1

      As far as notation software goes, there's Lilypond. It's a pain to learn and takes a while to set a piece of music (it took me about 40-50 hours to do Chopin's 4th Ballade), but the results look really nice.

    5. Re:There is none! by advocate_one · · Score: 1
      there are several programs that can frontend for lilypond... take most of the hard work out of it.

      Here's one...

      Denemo

      and another... noteedit

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    6. Re:There is none! by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      I picked up Lilypond very quickly, but I'm used to TeX and RTTTL so it was kind of natural. I like Lilypond in that it's the 'TeX of music' and I couldn't stand using some graphical abomination, much like I despise Word-like programs for writing text.

      What also helped is that I started off with a MIDI file from a sequencer, and polished the details in Lilypond format later. To be exact, I used my Korg Triton Le's builtin sequencer and turned it into a Lilypond file using Rosegarden. There are probably other ways to do this conversion. In any case the MIDI file provides a great starting point.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    7. Re:There is none! by dimension6 · · Score: 1

      I agree. I have not found any decent alternative to Sibelius (the program, that is). At the music conservatory I went to, we were all required to learn the Sibelius basics, and I, dying to get something that worked in Linux (I didn't try WINE or the like), tried hard to find something that could write the complex notation required for my classes. There were no alternatives as of about a year ago. Any ideas would be interesting.

    8. Re:There is none! by crhylove · · Score: 1

      Denomo looks pretty hot, but is there a windows port somewhere? I can't give up San Andreas yet, which means I can't give up windows.

      rhY

      --
      I hold very few opinions. I hold information based on observation and fact. If you wish to disagree, please use facts.
    9. Re:There is none! by crhylove · · Score: 1

      Somebody here mentioned denomo if you didn't see that listed. It looks interesting, but I'm still on the Redmond needle.

      rhY

      --
      I hold very few opinions. I hold information based on observation and fact. If you wish to disagree, please use facts.
  17. Technical skills... by Analog+Penguin · · Score: 4, Informative

    There have been some decent suggestions for metronome and tuning programs, but really, nothing can beat just dropping $30 or so on a combination tuner/metronome. Most have plugs for earpieces, so you can easily overcome the "drowning it out" problem, and should be available at your local music store.

    Also, as a clarinetist, I can tell you that it's easy to develop bad habits early on, which will be difficult to overcome later. With any musical instrument, bad habits can lead from poor technique at best to debilitating injury, but violin (and viola) are particularly prone to this. While I've never played a string instrument for any length of time, many of my friends who are string players have told me that the first two or three lessons for beginners can be devoted to just _learning to hold the instrument_. Sometimes, the bow doesn't even come into play for weeks after that.

    For this reason, I would say that the most important thing you can do as a beginning violinist is to find yourself a teacher who can show you the basic technical aspects of playing. Even if money is tight, it's worth taking just a few lessons to save yourself a lot of mental (and likely physical) anguish down the road. And of course, if money isn't really an issue, then you'll benefit from continuing lessons. There's no substitute for having a master standing over you and helping with individual issues. Many teachers love to take on adult students, so it shouldn't be hard to find someone in your area willing to teach you.

    That all being said, welcome to the music world! The violin is one of the most challenging instruments to learn, but it's also one of the most versatile and widely used throughout the world. The rewards you'll reap from the experience will be well worth the investment of time and energy.

  18. V&X stores by tepples · · Score: 1
    There's no five-and-dime near me, either.

    V&X stores are still around, except after inflation they're called Dollar Tree.

  19. not a substitute by Triv · · Score: 1

    I'm all for technology (I mean, I hang out here, so) but no software in the world is a substitute for a living, breathing music teacher. Software can't teach you how to make music expressive; otherwise you're just stringing note together.

    Go to your local music store or the music department of a local college; both of which are excellent places to get in touch with someone who'll be eager to teach you how music works.

