Slashdot Mirror


Humanity Gene Found?

Banana_Republican writes "Nature is reporting that that multiple copies of a mystery gene may be what makes us human. It appears that humans have multiple carbon copies of a recently discovered gene that other primates lack. In particular, one sequence not so romantically or emotionally termed 'DUF1220' was mentioned . Humans carry 212 copies of DUF1220, whereas chimps have 37 copies, and monkeys have only 30 copies. Apparently the current thinking is that this gene is responsible for coding important areas of brain function."

44 of 231 comments (clear)

  1. Duh by john83 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Apparently the current thinking is that this gene is responsible for coding important areas of brain function.

    Fantastic. Unfortunately, that seems to come from the same school of thought as my suggestion here: this gene is responsible for male pattern balding and fully erect bipedal motion.

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    1. Re:Duh by Kesch · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hee hee! He said erect. *snicker*

      This post brought to you by Humans, the only organism known to make childish penis jokes. (Some Slashdotters belive DUF may be involved.)

      --
      If this signature is witty enough, maybe somebody will like me.
    2. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I sometimes have problems with bipedal motion when I'm fully erect.

  2. Mmmmmm.... DUF by HaeMaker · · Score: 2, Funny

    Homer must be saying, "Told you so. We are not human without DUF".

  3. I can see the bumper stickers now... by mpoulton · · Score: 3, Funny

    "My honor student has more copies of the DUF 1220 gene than yours!" and "Got DUF1220?"

    --
    I am a geek attorney, but not your geek attorney unless you've already retained me. This is not legal advice.
  4. Obligatory reference to super-brained chimps by coolgeek · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Good news everyone"

    --

    cat /dev/null >sig
  5. Don't forget human antigenes by Baldrson · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Although there are some critical genes for expression of human characters, one of the characteristics of rapid evolution seems to be the inactivation of genes. As you progress along the line to humans there appear to be fewer and fewer genes being expressed. This seems to be the result of mutation's default action which is to damage gene function which in general means to deactivate it. Its a lot easier to deactivate a gene than it is to create a gene with positive action. So you can expect that if there are ways to create positive characters at the phenotype level by deactivating genes that would be main way those characters emerge during the early stage of evolution. It is probably also be that some older genes need to be silenced to so that newer genes that actually do function can express less competition.

    1. Re:Don't forget human antigenes by andyr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I heard that cancer was the oldest disease, and the careful countdown of cell generations from stem cells was precisely to keep the wart on the frogs bum from taking over the frog. Once you have licked cancer, the rest becomes manageable.

      --
      Andy Rabagliati
  6. Speaking of Bars by iluvcapra · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can't get enough of the wonderful DUF.

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
  7. DUF1220 slashdot handle by lems1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ok, this was going to be my new name in Slashdot but some bastard already registered it!

    --
    This sig can be distributed under the LGPL license
    1. Re:DUF1220 slashdot handle by dUf1220 · · Score: 5, Funny

      ha ha! foiled you!

    2. Re:DUF1220 slashdot handle by dUf1220 · · Score: 2, Funny

      ha ha!

    3. Re:DUF1220 slashdot handle by dUf1220 · · Score: 4, Funny

      ha ha! (you get the point)

  8. Re:Carbon copies? by elgee · · Score: 5, Funny

    I guess they don't have DRM. Good thing as if it were up to the RIAA, there would only be one human.

  9. Re:They couldn't have come up with a better name.. by danudwary · · Score: 5, Informative

    Not that it's going to stop all the Simpsons jokes, but DUF just stands for Domain of Unknown Function. It's not a name so much as a placeholder. There are lots of DUFs.

  10. It's a common mistake by RsG · · Score: 2, Funny

    In your defense, they're quite hard to tell apart once you've had a few Duffs. What look like slightly unshaven legs and sloping posture the night before reveal themselves fully in the morning after.

    --
    Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
  11. er... thats a bit of a leap by gsn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In other news the more midi-chlorians in your blood, the greater the person's Force ability

    TFA says that there is a gene that humans have more copies of than primates and that this gene makes a protein in the brain. They don't know what the protein does in the brain indeed they have no idea what having multiple copies of the gene does. Yet they reach the conclusion that this gene may be responsible for giving us our humanity.

