Slashdot Mirror


Earthlink Offers Alternate DNS Without "Dead DNS"

Joshua Flory writes, "In response to the story about Earthlink and their version of 'Site Finder', I learned today that Earthlink has provided alternate DNS servers that will remain outside of their 'dead DNS' service. However, this is a completely unsupported service, which begs the question, WHY? Everyone can gain access to public DNS servers, or create their own. The point is that people wanted DNS servers supported by EL that do not include this dead DNS service." Sounds like it's time for Earthlink users to check out OpenDNS.com... they make it easy to turn off the bad-URL behavior.

25 of 136 comments (clear)

  1. Islamic Clerics declare Fatwa against BLOCKQUOTE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    MUDRAGISTAN (Reuters) - Islamic Clerics announced today that due to the incapacity of the islamic mind to understand the difference between an opinion and a quotation, henceforth all use of the BLOCKQUOTE tag in HTML shall be met with unyielding and divine retribution.

    The BLOCKQUOTE tag, as introduced with the HTML 2.0 specification in 1994, has been used on websites throughout the world to signify that the text contained within is a quotation from an external source. However, due to an inability for islamics to grow the fuck up and understand basic communicative syntax, they now believe it is their holy right to murder anyone they want to just because one person quoted someone else within context.

    This antithesis of freedom is a common theme running throughout all islamic interaction with civilised society. Rampaging islamic mobs worldwide have burned effigies of Dave Raggett, creator of HTML, alongside effigies of President Bush and Pope Benedict XVI. Police measures are now in place to put everyone who ever had a Myspace page or Geocities account into hiding.

    Inventor of the World Wide Web, Tim Berners-Lee, was unavailable for comment. Which is probably just as well as we don't want to get bombed by the raghead fuckwits just for quoting him.

  2. umm by Foo2rama · · Score: 2, Funny

    Who uses earthlink anymore anyway...

    --


    ---In a time of Chimpanzees I was a Monkey.
    1. Re:umm by aliendisaster · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sprint uses Earthlink. I have Sprint DSL and it comes with Earthlink's services (which I never use).

      --
      Freedom is a state of mind. A mind is a state of being. Stay the fuck out of my mind and my being. - Corporate Avenger
    2. Re:umm by LunaticTippy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I use earthlink, ever since they bought netcom back in the 90s.

      I'm basically happy with it. I get 1.5/256k aDSL for $40, which is pretty pricey but it has flaked out for a total of 1 hour in 4 years. I've learned to avoid calling support, even for billing problems, unless it's worth wasting an hour and getting upset about. That's just never gone well.

      Someday I'm going to migrate to a non-ISP-issued email account for good and just hop from cheapest to cheapest.

      I miss my netcom shell account, I miss my old email address. It's hard to give that up. There's nothing holding me to earthlink but inertia right now though. I've never used their proprietary software, so my only addiction is to the email address.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    3. Re:umm by caluml · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Buy your own domain, and point the MX records wherever you like. Get a VPS somewhere?
      Or just open a Gmail account.

    4. Re:umm by Puggs · · Score: 2, Informative

      Or get your own domain, and point that at gmail ;-)
      google.com/a

    5. Re:umm by theodicey · · Score: 4, Informative

      I do, as an alternative to supporting AT&T's illegal wiretapping and internet traffic monitoring.

      They cost about $2 more a month for DSL + phone + long distance. The cost difference isn't really their fault, the FCC allowed AT&T and the phone monopolies to charge whatever they wanted for line access. But they make it up in other ways, like with 500 minutes of free long distance

      Also, Earthlink's DSL service (provided by Covad) is faster than AT&T's was.

    6. Re:umm by LunaticTippy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, that's not the problem. I'm registered at hundreds if not thousands of sites with my earthlink address. All my friends know my earthlink address. I'm really dreading getting everything changed. My best idea so far is to send a mass email advising of the change, and pick through my 5,000 messages looking for anywhere I've registered and change it. Wait a month and see what still comes to my earthlink address, fixing those. Wait another month, hopefully volume has dropped off. Repeat until I go a month or two with no nonspam messages and feel comfortable saying goodbye forever to anything I forgot.

      It's going to take many hours of boring eyestrain-inducing suffering.

      I'm not happy with my bank anymore, and changing that is quite easy in comparison. Maybe I should do that first to build my confidence. I'll only have to change about 20 things that hook into my account and comb through say a year of statements to make that happen.

