Slashdot Mirror


IBM Announces Wii Chips In Nintendo Hands

simoniker writes "IBM has announced that the 'Broadway' CPUs created for the Nintendo Wii have been shipping from the company's East Fishkill, N.Y., fabrication facility since earlier this year. Nintendo, it would seem, is ramping up for the launch of their next-gen console in a month or two." Joystiq and Kotaku have the news as well. From the article: "Nintendo has also confirmed their reception of IBM's chip: 'The first chips are in our possession,' said Genyo Takeda, Senior Managing Director/General Manager, Integrated Research & Development Division, Nintendo Co., Ltd. 'Today's milestone marks the final stage of our drive to reach both core and nontraditional gamers with an inviting, inclusive and remarkable gaming experience.'"

44 of 258 comments (clear)

  1. Digitizers? by headkase · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm wondering whether or not the wimote will work with my setup. I have a tv card with a built-in mpeg decoder. So when I'm pointing the thing at my lcd monitor the raster information has been lost - no more timing signal at 60hz. Am I confused or does the wimote work in such a setup?

    --
    Shh.
    1. Re:Digitizers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Wii will work on any kind of TV, because the TV has nothing to do with the controller. There is a small (about the size of a couple pencils glued together) sensor bar you place near the TV. It doesn't matter where you put it, but that general area is where you'll be pointing the remote. So put it near the TV, and it seems like the distance you are from the TV affects the sensitivity of the controller. The closer you are to the bar, the higher the sensitivity.

    2. Re:Digitizers? by MadUndergrad · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You seem to be talking about some sort of lightgun setup. My understanding is that the Wii comes with a sensor that you place near your tv (or monitor) that triangulates the position and orientation of the wii, plus of course the accelerometer and gyroscope in the offhand attachment. So I shouldn't think you would have any problems.

    3. Re:Digitizers? by Bombcar · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Wiimote doesn't work like the light guns of the past; it uses the two bars you sometimes see in the pictures, one goes beneath the screen and one goes on the side.

      See this.

    4. Re:Digitizers? by Dance_Dance_Karnov · · Score: 2

      just 1 bar. It contains 2 sets of 4 IR leds.

    5. Re:Digitizers? by mad_minstrel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually - the "sidebar" in the picture is the Wii...

      --
      May the source be with you.
    6. Re:Digitizers? by headkase · · Score: 5, Interesting

      My first computer was a Radio Shack TRS-80. I didn't have any storage mediums (not even tape) so I had to write something for it to do each time I turned it on. Sometimes I would press the reset button really fast to occasionaly cause a bad initialization. I really do remember the days of going uphill both ways to the computer shop. When I upgraded to a Commodore 128 (which I used almost exclusively in 64 mode) I unfortunately purchased an MSD brand hard drive instead of a 1541 drive which almost every piece of software depended on for copy protection purposes. So I had to reverse engineer my software to remove the copy protection before I could play it. One of the last protections on the 1541 was called V-Max (for Verify Maximum) and as a cracker I loved it because it was a third party product - once I cracked it it was the same protection for all titles.
      Been there done that. :p

      --
      Shh.
    7. Re:Digitizers? by QuantumFTL · · Score: 3, Informative

      According to the Wikipedia article, the Wiimote uses a 1 megapixel imaging sensor to detect (what is most likely) IR light from the "sensor bar" that's placed at the bottom of your screen. To see how that works, try pointing a remote control at a digital camera or a camcorder - if you press buttons the remote, it will light up brilliantly, yet not be a distraction to humans.

      To be honest, I'm not sure how they plan to get full positioning information from a horizontal bar, as I don't think any of their other sensors are absolute, which could lead to serious drift problems. They likely use Kalman filtering or some such to minimize the error, but I really do want to know how they stabilize this.

      I suppose it would be theoretically possible for the Wiimote to also lock on to the display (the frequency would not matter, just the overall size and shape) and use that to reduce uncertainty, but for now we can only speculate on the inner workings. I for one can't wait to get my hands on one!

    8. Re:Digitizers? by fithmo · · Score: 3, Funny

      As long as it works better than the sensors I had to strap to the television for the Power Glove. I bought it new, I still have it, it still works, and I still don't know how to use it. Worst use of allowance ever.

    9. Re:Digitizers? by stesch · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But using something like iTheatre (portable video glasses) could be a bit difficult, am I right?