    All they seem to have is a weak correlation between the number of this gene and intelligence (which is arguable - I know some really dumb people) and as we've all learnt many times "Correlation does not imply causation."

    IANAGS but I'd wait until there was some more evidence on offer.

    --
    Reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled.
    1. Re:er... thats a bit of a leap by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      All they seem to have is a weak correlation between the number of this gene and intelligence (which is arguable - I know some really dumb people) and as we've all learnt many times "Correlation does not imply causation."

      If you RTFA (I know, I know, this is /. and that's against the rules or something) you'll see that the researchers are not claiming anything except "we found this gene, humans have a lot more copies of it than monkeys, and we think that might be important." Anything else is reporter's and/or story submitter's hype.

      But there are a couple of other notes I'd like to make in response to your post, which are really responses to lots of posts of this nature. First, this is not a weak correlation; 212 vs. 37 vs. 1 is a significant difference in almost any context, and yes, we've all known some really dumb people, but unless those people are severely retarded, they're still a hell of a lot smarter than the smartest chimp or monkey. Second, I really wish people would stop invoking "correlation does not imply causation" as a mantra. Yes, it's true, but it's also true that correlation implies correlation -- by which I mean that if there is a statistically significant correlation between two variables, then it is entirely reasonable to assume that there exists some connection between them, and to use this assumption as, at the very least, a basis for further investigation.

      I think people are so used to misinterpretations of correlation (almost never by scientists, BTW) that they forget that it is still a powerful and useful tool. Actually, this is true of statistics in general. Yes, it's very easy to lie with statistics; it is somewhat harder, but entirely possible and fairly common, to use them to discover great truths.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    2. Re:er... thats a bit of a leap by gsn · · Score: 2, Informative

      No it isn't two data points - I have the article.Magdalena C. Popesco et. al. Human Lineage-Specific Amplification, Selection, and Neuronal Expression of DUF1220 Domains. Science 1 September 2006: Vol. 313. no. 5791, pp. 1304 - 1307
      I'd love to get a an opinion from a someone who works in genetics.

      They do claim that taken together the data from three seperate methods (BLAT http://genome.ucsc.edu/cgi-bin/hgBlat, aCGH and QPCR - I know what PCR is and I'm reading up on the others but this is not my field) they do claim that DUF1220 is "highly expanded in humans, reduced in African great apes, further reduced in orangutan and old world monkeys, single copy in non-primate animals, and absent in nonmamalian species." They've a graph of the the number they predict from PCR for different primate species and humans and though there is some spread it seems clear that humans have more DUF1220 domains than the other primate species tested again.

      However, the point remains they do not know what DUF1220 does and so saying that it leads to human traits is not very convincing. The researchers do speculate that they "may play an important role in human-lineage specific traits." So its not entirely the reporter/submitter hype. Yes I'd agree that correlation is strong basis for further investigation and thats what I asked for when I said I'd wait for there to be more evidence. Again I do not work in genetics and don't know if this is possible but it'd be a lot stronger evidence if they could implant more copies of this gene and then see that it lead to greater brain complexity or something.

      Topics like this tend to get a lot of hype and sensationalism and people jump to conclusions and I'd think it would be much better to wait until the genetics community says something strongly.

      And yes I was joking about the lots of stupid people Daniel. And yes they are a lot smarter than the smartest chimp or monkey. Though ever since I saw Project X I'm ashamed that chimps are better at Flight Simulator than me ;-D

      --
      Reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled.
    3. Re:er... thats a bit of a leap by AxemRed · · Score: 2, Funny

      There's only one thing we can do... We have to genetically engineer a child with about 800 copies and see what happens. Only then will we know the truth.

  12. In other news... by Evro · · Score: 5, Funny

    RIAA and MPAA members found lacking new gene...

    --
    rooooar
  13. There's a gene that confers some resistance... by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 5, Interesting
    ...to HIV. Chimps have more of them than humans. It seems likely that SIV (simian immunodeficiency virus) has existed in chimps much longer than HIV in humans. As a result, Chimps with more copies of the gene have outlived their less well endowed relatives and now almost all chimps can coexist with SIV without showing symptoms of immunodeficiency. Apparently humans have started making similar adaptations and in some areas of the world there is now a generation of humans who seem to do a fairly good job of coexisting with HIV. But all humans still have many fewer of these genes than chimps.

