Slashdot Mirror


Death by Google Calendar

the_harlequin writes "Ok, so the title is a little extreme, but it's a possibility. The link gives an example of how easy it is to obtain information about someone who uses Google Calendar, and is unaware of what they're allowing the world to see."

25 of 101 comments (clear)

  1. Easy problem to solve. by PrinceAshitaka · · Score: 5, Funny

    So I should be fine if I simply add some fake reoccurring classes to my calendar. I think I am going to "fake" take up some firearms classes and some marshal arts. It will also not hurt to add something else like, Tuesdays I will have a "fake" pit bull owners club. Or I could just not put flight information in my calendar.

    --
    quis custodiet ipsos custodes
    1. Re:Easy problem to solve. by phoenix321 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or better yet: take some real firearms classes. If they visit your house while you're away it's just property damage. A couple of hundred bucks you insurance will gladly repay if you agree to spend your share on improved locks and security measures. You'll feel unsafe for a while after being burglarized, but that goes away with time. After all, it's only a monetary loss, maybe a small insurance quarrel and a sturdier door you get.

      But you shouldn't need to worry about money you lose, as 99 out of 100 common burglars don't know jack about teh Intarnet and will visit you anyway, at night if you are away or not. And that's where the hairy part begins and those firearm lessons will come in extremely handy. A burglar in the same house with you, your wife/husband/partner, and kids and grandma and the family dog, is something totally entirely different. Your children may come out unharmed if you bend over and spread, but your dog is either large enough or toast. Think of the dogs, please.

      First: put an NRA sticker on your car, if you like and can stand being looked-down-on occasionally. Second: pretend to be interested in guns and order a for-free gun catalogue from somewhere. The resulting self-defense-centered bulk mail you receive might make an impression sometimes. Third: obtain empty rifle and handgun shells and disperse them liberally around your outside property. Not too much, you are no dangerous neighbor, remember. But two or three empty cartridges will make a bold impression on people in the violent businesses. Criminals want easy prey or easy opportunities, otherwise they'd be in the Rat Race like you and me, by the way. And any criminal who sees a clue on a potentially gun-hoarding, concealed-carrying, full-auto-skilled, hard-hitting, M249SAW-under-the-pillow-hiding expert-marksmanly Redneck will wait at least until the house is empty. In which case it's just property damage, again. Not unless you have a vulgar display of wealth in the middle of Somalia...

    2. Re:Easy problem to solve. by phoenix321 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Then again: how is this different to the a) large shiny SUV in your driveway, b) your custom tailored suits, c) your large shiny house with that luxurious pool or d) the classy display of wealth you show.

      You could hide yourself, drive that old rustbucket until it falls apart and build a modest house with all goodies strictly indoors in the basement. You could adapt to the constant threat of crime all around you and keep a low profile, pre-emptively forfeiting your self-determination. Or you could vote for more wealth transfer, more welfare, more spending, more taxes, more government. If everyone's on the dole, nobody needs to steal, right? //just kidding.

      Either way: no self-defense gun is of that kind the usual perpetrators cherish. Full-autos are rare in that field and shotguns and rifles are too bulky. Nothing is bad-ass enough for our fellow robbers like that Mac-10 or the saturday night special.

      In the end I'd rather have my daughter kidnapped than a crackhead roaming through my house at night. Paying ransom for my daughter is (you asked for it) merely monetary damage while the crackhead in my daughter's bedroom would be the end of my life as I know it. And everyone who collects ransom but still harms my daughter is going to have the absolutely longest and most painful death modern technology and medicine can provide. I'd go that far to take paramedics classes just to let that bastard feel the pain for a few more hours, I swear.

    3. Re:Easy problem to solve. by ipfwadm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In the end I'd rather have my daughter kidnapped than a crackhead roaming through my house at night. Paying ransom for my daughter is (you asked for it) merely monetary damage while the crackhead in my daughter's bedroom would be the end of my life as I know it.

      Merely monetary damage? Huh? Which kidnappings are you reading about? A significant percentage of abducted kids are sexually abused and/or killed. Does anybody even kidnap for ransom anymore, outside of third-world countries? Seems to me that the risks of collecting the ransom money are just too great. (And now that I venture over to Wikipedia, they claim that kidnapping for ransom is nearly non-existent in the U.S. today)

      I'd much prefer the crackhead in my house to my kid getting abducted. At least while someone's in the house I can do something about it. And a crackhead is more interested in money/jewelry/valuables than a kid, methinks. Easier to fence a laptop than a child.