    10. Re:Digitizers? by wootest · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not really, just prop the sensor bar up about the distance away that the glasses are supposed to feel like. (If they are supposed to feel like a 70" TV at 4 meters away, just put it 4 meters away, and so on.)

  2. Wii launch date by DeanCubed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, most analysts have predicted that the Wii would launch either mid-November (the 15th being thrown around a lot), November 1st, or sometime around Canadian Thanksgiving weekend. With this news that production has been going strong for almost two months, I think the earlier date is much more likely. If Nintendo can take advantage of a month's head start on the actual holiday season, it pretty much guarantees them second place worldwide behind the 360 until at least the end of summer 2007, and likely well into 2008. If the PS3 can't ship their 6 million before Nintendo ships theirs, it doesn't matter about demand. Plus, whichever console sees the most sales between November 2006 and March 2007 will undoubtedly get the most developer support, which will lead to an even stronger holiday season 2007. By January 1st 2008, the "winner" of this generation will have basically been decided. At that point, as we've seen with generations past, whoever has the most games wins.

    --
    Born to Play
    1. Re:Wii launch date by Heir+Of+The+Mess · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just releasing a product doesn't guarantee anything. It has to live up to expectations or else the first few adopters will trash it on the net and general media and then demand will dry up. Same goes for the PS3.

      It's interesting how you assume that XBOX 360 will be number 1 and that the Wii won't get past it. I know many people who would have never bought a console who are definately going to be buying a Wii. Even my girlfriend has been bugging me every week asking me when we can go buy one. This could be Nintendo's finest hour.

      --
      Australian running a company that does C# / C++ / Java / SQL / Python / Mathematica
    2. Re:Wii launch date by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Hmm. This argument is sound and very well-reasoned, but I don't quite buy it. It works if you consider the two consoles and their projected markets to be identical. But with the PS3 being a more capable machine aimed more at hardcore gamers, and the Wii being a machine of lesser abilities hoping to cash in on casual and young gamers, you have to take more into account than release date. Even if SOny moves the PS3 relases date back to 2008, developers will still support it, and people will still buy it.

      Nintendo may "win" in the short run, but I would bet money that the PS3 will soon generate more game sales, in terms of units sold and units sold per console. Sure, some of what would be the PS3 market might buy a Wii, but most of them are not afraid to fork over big bills so they'll buy a PS3 when it comes out anyway. If anything, the suggested scenario will only play to SOny's favor for the 2007 holiday season: he PS3 will be THE release of the year since it will be better (not adjusting for the crazy price, obviously), and it will be new. When it comes time to think about another generation of consoles, I bet we'll look back at the PS3 as the most popular of its generation, though it will certainly not be as dominant as was the PS2.

      Or, maybe build quality and reliability will bite it in the ass and I'll look like a damn fool. I just can't count the PS3 out because of a late release, since there's still tons of buzz about it and it looks good (though expensive).

      DISCLAIMER: I own a PS2 but am not likely to buy any of the newer consoles within the next two years, as I am not a big gamer and favor the PC as a gaming platform. The price for the Xbox 360 and PS3 (projected) are way too high for me. I will NOT shell out $60 for a game, period. (At least not until inflation drives my salary up a bit and I find a game that can do my laundry.)

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    3. Re:Wii launch date by DeanCubed · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, I was assuming it wouldn't get past it before 2008. There's a huge head start, and may developers are choosing the 360 over the PS3 when deciding on what platform to put their game. Many of those games won't make it to Wii based on the Wii's audience, and it's hardware capabilities. And those 360 exclusives should keep it ahead for the next couple of years. If, however, the Wii has more games than the 360 by 2008, then there's a good chance that the Wii will overtake the 360 by the end of the generation in 2009/2010.

      --
      Born to Play
    4. Re:Wii launch date by shigelojoe · · Score: 4, Funny

      Even my girlfriend has been bugging me every week asking me when we can go buy one.

      I wish *my* girlfriend looked forward to playing with my Wii with such enthusiasm.

    5. Re:Wii launch date by KDR_11k · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think the hardcore gamers are the ones that care the least about the PS3 because the hardcore gamers are well informed and have been complaining about graphics taking precedence over new ideas in gameplay for quite some time now. In fact I'd wager the PS3 aims more at the high-end hardware lover market, the kind that really wants HD. I wouldn't say those are hardcore gamers, a hardcore gamer is perfectly content playing a 10 year old 2d game over a modern 3d game if it offers superior gameplay. Of course noone cares about those hardcore gamers as they are too few and too hard to please.