      I stopped registering under my earthlink address a year or two ago, but I haven't taken on the backlog yet.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
  3. But wait! by OverlordQ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I thought Earthlink Engineers were so amazingly intelligent that they said that their Dead DNS would only affect Web traffic.

    Oh wait, no they're not. They *still* dont get what's wrong with what they're doing.

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    1. Re:But wait! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Most of the engineers didn't know this was being done until it was far too late, and they aren't happy about it. And even if they had, it's doubtful it would have made a difference to the folks looking to make some money. So as an engineer distressed by this whole idea, you have two choices:

      1. Make a fuss and become a potential target.
      2. Complain amongst friends, and pray for a PR disaster that gets it shut down.

      I think the bulk have opted for door #2.

  4. OpenDNS is no better by sidb · · Score: 4, Informative

    OpenDNS is not a solution to this problem those with dynamic IPs, which includes most Earthlink customers (like me). By default, they do exactly the same thing Earthlink does: from their webpage: "...when we can't fix your typo we take you to a page with a set of search results." They do allow you to turn that behavior off on their prefs page, but only if you have a static IP. And I somehow doubt that there isn't a speed hit going off your ISPs own network for all your DNS queries, anyway.

    The correct solution, of course, is to ditch Earthlink. Or in my case, not renew with them the next time I change my service -- unfortunately, changing now would be expensive. Until then, I'm going with Earthlink's secret, unbroken servers over OpenDNS.

    1. Re:OpenDNS is no better by davidu · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hey all,

      I, with some other highly-clued folks, run OpenDNS -- maybe I can help answer some questions. We're going to be rolling out some code at the beginning of October to deal with dynamic IPs. I think you'll find it elite.

      Ping me an email at ceo [at] opendns.com if you want to help us beta test.

      I'm happy to answer other questions too, as most of you know. :-)

      Best,

      -david

      --

      # Hack the planet, it's important.
    2. Re:OpenDNS is no better by davidu · · Score: 3, Informative

       
      So if you have typo protection enabled, and you type googl.ecom, it figures out that you meant google.com and directs you there. If it can't figure out the domain you intended, it sends you to their search page. If you disable the typo correction, then it just sends you to the search page immediately.


      That is absolutely false. If you disable typo correction you will never see the search page. The search page is intended to help users so if you turn off typo correction, you turn off that page. That's okay with us. You will see NXDOMAIN (RCODE=3) responses from our server. Like I've pointed out before, we're technologists and we're building functional and interoperable stuff here.

      Not to toot my horn or get all "Slashdot's lame" on this thread but I've been here a long time and it's clear to me that most of the users who posted on slashdot when we launched didn't even read our site or understand what it is that we're doing. Can we not make that mistake again?
       
      We're putting control and choice into users hands where there was none before. It's a fact of life that ISPs are doing this. They should be working with us, just like users are. We look at this as giving you a dashboard and all the knobs and buttons you need to manage DNS. DNS is the root (no pun intended) of a ton of applications and services so why wouldn't you want to manage it just like you would a firewall or anti-spam service?

      Best,
      David
      --

      # Hack the planet, it's important.
  5. Re:OpenDNS doesn't work for everyone by Aladrin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have Earthlink, sad as it is. I chose it when I got cable because I had them for Sprint DSL and their news servers were very good for free. Then they changed them and they suck now. I'd change to roadrunner, but every change I make is a 2 week interruption in service no matter what change I make, so I refuse to change anything.

    I almost made that mistake of using OpenDNS as well. I used Level 3's servers instead.

    --
    "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
  6. Less savy people will not know by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Who knows OpenDNS? Who knows of the alternatives? You do, I do, Joe Average doesn't. Ya know, the internet and a lotta tubes...

    Why do you think AOL is still in business? If people knew about their options, a lot of the large providers would go out of biz.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  7. Moo by Chacham · · Score: 3, Funny

    Better yet, let everyone have a say.

    Let's make DNS a wiki!

  8. wait wait wait.... by numbski · · Score: 2, Funny

    You mean George W. Bush is *wrong* about something.

    Someone get me a glass of water. I think I'm going to faint and fall off of my segway!