  20. MIDI learning tool? by GURU+Meditation+8000 · · Score: 1

    A long time back in the Amiga A500 days, there was a MIDI adapter which
    came with a keyboard and various software 'games' to teach children/interested
    folk to play the piano. can't recall its name.....anyhow, the musical
    equivalent of mavis beacon touch typing (or tux-typing, or typing of the dead
    if you will.... ;-) )

    so...are their OSS equivalents of THAT type of tool?

  21. gnu solfege by ffflala · · Score: 1

    http://www.solfege.org/

    It's ear-training software, it's OSS, it works when you don't have someone else to train with. Ear-training is the musical equivalent of kung-fu training, regardless of instrument. Sing the intervals while you play them; it's not so important that you know it's a fifth or a fourth or a b-flat etc as that you can sing the note/interval/line AND play it. And if you want to be a music ninja, do the ear-training WHILE you're doing your kung-fu forms.

    Here's how it works: your goal is to be able to reproduce the sounds in your head on your instrument, preferably instantaneously. These sounds get into your head in various ways -- via the written page, songs you hear, if you're a composer your imagination. Miles Davis talked about being able to call the pitch of a door squeak.

    For instrumental technique and skill, metronome work is key. Beginners often want to work directly on developing speed, which actually delays progress. Develop proper technique first (is it a bad hurt? Technique needs work.) During your metronome sessions start slow, slower than you think you need to. You can always end the session by playing as fast as you can, but always begin slowly and work up incrementally. Listen to the difference between 40 bpm and 140 bpm. One notch per day will get you there; trying to hit your speed limit every practice will not.

    1. Re:gnu solfege by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First paragraph:

      "the musical equivalent of kung-fu training"?
      "if you want to be a music ninja"?
      "do the ear-training WHILE you're doing your kung-fu forms"?

      If you want to be accepted in the world of us growed-ups, it might pay to stop talking like an adolescent.

      That said, the rest of your message is filled with excellent advice - quality, not quantity! Some of the best advice given on here, without getting into the ego-based diatribes I've seen earlier on in the piece.

    2. Re:gnu solfege by ffflala · · Score: 1

      ACscommentingonadulthingssareasswipes says what?

  22. Try RPitch for ear training by whatthef*ck · · Score: 1
    Try my program RPitch, to develop a sense of relative pitch (the ability to recognize and name intervals just by hearing them.)

    http://rpitch.sourceforge.net/

  23. Not for muzak n00bs, but it's worth checking out.. by jons2048 · · Score: 1

    Well, I'm a wee-bit passed learning a music instrument, but there are some really great OSS apps/projects for keyboardists and (music) programmers. PD (kinda like Csound, which is also pretty cool) is fairly exceptional as a programmable virtual instrument platform (it's not intuitive _AT_ALL_, but with a basic knowledge of how to use a VCO and the concept of ADSR (Attack, Delay, Sustain, Release), you can create some pretty phat noise.

    And as far as seqencing and arrangement goes, I've been using Rosegarden and it's pretty fuckin' impressive. Agreed, it's no Sibelius, but it's free, and it works.

    Oh yeah, if you wanna see what a REAL linux music machine looks like, check out Korg's OASYS. Sorry for the absence of links. I'm pretty lazy.

  24. Matlab/Didgeridoo by DelawareGT · · Score: 1

    I've been playing didgeridoo for less than a year (sax is main instrument). I wrote a Matlab script to analyze the frequency content of recordings I made. It's not real-time, but still neat to see how tongue movements change the harmonics. Pictures/code samples here: http://www.prism.gatech.edu/~gtg601q/didj/didj.htm l

  25. I'm rather impressed by your answers by cheros · · Score: 1

    I really like the way you explain things. The correlation between doing things you /LIKE/ for a long time and thus become good at them. I've got another one, though: sometimes it takes a life changing event to figure out what you really like..