    But nobody would make the mistake of saying that this gene is the gene for 'chimpness'. It's just an accident of history that SIV arose before HIV.

    I learned all of this from an excellent podcast whose name I dare not write for fear of offence...

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  14. I hate science reporters by Luxifer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    from paragraph 2 of TFA:
    "Scientists don't know what the gene does."
        No, they know what the gene does, it codes for a protein. They don't know what this protein does.
        Then they say that the protein is expressed all over, including the brain, so that means it may be involved in brain function.
    For all they know it could be a structural protein, which is a better bet if it's expressed outside the brain.
        Somehow I doubt that a single gene is responsible for humanity.

        I try to be positive when I post, but what kind of morons do they have writing this stuff? And this is Nature magazine? How about some info on what sort of protein it is: Kinase? Carboxylase? Protease? How about some info on the expression levels instead of how many copies there are? There could be 1000 copies in our genome, but if the expression is low, it doesn't matter.
        Guess I'll have to RTFP, where P=Paper.

    1. Re:I hate science reporters by jeschust · · Score: 2, Informative

      TFP, for those of you who subscribe to Science or you college kids slashdotting in the library: http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/313/579 1/1304

  15. Great.... by TrebleJunkie · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...now somebody's going to shove this thing a couple hundred times into a monkey, and it'll be fucking Planet of the Apes for real.

    --

    Ed R.Zahurak

    You know, oblivion keeps looking better every day.

  16. Re:Oh well, so much for the by thefirelane · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Your post confuses me... did anyone ever think there was no genetic difference?

  17. Whats the opposite of DUF? by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    If DUF makes us smart, FUD must make us stupid.

    1. Re:Whats the opposite of DUF? by constantnormal · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, in a second announcement later in the day, the "inhumanity gene", FUD9999 was discovered.

      It took longer to recognize as it was so much more prevalent than the DUF1220 gene.

      Apparently, the function of the FUD9999 gene is to convert the proteins that DUF1220 encodes into a complex mixture of steroids and alcohol.

  18. Re:DNF1220! by Kesch · · Score: 3, Funny

    Actually, 1220 refers to the fact that it will be released 1220 years after the second coming of Christ. (*Note: This release date is tenative and subject to change.*)

    --
    If this signature is witty enough, maybe somebody will like me.
  19. Re:%s/monkey/fish/g by Solra+Bizna · · Score: 2, Funny
    Killing and eating a fish/monkey/rat is murder. /sarcasm off

    I think killing and eating a fishmonkeyrat is downright weird.</joke>

    -:sigma.SB

    --
    WARN
    THERE IS ANOTHER SYSTEM
  20. Re:Obligitory Monkey Joke by sugapablo · · Score: 3, Funny

    Obligatory Simpsons Joke:

    "DUFMan, human! OH yeah!"

  21. Let's Uplift the Three-Toed sloth! by StefanJ · · Score: 4, Funny

    Three-toed sloths are an obvious first candidate to become earth's second sapient species.

    They can be put to work installing Wi-Fi nodes and spy cameras on telephone poles.

    And if they decide to rebel against their human creators, it will be really easy to outrun them.

  22. [Cue Barney Gimble's lip-rippling belch] by The_REAL_DZA · · Score: 2, Funny

    Moe : [reading from the bar's copy of Nature] "...it says here, that humans wouldn't be human without something called 'DUF'. Huh!"
    Barney [raising mug] : "I'll vouch for that! {BBBbBbbbbllllaaaabbllbbllbbllbb!!}"

    --


    This space intentionally left (almost) blank.
  23. As I recall this is a flipped segment by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2, Interesting

    which was puzzling at first, because it's literally flipped around from the chimp gene, and actually is similar to a dog segment. Turns out a lot of what we thought were different gene segments folded wrong and literally reassembled upside down (backwards).

    However, just remember that just because we may have found a segment doesn't mean we understand how it works. Sometimes, it's not just the genes it encodes, it's how it impacts other genes on other chromosomes, and how it misfolds or affects transcription errors.

    Every day we learn more and more, and understand less and less. But it's fascinating work, and is leading to greater understanding of what makes us tick - even though we are all different and the variation among us homo sapiens is greater than the difference between homo sapiens and a chimp. Sometimes, you may find you may have more genetically in common with someone from Borneo when you're from Germany than you do with another person from Germany.

