Slashdot Mirror


Helping Other Big Brothers Go High Tech

Dino writes "BusinessWeek has an interesting article about the export of high-tech equipment to China's security forces, and the dilemma that it creates. On the one hand, there is the desire to increase exports to a country with which there is a trade imbalance. On the other hand, we face a situation in which the technology can be used to track dissidents and unauthorized religions. Restrictions have been enacted since the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre to prevent exports intended to the Chinese security forces. However, the restrictions have been applied narrowly, and effectively prevent only low-tech exports such as handcuffs, helmets, fingerprint powder, and tear gas, while DB software, two-way radios, DNA analysis gear, and video probes, are allowed."

16 of 97 comments (clear)

  1. Perception & reality by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 4, Insightful
    There is little evidence of companies caring much in the past (IBM & Nazis etc), and I doubt they will care in the future either. Very few will put ethics before a sale.

    However, they do care about how they are are perceived to be acting because negative press can get in the way of other sales, so they might not sell to Chine etc if they think that might hurt selling to a more lucrative market. Don't for a minute confuse that with genuine ethical feelings though.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Perception & reality by vancondo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      However, they do care about how they are are perceived to be acting because negative press can get in the way of other sales, so they might not sell to Chine etc if they think that might hurt selling to a more lucrative market.

      Yes, but even then they only care after there is an uproar about what they are selling and to whom. They don't seem so keen on detecting where they will get negative press, or else it's worth the risk hoping that no one will notice.

      --
      you give me beer, i give you condo.

      --
      -
  2. Re-evaluate. Pretty please. by TalkingWire · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Another carrot proffered naively by the US in hopes that China will "come around" and re-evaluate its currency?

    1. Re:Re-evaluate. Pretty please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      No... it's further proof that the single party dictatorship in the United States is teaming up with the single party dictatorship in China to keep each other in power.

  3. Re:Unauthorized Religions by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    An "unathorized religion" would be the Catholic Church instead of the official Chinese Catholic Church or small Christian groups that meet in people's home. These are not fruitcake organizations that you find in the United States, although I'm sure the Chinese have plenty of fruitcakes in the Communist Party. Any social group that requires people to gather is considered an "unauthorized religion" in China since they might overthrow the Communists someday.

  4. US Big Brother by mulhollandj · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It is interesting how much we blast China for not giving freedoms to its citizens. Do not US citizens realize the same thing is happening to them?

    1. Re:US Big Brother by Xyrus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Some do, most don't.

      Keep the majority thinking that they're happy, and you could slaughter innocent civilians and get away with.

      For reference, see Iraq War 2.

      ~X~

      --
      ~X~
    2. Re:US Big Brother by dbIII · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Also China is nice to it's citizens in comparison to countries where they may on-sell this technology to like North Korea. Once you let the "top secret" tech out to the unscrupulous it ends up wherever it will end up - who would have thought that classified technology given to Israel would be put in tanks sold to China and then sold again to Iran within a couple of years of it's development?

      I'm curious as to why people think this thing is worse than arms sales - selling mustard gas to Iraq in 1990 and anthrax not long before (Rumsfeld was sure there were WMD because he could remember doing the deal). The moral high ground was lost long ago.

  5. As it is written... by MikeRT · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What does it profit a man to gain the whole world and in the end lose his very soul?

    If you need an argument against secularization of the culture (as opposed to the government), then look no further than capitalism completely unrestrained by any influence from the Protestant Christian tradition that gave birth to it.

    Or, as the Communists used to say, "the Capitalists will sell us the rope we will use to hang them."

  6. Re:Unauthorized Religions by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Insightful

    David Koresh's cult didn't get in any trouble until it was thought that they were breaking laws. The existence of the cult itself was not illegal. If you rape children, force people to commit "suicide", or don't pay your taxes, Uncle Sam will come after you. Other than that, they don't really care. Sure, you can say there may be some aspect of some religion that is illegal and that it shouldn't be -- multiple wives, use of mind-altering substances, whatever -- but it isn't the religion itself that is illegal. Raeliens, despite being considered a cooky cult, have not been arrested simply for being Raelien.

    That's the difference. In China, being a member of a certain religion, regardless of not having committed any other crime, is illegal.