      Another market that cares about the PS3 is the large number of average and casual gamers that liked the PS2 and expect the PS3 to perform similarily, sometimes while harboring misconceptions like believing that the exclusive titles for the PS2 are somehow bound to Sony in a way that prevents their sequels from being on other consoles.

      The Wii is hoping to sway that sector of the market (as is the XBox 360, of course) in addition to gaining the "non-gamer", i.e. the people that don't like the games currently made by the big players in the industry and would like a game that's controlled with a mouse and one button instead.

      I think that in the end all three consoles try to compete for the same markets, when one covers a market the others don't the others quickly try to adapt and cover it as well. Maybe with the exception of Nintendo as they are always quite slow to react to their competitors' actions.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    6. Re:Wii launch date by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      and the Wii being a machine of lesser abilities hoping to cash in on casual and young gamers, you have to take more into account than release date. Even if SOny moves the PS3 relases date back to 2008, developers will still support it, and people will still buy it.

      First off, I don't think the Wii is hoping to cash in on Young Gamers but that is besides the point; the Nintendo DS was a machine of lesser abilities hoping to cash in on casual and young gamers and it is leading (and extending its lead) in every market:

      North America:
      http://www.vgcharts.org/usaconscomps.php?name1=DS& name2=PSP&type=2

      Japan:
      http://www.vgcharts.org/japconscomps.php?name1=DS& name2=PSP&type=2

      (sorry, accurate European numbers not avaiable)

      Nintendo may "win" in the short run, but I would bet money that the PS3 will soon generate more game sales, in terms of units sold and units sold per console.

      Now, the DS has captured the casual and non-gamer market in Japan (and is starting to capture the same market in North America) and look how software sales have gone:

      North America:
      http://www.vgcharts.org/usaconscomps.php?name1=DS& name2=PSP&type=3

      Japan:
      http://www.vgcharts.org/japconscomps.php?name1=DS& name2=PSP&type=3

      Sure, some of what would be the PS3 market might buy a Wii, but most of them are not afraid to fork over big bills so they'll buy a PS3 when it comes out anyway

      The thing that really bothers me about people who assume that the PS3 will be successful regardless, and Nintendo's strategy to broaden the gaming market is meaningless, is that they don't understand why the Playstation brand was so successful up to this point. The Playstation and PS2 catered to the mainstream market which is predominantely casual and non-gamers; when you consider that there is probably about 10 Million hard-core gamers (depends on your definition of hard-core) and you'd have to be pretty hard-core to spend more than about $200 (or maybe $300) on a console then it becomes clear that Sony is ignoring about 90% of the people they have sold their system to in the past.

      the PS3 will be THE release of the year since it will be better (not adjusting for the crazy price, obviously), and it will be new. When it comes time to think about another generation of consoles, I bet we'll look back at the PS3 as the most popular of its generation ...

      Much like the XBox and Gamecube were the release of the year in 2001, and both carried their more powerful hardware onto outselling the PS2 worldwide.

      The truth is that the reasons why Nintendo is currently not the market leader in the home console market (they're the total leader, but that's not important) is that durring the end of the SNES generation and leading into the N64 generation they made several mistakes and Sony Capatalized on those mistakes; an upstart captured the market by producing a machine of lesser abilities hoping to cash in on casual market. As far as I can see, Sony has made some massive mistakes, including producing a $500/$600 system, alienating third party developers by screwing up the launch of the PS3 (not to mention the massive price, huge development costs, and Sony's insistence that games have to be of PS3 quality [in other words, those crappy looking games that made up 50% of the PS2's library are now not allowed to publish for the PS3]), and plain old hubris.

      The way I see it is that the plague that has infe

    7. Re:Wii launch date by rolfwind · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe it's because she understood it to be a wee mote, not like a wiimote.

  3. Wii, PS3, Xbox360 by j235 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The console wars are over before they even start. IBM wins.

    1. Re:Wii, PS3, Xbox360 by ZakuSage · · Score: 5, Informative

      Do you not understand the point he's trying to make? IBM is manufacturing the CPUs for 360, Wii, and PS3, thereby making a killing irregardless of who "wins".