    --

    Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

  9. Do You Say Wed-Ness-Day? by finiteSet · · Score: 2, Funny
    You know, pronouncing nuclear as nucular is still wrong, even if everyone does it.
    Dammit man, I cannot understand this "modern English" garbage language you are speaking in. I don't care if everyone uses modern English today - Proto-Indo-European is still the true tongue and every word you speak is a crime against language purity. Oh yeah, and get off my lawn!
    --
    If we start buying CDs then the terrorists have already won.
  10. That's funny by deinol · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sounds like it's time for Earthlink users to check out OpenDNS.com... they make it easy to turn off the bad-URL behavior.

    Strange, it sounds to me like it's time for Earthlink users to find a new provider. I know sometimes there are very few options for broadband in an area, but last I checked there were plenty of dialup companies still competing and about.

    --
    Got Apathy?
  11. Uh... by DeadCatX2 · · Score: 2

    Regardless of my ability to research the definition of "Dead DNS" on my own (and I think I actually succeeded, thanks), I thought perhaps it would be useful to save other slashdotters the effort of hammering Google's servers to figure it out, by doing the following

    1) Post a question asking what "Dead DNS" is
    2) Get a response
    3) Watch that person's response get modded up
    4) ...
    5) PROFIT!

    Let me guess - your fingers are broken and you couldn't look it up, either? Or were you just trying to insult me?

    --
    :(){ :|:& };:
  12. Re:OpenDNS doesn't work for everyone by pixr99 · · Score: 3, Informative

    FYI, a few weeks back, David Ulevitch blogged that this is no longer a problem.

  13. Re:No, it does not "beg the question", it raises i by bill_kress · · Score: 2, Interesting
    What about an ignorant propogation[sic] of ignorance?
    I imagine that is the much more likely scenario, rather than the unlikely one: someone researches the proper use of the phrase "begging the question," then continues using it improperly, willfully.

    The latter would be an informed propagation of ignorance. Well, no, it's no longer ignorance since the phrase makes much more sense in the newer usage.

    Perhaps we could call it an informed, willful attempt to patch a critically broken language.
    ---
    On the other hand I have recently come across quite a few truly tragic turns of phrase like "For all intensive purposes.", that one is everywhere--just google for it.

    My wife knows someone who says "I'd just assume not" and she's been trying to decide if she should correct him--I thought was a cute fluke, nobody would actually say that! Of course then I start noticing it in other places--last night I saw "I'd just assume not" in the documentation for a linux distro (freespire).

    Then there was the training video at prior company where the guy kept saying "Per Se" (or the new written version "Per Say") in the same way most people insert "and" or "Uh" while speaking. "This variable is for regulating the speed per se, this other one is for timing..."

    We are now in a world where most text that actually gets read is generated by people without language training of any sort (like myself).

    Just give in, trying to correct this exponentially expanding pile of errors we call the internet is just "Tilling at Windmills" (Google it)
  14. The problem is the search pages by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't think what you're talking about is a solution -- the behavior that's not wanted by a lot of people, is the redirection to the search page, period.

    I.e., what's desired is if you type in a bad address, you get a "domain name not found" error, not a search page.

    Those search pages are called a "feature" to some, but to many people -- myself included -- they're just unwelcome advertising and an obnoxious waste of bandwidth.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  15. I tried to use Earthlink by beaverfever · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Years ago I tried to get Earthlink DSL service. I called and was told DSL was available at my house. My account is set up and the Earthlink person tells me they'd send me a package and then arrange for installation. Time passes and I don't receive the package. More time passes and I phone: I'm told that DSL is not available in my neighbourhood and so the package and my account was cancelled.

    When I ask if perhaps Earthlink could have contacted me to tell me this a couple weeks earlier, the person on the phone tells me (without any hint of humour or irony) that I was sent an email. I never received an email. Yes, we sent an email. To which address I ask. They sent the email telling me that I could not have Earthlink service to the free Earthilink email address they had provided with my account. Super-Genius!

    That may have been the stupidest customer service experience of my life and has forever tainted my opinion of anything having to do with Earhtlink.

    earthlink is dumbest!!1! :P !!

  16. No such thing as a dead domain by kindbud · · Score: 2, Informative

    It either exists, or it does not exist. If it doesn't exist, the only correct answer is NXDOMAIN. Anything else is some protocol other than DNS. There is no DEAD_DOMAIN_REDIRECT_TO_AD answer defined in the protocol. If the domain is not in the TLD servers, any answer but NXDOMAIN is a lie.

    That includes when it comes from OpenDNS nameservers, which is just another service that lies to you about DNS query results.

    --
    Edith Keeler Must Die