    4. Re:Easy problem to solve. by phoenix321 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Could've been me :) - protecting the environment, twice.

  2. Bah by Iron+(III)+Chloride · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Any calendar site can be exploited in this way. As with many aspects of computer usage, user intelligence (posting info w/discretion) and proper privacy settings (think Facebook here) is all that's necessary. I say this is a non-issue, especially for hopefully more-intelligent /. nerds.

    --
    Cogito, ergo sum, fosho!
  3. so should we expect a slew of new crime? by yagu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't know the answer to, "should we expect more crime?" because of the internet. There are stories in the news about molesters and the internet, but is the internet merely a different avenue for crime? Or does it open floodgates for increased crime?

    I don't know that I've seen overwhelming evidence the crime rates have surged -- makes me wonder, is there some expected value for crime rates, regardless of the mechanism? This would make for an interesting study -- to date what I've seen is mostly anecdotal.

    The example cited in the article is interesting, but I wonder that it really changes tactics -- a thief, a burglar, usually works on opportunity, and someone's calendar is as reliable in determining what a "household" is doing as the person maintaining that calendar.... My experience has been people maintaining calendars accurately, not so much.

    On the uncertainty alone, a criminal would still have to case a target on the chance a calendar entry was inaccurate, an event was canceled but not taken off the calendar, etc.

    Credit to the author for giving instructions to make Google calendars private -- an option with which I strongly agree...

  4. Eh, unnecessary... by Ruff_ilb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First of all, I'd like to point out that this trick only works IF you set your calendar to share with the entire world. This is in no way a way to 'hack' google, as it were.

    Furthermore, in the real world, this is very likely rediculous. If I'm a criminal, what are the chances that I'm going to find someone in my area that uses google calendar on a regular basis, AND has a trip or event planned with specific times that tell me when they're going to be out of the house.

    If I were trying to steal something, it would be much easier to just get in my car, cruise around, find a house that looks empty, bump/pick the lock, walk in, and take stuff.

    --
    http://www.TheGamerNation.com/Forums
    1. Re:Eh, unnecessary... by xtracto · · Score: 2, Interesting

      in the real world, this is very likely rediculous. If I'm a criminal, what are the chances that I'm going to find someone in my area that uses google calendar on a regular basis, AND has a trip or event planned with specific times that tell me when they're going to be out of the house.

      The chances keep getting greater and greater. As the article said, not only GOOGLE calendars but all other information pusblishing page. I find interesting how easly people share their personal information via webpages. Even some people share that informaiton without knowing it. For example, if you search for a telephone number in google you can get the complete address and name of that person, and from that you can go to Google maps and get a nice aereal photo.

      I used to get into ppl email quite esaly in the ICQ era, see, on the ICQ profile people used to write down all their information with their email account (for hotmail or another email provider), then, if you went to the email page and requested to "remind me my password", the web page would ask you some personal information (name, birthday, etc etc) and then it will give you the password. The only thing I had to do is look at the ICQ profile to get all the personal information.

      I think parents MUST take more care of what their children are publishing on their MySpace and other web pages, you dont know how much informaiton someone can get from you via google. Nowadays I usually run a google search for each ebayer I deal with (before dealing with him/her or sometimes after as the email usually lets you get lots of more informaiton), it is quite easy to find a lot of info about the person.

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
  5. pool party? by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 4, Funny

    Anyone wanna crash Daisy's all girl pool party?

    --
    This guy's the limit!
    1. Re:pool party? by Bastiaan · · Score: 2, Funny
      Anyone wanna crash Daisy's all girl pool party?

      After some more research on Daisy's identity, I dediced I pass: http://www.tubgirl.com/

  6. Of course... by Transcendent · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...this is only true if you're "smart" enough to publicly share the calendar with everyone.

    By default the caldendar is unshared, so the fault is in the end user.

  7. That's entirely unnecessary. by Ruff_ilb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You can avoid this entirely by simply marking your calendar as "private," or "share with friends only."

    This person isn't hacking google, he's simply viewing public calendars. If your calendar isn't public, there's no problem.

    Check TFA.