    2. Re:Wii, PS3, Xbox360 by wildstoo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sorry, scratch that. Apparently it's been becoming a word since 1912.

      It still sucks. Stupid American English. ;)

    3. Re:Wii, PS3, Xbox360 by masklinn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but IIRC, Sony is manufacturing the Cells for PS3s, but IBM holds a plethora of patents on that architecture and manufacturing process.

      IBM probably gets a cut of every single manufactured Cell CPU. This is IBM we're talking about, not Mother Theresa, they played a big part designing the chip, you can bet they won't let Sony get away with just letting them sell Cells by their own

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
    4. Re:Wii, PS3, Xbox360 by archen · · Score: 2, Funny

      Simpsons quote:

      Dr. Nick: Inflammable means flammable? What a country!

  4. Re:Summary is misleading by DigitalRaptor · · Score: 3, Funny

    Technically 10 seconds ago is "earlier this year".

    --
    Lose Weight and Feel Great with Isagenix
  5. It's ironic isn't it... by admactanium · · Score: 5, Interesting

    that twenty years ago people said macintoshes were toy computers and ibm's were serious business machines. now macs use some stonkin intel processors and ibm processors are behind every next generation game console.

    1. Re:It's ironic isn't it... by DrXym · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Except the IBM processors are pretty stonking too. The Cell is basically a 8-core processor - one general purpose CPU and 7 GPU-like cores for handling large amounts of data. Supposedly it is much, much faster than any Intel chip at floating point calculations. This may be why Sony worked with folding@home to produce a PS3 client - to demonstrate that the thing could kick seven shades of shit out of any standard PC when it comes to intensive number crunching. I expect IBM also have their eyes on the thing for all manner of applications, both large and small.

  6. Wait you mean they'll have enough of them?? by Korin43 · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's like Nintendo actually expects people to buy these things and doesn't need to limit the supply to make them sell out.. Crazy!

  7. Price Points by dch24 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A little googling turns up the following info:

    There's a really good Ars Technica article that breaks down the prices for the xbox360 and ps3.

    xbox360: Xenon CPU $106, ATI GPU $141, total mfg cost $525 (the high end model)
    ps3: Cell CPU $230, nVidia GPU $70, total mfg cost $800 (remember the debate? I think $350 for the BD-ROM is too high.)

    Wii: there's no information out there on what components will cost. But the total price tag will be $250, and an educated guess says that only at most $125 of that can be the Broadway CPU and ATI GPU. Maybe Nintendo will sell the Wii as a loss leader, but they've never done that before.

    Now, I'm going to use these specs which are unreliable, but speculation is all there is right now:

    Total System Memory: 88 Mb RAM, 512 Mb Flash
    Broadway CPU: 729 MHz
    ATI GPU: 243 MHz

    So the GPU probably has 32 Mb RAM or less. What this means is that it's equivalent to an ATI Radeon 9700, which fetches $30-$50 on eBay.

    That leaves at most $95 for the CPU, and as little as $75. That's not a lot of money for a dual-core CPU. IBM's not going to make much money on Wii sales, and neither is Nintendo. On the other hand, Nintendo will probably make a killing when the economies of scale kick in and the prices come down. I could see the GPU dropping to $10, the CPU dropping to $50, etc.

    Since this is just my speculating, I'd expect someone will reply with more info.

    1. Re:Price Points by Yahweh+Doesn't+Exist · · Score: 2, Funny

      >Since this is just my speculating, I'd expect someone will reply with more info.

      very few companies still source components for their flagship products from ebay.

  8. Re:Queue the East Fishkill jokes here by roesti · · Score: 5, Funny
    Do we want video games or fish?

    Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day.
    Give a man The Legend of Zelda: The Ocarina Of Time and he will forget to eat for a day while his on-screen avatar goes fishing.

  9. Not quite... by GFLPraxis · · Score: 3, Informative

    "The closer you are to the bar, the higher the sensitivity."

    Opposite, actually. Getting too close (within a couple feet) of the TV tends to make it hard for it to get exactly where you are pointing. I tried putting the Wiimote close to the TV to see if it helped me aim when I was playing it at E3, and when it made the pointer go nuts the representative told me that it loses sensitivity when you get that close and to stand back.

    I could aim better from a distance.

  10. IBM Wii's on Nintendo's hands??? by revolu7ion · · Score: 4, Funny

    oh, sorry - i misread the title...