    Incidentally, you mentioned some issues that seem to be neurologic in nature. Ever looked at neurofeedback? I've seen some frankly amazing results with that: a little kid (9 years old) with dyspraxia finally be able to cycle, and the scientific basis of it makes logical sense. I think there's a small conference on in the UK in 2 weeks.

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  26. Human ability.. by cheros · · Score: 1

    It never ends - I always learn something new here (and long may it continue).

    The learning process you describe is exactly that of martial arts as well. First you go through the moves, and especially in Tai Chi are you very quickly introduced to the idea that it's not the move that matters, it's what your mind does with it (I mention Tai Chi because it's one of the most potent forms using the mind).

    It then takes years to make your mind and the moves "one" - but at least you know early what you're aiming for. A friend of mine demonstrates this rather bluntly with the 1-inch punch (move with and without mind - and make sure you have a safe landing zone), I -as an interested amateur- tend to show the waterhose method instead.

    I'm over 40, and always wanted to play an instrument. I think I'm the type that accepts a period of near absence of ability, but I do need a bit of encouragement from time to time. It's time (a) working out what I want to play and (b) find a teacher locally. The two may actually influence eachother as I have no real bias. Piano, guitar, both attract (one's more portable, though), but you got me a tad worried about locking myself up in do-re-mi and fret-determined intervals :-). I'm sure it'll come out in the end ;-).

    If you ever come to Zurich, let me know. I'll leave my Slashdot email address enabled for a day or so to allow you to make contact if you so wish.

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  27. [email enabled] n/t by cheros · · Score: 1

    n/t = no text. Duh.

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  28. Obsession with the "right" pitch by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

    If you are playing a continuous-pitch instrument, beware of becoming too obsessed with always being on the "right" pitch at all times. (This is true to a lesser extent of tempered instruments as well, as long as they allow some pitch flexibility.)

    The pitch indicated by a tuner is going to match the location of a note in 12-tone equal temperament (aka "12-TET"), and this is probably exactly what you want if you are playing bass, and it is almost certainly what you want if you are playing a fretted or keyboard instrument (unless you are playing music that specifically calls for something else). However, this is not always the best pitch for maximal sonority in a chord -- it is quite common for a skilled performer to vary as much as 20 to 25 cents (percent of a semitone) from the 12-TET pitch in order to blend better with the other musicians around them.

    Also remember that frequency detection in the ear gets less defined as notes get shorter and lower. Fewer cycles mean a wider margin of error, to put it simply. So the faster you play, the more mistuning you can get away with. Most instruments have techniques for rapid passages that, if played slowly, would sound muffled and/or out of tune. But when they are played rapidly, they sound perfectly acceptable as the note in question is too short to nail down as "out of tune".

    Finally consider the matter of vibrato. Unless you are playing "dead tone" (and some compositions do call for this), you are unlikely to play many sustained notes on a violin that do not have some amount of vibrato to them. This also widens your margin for error, as you will not be at any one specific pitch for very long.

    All this is not to say that you shouldn't consider the matter of intonation -- it is every bit as critical as you imagine. Just don't put too much emphasis on pegging the tuner at 0 every time, as there are perfectly valid reasons you may want to be somewhere else. 12-TET is a compromise necessitated by fixed-pitch instruments. That does not mean you have to live within its confines at all times.

    Mal-2

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  29. That is silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wired Metronome (Windows binary, free to download) to keep a steady beat

    You mean you use a $1000 computer to do an inferior job of emulating a $20 metronome?

    Seriously, don't be such a cheapskate. Metronomes are cheap and much more convenient to operate than a keyboard (or a mouse or touchpad).

  30. The MIRACLE piano system by JonTurner · · Score: 1

    I believe you're referring to the MIRACLE piano system. IIRC, it had cartridges for the Nintendo, and software for Win and Mac systems, too.

    Your description of it as "the musical equivalent of Mavis Beacon touch typing" is excellent!