    Now I'm not one to appologize for the U.S., and I think "better than China" is damning with faint praise, but this really is a fundamental difference between the two nations.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  7. Real useful law by Dan+East · · Score: 4, Insightful

    However, the restrictions have been applied narrowly, and effectively prevent only low-tech exports such as handcuffs, helmets, fingerprint powder, and tear gas

    I'm sure that really makes a big difference. You know, since China is such a small country with few resources, there's just no way they could manufacture stuff like that domestically. Yeah, I know, it's the principle of it all (or, in other words, a bill a politician could sponsor to make them appear moral).

    Unfortunately far too many laws are created so politicians can simply be seen doing something. Sort of like in our town, where a lady was killed in a car accident a few years ago (because her cat was loose in her car and she was messing around with it and pulled out in front of a truck), so the town quickly changed the intersection to a 4-way stop. Now hundreds of drivers are inconvenienced daily just because the local government wanted to do something the newspaper could write about.

    Dan East

    --
    Better known as 318230.
  8. Dual use technology by Introspective · · Score: 3, Insightful

    while DB software, two-way radios, DNA analysis gear, and video probes, are allowed

    And these items could also be very useful for disaster response and relief - in other words, humanitarian aid.

    The poster seems to be struggling to make a political point where there is simply not enoungh evidence which clearly defines what these things will be used for.

  9. Re:Unauthorized Religions by zacronos · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Wasn't that what got Koresh's cult into trouble? Because he thought that he was God, and could do anything he wanted, including having sex with his own daughters?
    No. Don't be ridiculous. Did you even read what GP said? (Seriously, am I just feeding a troll here?) It wasn't thinking he was God that got Koresh's cult into trouble. They could have thought he was God all they wanted. And Koresh could have thought he was God all he wanted, too. But if you break an incest law, you get in trouble, regardless of why you decided to break it.

    The same would be true if I stood in the middle of a highway blocking traffic because I thought it would bring peace and happiness to the world:
    • Am I allowed to think that doing so will bring peace and happiness to the world? Yes.
    • Am I allowed to form a cult where my followers think that my standing in the middle of a highway blocking traffic will bring peace and happiness to the world? Yes.
    • Am I allowed to actually stand in the middle of a highway blocking traffic? No.
    • Is arresting me for doing it persecution of a religion? No.
    • Is arresting my followers for trying to prevent the police from arresting me persecution of a religion? No.
    What about this is hard to understand?
  10. Consumers? Hello? by NineNine · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Oh please. You can talk about companies all day, but all of the corporations in the world don't begin to measure up to what consumer whores regular citizens are. You know those hundreds of millions of people shopping at Wal-Mart? You think any of them know or care where their money is going. I'd wager on "no". Hell, Wal-Mart didn't have even a bump in their upward trajectory when they quietly dropped their "Made in the USA" schtick. People just keep buying, and buying, and buying...

    And I'm not talking about Wal-Mart, I'm talking about every little thing that regular people buy every day. Hell, I've seen people beat the shit out of each other like animals so that they could save $100 on a laptop computer.

    Remember, the only reason these companies are here is because people keep buying stuff from them.

  11. Re:Maybe? by kalidasa · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Unless your name is Khomeni, he was probably a former ally of yours, too.

  12. Re:Sadly there is only one world religion... by Denial93 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    >What I really fear is the torture that Tibetans are going to endure before the Olympic games. They're gonna be looking for a platform and China is probably just gonna round 'em up.

    You underestimate the Chinese. They're going to run a huge campaign where happy Tibetans in traditional-but-clean garments smile into cameras before magnificent Himalaya skylines and say how much better their country is after the Chinese helped them electrify it, and how the Dalai Lama and his guys are really just a bunch of old theocrats who want their dictatorship back. There'll be local representatives ready for interviewing, guided tours through Tibet (with really helpful translators so journalists can converse with the locals freely) and all sorts of helpful press maps/video clips/etc. After all, this is the perfect opportunity: the Chinese will, temporarily, have all the media in the World to press down the Party's version of the story in everyone's minds.

    Unruly Tibetans aren't going to be rounded up before the games (because the World could find out), but will be temporarily arrested "to prevent violence" during the games, to be seriously rounded up a bit later when the World has grown tired of China for a while, and looks somewhere else.