    --
    Jesus Saves
  11. Re:Queue the East Fishkill jokes here by novus+ordo · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's no joke that the IC industry is dirty. Just ask the people who live there.

    --
    "You're everywhere. You're omnivorous."
  12. Scary flashback by tygerstripes · · Score: 2, Funny
    The first chips are in our possession,' said Genyo Takeda
    So... in other words, "All your chips are belong to us".
    --
    Meta will eat itself
    1. Re:Scary flashback by Z80a · · Score: 2, Funny

      SONY has no chance to survive make you time!

  13. Re:Fishkill by Y-Crate · · Score: 4, Informative
    Their manufacturing plant, which no doubt produces some toxic chemicals, is in a town called East Fishkill? There's gotta be an interesting story behind that name :)
    "Kill" means "Fresh Water Channel" in Dutch. Since New York City was once called "New Amsterdam" for a good reason, you can understand why the word "kill" pops up all over the place. It was however, a cringe-worthy experience hearing about all of the World Trade Center debris being taken to the Fresh Kills landfill five years ago. I could imagine how people all over the country were reacting to hearing the name over and over again, without any explanation from newscasters as to what "kill" meant in this particular context.

    To those unknowledgeable about the origins of the word, it sounded like New Yorkers had particularly horrific taste.
  14. Re:Interested in performance. by masklinn · · Score: 2, Informative

    Dude, these numbers have been debunked, no one has any info on either the CPU, the GPU or the RAM, even Wikipedia doesn't use these numbers for god's sake!

    Graphics aren't everything but I have become used to beautifully rendered worlds immersive worlds and effects and it will be hard for most consumers to purchase a 'next generation' console with visuals from the pong era.

    Remember that the Wii only needs to go up to 480p/60fps (well all games are supposed to be 480p/60fps stable), the Xbox360 and the PS3 will range between 720p and 1080p. You need a lot of processing power for the rise in pixels alone. And the GC probably had the highest power of it's generation, only the lack of RAM made it extremely hard to reach it's best potential (just check RE4/GC).

    I really doubt the Wii will be underpowered.

    We'll just see, though.

    --
    "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
  15. Higher clock than E3 dev kits? by saboola · · Score: 2, Interesting

    FTFA: According to the company, Silicon on Insulator technology from IBM helps deliver to Nintendo a generous improvement in processing power, while achieving a 20 percent reduction in energy consumption compared to the 'Gekko'.

    Less energy consumption usually means less heat. If there is less heat could we be seeing a higher clocked version of the chip than the one shown at E3?

  16. Re:Interested in performance. by rnmartinez · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I wouldn't worry. I played Resident Evil 4 on my gamecube with Component video cables and progressive scan - the graphics are way better then anything I have seen on ps2 or xbox1, so if you soup up the cube abit and you're doing everything at 480p I bet it will look great

  17. Re:Broadway by squiggleslash · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Worth pointing out that the "part of the G5 family" stuff is based upon Hannibal hearing a rumour that it was offered as a laptop equivalent of the G5. This, by itself, makes no sense whatsoever. It's a relatively recent chip, the main maker of PowerPC laptops is Apple, they wouldn't have been interested in a 729MHz G5 to replace their ~1.5GHz G4s, and if IBM did have a ~1.5GHz Broadway low-powered enough to be usable in a laptop, what the hell is Nintendo doing using a version that runs at half the speed?

    Until now, all rumours have suggested it's simply a faster, better made, Gekko (which itself is derived from the G3, which is probably why the page you linked to redirects to the G3.) I think setting ones-self up for it being unbelievably more than that is probably setting ones-self up for disappointment.

    The "It runs at 7xxMHz" and "It was offered as a laptop G5" "facts" clash. One of them has to be false. The 7xxMHz thing has been consistant and is the kind of thing developers would know about. Plus, Hannibal's reasoning for it being a major disappointment ("That it would make the Wii just an overclocked gamecube with a DVD player") is ridiculous. You might just as well call the Commodore 64 an overclocked KIM-I. Or the Nintendo DS an overclocked GBA.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  18. Unfounded Hype! (or, Nintendo == Apple?) by ostermei · · Score: 2, Interesting

    (Disclaimer: I have no factual basis whatsoever for the theory I'm about to spout. There's probably zero chance that this will come to pass, but it sure would be cool :)

    As has been pointed out here on /. (and elsewhere around the Intertron) on many occasions, Nintendo has some superficial parallels with Apple. Both companies offer products in their respective arenas that may not be the most powerful or the most feature-rich, but their products tend to be of the highest quality (and stylish, to boot). Focusing on doing a limited set of things, but doing those things well seems to be the modus operandi of both companies (see the iPod and the DS).