    [note - if I'm wrong about the flip, my apologies, it's been a summer with few seminars - reading the papers is harder in some ways]

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  24. The Noodly Appendage Did It... by hcob$ · · Score: 2, Funny

    CAN'T YOU ALL SEE??? This is the work of his noodly appendage! We should all marvel at this(and his) wonderous and miraculus feat(and feet)! Anyone saying otherise is just speaking blasphemy!!!

    --
    Cliff Claven
    K.E.G. Party Chairman
    Founding Leader of: Koncerned for Egalitarin Governance
  25. More Common Elsewhere by dorath · · Score: 5, Informative

    I sent a link of the Slashdot article to my brother, with the requisite Duff joke. He responded by saying that DUF1220 is more common in rabbits, elephants, and some other stuff than it is in humans.

    I for one welcome our new armadillo overlords.

    http://genome.ucsc.edu/cgi-bin/hgTracks?hgsid=7703 1393&hgt.out2=+3x+&position=chr1%3A142191957-14219 9015

  26. We're already there by JonTurner · · Score: 2, Funny

    >>Apparently the current thinking is that this gene is responsible for coding important areas of brain function.
    >Well, why don't they make some knockout mutants and then look at the brain function? It seems like the logical next step.

    Three words: Jerry Springer Show

  27. OK, So I'm in a Bad Mood by XLawyer · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Perhaps most revealingly, transgenic mice with this gene incorporated into their genomes have been found to habitually scratch patterns on the floors of their cages that strongly resemble engineering blueprints for a flamethrower."

  28. Does this prove Intelligent Design is flawed? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2, Funny

    Because, if God was such a bad programmer he had to encode it 220 times, instead of making an efficient coding paradigm that used only say three segments for backup ... well ...

    Or does it mean chimps run Linux and only need 22 code segments to do what Humans (Windows) needs 220 code segments to get done?

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  29. Not as widely reported, but still interesting by g1zmo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Humans carry 212 copies of DUF1220, whereas chimps have 37 copies, and monkeys have only 30 copies.

    Corporate CEOs carry between 3-6 copies of the gene, and no one has yet to find a middle management specimen exhibiting even a single instance.

    In addition, a representative sample of Slashdot readers was tested and there was a remarkably strong correlation between their karma level and copies of the gene. Digg readers came in slightly above MySpace users with 10 and 4 copies, respectively. 8^)

    --
    I have found there are just two ways to go.
    It all comes down to livin' fast or dyin' slow.
    -REK, Jr.
  30. Oh the humanity!!! by erroneus · · Score: 2, Funny

    (do I really need to put anything else in here for that to be funny?)

  31. DUF stands for "Domain of Unknown Function" by dokebi · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Abstract of paper:

    Extreme gene duplication is a major source of evolutionary novelty. A genome-wide survey of gene copy number variation among human and great ape lineages revealed that the most striking human lineage-specific amplification was due to an unknown gene, MGC8902, which is predicted to encode multiple copies of a protein domain of unknown function (DUF1220). Sequences encoding these domains are virtually all primate-specific, show signs of positive selection, and are increasingly amplified generally as a function of a species' evolutionary proximity to humans, where the greatest number of copies (212) is found. DUF1220 domains are highly expressed in brain regions associated with higher cognitive function, and in brain show neuron-specific expression preferentially in cell bodies and dendrites.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, articles before post read *you*!
  32. Re:They couldn't have come up with a better name.. by chris_mahan · · Score: 2, Funny

    Completely offtopic but there it goes:

    It's Draft on the western side of the Atlantic because we're still trying to perfect the brews.

    --

    "Piter, too, is dead."

  33. no such thing as a humanity gene by mrpeebles · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There is more to being human than genes and flesh. A baby is raised without human contact may grow up to be a human being, but certainly not a functional human being. And homo sapiens existed for tens, or hundreds, of thousands of years before acquiring religion, language, art, etc., aspects of civilization we consider important parts of our humanity. Isn't the most we could ever find a gene that allows us to be human? To make an analogy, ink allowed the original manuscript of Hamlet to be Hamlet, but it's not a Hamlet material. It doesn't contain the essence of Hamlet-ness in any meaningful sense.