    --
    http://www.TheGamerNation.com/Forums
  8. bah by Danzigism · · Score: 3, Insightful

    always bullshit when i hear things like this.. its like when the dumb ass that wrote that Google Documentary and made them look like the biggest most horrible big brother company thats out there, all because of how powerful Google Earth is.. FOR SHAME GOOGLE for allowing terrorists to pinpoint locations!! oh come-the-fuck-on.. every bit of satellite imagery that's out there has nothing to even do with google.. governments and scientists work together in providing PUBLIC geographic data.. Google simple is one of the very few people that actually use it..

    --
    *plays the Apogee theme song music*
  9. Lotus Notes Too by neonprimetime · · Score: 3, Funny

    I have this same problem at work with co-workers and Lotus Notes too. They can see everything I put on my calendar by default, unless I purposely block stuff and make it unreadable to them.

  10. ...utterly stupid that people display their lives by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 4, Funny

    "I find it...utterly stupid that people display their lives online..."

      Such as a blog?

  11. obligatory... by thelost · · Score: 2, Insightful

    in other news water banned as can be used as offensive weapon. /captain obvious to the rescue

    --
    Promote Charity on Myspace, Show Your Colours!
  12. Single? by BenjyD · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Maybe I missed something, but why does one person being out of the house mean the house is empty? What about partners, housemates etc?

    1. Re:Single? by GauteL · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Maybe I missed something, but why does one person being out of the house mean the house is empty? What about partners, housemates etc?"

      House mates are clearly possible, but her calendar never mentions any partner like it would if she was married or living with a partner.

  13. then if you die via google calendar.. by jkind · · Score: 3, Funny

    Maybe people will discuss you on www.mydeathspace.com.

    --
    ~jennifer.k~
  14. Re:...utterly stupid that people display their liv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    And now Google knows he is stalking this person. Google knows all.

  15. Utterly Uninteresting by LionKimbro · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have my calendar marked "Public" on Google, and there's no way that this silly article is changing my mind.

    This is, to me, akin to the old scare about putting your phone number online.

    Do any of you remember? The attitude of the 1990's was: Oh My God Jesus Christ, That Man Has His Phone Number Online! Somebody stop that man, he's a menace to himself, and to Society!

    Then I read something Philip Greenspun wrote, where he said: (A) I have X,000,000 gajillion hits on my site per day. (B) My cell phone number is featured prominantly on my website. (C) I have only once received a phone call that was unwelcome, but I have far more many times received phone calls that I wanted (due to the posting.)

    Personally, I have never received the unwanted phone call.

    I think people have a way of inflating plausible threats to themselves, regardless of the actual risks.

    In the event (it has to actually happen several times!) that people start using Google Calendars to raid homes, and in the event that it's statistically significant as far as threats go, I will simply wire up my apartment with cams, hard drives, and redundant offsite storage.

  16. There are many easier traditional ways by GauteL · · Score: 2, Insightful

    .. of doing exactly what he suggests. Any semi-intelligent person should be able to think up some.

    My try:
    1. Find some sports club with scheduled activities.
    2. Follow home someone that looks like a young professional with a sports bag. You now know their address.
    3. Next time that class is on, watch her or his house. If the person leave before the class begins, with their trusted sports bag, you know they are going to the gym. If the person switches off the lights, then you are set!
    4. Break in and enjoy the goodies!

    This is a lot easier, and you have a bigger chance of figuring out whether the person has anything worth stealing straight away. Fancy clothes is a give-away.

  17. Re:Oop! by einexile · · Score: 2, Funny

    LOL thanks for posting all those hilarious comments guys! They really made my morning one big laugh fest.

    I always know I can rely on Slashdot to lift my spirits with the crazy, unpredictable observations of the web's finest aspiring humorists.

    An extra special thanks to TFA for driving home the ancient bloody obvious while helping the less informed among us to live in fear. Not enough people live in fear these days or structure their lifestyles around paranoid stalker fantasies! If only more folks would tune in for their local 5:25 identity theft nightmare broadcast, certainly the world would be a much friendlier place.

    Let's not get into the barely noticeable assumption that the reader never leaves his house and has no more than a dozen acquaintances. Perhaps for a followup the author could focus on the dangers implicit on going out at night, having more than a handful of friends, being seen on the street, being involved in your neighborhood, etc. God forbid we should announce beyond our most inner circles that we'll be working somewhere or hosting a party. Wait, what's a party?

  18. A dash of hypocrisy by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Funny

    I found it insanely funny that someone who is basically a blogger would lead with this sentence:

    "I find it utterly stupid that people display their lives online."

    So I guess after "people" there is an implicit "(other than me)"?

    --
    #DeleteChrome