    Nintendo is targeting the Wii at a new market. They're looking for casual gamers, older gamers, gamers who would not have even considered buying a console in the past. These are the buyers that Nintendo really wants to get the Wii to. Now, with the current console release model, companies announce the price and release date of the system many months in advance. This allows current gamers, who keep abreast of these things, to get in their pre-orders right away, essentially buying up all of the initial units right off the bat. The casual gamer generally can't get the system at launch even if they wanted to. If Nintendo wants to court the casual gamer with the Wii, they need to make sure that said casual gamer can actually buy one as soon as it launches.

    Now take another look at Apple. When Apple is gearing up to release a new product, they don't make a peep about it ahead of time. They announce a press event a few weeks out, and then keep everything under wraps. Rumors leak out, of course, but that only serves to build up the all-important hype. Then, at the press event, the new products are announced, and immediately they're available on Apple's website and in their meatspace stores. No waiting. No preferential treatment for Apple fanboys. It's first-come, first-served.

    With the news that Nintendo has already been receiving shipments one of the main components of the Wii, it's quite possible that the system could be launched very very soon (Joystiq, for example, has floated a rumor that it could be "within weeks" or "by the end of the month."). Perhaps Nintendo has decided to take a page from Apple's book again. Next week Nintendo has scheduled three nearly-simultaneous press events at three separate locations across the globe. As mentioned in my disclaimer above, I have no facts to back this up, but maybe... just maybe... Nintendo's going to do it exactly like Apple.

    How cool would it be if next week Nintendo holds their press event, talks up the Wii, shows videos of all the launch games, etc, etc, and then at the end they announce, Jobs-like, that the system is available to purchase right now?

    --
    "Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read." -- Groucho Marx
  19. Re:IBM Chips for Cheap -- General Purpose? by uarch · · Score: 2, Interesting

    1) These chips won't be in PCs. They're a PowerPC derivitive and won't be running your x86 PC code. That being said its already possible to pickup sub-$100 CPUs if you aren't fixated on getting the fastest core out there. (Just like Nintendo didn't want the fastest possible core. They wanted good performance for low-cost)

    2) I'd be surprised if someone didn't get Linux up and running on it but I doubt it'll be a common practice.

    3) Yeah, Cell is definitely interesting to program since its parallelism is thrown right in your face. There's some compiler work that's been going on for a while to automate the process a little but I don't track it so I have no clue what its current status is (the last white paper I read seemed promising though). It will definitely be used by more than just game consoles & cgi graphics. Its already being applied to some medical imaging, radar and there was just an IBM announcement about an upcoming system for one of the government labs that will be using 16,000 Cells and 16,000 Opterons. It'll be the world's fastest computer when it's finished.

    4) While the Xbox core can run general purpose code just fine it is definitely geared towards graphics much more than your standard PC. I don't have a link laying around but there are a few diagrams floating around online that show how the system is architected. The GPU is really the heart of the system with the CPU hanging off to the side - reversed from current PC architectures.
    Could the Xbox core be used as a desktop part? Sure. Will it? Not likely. The momentum that would be required to completely rearchitect PCs is enormous (software & hardware would all have to change). This pretty much goes back to point #1.

    Anyway. These views in no way represent IBM and I may be completely off-base.

  20. Re:Choices by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Delays, delays, choices, perspectives, and more delays. Those in my view are big factors to market presence. Choices? Yes, should I buy this or should I buy that? It is not as simple as if should I buy a Wii over a PS3, or even an Xbox360? Maybe a new bicycle, monitor, or anything else worth a few hundred dollars, depending on season; that fishing reel was just an example of something _offtopic_ that may influence your buying pattern. Releasing a product the wrong season may be bad for your product's life cycle. And if Wii comes out before Thanksgiving it probably will start Q3 2008 with a better market presence than Sony will have. BTW, as was claimed in the article, Wii was shipped from Fishkill... Sounds darn close to a fishing reel to me, even if in essence wildly OT. :)